Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush's Unauthorized Attack on Syria Killed Civilians; Dems Silent

By Stephen Zunes, AlterNet. Posted November 10, 2008.


By the time it was over, eight people had been killed, at least seven of whom were civilians, including three children.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

A raid by U.S. forces into Syria last month was not only a major breach of international law, but has resulted in serious diplomatic repercussions which will likely harm U.S. strategic interests in the region. On October 25, four U.S. Army helicopters entered Syrian airspace from Iraq, firing upon laborers at the Sukkariyeh Farm near the town of Abu Kamal; two of the helicopters landed and eight commandoes reportedly stormed a building. By the time it was over, eight people had been killed, at least seven of whom were civilians, including three children.

It is believed to be the first time the United States has ever engaged in ground combat operations in Syria. And, though Congress did not authorize any operations against that country, there appears to be virtually no opposition in the Democrat-controlled Congress to President George W. Bush unilaterally deciding to attack Syria, even when the casualties appear to have been almost exclusively innocent civilians.

Claim of Counter-Terrorism

The apparent target of the raid, who was the sole non-civilian casualty (though no evidence of finding his body has been publicly reported), was Abu Ghadiya, whom the United States has accused of helping to smuggle foreign fighters into Iraq for the an extremist Salafi Sunni group known as Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI). There appears to have been no effort by the Bush administration, however, to ask the Syrian government to either arrest Abu Ghadiya or extradite him.

An administration official told The Washington Post, "You have to clean up the global threat that is in your backyard, and if you won't do that, we are left with no choice but to take these matters into our hands." In reality, there was no indication that Abu Ghadiya had any relationship with the branch of Al-Qaeda headed by Osama bin Laden which does have a global reach. (Many analysts see AQI as simply an Iraqi-led group that simply appropriated the name.) Furthermore, the Syrians have been quite aggressive in tracking down suspected al-Qaeda cells that did.

For example, former CIA director George Tenet had praised Syria for providing the United States with intelligence dossiers on al-Qaeda in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks and had called for increased intelligence cooperation with the Syrian regime. In one example, intelligence provided by Syria helped thwart a potentially devastaing attack on the headquarters of the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet, based in Bahrain.

Syria's secular government, which has itself been the target of the very kind of hard-line Salafi Sunni terrorists the U.S. claims they were targeting, would have little motivation to knowingly allow someone like that to operate within their territory. Nor would they want to facilitate the growth of such dangerous groups destabilizing their neighbor Iraq. Indeed, a recent National Intelligence Estimate noted how Syria had "cracked down on some Sunni extremist groups attempting to infiltrate fighters into Iraq through Syria because of threats they pose to Syrian stability."

Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem just completed a visit to Great Britain, where he and British foreign minister David Miliband issued a joint statement declaring that "tackling al-Qaeda and groups inspired by it was a high priority" and that the two governments had "agreed to work more closely together to tackle this threat."

Syria is among a small minority of Arab countries which have formally recognized the Iraqi government, which also raises questions as to why they would seek to destabilize it. Furthermore, Syria's closest regional ally is the Shia government of Iran, which served as the exiled base for the major Shia parties which currently control the Iraqi government and which have been a target of hard-line Sunni groups like AQI, which are fanatically anti-Iranian and see Shiism as apostasy.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bush, democrats, international law, syria, civilian casualties

Stephen Zunes is a professor of Politics and chair of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of San Francisco and serves as a senior policy analyst for Foreign Policy in Focus.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
No Expectations of Significant Change
Posted by: laoma on Nov 10, 2008 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though Obama's election as the first person of color is truly historic, there is no reason to expect equally historic measures in the US position vis-a-vis the Middle East. A more than superficial examination of Obama's advisors and choices for top cabinet positions will reinforce this assertion. A litmus test for checking for democracy-like and/or balanced policies in the ME has always been the Israel Factor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No Expectations of Significant Change Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
the Democrats and Obama
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Nov 10, 2008 9:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
should do everything possible to make Dumbya sit on his fucking hands for the remainder of his reign of error. If not ,he will do everything possible to fuck it up. the man is a criminal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the Democrats and Obama Posted by: Crazy H
and do what?
Posted by: the baron on Nov 14, 2008 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the Congress has allowed everything to pass that has already come to pass; and they are more concerned about their wallets, and personal comforts than the American people, and the laws governing us and our relations with the world community; what pray tell is the action you expect them to take?

Finally go for impeachment? To what end, what purpose does that action serve? Justice? Hardly, given the amount of time it would take to begin proceedings, and the damage done thus far. Apologize to Syria? Again, to what end? Congress or Bush? Bush won't, and most people outside our country and sadly most within are unaware of Congress' role in our government; so to have Congress formally do so on the "world stage" is not only moot but is laughable.

The mess is so convoluted, so despairingly horrendous that there is no immediate solution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The founding fathers gave us the impeachment process
Posted by: tginmn on Nov 14, 2008 5:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for a reason. While it may be late at least the evidence would get publicity and the world would know that we really do care. Perhaps the evidence will make it more difficult to pull it off again in the next 20 years or so. By then we will no longer be the lone super power and won't be able to go it alone in invading a soverign country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As long as AIPAC
Posted by: weathered on Nov 21, 2008 6:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
bribes, threatens and manipulates Congress we'll suffer and so too will others.

For Israel more is never enough.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]