Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Pentagon Hands Iraq Oil Deal to Shell

By Nick Turse, AlterNet. Posted October 2, 2008.


The U.S. government secretly facilitated dealings between Shell and the Iraqi Oil Ministry for no-bid contracts.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In June of this year, Andrew Kramer, writing in the New York Times broke the story that the world's oil giants, "Exxon Mobil, Shell, Total and BP ... along with Chevron and a number of smaller oil companies" were "in talks with Iraq's Oil Ministry for no-bid contracts to service Iraq's largest fields." Subsequently, the Times went on to report that "A group of American advisers led by a small State Department team played an integral part in drawing up contracts between the Iraqi government and five major Western oil companies ... " The Times asserted that the "disclosure" was "the first confirmation of direct involvement by the Bush administration in deals to open Iraq's oil to commercial development and is likely to stoke criticism."

In reality, there had long been ample evidence of deep involvement between the Bush administration, foreign firms and Iraq's Oil Ministry. The Times and other major media outlets also failed to expose the major financial ties between the military occupation in Iraq and the same oil giants. In fact, each of the oil giants named in the original New York Times piece -- Exxon Mobil, Shell, Total, BP, and Chevron -- regularly shows up on the Pentagon's payroll. In fact, last year, the five firms took home more than $4.1 billion from the Pentagon -- with Shell leading the way with $2.1 billion.

In September, the "criticism" the Times predicted apparently finally scuttled the no-bid deals. In a piece by Kramer and Campbell Robertson, it was reported that the "plan to award six no-bid contracts to Western oil companies, which came under sharp criticism from several United States senators this summer, ha[d] been withdrawn." The companies would, however, be eligible to bid for contracts and, just days later, it was announced that the Pentagon's favorite of the oil majors, Shell, would become the first oil giant to sign an energy deal with the Iraqi government in 35 years.

On September 22nd, the government of Iraq and Royal Dutch Shell officially signed a $4 billion deal "to establish a joint venture with [Iraq's] South Gas Company in the Basra district of southern Iraq to process and market natural gas." A day later, the Times reported that Shell had "established an office in Baghdad." From a "news conference in Baghdad's heavily guarded Green Zone," the Times quoted Linda Cook, the executive director of the Shell's gas and power unit, as saying, "We are ready to establish a presence."

While the Times didn't report it, Cook went on to say, "I am delighted that the Iraqi Government including the Ministry of Oil have supported Shell as the partner for joint venture with the South Gas Company. We look forward to moving jointly to implement the JV and begin investing in the energy infrastructure in Iraq." What the Times (and other major media outlets) also failed to mention was that guarantor of that "Green Zone" from which Cook spoke, just days before, had the inked its own huge energy deal with Shell. On September 17th, Shell was awarded a $338 million contract for aviation fuel by the Pentagon. In fact, even before this contract, Shell had already awarded over $1 billion from the Pentagon during this fiscal year. If history is any guide, it will receive billions more before fiscal 2009 starts.

The Pentagon's Shell deal came during one DoD's periodic petroleum benders -- massive multi-day spending sprees where hundreds of millions or billions of taxpayer dollars are paid out to oil companies. This one, on September 17th and 18th, netted Shell, Chevron, ConocoPhillips and seven other oil companies a grand total of over $1.5 billion.

The fact that the U.S. government secretly facilitated dealings between Shell and the Iraqi Oil Ministry for no-bid contracts; that the U.S. military -- the primary occupation force in Iraq -- regularly pays Shell billions of dollars each year; that on the heals of a contract worth hundred of millions of dollars with the U.S. military, Shell just inked a deal with the with occupied Iraq and set up an office in the U.S. military's secure "Green Zone" should raise myriad questions about the tangled relationship between the major players in Iraq. These complex issues go ignored because they are viewed as so routine as not to be worth mentioning, but in any other context the confluence of guns, oil and billions of dollars would certainly raise eyebrows.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, pentagon, oil companies, shell, no-bid contracts

Nick Turse is the associate editor and research director of Tomdispatch.com. His first book, The Complex: How the Military Invades Our Everyday Lives, an exploration of the new military-corporate complex in America, was recently published by Metropolitan Books. His website is Nick Turse.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
usterroristnation
Posted by: usterroristnation on Oct 3, 2008 12:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No surprises here then ? The whole thrust of this phoney war on "terror" and the Iraq invasion was and is oil .... and nothing else. Clearly there were ties between Washington and the Iraqi Ministry of Oil going back to when the US implanted "their friend" Saddam Hussein as dictator in Iraq including supplying him with arms and finance. If this were an open and honest bid the Iraqi government would have put out an open tender to these US oil companies AND to the Russian, Chinese and European oil giants. Wonder why that didn't happen ? No question of bribes and corruption and a fraud perpetrated against the Iraqi people I suppose ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

motown67
Posted by: motown67 on Oct 3, 2008 7:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Couple things should be pointed out.

1) None of those Technicl Support Agreements were signed. In fact, the Oil Ministry dumped the whole idea for them in September because the major oil companies they were negotiating with didn't like them because they were advising contracts, they were not for actual oil production, which is what the companies wanted. Instead, Iraq signed one such deal with a Chinese firm to save face. So all that help from the U.S. government resulted in a failure.

2) The Shell deal is not for oil, but for natural gas from an oil field near Basra in the south.

3) As of now, there is only one U.S. oil company working on oil in Iraq, its a minor company called Hunt, and they operate on a small oil field in Kurdistan, which Baghdad has declared illegal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GWB is Shell's newest board member
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Oct 3, 2008 5:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey gang, just watch after January 20th to see who gets a golden seat as Shell's newest board member - gotta be Georgie Bush. Of course Tricky Dick Cheney will be going back to Hall Burton as their new CEO.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement