Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

With All Eyes on the Bailout, House Passes Trillion-Dollar Defense Bill

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted September 26, 2008.


It's 'empire spending,' not 'defense spending.'
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

On Wednesday, the House passed a mammoth defense bill by a 392-39 vote. It's expected to clear the Senate with little difficulty next week.

It was part of a trillion-dollar stop-gap measure to keep programs running through next March, allowing lawmakers to skip town without passing a final budget. The Associated Press reports, "The legislation came together in a remarkably secret process that concentrated decision-making power in the hands of a few lawmakers."

In keeping with the tradition of recent years, Bush held a gun to his own head and threatened to pull the trigger if his demands weren't met. According to the AP, "To earn President Bush's signature rather than a veto, House and Senate negotiators dropped several provisions he opposed. They include a ban on private interrogators in U.S. military detention facilities and what would have amounted to congressional veto power over a security pact with Iraq."

In other words, Congress also maintained recent tradition, swearing not to give Bush a blank check and then whipping out their pens and signing a blank check.

The number that the House sent to the Senate for "defense" -- $612 billion for the coming year -- is eye-popping. Imagine a stack of 612,000 million-dollar bills. Quite a pile.

That number's a sham, however. The budget calls for $68.6 billion for the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan in 2009. War costs this year totaled $182 billion, according to the Federation of American Scientists.

The House passed the Brobdingnagian spending measure 11 months after George W. Bush vetoed a bill -- one passed with a lot of bipartisan support -- that would have added $7 billion measly dollars per year to the State Children's Health Insurance Program, covering 4 million more uninsured children. You'd be hard-pressed to find a clearer sign of national psychosis.

Here's what "defense" spending looks like in the era of Bush's "War on Terror," according to official figures:

Click for larger version
(click for larger version)


But that's just the cash to feed the gaping maw of the Department of Defense. Throw in a bit more than $50 billion for Homeland Security, around $20 billion for the nuclear arsenal in the Department of Energy's budget, about $10 billion for the Coast Guard, a similar number for foreign "security assistance" and maybe another $125 billion -- according to one estimate -- in other defense-related programs scattered throughout the federal budget.

Bush also requested $91 billion for the Department of Veterans Affairs in 2009, up from $72 billion just three years ago. A generation of damaged young men and women are going to cost more and more as the years go by -- many post-traumatic injuries, for example, don't manifest themselves for 10 or more years after people get out of combat. In 2000, nine years after the first Gulf War, 56 percent of those who had served in that conflict were receiving disability payments.

But wait, as they say on late-night infomercials, there's more!

All of this only finances our current military adventures. We're still paying for Korea and Vietnam and Grenada and Panama and the first Gulf War and Somalia and the Balkans and on and on. Estimates of just how much of our national debt payments are from past military spending vary wildly. Economist Robert Higgs calculated it like this:
I added up all past deficits (minus surpluses) since 1916 (when the debt was nearly zero), prorated according to each year's ratio of narrowly defined national security spending--military, veterans, and international affairs--to total federal spending, expressing everything in dollars of constant purchasing power. This sum is equal to 91.2 percent of the value of the national debt held by the public at the end of 2006. Therefore, I attribute that same percentage of the government's net interest outlays in that year to past debt-financed defense spending.
In 2006, he came up with a figure of $206.7 billion for interest payments on past militarism. Add it all up, and we're talking about at least a trillion dollars in military and homeland security spending. If there were a million-dollar bill, you'd have to stack a million of them to reach a trillion dollars.

Of course, very little of this is "defense." This is empire spending, pure and simple ...

Empire

What's that? You want health care, education, affordable housing, 21st-century infrastructure?

Sorry, we've got other priorities.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: military budget

Joshua Holland is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Empire spending, now that's a perfect phrase to REFRAME the issue.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 26, 2008 3:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perfect. Thank you. I'll send this to Ralph Nader and Obama and see what they say.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We're also breaking records in arms sales to the Middle East
Posted by: fanny666 on Sep 26, 2008 3:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just announced: $11.5 billion in arms- sold mostly to our anti-democratic allies in the Middle East.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm glad to see
Posted by: badkitty on Sep 26, 2008 5:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad to see my congresswoman voted against this monstrosity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm glad to see Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Thanks Josh
Posted by: Ripcord on Sep 26, 2008 5:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad that there is at least one journalist keeping an eye on the Iraq War.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A GROSS AND NEGLIGENT MISALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
Posted by: drricklippin on Sep 26, 2008 5:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The biggest threat to this nation by far is the collapse of its middle class. No external enemy could bring us down more quickly or more effectively.

The global war on terrorism is in part "W"s and McCain's misguided belief/obsession that "radical Islamofacism is the defining issue of our times"

I have a particular interest in the private sector profiteering that took place and continues after Mr Bush signed Operation Bioshield in 2004 where billions wre allocated to Bioweapons research and even possible illegal production? This also resulted in an academic brain drain away from endemic diseases the world has right now like tuberculosis, malaria and HIV/Aids.(the very breeding grounds of terrorism)

Also how we justify this level of defense expenditure for whatever reasons- to reduce threats both real or perceived- when access to quality Health Care is denied to so many Americans?

Thanks Josh Holland

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
ralippin@aol.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» usterroristnation Posted by: usterroristnation
Welcome To The Homeland
Posted by: chlamor on Sep 26, 2008 8:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Welcome to Germany
Welcome to the Hyper-White Techno-Evangelical Inquisition.

80 billion additional dollars to the War for Lockheed-Halliburton
now up to a quarter of a trillion for the war for the Brown&Root- for the Dyncorp
in addition to the regular 800 million or so a minute for the
Narcotics Trafficking- CIA- Military- Industrial- World's Greatest Polluter- Criminal Think Tank Complex

Small scale tactical nuclear weapons cocktails
served up to brown skinned children
with distended bellies
by well-manicured barbarians in Citadels and Mansions
by their servants in boardrooms
with distended bellies

With 725 military bases
With 350 outposts
In 132 countries
In Every jungle
In Every tree
All baby-faced tamarinds run for cover, hiding in their mother's breasts

America- A fundamentally sick society
America- A culture of conquest

Get out of Iraq Get out of Viet Nam
America get out of Colombia
America get off the Rez
America get out of Afghanistan
America get out of etcetera

America, a fundamentally sick society.

Welcome to Plastic Racist Nation
Welcome to McAmeriWal-Martika
Germany- The Fatherland
America- The Homeland
Welcome to Soft Fascism

General Reinhard Gehlen head of German military intelligence on the Eastern front and his network of spies and terrorists were brought over to the USA after World War 2 in the now well known Operation Paperclip. From these advisers and functionaries Allen Dulles, copying many of the methods utilized by the likes of Herr Gehlen, shaped what we now know to be the CIA.

Instruments of Statecraft
Counterinsurgency Literature

Strangle Them- Starve Them
Hold an election
Call it Democracy

I pledge allegiance to the United Sports Utility Vehicle
of Der Father- der Home Land of the Fee
Home Land of Wage Slavery
Land of the Tidy White Bestiality
This Land of Pre-Ordained Brutality
This Land of Hyper-Tense Entreprenurial Mentality

Overthrow Castro
Overthrow Arbenz
Overthrow Mossadegh
Overthrow Chavez
Overthrow National Sovereignty
Overthrow Dignity

It is time to stop living
The Lie that is America- I Secede

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Welcome To The Homeland Posted by: MajorHart
» RE: Welcome To The Homeland Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
million dollar bills piled a million high
Posted by: lenioui on Sep 26, 2008 8:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an excellent article. This American culture is hearing the words 700 billion dollars routinely now...and it is so easy to lose perspective of what a billion, what a trillion, what even a million really is.

Good that it is broken down in a way that is more digestable.

The number, 700 billion, is now a household phrase. Ah, but surely you too have 700 billion tucked away in the corners of your house. What? Whats that you say? You don't have a house?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Old proverb.
Posted by: symcokid on Sep 27, 2008 10:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Earth has no sorrow that Fiat Money cannot heal!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

some books on the American Empire
Posted by: CJC on Sep 27, 2008 12:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chalmers Johnson - The Blowback Trilogy
"Blowback" 2001
"Sorrows of Empire" 2004
"Nemesis" 2007

Andrew Bacevich
"The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism," 2008

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bring them ALL HOME NOW
Posted by: EJW on Sep 27, 2008 1:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... it's time to rebuilt The United States. We cannot afford this S**T!!!!

Who is going to bail me out????????????

Can I get foreign aid from China?????

I want my electric Car !!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THIS LEVEL OF SPENDING WILL DESTROY US
Posted by: cori on Sep 27, 2008 4:10 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think what Nader said on the Bill Maher show is true. The corporate structure in power will be a gigantic force to be reckoned with and will, he thought, give anyone who gets in their marching orders. But what saddened me was the continued obsession with war and the never ending spending of trillions of dollars as far as the eyes can see. It is folly to think we will be the first nation, besides Alexander the Great to rule and create order in Afganistan and Pakistan. Furthmore, I don't think it is wise or diplomatic of us to be putting missiles on the Czechoslovakian border. What if Russia put missiles on the Mexican border? This was never mentioned. Barack left a lot out and I'm sure he too will be pushed around by the next big bubble, the Military Industrial Complex. who would like to see all of our tax dollars go to private corporations forever. If we want to increase revenues we need to have some kind of cut backs on military spending this was never mentioned. They just passed a 630 billion dollar miltary budget on top of the bail out and wouldn't even extend unemployment benefits. Do you think they care if you live or die? NO! We need to erase tax cuts for the very wealthy, stop giving billions to the drug and health insurance companies, restore capital gains tax and raise caps on Social Security among many other things. All in all we are spending way too much and eventually it will totally hollow out our economy if it already hasn't. How Obama and address all this does not seems doable without some major reduction in spending and those in power will do anything to stop him. They do not care if we go down in ashes. They are a moral, ruthless Neo Cons who believe that the end justifies the means. That's why they think it's OK to keep stealing elections as they intend to do for the next one. As long as they have control we are gonners cause they will spend us to death. Ten's of thousands of Iraqis were also killed. Maybe a million, that was never mentioned and a couple of million displaced. That was never mentioned. What if that was us? Can you even imagine. And now they tell us there will be happy Democracies there while we kill their women and children? This doesn't seem like a winning strategy to me. We need to tell congress NO MORE WAR ANYWHERE. We can still protect our borders and do what we have to to protect us here but waging wars and provoking nations only means less for us and more for the military and corporations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We've got behead the military-industrial monster
Posted by: willymack on Sep 27, 2008 7:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the sooner, the better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Gimme More"
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Sep 30, 2008 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Picture the Pentagon as a spolied and overweight adolescent that is trying to squeeze into a size 36 when he's a size 66. The extra flabs of goo hang over his waist like someone who's had too many Twinkies in his brief life; yet he continues to consume more and more of the wrong kinds of food which prevents him from losing weight.
By now you know the bailing out of America's Wall Street banking and financial institutions failed and the Pentagon remains unfazed by our impending malaise. In jargonese, you can have your cake and eat it, too.
The "cake" in this case is the allocation of money to pay to maintain our far-flung military and personnel.
With apologies to Britney Spears, "Gimme More" is the Pentagon's anthem. It's awfully outrageous that they get theirs while others barely eke by. We need to get them on our radar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement