Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Body Count Nation

By Tom Engelhardt, Tomdispatch.com. Posted January 8, 2009.


Judging by our wars, we're not much more advanced than ancient civilizations.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It may finally be 2009, but in some ways, given these last years, it might as well be 800 BCE.

From the ninth to the seventh centuries BCE, the palace walls of the kings who ruled the Assyrian Empire were decorated with vast stone friezes, filled with enough dead bodies to sate any video-game maker and often depicting -- in almost comic strip-style -- various bloody royal victories and conquests. At least one of them shows Assyrian soldiers lopping off the heads of defeated enemies and piling them into pyramids for an early version of what, in the VCE (Vietnam Common Era) of the 1960s, Americans came to know as the "body count."

So I learned recently by wandering through a traveling exhibit of ancient Assyrian art from the British Museum. On the audio tour accompanying the show, one expert pointed out that Assyrian scribes, part of an impressive imperial bureaucracy, carefully counted those heads and recorded the numbers for the greater glory of the king (as, in earlier centuries, Egyptian scribes had recorded counts of severed hands for victorious Pharaohs).

Hand it to art museums. Is there anything stranger than wandering through one and locking eyes with a Vermeer lady, a Van Eyck portrait, or one of Rembrandt's burghers staring out at you across the centuries? What a reminder of the common humanity we share with the distant past. In a darker sense, it's no less a reminder of our kinship across time to spot a little pyramid of heads on a frieze, imagine an Assyrian scribe making his count, and -- eerily enough -- feel at home. What a measure of just how few miles "the march of civilization" (as my parents' generation once called it) has actually covered.

Prejudiced Toward War

If you need an epitaph for the Bush administration, here's one to test out: They tried. They really tried. But they couldn't help it. They just had to count.

In a sense, George W. Bush did the Assyrians proud. With his secret prisons, his outsourced torture chambers, his officially approved kidnappings, the murders committed by his interrogators, the massacres committed by his troops and mercenaries, and the shock-and-awe slaughter he ordered from the air, it's easy enough to imagine what those Assyrian scribes would have counted, had they somehow been teleported into his world. True, his White House didn't have friezes of his victories (one problem being that there were none to glorify); all it had was Saddam Hussein's captured pistol proudly stored in a small study off the Oval Office. Almost 3,000 years later, however, Bush's "scribes," still traveling with the imperial forces, continued to count the bodies as they piled ever higher in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Pakistani borderlands, and elsewhere.

Many of those body counts were duly made public. This record of American "success" was visible to anyone who visited the Pentagon's website and viewed its upbeat news articles complete with enumerations of "Taliban fighters" or, in Iraq, "terrorists," the Air Force's news feed listing the number of bombs dropped on "anti-Afghan forces," or the U.S. Central Command's stories of killing "Taliban militants."

On the other hand, history, as we know, doesn't repeat itself and -- unlike the Assyrians -- the Bush administration would have preferred not to count, or at least not to make its body counts public. One of its small but tellingly unsuccessful struggles, a sign of the depth of its failure on its own terms, was to avoid the release of those counts.

Its aversion to the body count made some sense. After all, since the 1950s, body counting for the U.S. military has invariably signaled not impending victory, but disaster, and even defeat. In fact, one of the strangest things about the American empire has been this: Between 1945 and George W. Bush's second term, the U.S. economy, American corporations, and the dollar have held remarkable sway over much of the rest of the world. New York City has been the planet's financial capital and Washington its war capital. (Moscow, even at the height of the Cold War, always came in a provincial second.)


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: war, bush, violence, iraq, vietnam

Tom Engelhardt, editor of Tomdispatch.com, is co-founder of the American Empire Project and author of The End of Victory Culture.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I smell the black hole of interminable controversy beginning to suck at my belt buckle.
Posted by: Nightstallion on Jan 8, 2009 1:38 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First and formost what Civilization? You mean we had one this last hundred thousand years that slipped by me? I think the Reptoids of Gondwanaland were the last to have a civilization here. It sure as hell wasn't any stinking primates! (apologies to the Chimps, Orangs, and Gorillas you guys can't help who are your relatives}

There are no representatives of a greater civilization present so humans have claimed the brass ring by default. Maybe it is really default of those creepy horned Annunaki slithering around in the Gene Pool. There is no such thing as death by proxy you only have your own to chase you screaming through the infinite dark of your souls.

You don't like what I say? Then instead of creating new ways to kill people find new ways to teach them to heal themselves. The dark truth is no good work goes unpunished but what the hey!.... You got anything better to do?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where is integrity?
Posted by: Knowmad on Jan 8, 2009 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Non-violence is a sign of evolvement. A society that relies upon violence to accomplish anything other than the minimum requirement for defence is primitive by nature.

The US is the worst bully right now simply because you have the most money and arms. You're no worse than some petty tyrant committing genocide on their neighbour, you're just doing it on a larger scale. Sadly, however, you're no better either.

Case in point: Does any thinking person seriously believe that the Iraq farce, the sabre-rattling at Iran or even the current episode of the Jewish/Palistinian conflict is really about anything other than oil? And consider that oil is one of the main reasons the climate is collapsing around us worldwide.

These are the actions of a shortsighted people, who see their behaviour as the only way to get what they think they need; just as our hulking, club-wielding ancestors did.

Peace!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

missing definitions
Posted by: mwildfire on Jan 8, 2009 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This piece suffers from the usual blindness: failing to recognize that all the "conflicts" in which the US has been engaged since WW II are completely different than that war in that they were not defensive and not about gaining or defending territory. Who is the "enemy" in Iraq (or Afghanistan, or Vietnam)? What consititutes victory? If defending ourselves against Saddam's imaginary WMD's was the reason for the war, as was stated unequivocally at the outset, why didn't we get out as soon as it was apparent that there weren't any? But of course the Cheney administration knew that--all the WMD talk was simply lies, a pretext to enter a war for very different reasons. The notion that the critical aim was to rid the people of Iraq of a tyrant and help them set up democracy (the next claim) is absurd--if that were our burning ambition we would have invaded Burma instead. Oh, that's right--we're fighting "terrorism." But the WHNSC or whatever they call the School of the Americas in Georgis now, that terrorist training school is allowed to continue, and the Venezuelan who has essentially admitted he blew up a civilian Cuban airliner, killing over a hundred people, is living in Miami and the US refuses to extradite him. What is a terrorist? It's not what you do but what you believe, apparently--it's someone who hates the US, apparently. But since that now includes virtually all the planet--including a good bit of the US--that's one hell of a war we have on our hands.
Which is fine, because that's what they really want: endless war, to benefit their very good friends in the military-industrial-media complex, to advance military careers, to justify repression at home. And, they hope ultimately to control the flow of oil in the Middle East, as well as to allow the relatively tiny Israeli population to control the vast surrounding territory.
So--who says the war was a terrible failure? It depends on what you think the actual object was.
One more quibble: the blind assumption that we MUST have advanced beyond primitive hunter-gatherers or the earliest city-states, it's only a question of how much. Who says? There is a school of thought, well articulated by Derrick Jensen and Daniel Quinn among others, that the invention of agriculture is where the human race went down the wrong path. That primitives and indigenous peoples were and are wiser and more humane than any "civilized" people. Whether this is true, I don't know, but it's certainly possible--the mere passage of time does not guarantee progress. Until we learn how to resolve the tendency for wisdom and power to repel each other--for the least wise among us to gain the most power--we will continue to excel primarily in destructiveness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You're right... Posted by: Knowmad
The British
Posted by: 876 on Jan 8, 2009 8:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn’t something that you can find Assyrian artifacts in the British museum along with the stolen heritage of people and cultures all over the entire globe? Isn’t it just like the British to take by bloody, violent force from everyone even the very heritage and legacy of their ancestors, post it in their museums and declare themselves most “civilized” of all?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We've yet to have a true civilization on Earth
Posted by: willymack on Jan 8, 2009 12:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Civilizations" have been anything but civil-ever. We still worship ruthless exploiters of human weaknesses and obscene greed as if those characteristics were somehow GOOD, when, in fact, they're the exact opposite. We STILL equate war mongering and bloody, pointless masacres of the guilty and innocent alike with heroism. We still speak of fighting for change, justice, equality, etc. as if fighting is necessary and preferable to peaceful negotiating, and reasoned discourse. We still deny the fact that humankind is the most ferocious and savage species on Earth, and a danger to every living thing, including itself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

was it just Bush??
Posted by: DBachmozart on Jan 8, 2009 12:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a good summary of the past eight years except for putting all the blame on Bush and his administration. We still have some remnants of a democratic republic where the legislative branch plays a role - where was our "opposition party" when all this was going on? Why no mention of the role played by the Democrats in the march to war and passing the Patriot Act when few if any even bothered to read it first? Why no condemnation of Pelosi and co. for being aware of torture and illegal spying on US citizens but not saying anything and coming down hard on honest whistleblowers who did what they refused to do? Why give a free pass to those who like Bush insist that Israel cannot be criticized and that Palestinians must be demonized?

The Democrats are complicit with everything that Bush/Cheney did these last eight years and must also be held accountable. No wonder they took impeachment "off the table" - they knew where it might lead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bushs - a different point of view
Posted by: barefeet on Jan 8, 2009 12:22 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bushs have both been total successes in their foreign policy, no, not to Mr and Mrs America but to International Judaism.

The Bushs belong to that segment of Judaism referred to as "crypto Jews", or Jews who lead their lives concealing the fact that they are Jews in order to serve best the interests of Judaism, making it appear that gentile America shares the political interest of Judaism while also avoiding shedding light as to just what the real interest of Judaism actually is.

They took charge of forcing America to carry out Judaism's order to "make straight" the way of Judaism in the Middle East by decimating opposing military might in the area while baffling us with other reasons for doing it - all of which were proven wrong.

There is no hope at all for America, completely dominated as we are by International Judaism. As for a "reason" for that one has to look no further than Christianity, the designer religion by which Americans have sold themselves to Judaism, promising to publicly worship Jews and indoctrinate our children to do so themselves for the rest of their lives in return for "happiness ever after."

Add to that the pasting on of a monarch/president to what was once the only democracy in the world, done at the first constitutional convention following the revolutionary war to make the task easy.

To naysayers I suggest that they consider Obama's first "choice" of Rahm Emmanual as his Chief of Staff - a Mossad Agent who is Judaism's in-our-faces real administrator of America.

Real life puts any fairy tale of Hans "Christian" Anderson to shame. Only the Mary Shelly(?) story of Frankenstein comes close to describing our sad story, and that is exactly what she was talking about. Of course the Frankenstein monster in that tale was her representation of Christianity, as created by Judaism.

Sadly, my America has perished from the earth forever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Conflict The US DID Win
Posted by: gradioc on Jan 8, 2009 3:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The most important post-WWII conflict, the Battle Of The Fulda Gap as Soviet forces moved into West Germany, the US did win. It won it by never fighting it. The leaders that lived through WWII understood the horror of it How old would you have to be to understand Hiroshima when it happened? Maybe some precocious 10 year olds could get it. They would be 73 now and the generation that fought that war are in their dotage. People like Bush think war can be easy and clean, having never really experienced even the home front. But never forget that the high society of Washington drove their buggys filled with picnics out to watch the first battle of the Civil War. These attitudes are not new. They are older than the Assyrians.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you Tom Englehardt
Posted by: Sojourner on Jan 8, 2009 10:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is one of the most moving essays I have read that addresses our barbarism. It makes me wonder how we can never seem to learn the lesson that we cannot afford the cost of war.

My dream has been to have a generation, at least, and maybe two without war. I learned long ago that we are a violent people. I wish I could be a pacifist, but it is beyond my capacity; I am crippled by my patriotism.

As Conrad's hero in "Heart of Darkness" says, "The horror. The horror." And so it continues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Patriotism... Posted by: Knowmad