Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

State Capitalism Comes to America

By Nicholas von Hoffman, The Nation. Posted September 11, 2008.


With no debate or commitment to principle, an enormous segment of the US economy has been turned over to the government.
Advertisement

With George Bush's approval, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has tripped across a line of historic dimension. Two less likely agents of change we have seldom seen, but in executing the financial putsch on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, they have taken America to a new place.

Other nations have been there. In the early decades of the twentieth century Italy went there when Benito Mussolini initiated his version of state capitalism. He was followed in Germany by Adolf Hitler and national socialism. Both were able to bring about a significant increase in prosperity, however repugnant their other teachings and practices.

Though the particular arrangements may vary from one nation to another, under state capitalism government is the senior partner in the economy. That is a different arrangement from tax breaks, tax shelters, tax subsidies, tax-exempt bonds, low-interest loans, tariff protection or the kind of parasitical finagling that made George W. Bush rich. Under state capitalism, the economy is manipulated to meet government set goals. Under state capitalism, Washington rules.

Under the Freddie and Fannie takeovers, the government becomes the controlling stockholder and supplier of capital in two previously private organizations on whom the residential construction, real estate, building materials, home appliance, banking and furniture industries depend. An enormous segment of the American economy has been turned over to the government, with the enthusiastic approval of the industries concerned.

A line has been crossed, but not in accordance with any doctrine or set of economic beliefs or with a thought-out plan in mind. "The sweeping government intervention stemmed from a growing realization by Treasury and Federal Reserve officials that the two companies couldn't survive in their present forms, and that any collapse would be devastating to the economy," reports the Wall Street Journal, "The decision was hashed out over weeks of meetings. They included a conclave of Federal Reserve officials during their annual retreat at Jackson Hole, Wyoming; a mid-August polling of bond-market players by Morgan Stanley bankers advising Treasury; and a marathon session over the Labor Day weekend, fueled in part by Diet Coke and Coke Zero."

As with the other steps in the direction of state capitalism these past months, the decision was made in pit-of-the-stomach fear that the whole system was moving toward implosion. As to what comes next, the businessmen-turned-government-officials who pressed the button on this one have no idea. The administrators whom Paulson and James Lockhart, the head of Federal Housing Finance Agency, have installed as the heads of these two gigantic organizations will run them the best as they can, at as little cost to the taxpayers as they can.

The Clinton-Bush II administrations finished the work of destroying and/or emasculating the regulatory framework inherited from the 1930s New Deal and replaced it with nothing. Their deregulation was the economic equivalent of opening the doors to a maximum security penitentiary and letting the most dangerous criminals in captivity out to feast on the civilian society.

What a feast it was! And, oh, how we are paying for it.

Instead of rounding up the escaped felons from their Wall Street dens and re-imposing law and order, Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke have been running to the scenes of the crimes committed by the escapees to attend to the wounded and cart off the dead. All fine and noble, but in their ill-considered attempts to help they are creating anarchy. The are making various state capitalist precedents which have no pattern or direction but will open us up to the depredations of every business lobby and special-interest group.

Soon Paulson and company are going to have to deal with a desperate automobile industry pleading for a $25 billion loan. Once upon a time the car companies were too big to fail. They are now so shrunken they are merely too important to fail. When they get their money, another chaotic step into state capitalism will have been taken.

France has operated under a form of state capitalism since before its revolution. It is carried out with a modicum of planning and self-discipline. When the French state invests in a company, it has a plausible rationale for what it is doing.

The United States has none. Without realizing it, we are ripping holes in our free-market system and filling them with a jumble of ineffectual expedients. The Freddie and Fannie takeover will not take care of our problems. It will not hold back the night.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: economy, fannie, freddie

Nicholas von Hoffman is the author of A Devil's Dictionary of Business, now in paperback. He is a Pulitzer Prize losing author of thirteen books, including Citizen Cohn, and a columnist for the New York Observer.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sounds More Like Bong Rips To me
Posted by: pdxjoe on Sep 11, 2008 5:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Without realizing it, we are ripping holes in our free-market system and filling them with a jumble of ineffectual expedients."

There is no "free-market" without a State to create and sustain it. Ask John Locke for Christ-sake: in the lala-land before the in(ter)vention of a State apparatus there is no free-market or market period, because every mythological rugged-individual and his family simply takes from and cultivates the earth with abso-fucking-lutely no dependence on others.

The take-over of these lenders evidences the failure of not of the State to do its job, which is to make sure that such economic implosions do not harm The People, but the failure of Capitalism to function without being propped up by the State.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does von Hoffman mention ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 11, 2008 5:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the biggest taxpayer ripoff in history ?

He misses the forest for the trees while wildly swinging his rhetorical ax.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does the Bureaucratic Involvement Have A Sunset Clause?
Posted by: ranchero42 on Sep 11, 2008 6:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How the hell do we trust ourselves to underwrite our loans? If we miss three payments do we self-flagellate or will there be SQUAT Teams?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Naomi Klein's wet dream comes true!
Posted by: Bobsays on Sep 12, 2008 3:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
State capitalism is the perfect result for all the anti-globalization critics out there. Just eight or nine years after they launched their campaign, they have driven the US into ruinous wars (as their fellow travellers in radical islam launched their attacks), and now, they have pushed the US into state capitalism. What's next? Socialism? Probably.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only Partial Definition of 'State Capitalism' - What About The New Deal?
Posted by: pdxjoe on Sep 12, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Under state capitalism, the economy is manipulated to meet government set goals."

Great way to naturalize capitalism, as if "the economy" was by definition capitalist. No. Under State Capitalism, the interests of private property are manipulated by and ultimately for the State. A couple versions of this are fascist 'National Socialism' and communist 'Socialism in One Country'. Aren't we forgetting another version though: none other than the New Deal.

The New Deal was in many ways this lender take-over applied as general economic policy. It bought its way into the hearts of Americans by offering in-roads to improved work-conditions and other workers' rights, not to mention the satisfaction of conspicuous consumerism and the so-called "middle-class lifestyle." These are, from the perspective of Capitalism, small prices to pay for being bailed out of the fucking GREAT DEPRESSION. All this talk about the middle-class disappearing is simply Capitalism taking back what it never really gave America.

The New Deal, coupled with the World War it took to help pull us out of the Depression, is the largest example ever of a pyrrhonic victory. We are on the verge of perhaps another Great Depression, with ecological meltdown and nuclear holocaust as real possibilities on the side. The world and all the living things in it cannot continue to function within the logic of Capital. There is no New Deal 2.0. We need to use the State to take responsibility for changing our way of life, not continually making excuses for and propping it up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good Point Posted by: pdxjoe
» RE: Good Point Posted by: yellow
Crony Capitalism
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Sep 12, 2008 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is another name for the Bush economic system. Pretend to have "free" markets and tilt towards one's friends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Private Bankers Take Over Through the Fed ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 12, 2008 11:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"From Nouriel's blog, here is a comment from London Banker, a writer and commentator for the blog:


I was briefed on the proposed US financial reforms which will be shoved through with minimal review. Short version is that the Fed wins an explicit "financial stability" role which gives it powers and secrecy to do pretty well whatever Tim Geithner chooses to do for his capitalist crony clientele. The role will include comprehensive, global data collection which will give the Fed visibility of all open positions. In the wrong hands, this insight could be used to selectively induce volatility and margin calls which would selectively hurt some and advantage others. That could help the Fed's friends over time.

The FDIC will be stripped of financial supervision and prudential intervention powers in favour of the Fed. That makes the Fed totally unreviewable and unchallenged by other authority in the USA.

Additionally, the SEC will be forcibly reformed to be more like the CFTC - a service entity for the interests of those who pay good money for bad regulators. Instead of fixed rules, SEC regulation will become "principles based" which will mean that no one is ever held accountable for breaking the law unless they have done something to break the code of omerta and anger their peers.

Federal law and regulation will pre-empt all state laws, and states attorney generals will be stripped of authority to investigate or sue. That means no more inconvenient Elliot Spitzers to get in the way of Wall Street excess.

This may not meet Professor Roubini's recommendations, but the deal is going through with little review so far because the cries for reform are only going to be met with this one pre-agreed proposal. After all, who in Washington or Wall Street would ever suggest that Geithner, Bernanke and Paulson didn't have the best interests of American and global investors at heart?" from Angry Bear

That's right folks, no oversight for banks by the public. They will not only have their money making monopoly but noone, not even the Justice System can challenge their monopoly power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The 2nd great depression is just around the corner.
Posted by: james2021 on Sep 12, 2008 11:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I will bet that Bush/Cheney have made a financial killing during all this.
And he gets a special reward from the taxpayers, Money, more Money, and SS protection for his sorry hide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

seriously wrong analysis
Posted by: equality on Sep 13, 2008 12:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you write state capitalism you forget to mention that the state is acted by the corporations "shaebols" "conglomerates" eg Thyssen Krup, Bayer, BASF etc.
The democratic state can be more efficient in running state services (post office, utilities,education, health services, etc.) than private enterprises.
Volskwagen was created during the Weimar republic Hitler merilly took the profit
afterward.
The french state health system is cheaper and deliver a better service than the USA one.
Please review your historical references.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Commondreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Sep 14, 2008 8:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember, in this fascist, mercenary regime, it's perfectly okay to use taxpayer money finance the nanny state for the wealthy - because no matter what, this government is all about them winning. In the case of bank and auto manufacturer failures, it is most unfortunate that we must rescue them in order to avoid catastrophic consequences which will envelope the entire economy. We wish we could let these overpaid CEOs drown in their companies' debts, but we cannot.

However, we could as the author suggests, handle this so much better. I think that all of the perpetrators - and that includes the right wing which in its zeal for free market policy pressed wages down while enabling the very wealthiest to drive up the prices of everything and offer usury loans so the populace could be ensnared in keeping up - for all of them retroactive taxes should be enacted, in an organized fashion so that we can slow the hemmorage. It is time for those who pulled off this great Ponzi scheme to pay up. Otherwise America just simply won't have any money at all (certainly the lower and middle classes won't because it has all been stolen by and for the top)....and that means there will be consumption at the lowest levels......without customers where will these businesses be?

Time to take back America. Time to invest in infrastructure, affordable housing, important things. And I believe in an orderly fashion, retroactive taxes should be enacted upon those who routed the economy (and this goes back so many years). It is time now to return to the days of privatization of risk and the socialization of profit, which is a hallmark of democracy. The other way around has been ruinous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Commondreamer Posted by: edgar1
» RE: Commondreamer Posted by: CommonDreamer
» By the People Posted by: edgar1
» RE: By the People Posted by: CommonDreamer
Robber Barons Revisited
Posted by: boing007 on Sep 18, 2008 4:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the biggest heist of the last hundred years. It reminds me of the Stavisky scandal in France.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]