Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Moral Legitimacy of Refusing to Fight in an Illegitimate War

By Camillo "Mac" Bica, TruthOut.org. Posted December 27, 2008.


It's clear that the military's position on conscientious objectors is inconsistent with the demands both of morality and of law.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

    -------

    References

    [1] For purposes of convenience, I will use the generic term "soldier" to refer to all members of the military regardless of branch of service or gender.

    [2] DoD Directive 1300.6; AR 600-43 §2-10; MILPERSMAN §1900-020; MCO 1306.16 E; AFI 36-3204; Gillette v. United States, 401 US 437 [91 S.Ct. 828, 28 L.Ed.2d 168 (1971)].

    [3] Article Four, Nuremberg Principles.

    [4] http://www.loyno.edu/~quigley/case_docs/motion_exp.pdf


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, vietnam, human rights, conscientious objectors, war of aggression

Camillo "Mac" Bica, Ph.D., is a professor of philosophy at the School of Visual Arts in New York City. He is a former United States Marine Corps Officer with service in Vietnam and a long-time activist for peace and justice.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement