Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

The Middle Class Must Not Be Forced to Bail Out Wall Street

By Sen. Bernie Sanders, AlterNet. Posted September 21, 2008.


If the economy is on the edge of collapse we need to act. But we can't just give away $700 billion of taxpayer money to the banks.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For years, as a member of the House Banking Committee and now as a member of the Senate Budget Committee, I have heard the Bush Administration tell us how "robust" our economy was and how strong the "fundamentals" were. That was until a few days ago. Now, we are being told that if Congress does not act immediately and approve the $700 billion Wall Street bailout proposal these "free marketers" have just written up, there will be an unprecedented economic meltdown in the United States and an unraveling of the global economy.

This proposal as presented is an unacceptable attempt to force middle income families (and our children) to pick up the cost of fixing the horrendous economic mess that is the product of the Bush Administration's deregulatory fever and Wall Street's insatiable greed. If the potential danger to our economy was not so dire, this blatant effort to essentially transfer $700 billion up the income ladder to those at the top would be laughable.

Let us be clear. If the economy is on the edge of collapse we need to act. But rescuing the economy does not mean we have to just give away $700 billion of taxpayer money to the banks. (In truth, it could be much more than $700 billion. The bill only says the government is limited to having $700 billion outstanding at any time. By selling the mortgage-backed assets it acquires -- even at staggering losses -- the government will be able to buy even more, resulting is a virtually limitless financial exposure on the part of taxpayers.) Any proposal must protect middle income and working families from bearing the burden of this bailout.

I have proposed a four part plan to accomplish that goal which includes a five-year, 10% surtax on the income of individuals above $500,000 a year, and $1 million a year for couples; a requirement that the price the government pays for any mortgage assets are discounted appropriately so that government can recover the amount it paid for them; and, finally, the government should receive equity in the companies it bails out so that when the stock of these companies rises after the bailout, taxpayers also have the opportunity to share in the resulting windfall. Taken together, these measures would provide the best guarantee that at the end of five years, the government will have gotten back the money it put out.

Second, in addition to protecting the average American from being saddled with the cost, any serious proposal has to include reforms so that we end the type of behavior that led to this crisis in the first place. Much of this activity can be traced to specific legislation that broke down regulatory safety walls in the financial sector and allowed banks and others to engage in new types of risky transactions that are at the heart of this crisis. That deregulation needs to be repealed. Wall Street has shown it cannot be trusted to police itself. We need to reinstate a strong regulatory system that protects our economy.

Third, we need to address the needs of working families in this country who are today facing very difficult times. If we can bail out Wall Street, we need to respond with equal vigor to their plight. That means, for example, creating millions of jobs through major investments in rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure and creating a new renewable energy system. We must also make certain that the most vulnerable Americans don't freeze in the winter or die because they lack access to primary health care.

Finally, we need to protect ourselves from being at the mercy of giant companies that are "too big to fail," that is, companies who are so large that their failure would cause systemic harm to the economy. We need to assess which companies fall into this category and insist they are broken up. Otherwise, the American taxpayer will continue to be on the financial hook for the risky behavior, the mismanagement, and even the illegal conduct of these companies' executives.

These are the last days of the Bush Administration, the most dishonest and incompetent in modern American history. It is imperative that, at this important moment, Congress stand up for the middle class and for fiscal integrity. The future of our country is at stake.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bush, economy, wall street, deregulation, bailout

Sen. Bernie Sanders was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2006 after serving 16 years in the House of Representatives. He is the longest serving independent member of Congress in American history.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
oxheadone
Posted by: oxheadone on Sep 21, 2008 4:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of bailing out the bond holders, we should buy defaulting mortgages from the homeowners and renegotiate so that they can afford to pay. This would put more money into the hands of people who would spend and stimulate real growth in the economy. The finance companies who hold the mixture of unmarketable mortgage-backed would not have to worry since the payment of the mortgages would be guaranteed by the US. In fact, it would be better than buying blocs of unmarketable bonds, since we wouldn't have to try to unmix good from bad; since all mortgages would be backed by the US. It would also be cheaper.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: oxheadone Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: oxheadone Posted by: Quannah
» RE: oxheadone Posted by: john mont
» RE: oxheadone Posted by: halg
» RE: oxheadone Posted by: gsmiley
The Fundamentals are Sound
Posted by: halg on Sep 21, 2008 4:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, really. Trust us. Why would we lie to you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bushvovitch won't lead us astray ----- we're all in this together, but not by choice!
Posted by: symcokid on Sep 21, 2008 5:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it was only a few months back when Bush said' "there is a cloud hanging over our economy but the underpinning is good"! What did the Dolt mean by that? Oh we'll never know anyway - the only thing we can be sure about the meaning of was when Bushdictator said, "we will liberate the people of Iraq". Now that was clear because we knew that meant we we're going to liberate the people of Iraq of there oil, that was clear and it's pretty much a done deal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I LOVE BERNIE SANDERS!!!
Posted by: Quannah on Sep 21, 2008 5:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally... someone with common sense solutions to this debacle we've been handed.

Maybe I'll move to Vermont.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I LOVE BERNIE SANDERS!!! Posted by: hemp&hemp
» RE: I LOVE BERNIE SANDERS!!! Posted by: Quannah
Karina
Posted by: dtorrance on Sep 21, 2008 5:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only the people who benefitted from Wall Street investments should have to help bail out Wall Street. The vast majority of Americans do not invest in stocks and should not be forced to help bail out these people whose "chickens have come home to roost."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Karina Posted by: joepiccaso
Penalty for those responsible for the financial crisis
Posted by: nyny3a on Sep 21, 2008 6:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The officers of the companies being bailed out should forfeit of 95% of their wealth and bared for life from the financial industry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You, go, Bernie!
Posted by: eaanders on Sep 21, 2008 6:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get some blood out of the vampire class while we have them over a barrel!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I posted on another thread...
Posted by: lexicon on Sep 21, 2008 6:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we established a fund that did FHA-style bridge loans to the mortgagees who are going under, then the mortgages that are at the base of this all will still continue to perform...

i.e. the money will continue up the pyramid, and all the derivatives will still be funded.

and there will be no more crisis. The toxic paper is STILL toxic, but it can be unwound in an orderly fashion.

Why not spend 200 billion addressing the fundamental root cause, instead of 1 trillion thrown at the 20x leveraged derivative paper, when the end result will be the same?

lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you want business out of politics, get the government out of business
Posted by: HeroicLife on Sep 21, 2008 7:34 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Businesses lose money and go bankrupt every day. Wasteful enterprises need to go bankrupt- our modern, wealthy lives are possible only because markets redirect wealth from less productive enterprises to more productive ones.

If unsuccessful entrepreneurs were punished for making losses, successful entrepreneurs – and our economy – would be destroyed as well. The real criminals are the politicians forcing you to pay for the market’s mistakes.

If you want business out of politics, get the government out of business. As long as governments try to control corporations, corporations will try to control governments. The only solution is to separate government and economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Senator Sanders, You Rock!!!
Posted by: buzzsaw on Sep 21, 2008 9:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We also need to reinstate the entire Glass-Steagall Act.

buzzsaw

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have an idea
Posted by: feduphoosier on Sep 21, 2008 10:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe we can somehow separate church and state while we're at it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's use the Bush Doctrine to help regular Americans
Posted by: anonymous12 on Sep 22, 2008 3:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally, an intelligent, thoughtful approach is presented.

However I think we should then apply the Bush Doctrine to Exxon/Mobile and other beneficiaries who have reaped billions over the last eight years at the expense of the common American (yes, each child, each American's share of our national debt is now over $30,000!).

Yes. That means explicitly taking control of the MOST PROFITABLE (like oil) and MOST CORRUPTING (like media) organizations and 1. using their assets and profits to paying down our national debt and 2. utilizing those resources to maximizing equal opportunity and the pre-Orwellian version of American values of liberty and justice for all. And 3. requiring ALL organizations to function with viable transparency and ACCOUNTABILITY.

Of course, the devil is in the details. (Like how to implement it without causing massive capital flight).

Sure, I'd LIKE to see those responsible held accountable. Many people's definition of justice would probably serve more vengeance than practical deterrence. Since 70 years after the Great Depression, and after 20 years of "conservative" ideology being broadcast as "common sense", Americans have forgotten what real common sense is, and have allowed our leaders to repeat mistakes of the past.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CASH FOR EQUITY NOT PAPER
Posted by: Peter Mackrael on Sep 22, 2008 5:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US Congress is currently under pressure to pass Paulson’s $700 billion bail-out proposal.

If any company is given federal assistance, the US government should receive equity in the company, otherwise any massive cash infusion will merely reward those banks that got deepest in debt. Buying their worthless paper makes no sense. There is no clear method to evaluate the paper to be 'bought' and worst of all, no regulations to address the real cause or to investigate possible criminal activity. Buying this worthless paper without enforcing new regulations will merely encourage continued derivatives trading and increase the total debt. If this occurs, does anyone believe that $700 billion will be enough? I expect total bail-out costs could run into the tens of trillions if foreign banks are included.

On the other hand, government ownership will ensure that future profits (if any) are returned to the people and that new regulations to manage derivatives trading - assuming Congress writes them - are followed. If and when these banks become profitable and socially responsible, they can be sold back to private investors.

Further, I do not trust Paulson and the Bush administration to administer this huge 'bail-out/buy-out'. As with the war in Iraq, I fear that most of this money will go to political allies and cronies.

A separate bi-partisan committee/agency should be created to assess other alternatives. One possible alternative is to buy these failing banks at their current market value. All purchases should be subject to review and approval by Congress. If any bank rejects a government buy-out, then perhaps a cash infusion might be offered but with severe restrictions on its’ use.

I believe it is highly likely that conspiracy to defraud and outright fraud has occurred - and will continue to occur - with respect to this 'rescue' plan. Who will investigate fraud/conspiracy and when will these investigations begin? Will any Wall Street fraudsters go to jail?

The current approach uses "fear of imminent financial collapse and appeals to the need for public sacrifice" combined with a rush to push a "clean" bill through a Congress distracted by “how to protect the interests of homeowners facing foreclosure”, without allowing adequate time for assessment. This reminds me of the method that Bush used to pass the bill to authorize the invasion of Iraq. Paulson's initial proposal will give the Bush administration incredible power to privatize profits while socializing the losses!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Go, Bernie!!!
Posted by: Aredee on Sep 22, 2008 8:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's bring back the usury laws and do away with legalized loan sharking--the "payday loan" outfits, the "title loan" ripoffs, and the J.B. Byriders, whose sole purpose is exploiting the working poor. That, along with allowing subprime borrowers to renegotiate, will help those on the fringe the most.

Then for the rest of us, there should be a ceiling on credit card interest, including hidden fees and other crap they sneak in after the teaser rates have ended. Credit card interest should be limited to a decent rate above the prime and nothing more. The days of "anything goes" have to come to an end.

While we're at it, let's enforce the Sherman Anti-trust act. If Sherman is antiquated, let's update it and make sure it works.

We've been listening to "socialists for the rich" for the past 30 years, and look where it's brought us. It's time we started listening to a true socialist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cake and Eat It Too
Posted by: joepiccaso on Sep 22, 2008 3:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It wasn't too long ago that many of you who are crying about this bailout and Mortgage debacle, were crying foul that the "Big Corporations weren't playing fair, by not making loans to people who couldn't afford it. So through a lot of political pressure, non-executive I might add, the lending institutions made those loans , and Pandora's Box was opened. Now you see the result of social decisions verses sound financial decisions. More government regulation, or too much already? This isn't the problem of "Big Corporations." This is a problem of government intervention pure and simple. If it wasn't, this would have happened long ago. Schools were just fine before there ever was a Secretary of Education, Carter's Administration, and show me where it's gotten any better. The only place that education is better, is in private schools and Home Schooling. Both spend less that what the government spends per pupil, so money isn't the problem. The Governments involvement is!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Great Depression, the sequel
Posted by: Menopausal Mick on Sep 22, 2008 4:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for the plain talk. Can you speak to the other reasons this deal is being rushed along? If Americans are going to have an informed opinion on what is going on, shouldn’t they be fully informed?

Isn’t it true that part of the reason this came to such a head this week is because the rest of the world is tired of holding bad American debt in the form financial securities that are tanking as the dollar tanks?

Isn’t it true that if this bailout doesn’t convince the rest of the world that we are going to get fiscally realistic with things like unregulated derivatives that we are looking at a possible financial event like the Great Depression?

Isn’t it true that the recent China/Iraq oil deal sounded the death knell for dollar dominance managed with Petro-Dollar over Petro-Euro?

Isn’t it true that if sovereign funds don’t roll-over their T Bill securities that we are looking at a Depression and the fact that it could quickly become global is the only thing that has kept it from happening already? Isn’t it true that China has already made some moves in this direction?

This afternoon, Cramer on CNBC is finally talking about what the severity of the situation is. He has actually used the “D” word (Great Depression) when talking about the consequences of not having a very quick response to this financial crisis.

Isn’t it true that even if we allow a bailout of the Wall Street thieves that it isn’t even the LAST of our financial crisis? It doesn’t deal with the NEXT big pus pocket on this boil of an economy. Commercial Real estate derivatives? Defaulting credit card debt from no home equity loans?

How many more bailouts are in our future?

If we taxpayers are going to have to shoulder the burden of this unmitigated greed, then shouldn’t we be fully informed of the why and let us make up our own minds whether we want to let the bastidges go down the tubes, knowing what the likely result will be or do we choose to reward their greed in order to keep any sort of an economy moving away from Global Depression?

It is all much more complicated than anyone is talking about on any of MSM. There is a pain pill headed our way… do we let it all go down now so it truly bottoms out and can begin to rebuild or do we put our trust in the government’s ability to get us out of this mess? Trust the government? This government? I’m not sure which scenario is more fear inspiring. Global Depression or trusting that Bush and the Bunch won’t merely hang Wall Streets losses around our necks without any regulation that would stop it from happening again.

I don’t know about the rest of you, but I intend to get totally knee-walking in me cups in love with a bottle of scotch.

Menopausal Mick

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement