Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Border Fence to Carve up Nature Reserve

By Enrique Gili, IPS News. Posted November 21, 2008.


The Wall is being constructed over the objections of communities living near the border.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Another chapter in U.S.-Mexico border relations is about to close. In the waning days of the George W. Bush administration, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is completing construction of a 22-kilometre triple fence along the San Diego-Tijuana border.

It is being done over the objections of environmental activists living near the border, who are worried both about the toll on wildlife and those seeking entry into the United States. A patch of green encircled by two cities, the Tijuana estuary lacks the grandeur of a mountain range but to biologists and conservationists it's an invaluable piece of real estate.

Created in 1981, the Tijuana River Research Reserve is an island of relative calm at the centre of a political maelstrom that pits conservations against advocates that promote tighter border controls.

Nesting amid coastal sage and tall grass, 400 species of birds inhabit the wetlands. Thousands more birds return each year to one of the last vestiges of salt marsh existing in Southern California, where 90 percent have been lost to development.

"The estuary is one of the few remaining in Southern California without heavy human intrusion," said Mike McCoy, president of the South West Wetlands Interpretive Association.

However, the estuary has been part of contested territory for generations. The land was granted to the United States after the Treaty of Hidalgo in 1848, which ceded much of what is now southwest Arizona, Texas, New Mexico and California to the United States in the aftermath of the U.S-Mexican War.

The estuary has also been labeled a haven for drug-running and illegal border crossings, according to border officials, making it a flash point for U.S. immigration policy and government agencies entrusted with protecting rare and endangered species living in the estuary.

The nearby Otay Mesa border crossing is the most active border crossing in the world. On average, more than 31 billion dollars worth of products cross through the checkpoint each day, nearly all of it related to the regional maquiladora/manufacturing and agricultural industries. Others seek entry through different methods.

"The immigration problem is overblown," remarked a docent on a recent trip to the Tijuana River Research Reserve. The border, however, does have a dark side.

According to U.S. border officials, the region is a magnet for illegal activity -- 162,000 arrests have been made, and 49,000 pounds of marijuana and 699 pounds of cocaine intercepted since November 2007. Drug cartels waging war on the streets of Tijuana also add an element of fear and apprehension.

Here the border is tangible. After 3,200 kilometres, the line tumbles into the Pacific Ocean, and a steel fence divides the United States from Mexico.

During the 1980s, the estuary was in danger of being overrun. Social trails scarred the land. Migrants seeking entry into the United States used the estuary as a crossing point, prompting local politicos to take action.

Also known as Operation Gatekeeper, the 60-million-dollar construction project comprises the western portion of the San Diego Border Infrastructure System. A federally funded programme put in place by Rep. Duncan Hunter of California, it dates back to 1996.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: enviro, border fence

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Nobody cares about a border fence when the extinction of Homo Sap is a possibility. Worry about Google:
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Nov 21, 2008 11:07 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here may be one of the reasons for the large number of
people who don't take global warming seriously:

Reference: "Google and the myth of universal knowledge"
by Jean-Noel Jeanneney 2007 The original is in French.

When you do a Google search, you get "sponsored" links
on the right side and "non-sponsored" links on the left.
The "NON-SPONSORED" links on Google ARE LISTED
IN THE ORDER OF THE HIGHEST BIDDER to lowest
bidder. Companies pay dollars to Google to get web sites
other than their own that lie in favor of the paying company
to be at the top of the "non-sponsored" list. Google search
results in your getting nothing but corporate propaganda.
Since the coal industry has a $100 Billion per year income
at stake, they can and must share a lot of money with
Google.

Page 32: 62% of internet users questioned make no
distinction whatever between advertising and other
information, and only 18% proved capable of telling which
data were paid for by companies for their promotion and
which were not."
"92% of users of search engines have full confidence in the
results of their search, and 71% (users for less than five
years) consider that information from this source [Google]
is never biased in any way."

Suggestion: Use only Google Advanced or Google Scholar.
On Google Advanced, specify either the .gov domain or the
.edu domain. Otherwise, use only web sites that
www.RealClimate.org uses.

There should be a law requiring Google to disclose the above
and the donors and the dollars for each "non-sponsored" link.
Environmentalists should work on Google legislation first.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Human Life over Wildlife!!!!!
Posted by: ds1st on Nov 23, 2008 12:35 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am more concerned with human life than wildlife.

50+ yards on either side of the fence will be affected. This is less that .0001% of the national reserve. The stemming of drug trafficking and the saving of human life is more important.

I wonder why the negative impact of drugs in the urban environment is not cared about more?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's just more big government spending
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Nov 26, 2008 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This wall will not keep people out. Our so called globalization policies in the world have resulted in starving populations all over Latin America who come here to stay alive, not to shop better. I believe it's Boeing that won the contract to build this monstrosity. All along the border between the US and Mexico, the fence breaks wherever people have grand estates with pretty river views or golf courses, and starts again where the estate or hotel grounds end. I'm so fed up with the hypocrisy. I thought, however, that Obama was going to stop this. Mr. Obama, tear down that wall!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Walls are not all bad
Posted by: mygirlboo on Nov 26, 2008 12:21 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If walls were not effective, the White House would not have one, the Pope would not live withing a gated Vatican, and the Congress would not be surrounded by all sorts of barriers. While no fence is 100% effective, they act as a deterrent and buy time for agents to do their job.

The U.S. and Canada have been Protestant countries with strict separation between church and state. It has served us well so far. Every country to the south of us is Catholic. The Catholic Church has worked hand and hand with right-wing conservative dictatorships to keep their people ignorant and breeding, providing lots and lots of cheap labor. The fact of the matter is that these people have bred themselves out of their economy. Now they are pouring into our country, breeding like flies, expecting to be taken care of like unneutered pets. We cannot allow our country to degenerate into a low-wage sewer packed with people who lack the education and skills to support their huge families. They only care to be American for the benefits and what they can get out of us. Half of the babies born in this country are on WIC. That is Third World breeding when people go right ahead and have children they cannot even feed once the breast milk is gone. Of all the Latino babies born in this country, 45% of them are born out of wedlock, and Latinos are our fastest growing ethnic group. Right now 70% of our prison population are the children of unwed mothers. The majority of our gang members, our dropouts, and unwed mothers are the children of unwed mothers. I shudder to think about the coming breakdown of civil society in the U.S. Not to mention the drain on our environmental resources. Already we have severe water shortages. What will be the impact when our population doubles and triples? The birth rate has got to come down not just here but in all the countries to the south.

By the way, Mexicans are the second fattest people in the world, just after us. I've been reading about Mexico all my life, and I have never read of any starvation there. If they would just think about how they were going to feed their families BEFORE they started making them, everyone would be better off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Walls are not all bad Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: Walls are not all bad Posted by: mygirlboo
» RE: Walls are not all bad Posted by: Bliss Doubt
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement