Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Israel's War Crimes

By Richard Falk, The Nation. Posted January 7, 2009.


The Israeli airstrikes represent severe and massive violations of international humanitarian law.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The Israeli airstrikes on the Gaza Strip represent severe and massive violations of international humanitarian law as defined in the Geneva Conventions, both in regard to the obligations of an Occupying Power and in the requirements of the laws of war.

Those violations include:

Collective punishment: The entire 1.5 million people who live in the crowded Gaza Strip are being punished for the actions of a few militants.

Targeting civilians: The airstrikes were aimed at civilian areas in one of the most crowded stretches of land in the world, certainly the most densely populated area of the Middle East.

Disproportionate military response: The airstrikes have not only destroyed every police and security office of Gaza's elected government, but have killed and injured hundreds of civilians; at least one strike reportedly hit groups of students attempting to find transportation home from the university.

Earlier Israeli actions, specifically the complete sealing off of entry and exit to and from the Gaza Strip, have led to severe shortages of medicine and fuel (as well as food), resulting in the inability of ambulances to respond to the injured, the inability of hospitals to adequately provide medicine or necessary equipment for the injured, and the inability of Gaza's besieged doctors and other medical workers to sufficiently treat the victims.

Certainly the rocket attacks against civilian targets in Israel are unlawful. But that illegality does not give rise to any Israeli right, neither as the Occupying Power nor as a sovereign state, to violate international humanitarian law and commit war crimes or crimes against humanity in its response. I note that Israel's escalating military assaults have not made Israeli civilians safer; to the contrary, the one Israeli killed today after the upsurge of Israeli violence is the first in over a year.

Israel has also ignored recent Hamas diplomatic initiatives to re-establish the truce or ceasefire since its expiration on December 26.

The Israeli airstrikes today, and the catastrophic human toll that they caused, challenge those countries that have been and remain complicit, either directly or indirectly, in Israel's violations of international law. That complicity includes those countries knowingly providing the military equipment including warplanes and missiles used in these illegal attacks, as well as those countries who have supported and participated in the siege of Gaza that itself has caused a humanitarian catastrophe.

I remind all Member States of the United Nations that the UN continues to be bound to an independent obligation to protect any civilian population facing massive violations of international humanitarian law--regardless of what country may be responsible for those violations. I call on all Member States, as well as officials and every relevant organ of the United Nations system, to move on an emergency basis not only to condemn Israel's serious violations, but to develop new approaches to providing real protection for the Palestinian people.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: israel, war crimes, gaza, airstrikes

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Alleged War crimes part 1
Posted by: Zened on Jan 7, 2009 10:13 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So that readers do not think you are neutral let us take a brief look at the axe you have to grind:

It is no surprise that you are showing sour grapes and bitterness towards Israel; they recently blocked your entry to their country, as they see you as an enemy of their people.

Your job relies on perpetuating the palestinian struggle against Israel. The Arabs have used the natural majority of their unelected dictatorships at the UN to create your special agency that is solely responsible for the palestinians. No other human rights issue is dealt with by you, all other human rights issues are dealt with by a single impartial UN body. You cheerlead the demonisation, discrimination and rejectionism of Israel at the UN.

Now let us examine your hysterical hyperbole:

Firstly no war crimes have been proven against Israel. Are you so biased, that all are innocent until proven guilty, accept for Israel? Are you judge and Jury? No. Until war crimes have been proven I suggest you control yourself and write truthfully that you allege war crimes. Your blatant illegal proclamations against Israel give uneducated people the idea that Israel has been found guilty of crimes when it has not been. This is designed to cause hate against Israel; it is libel and defamation. It is people like you that give the Israelis good reason to demonstrate the bias of the UN against them.

Your allegation of collective punishment:

You accept that Gazans elected Hamas as a majority government. As such the Gazans elected a political party dedicated to a genocidal war against its neighbour. Anyone who voted for Hamas shares electoral responsibility for the carnage that they cause. As Hamas fights from within the civilian population (a point you fail to mention), it can be argued that it is they who are breaching humanitarian law. You seem to be arguing that the international law protects a terrorist movement fighting as illegal combatants from amongst civilians over the right of states to self-defend. I think this is a nonsensical argument and would not be accepted by any international court. Historical precedent shows that civilian populations who elect militaristic leaders are commonly held liable for the consequences of their government’s action. It was the USA and the UK who bombed German and Japanese cities flat without distinction between civilian and military. In light of this it is almost impossible for Israel to be convicted of collective punishment.
If you attempt to set a precedent that a population can elect a party for war without facing any consequences you will be making the world very much more dangerous than it already is.

Continued...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Istael is a dead man walking Posted by: kackermann
» RE: Alleged War crimes part 1 Posted by: Carlos111
» RE: Alleged War crimes part 1 Posted by: Isreal=terrorist state
Alleged War crimes part 2
Posted by: Zened on Jan 7, 2009 10:14 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Continued...

Your allegation of targeting civilians:

You talk more nonsense on this point as well. Clearly Israel has the ability to extinguish all life from Gaza, if they so desired. They do not desire to do so and have not done so. In fact the Israeli military kill less civilians per terrorist or illegal combatant (pick your own definition), than the US, UK or NATO armies do in Iraq and Afghanistan. Further, Islamist armies in Darfur intentionally kill civilians en masse. Israel has never been close to this sort of slaughter and is at great pains to avoid civilian casualties. You fail to mention that it is Hamas who intentionally fire at Israel from civilian structures in an attempt to increase the number of Gazans killed. Your argument is lunacy. You are meant to be impartial working for the UN. Again you demonstrate your hateful one sidedness.

Your allegation of Disproportionate military response:

Again your attack falls short of logical precision. Up to one quarter of Israel’s civilian population is under random rocket attack from Hamas, and it has been for several years. This is a war by any definition. In war your military is there to win. It is ridiculous to attempt to argue that Israel should use anything less than all necessary means to prevent rocket attacks on its territory. Furthermore, your article fails to mention that by any definition Hamas attacks on civilian populations are random and illegal, de jure war crimes that do not need a court to adjudicate them. You seek to limit the sovereignty of the state of Israel to defend itself: Your argument thus falls into the definition of Judeophobic anti-Semitism (by the EU’s legal definition).

You talk of catastrophic Gazan deaths, however the deaths in Gaza (including military ones) are still a small fraction of Jews killed by Hamas terrorists during their own campaign to obliterate Israel. Your one sided bias is clear for all initiated to see; yet you seek to twist the minds of the uninitiated. It is obvious why the Jewish people regard you as an enemy and traitor.

You should remind all UN States that they are obligated to respect the strictly reciprocal sovereignty of all other members. The respect for State Sovereignty and territorial integrity over rides any obligation to non-State actors. In fact whilst Israel remains unrecognised by Arab States it has simply no obligation to recognise Arab countries as anything other than terra nullius. I call on the United Nations to remove all bias and corrupt officials; especially those who make direct actions that are a threat to international peace and security, the UN Charter and the strictly reciprocal principle of Sovereignty. You attempt to use your qualifications to bemuse the world with self-righteous Sophism.

You can fool most of the people most of the time; but you do not fool me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Alleged War crimes part 2 Posted by: Carlos111
leftofroght
Posted by: leftofright on Jan 7, 2009 2:31 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
zened called it....

the war crimes belong to hamas; they have been punishing,collectivily, over 200,000 israelis for being....israeli! oh, and jewish.

hamas have responsbilty to protect the people of gaza, not use them as human shields against an attacking army.

to use children as a weapon, as a pr campaign.... and then have the illiberal left fall for it!! it would be amazing if not for the rich vein of anti-semetism running just below the surface of europe. hamas have tapped into this with alacrity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: leftofroght Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: leftofroght Posted by: Carlos111
Actions of a few..
Posted by: 2thepoint on Jan 7, 2009 6:36 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Collective punishment: The entire 1.5 million people who live in the crowded Gaza Strip are being punished for the actions of a few militants."" they are being caught in the middle of a war THEIR elected government started - not the actions of a few. THAT is the crime. Maybe they will finally realize warring governments is not the path to peace!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHY AMERICAN HATES MUSLIMS
Posted by: hall on Jan 7, 2009 7:36 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Strange, why american christians hate muslims and love jews to kill muslims. ask any muslim, for them jesus pbuh is not son of god but the higest and most respectable prophets besides adam, abraham, noah, moses and mohammed pbuh. Ask any jews, for them jesus is too qualified to be crucified!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WHY AMERICAN HATES MUSLIMS Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
From Human Rights Watch (1/7/09)
Posted by: Quannah on Jan 7, 2009 9:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In an email to Human Rights Watch, Andrew Whitley, director of the UNRWA Representative Office at the UN, stated: "[T]here has been no recent abuse of our facilities in Gaza by Palestinian militants using them for cover or as firing positions. There were no, repeat no, mortars fired from the school in Jabaliya camp, although we cannot exclude that there was fighting nearby."

Human Rights Watch spoke by telephone with two men who said they had witnessed the attack. Neither of them said they saw Hamas militants in the area at the time. According to Mouin Gasser, a 45-year-old teacher, about four strikes hit around the school, and he could not distinguish the type of shell. He said:

"I was walking on the street where the school is located in the Jabaliya refugee camp. I was 15 meters away from the school gate and I saw the people running towards me as soon as the sound of the shelling began. While I was walking I could not distinguish what kind of shelling it was because all of them took place around the same time. There were about four strikes, about a half minute between them. The shells landed just outside the school and one hit an electricity transformer on a pole just outside the school, and the shrapnel from that strike hit the people inside the school. There were different sizes of shrapnel, very sharp pieces of metal, most of them about five centimeters long. The tanks were about two kilometers away to the west in Beit Lahiya. I was offering first aid to the people on the street and at the gate of the school. We did not know how this large number of casualties came about. At the gate of the school there were donkey carts and people were transporting their belongings to the school. I did not see any militants in the area. The shelling did not cause that much damage to the building but it was the first time to see so much shrapnel spreading everywhere."

Another man, Shadi Abu Shanar, worked as a guard at the school. In a brief phone interview, he said he was inside the gate of the school when the attack took place:

"Suddenly I heard a number of explosions at the gate. I went out onto the street and found dead bodies and wounded people lying on the ground. Most of them were cut into pieces. The street was full of people. I was about to pass out because of what I saw. The shells landed in a range of 20 to 40 meters around the school. The school was full of people."

The laws of war require all parties to a conflict to take all feasible measures to protect the civilian population. Attacks must be made against only military targets. It is unlawful to conduct attacks that do not discriminate between combatants and civilians or when the expected civilian loss from the attack is excessive to the anticipated military advantage.


Those who dismiss the human tragedy of what is going on in Gaza should be ashamed.

None are so blind as those who would not see.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Haven't you heard? Posted by: kackermann
» RE: From Human Rights Watch (1/7/09) Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
Israel has become the evil that they deplore
Posted by: Carlos111 on Jan 8, 2009 3:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Israel pays big bucks to U.S. PR firms to spin and deceive the American people and most of the world just like the U.S. government that makes it possible for Israel to "extinguish all life from Gaza." Jews used guerrilla (terrorist) warfare against the Nazis when they were oppressed and forced into ghettos. Israel has become the evil that they deplore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Israel is America's "Rogue State" in the Middle East
Posted by: susan rosenthal1 on Jan 9, 2009 5:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Declaring that it answers to no one, Israel is defying the newly-passed UN Security Council resolution demanding that it stop its war against Gaza.

By vetoing the first such resolution, the US gave Israel the green light to continue the war.

By abstaining on the second resolution, the US gives Israel the yellow light to continue, but hurry up and finish the job.

The UN can't stop this imperial war, but the American people can.

We can demand that not a penny more be spent on war.

We need a social rebellion, a social revolution, to end this madness.

Susan Rosenthal

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement