Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Obama Could Issue an Executive Order to End the Wars Tomorrow (Yes, It's That Simple)

By Nora Eisenberg, AlterNet. Posted January 29, 2009.


In a wide-ranging interview, veteran Paul Sullivan discusses Bush, Obama and the legacies of the Gulf War.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Paul Sullivan is a veteran of the 1991 Gulf War, serving in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Iraq as a Cavalry Scout with the Army's 1st Armored Division.

As executive director of the National Gulf War Resource Center from 1997 to 2000, he advocated for the passage of the Persian Gulf Veterans Act of 1998, which expanded health care and disability benefits for Gulf War veterans. From 2000 to 2006, he was Veterans Affairs project manager, leading a team that produced reports related to the Gulf War, Iraq war and Afghanistan war.

Sullivan is a life member of the Veterans of Foreign Wars and the Disabled American Veterans and is presently the executive director of Veterans for Common Sense, a Washington nonprofit organization focusing on issues related to national security, veterans' rights and benefits and civil liberties.

Two days after the inauguration, Paul spoke with me about a number of topics, including: the lies, drugs and poisons involved in the Gulf War and its current sequels; the suicide epidemic among Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans; the rash of homicides around military bases; the need for a truth commission; skewed research on Gulf War illness at VA; signs of conspiracy and subterfuge; the legacies of Bush 41 and Bush 43; the first days of Barack Obama; and his hopes for Michelle Obama as a true friend of veterans and veterans' families.

Nora Eisenberg: You've been involved with veterans' issues and rights for close to two decades -- as a veteran and advocate for veterans. Why have you devoted your life to this?

Paul Sullivan: The military taught us a valuable lesson during war: never leave a fallen comrade behind. We are now applying that essential lesson for use outside the war zone: We must never leave a fellow veteran behind.

Most people don't know that under a little-noticed 1991 law, the Gulf War began on Aug. 2, 1990, and it continues through today. The devastation that began with the bombing of Iraq on Jan. 17, 1991, continues through today. … Out of 700,000 Gulf War veterans, 290,000 filed disability claims against VA. VA also reports that 250,000 Gulf War veterans sought medical care at VA hospitals.

Friends of mine completed suicide after the Gulf War because VA delayed or denied assistance. A few friends suffered without answers from Lou Gehrig's disease, also known as ALS, for years before dying early, often after fighting VA.

The Gulf War continues as the new Iraq and Afghanistan wars. VA reports an additional 330,000 Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans have already filed disability claims against VA, and 400,000 have already been treated at VA hospitals. That's a grand total of 620,000 disability claims and 650,000 veteran patients.

We continue fighting for veterans because they need it, and because we are successful. Our 2007 lawsuit forced VA to establish a toll-free suicide-prevention hot line. In the first 15 months, the hot line received 85,000 calls and performed more than 2,100 rescues of suicidal veterans.

We fought for and secured $1.8 billion in emergency funding in 2007 that VA used to hire thousands of new doctors and claims processors. VCS testified repeatedly about the need to reform VA's broken claims system, and Congress acted by passing an overhaul bill in late 2008. Yet much more work needs to be done in 2009 and beyond.

The time has come to bring common sense to our U.S. government -- we must end the wars, bring our troops home with a responsible plan, provide medical care and benefits to our veterans, begin repairing our Constitution and our international reputation, and create a truth commission that will present the facts about the causes, conduct and consequences of the war to the American public. Then we can learn from our mistakes and move forward.

Now that President Bush has been peaceably removed from office, President Obama need only sign an executive order to end the wars (see Title 38, United States Code, Section 101, Paragraph 33). Congress also has the authority under the Constitution to end the war. Yes, it is that simple. 

NE: Your organization, Veterans for Common Sense, addresses veterans' issues as well as issues of national security and civil liberties. Why have you expanded your work to include these other issues? How do they relate to veterans' issues and rights?

PS: We have always focused on national security, civil liberties and veterans since VCS was founded in 2002. We were formed by Gulf War veterans who questioned former President George W. Bush's misleading comments about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction and his rush to invade Iraq without international support.

We were fully aware that George H.W. Bush, the 41st president, also misled America into supporting the 1991 Gulf War, and we wanted to avoid repeating that mistake.

VCS also opposed former President [George W.] Bush's now-documented ordering of illegal torture against enemy prisoners of war because it endangers the welfare of our soldiers captured by the enemy. Torture is also morally wrong and prohibited by the Geneva Conventions the U.S. agreed to uphold, and by several U.S. anti-torture laws. On March 10, 2003, VCS sent a letter to Bush detailing our concerns.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, vietnam, 9/11, torture, afghanistan, robert gates, barack obama, blackwater, mercenaries, george w. bush, military contractors, ptsd, walter reed, department of defense, depleted uranium, gulf war, jeremy scahill, veterans affairs, gulf war syndrome, paul sullivan, veterans for common sense, bonus army, post-traumatic stress dis, penatgon, phil sheldon

Nora Eisenberg is the author of the novels The War at Home, a Washington Post Rave of the Year 2002, and Just the Way You Want Me, awarded the 2004 Gold Prize for Fiction from ForeWord Magazine, the weekly of independent publishing. Her new novel, issued this month by Curbstone Press, is about troops returning home from the 1991 Gulf War, and the unexpected price of war for young victors and their families.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Executive Order
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jan 29, 2009 4:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is so fixated--as many have been the past few weeks--on Obama's ability to save us from the mess we're in. What they seem to miss is how scary the executive branch is becoming. Or to put it another way, it shouldn't be that simple, which is a big reason why we're in this mess in the first place.

Even if Obama is all that the sobbing crowds think he is, he's only there for 4-8 years. As executive power continues to grow exponentially, it will just be that much worse when the Republicans get their turn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xecutive Order Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: xecutive Order Posted by: dustdevil
» RE Xecutive Quagmire of Madness Posted by: americansheep
» RE: Xecutive Quagmire of Madness Posted by: Sister_Lauren
I hope No One takes offense at My comments Because
Posted by: madmax427 on Jan 29, 2009 5:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I strongly believe what this Man is doing a VERY much a GOOD thing, However, I am more than a little upset His thrust for helping Veterans is leaving out Those in My age group.

I am 57 yrs. old, a Twelve year Veteran of the U.S. Navy Nuclear Powered Submarines and I have been denied at least five times for a Service Connected Disability: The V.A. has told Me numerous times there is no proof My exposure to radiation onboard Submarines is responsible for My problems. I guess what was learned at the Bikini Island Nuclear testing way back when doesn't count or has since disappeared.

I believe My problems truly started when I decided Nuclear Power was NOT as well planned out as My Recruiter said it was. After making Chief Petty Officer in ten years, I wanted OUT of Nuclear Power and I took advantage of the Rules and the Mistake of My Command. When it was made obvious I was going to stick to the rules, the rule book was thrown out the window. AN entry into My service record stated I had shown Demonstrated Unreliability and I was not to have anything to do with the Operation, Maintenance or Repair of any Nuclear System and I was dismissed from Submarine Duty. My next Two duty assignments BOTH Violated that entry in My Service Record! The first of the two was a TAD to COMSUBGRP7 where I was ORDERED to Update the Reactor Plant Manuals for COMSUBGRP7. It is worth noting that the RPM's are the Navy's "bible" for Nuclear Plant Operations and ALL the Subs in GRP7 had to MATCH the Manuals I updated and according to Naval Records, My initials should still be in the Manuals! The next duty assignment was on a Sub Tender in Guam where I was ORDERED to insure the required paperwork that must accompany any Nuclear Repairs was properly completed. To this day when anyone refers to Me as Sir, It enrages Me becasue I had to call These "Officers" who can ONLY be reffered to as "Gentlemen" for the same Reason Judges are called "Your Honor": It is DEMANDED, NOT Deserved!!

Had I retired from the Navy, IN Nuclear Power, as I had wanted to, I would NOT be writing this now because I would probably be DEAD. At the time, the average age of Death for Retired Personnel was around five to eight years! I COULD continue this for pages, but I think You can get the POINT now: Rules & Regulations ONLY apply when it is convienent for Those in Power. THAT was My wake up call.

Now I suffer with having one heart attack, a sleep disorder, Skin problems, the cartilidge in My right knee broke and is extremely weak and I cannot go to the V.A. because I cannot TRUST the V.A. because of the way I lost My Father (He passed away while in the "care" of the V. A. May of 06 and I am STILL waiting after over 2.5 YEARS for the last few months of His Medical Records which I requested because the circumstances just before He died are very troubling)

YES, I believe the V.A. needs a MAJOR Overhual, along with the ability to show Compassion for Our Veterans because stories such as Mine are NOT that few and far between!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What makes you think Obama has any interest in changing the general direction of America?
Posted by: bob12386 on Jan 29, 2009 5:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He doesn't. Why would he? He wouldn't have been elected if he hadn't clearly demonstrated to his handlers, selectors, and masters that he was willing to play by their rules.

If he breaks the rules they'll JFK him. Done deal.

You didn't think the "Korea model" for Iraq was going out with the Bush administration, did you?

Are you really that naive? Any Alternet reader has been exposed to far more than enough stories on the general corruption of both American political parties that to not understand these facts I have described by this point goes well beyond naive. The better question is, are you stupid?

Obama will be another Bill Clinton, but not some crusading radical that revolutionizes America. The current economic depression will create more change in this country than Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You stupid girl, oh you had to waste it ! Posted by: Jennifer Bedingfield
On ending wars(=stop expanding via missiles into Pakistan and the VA
Posted by: NYCartist on Jan 29, 2009 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If President Obama can stop the present wars via executive order, I'll be happy to see it. I voted for him. It isn't looking good, since on Jan. 23,2009, Friday, the President OK'd missiles be fired from drones, into villages in Pakistan. This is escalation, and illegal. (Who will tell the President, "No, Mr. President. It is illegal to fire missiles into Pakistan.".) It was a Bush Admin. policy. I'd like to see "change I can believe in".

On the VA:my dad fought for the VA to change his 75% disability status after WWII. He was in a spinal meningitis epidemic in army boot camp, after he enlisted for service. He was left disabled. Epidemics in boot camp (and other camps) are not discussed in media. A relative by marriage got the same illness in a boot camp epidemic during the Vietnam War, a generation later. The book "Osler's Web" by Hillary Johnson, Crown Publishers, 1995 discusses the politics of illness, mainly CFS, but mentions Gulf War Syndrome,too.

It's about money. If the government "disses" illness, including making it seem to be psychological, and suggest it's not "serious", (PTSD, all the other illnesses listed in the article), then they don't have to pay for treatment or benefits.

And my dad died about "5 minutes" after getting his VA disability rating changed to 100%. I found the letters after his death. I was a child.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Okay, I give up. Who? Posted by: Beck
Rabbit
Posted by: arabbit on Jan 29, 2009 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Progressives keep playing kissey face with the Dems which is going to deliver us to the same place Repubs would take us. Just a bit slower. Democrats are stoking the wars not trying to get us out. Wise up. Don't vote for Dems again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: abbit Posted by: Jennifer Bedingfield
Too late you stupid Obamabots ! Obama's been playing kissy face with Big Military !!
Posted by: Jennifer Bedingfield on Jan 29, 2009 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the more Obama keeps this up and making it to Bill Clinton v2.0, the PROUDER I am that I VOTED FOR RALPH NADER !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama BELIEVES in war, he's not going to end any of them!!!
Posted by: DCostello2 on Jan 29, 2009 8:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article works from a wrong assumption. The assumption that Obama is somehow against war. Obama is just as much of an American War Monger as W or any other American President. Obama won't end ANY war. Obama campaigned on expanding the war in Afghanistan. Doesn't sound like he's going to end that on. Obama campaigned on EXPANDING the military by 90,000 troops. Doesn't sound like he plans on ending any of them. Obama has said over and over again that he believes in War and in America's right to wage them. If anything Obama will start another war with Pakistan and/or Iran before he's done. Oh, and let's not forget his blanket support for Israel and their slaughter of innocent civilians. Obama, end war???? Puuuulllleeeease. There'a better chance of the sun coming up in the west.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama body count time
Posted by: sliver on Jan 29, 2009 9:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure, this is Bush's war, but every time an American or an innocent Iraqi citizen is killed while Obama is doing nothing to stop it, that catostrophic death needs to be counted under Obama's name.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Within our own borders
Posted by: linecrosser on Jan 29, 2009 9:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The writer has been successful in many ways, and deserves all the support any just cause can get. Now if only we could end the War on Drugs in our own borders.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama the new War Criminal-in-Chief
Posted by: MeyravLevine on Jan 29, 2009 10:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Twenty-two people8 to 10 alleged Al-Qaeda and Taliban members, the rest civilians, including children - were killed on January 23, 2009, when Predator drones operated by the US Central Intelligence Agency fired missiles at houses in Pakistan’s ‘Federally Administered Tribal Areas.’

The illegality of such missile strikes is beyond doubt, if civilian life is still considered inviolable according to international law, but its efficacy as part of the US’ and NATO’s military strategy in the ‘War on Terror’ remains a matter of debate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Slooow way of getting out of Vietnams
Posted by: PaulK on Jan 29, 2009 10:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
President Obama can keep the troops in to preserve his options. Then he can go away, and then realize later that he hasn't created any new options, and then he can get out.

Or, he can set up some brightest and best to study peace. Here's the skinny on what will happen:

They'll ask, what are America's goals in Iraq?

1. Accomplish a mission, any mission. Win an election.

The 2004 election was actually won by jiggering the vote counts in all those Ohio computers, just exactly enough to win. The 2008 election was heavily lost, along with the Republican House and Senate.

2. Kill Saddam.

Done that.

3. Kill anyone connected with the Saddam regime.

But that includes Rumsfeld, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, who gave Saddam the nerve gas in the first place. Maybe we want to retreat to "Kill anyone who is ultraviolent." No, that still includes the American administrations. Maybe...

That's the problem with trying to indict and kill any large group of people. It's too inclusive.

4. Steal all their oil.

Didn't actually work. Won't work.

So in the end we don't have a great reason to be in Iraq.

5. Promote democracy with guns.

Oh come on, we just made that one up! Do you think America gives a hoot about democracy in Guatemala or in Burma?

So in the end we may actually promote democracy in Iraq, or everywhere, but it won't be with guns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good article, misleading headline
Posted by: tommy_slothrop on Jan 29, 2009 1:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I wanna address the headline (that never happens in the article)
Posted by: DaBear on Jan 29, 2009 1:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama Could Issue an Executive Order to End the Wars Tomorrow (Yes, It's That Simple)

But he's an owning-class guy, so he won't. I know lots of nice intelligent, educated guys like 'Bama... and they still can't get their heads outta their asses simply because they're... owning-classers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

we cannot survive...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Jan 29, 2009 3:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
long term with diametrically opposed policy shifts based on signing statements every 4 to 8 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

O'BUMMER WARS
Posted by: americansheep on Jan 29, 2009 6:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For all those who said "wait and see", do you like what you see? The wars will go on for years. With his mindset to "not look back" and prosecute, and his puppet strings attached to the Israel lobbyists, the only change may be that Obama will pacify us by lifting the ban on photographing returning body bags. Has anyone popped that question to him?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Case for Rapid and Complete Withdrawal from Iraq
Posted by: dchauls on Jan 30, 2009 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Sudbury (Massachusetts) Democratic Town Committee is critical of President Obama’s plans for the war in Iraq. In particular, we believe that the US should withdraw our troops completely and more rapidly than the President intends.

We have prepared a document entitled The Case for Rapid and Complete Withdrawal of US Forces from Iraq that explains our thinking on this issue in detail. It reviews the history and current status of our involvement in that country, and clarifies why we have drawn our conclusions. We have also prepared an op-ed piece (with the same title) that summarizes our thinking on this issue.

These papers may be found on our website, sudburydemocrats.org.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's hopeless, folks
Posted by: StillStanding on Jan 30, 2009 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As the Depression of 09 rolls across the nation, it will become increasing obvious that the American empire is unaffordable. Obama should be looking to shut down the Iraq invasion, cut the Pentagon budget by at least 50%, audit the Pentagon's expenditures for the past 8 years and put the crooks in the military and defense industries behind bars, and bring war crimes charges against all members of the Bush regime who foisted this fraudulent "war on terror" upon us through lies and false intelligence.

The military-industrial-espionage complex has brought the U.S. to bankruptcy and all of these pathetic efforts to prop up the corpse of the economy are destined to fail. Nothing short of a 180 degree change in national priorities can save us now, but it seems like Obama has bought into the fascist agenda, at least publicly.

In other words, the show will go on until all of us are crawling in the gutter while our leaders scramble to prop up the carcass of the failed 4th Reich.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's hopeless, folks Posted by: jvaljon1
Obama could stop the wars with an executive order
Posted by: jeaninemolloff on Jan 30, 2009 12:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Several of you are right; the problem is the over-arching power of the 'Unitary Executive.' Unfortunately Congress has failed to fulfill its constitutional mandate as an equal branch of government. Congress could have put a halt to these wars by simply rescinding the war declaration and limiting any war appropriations to monies required for withdrawal activities. Our government has become a toady of a fascist group of bankers. We must take our government back and elect representative who will perform according to constitutional mandates. Nothing else is acceptable. Ironically, most of the members of Congress are ATTORNEYS. So much for honest brokers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DISSECTING DEMOCRAT BALONEY
Posted by: reelman on Feb 3, 2009 4:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
W-ASS-INGTON (AP) - Despite the tax problems faced by high-level nominees, and the exceptions made to the no-lobbyists pledge (13), President Barack Obama’s spokesman is defending the administration’s ethical standards.

***Despite? Try finding that word for a Repub admin… 13 exceptions to ethics means no ethics, he lied***

Robert Gibbs told reporters Tuesday, “The bar that we set is the highest that any administration in the country has ever set.”

***The standard democrat lie from the lowest standards (personal = Klinton) and political basement = Obama …because Obama is a coward, unable to mean what he says…or you can say a sneaky snake you can’t trust…isn’t either wonderful?

During a briefing filled with questions about Tom Daschle’s decision to withdraw from consideration to be Health and Human Services secretary, Gibbs pointed to experts who describe the administration’s ethics rules as the strongest in history.

***Now Gibbs repeats a lie from a liar…a Treasury Secretary who did not pay his taxes for 4 years… pleeease …Gibbs with a sincere straight face…its Obama-style…suckers***

He also said those experts recognized that Obama would need to make exceptions to his pledge to run an administration free of former lobbyists.

***Did “experts” recognize Bush exceptions? Recognize “exceptions” to a perfect war will be made? Who are these “experts”? What gibberish.***====

CRAWFISH NOTE:Liberals can defend the indefensible any day any time…with a confident straight face…pledges and promises mean nothing to them after being elected. Remember Klinton’s “middle class tax cut” that went away after the election? The libmedia changes democrat diapers daily.

The network media is sick and dangerous.
http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement