Israeli Military Strikes: The Mideast Version of Bay of Pigs Fiasco

By Jakob Rieken, AlterNet. Posted December 30, 2008.

Following a disastrous policy of not engaging with Hamas, the Israeli government has commenced a very heavy-handed military operation to destroy or batter the Islamic movement. Aside from being an egregious crime against humanity, this bombing campaign (likely soon followed by a ground incursion) will undoubtedly result in failure as it represents a complete misunderstanding of Gazans' relationship with Hamas. Not only is Hamas deeply connected to the Palestinians of the Gaza Strip through its long history of social services and welfare provision in the refugee camps as well as its reputation for non-corruption; it is host of an attitude and a style of opposition, something that cannot be eradicated with bombs or incursions. Indeed, the Western narrative about the group omits its large-scale insistence on political and social rather than military engagement. According to Israeli scholar Reuven Paz, 90% of the organization's activities are in the social sector. Hamas, in many ways, is a balancing act -- a set of dissenting projections, constructed with different degrees of influence by its variegated constituencies and wilfully filtered and distorted by its students and opponents. Like all large and complex organizations, it is a construct with fluctuating consistency and changing internal power relations, not simply a set of bombing coordinates and targets.

Neither is Hamas, as the Western and Israeli narrative would have it, an unapproachably reactionary and ideologically impenetrable organization. It has shown remarkable political pragmatism and ideological flexibility as it maneuvered for a position in the last parliamentary elections. It has effectively co-opted Islamist zeal within the Occupied Palestinian Territories (highlighted by the fact of al Qa'ida's remarkable absence from the Palestinian theatre, despite its central rhetorical insistence on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict) as well as secular disappointment with corrupt government. The elections of January 2006, which gave Hamas a majority of seats in the Palestinian Legislative Council, presented a window of opportunity for elevating the more peaceable pragmatists within the movement and making it an accepted player within a Palestinian democracy. With any degree of real political power, Hamas would have had too much to lose had it listened to the unaccommodating extremists in its ranks, who view violence as the only way to oppose Israeli occupation. As an exasperated Ismail Haniyyeh, under increasing pressure after the withdrawal of humanitarian aid following Hamas' electoral victory, wrote in a guest editorial in the Washington Post, "[w]e want what Americans enjoy -- democratic rights, economic sovereignty and justice. We thought our pride in conducting the fairest elections in the Arab world might resonate with the United States and its citizens."

See more stories tagged with: israel, gaza, hamas, olmert, israeli strikes

Jakob Rieken is a graduate of the University of Cambridge and wrote his Master's dissertation on the engagement of Western foreign aid with political Islam, focusing in particular on Hamas. He now lives and works in Cairo, Egypt.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »