Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

More Bushenomics: Why McCain's Plans Would Only Add to Americans' Economic Pain

By Nomi Prins, AlterNet. Posted September 9, 2008.


Ignore the pop-politics and look at the issue that matters most to American families.
Advertisement

Somewhere between box-office hit and policy wonk mentality is the real world. Here, "Country First" should represent more than military prowess; it should mean economic stability. A country can't be strong if the personal economies of its citizens are weak. Yet, under McCain's economic strategy, individual financial security is under attack.

Grandiose notions of combat don't pay for adjustable mortgages, sneaky credit card fees and rate hikes, health care premiums, tuition, gas or food. They don't regulate a banking system gone mad that has already commandeered billions of dollars of bailouts (from Bear Stearns to the cost of "effectively nationalizing" Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac).

McCain's main economic promises are cutting taxes, creating jobs and balancing the budget (aka removing pork). All commendable, except when you consider the details. His policies would result in a higher deficit, a lower dollar, more jobs leaving the country, and a reduction in Social Security, Medicare, education and other entitlement programs.

Let's start with tax cuts. The "pro-growth" plan on his Web site centers on corporate taxes, which he would cut from 35 percent to 25 percent to "help American companies compete and keep jobs from going overseas."

But his cuts won't actually be tied to job creation. Already, corporations don't pay a lot of taxes, and that hasn't kept jobs from heading east. According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, two-thirds of U.S. corporations paid zero federal taxes during the past decade. Almost three-quarters of all foreign corporations between 1998 and 2005 didn't, either.

Citizens pay the bulk of the $2.5 trillion federal tax revenue. Our income taxes contributed 43 percent of it and Social Security taxes 37 percent. Corporate taxes only accounted for 13 percent. If McCain was truly a "reformer" bent on "fighting" for us, he'd go after the $20 billion of executive compensation sliding through loopholes, or the $100 billion of annual offshore tax dodges. Instead, American citizens effectively wind up subsidizing this.

As for jobs, McCain said, "We're going to help workers who've lost a job that won't come back find a new one that won't go away." He didn't specify how, even though the unemployment rate of 6.1 percent is a five-year high, and we have lost more than 600,000 jobs this year.

When he talks about jobs going overseas, McCain means China. Between 2001 and 2007, 2.3 million jobs were lost or displaced (two-thirds of those jobs came from the manufacturing sector, the rest from the tech sector), as the trade deficit with China tripled. He didn't say how he would change that. In his acceptance speech, McCain pretended to acknowledge the pain of voters -- in swing states. "Bill and Sue Nebe from Farmington Hills, Michigan ... lost their real estate investments in the bad housing market. Bill got a temporary job after he was out of work for seven months. Sue works three jobs to help pay the bills."

Now, I don't know Bill or Sue, but they probably own fewer homes than McCain does. This characterization of the homes of millions of Americans as "investments" rather than actual residences comes from a man who, like Bush, is against regulating the lending industry or helping homeowners, though he considered the $30 billion bailout of Bear Stearns "necessary to protect the economy."

Other than that, he didn't address the foreclosure crisis. The percentage of homes in foreclosure doubled this quarter versus last year, 30 percent of subprime loans are now in foreclosure, and 5.35 percent of prime ones are. McCain has no plan to deal with this.

On health matters, McCain said he fights "for Jake and Toni Wimmer of Franklin County, Pennsylvania. Jake works on a loading dock, coaches Little League and raises money for the mentally and physically disabled. Toni is a schoolteacher, working toward her master's degree. They have two sons; the youngest, Luke, has been diagnosed with autism. Their lives should matter to the people they elect to office. They matter to me."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: economy, obama, election08, mccain

Nomi Prins is a senior fellow at the public policy center Demos and author of Other People's Money and Jacked: How "Conservatives" Are Picking Your Pocket (Whether You Voted for Them or Not).


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Sep 9, 2008 3:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And don't forget to mention the regressive personal tax rate which would continue and would make the inequality we labor under now - even worse.

It is such a nightmare I can't even think about it. But it just might come true because I have seen from the poll bounce....that it seems the country is truly clueless and buys empty rhetoric while Barack Obama has real plans.

Thanks to Jerry Falwell and successors we now have a country that will continue to vote againsts its economic interests - no matter how bad it gets. Assets will continue to be sold to China until it owns the U.S. along with many other countries...and the government debt per person will be out of control - but no matter. Incredibly, reason, nuance, real thinking, morals, being personally bankrupt (and the country also) at the hands of poor economic policy - it seems absolutely nothing resonates with the populace that keeps electing these rulers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» rich people don't have income Posted by: billwald
» RE: CommonDreamer Posted by: CatDad
» RE: CommonDreamer Posted by: CommonDreamer
Keep in mind that this doesn't include the Fannie and Freddie bailouts
Posted by: Farasien on Sep 9, 2008 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US gov. (in other words, the taxpayers- US)just took over both the mortgage giants who have a combined total of about 5.5 TRILLION dollars in debt. Oh, and accountability? If you comb through the news (its amazing howe little of it there is on this issue, by the way...I wonder why?) you'll find the CEO's of both of those companies aren't getting the boot, they are being allowed to stay on to 'help' with the transition.

So much for sanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» golden parachutes for execs Posted by: socialpsych
ba
Posted by: mnstra on Sep 9, 2008 12:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Make no mistake. There is a Chinese Black water that is going to come to the US to help police the civil unrest.Just like they did in SF for the Olympic torch.Vote Nader. Men in Chinese police or military uniforms will be called upon in the next few years ,during the growing enormous civil unrest ,due to the economic melt down; brought about by the next President, will be in a town near you. Vote Nader.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nader Can't Win... Posted by: Carol Burns
Vote McCain and Get It Over With ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 9, 2008 12:50 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just vote McCain into office and watch this country implode right away ...

Obama's Plan: Slow motion implosion ...

Your Choice for President : Barrack O'Bilderberg or John "Mussolini" McCain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

With all this so obvious!
Posted by: donl51 on Sep 9, 2008 1:54 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...why are the candidates running neck and neck in the latest polls....kinda makes one wonder,and kinda makes me sick that anyone would even applaud when MAC enters a room....but then their are those who'd love to see Bush run a third term too!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How can 85%
Posted by: JSquercia on Sep 9, 2008 3:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can 85% of the country feel that we are headed in the wrong directions and yet 50% supposrt McSame . Can they possibly believe that the canidates of the Party that has controlled Washington for the Past 8 years are agents of change ?
Which John McCain do we believe in the one who denounced the Bush Tax cuts as too skewed towards the wealthy and unaffordable in a time of war OR the one who seems to have doubled down on those Tax Cuts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» public opinion polls are bogus Posted by: socialpsych
If Manchurian Candidate McCain wins in November...
Posted by: VetAgainst McCain on Sep 10, 2008 2:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America, bend over and kiss your red, white and blue ass goodbye!

Vet against McCain
To find out why, click on the links below
VietnamVeteransAgainstJohnMcCain.com
VoteVets.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

seazen
Posted by: seazen on Sep 10, 2008 4:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is one of the most succinct, well-supported articles I have read anywhere on the core issues and how the Republicans have twisted everything in the direction of the "already rich." McCain may or may not support the same economic/financial principles that got us here - I guarantee you he wouldn't understand this article and its implications for the overall economy.

We should not hesitate to utilize some of this great analysis to craft letters to editors and to ask the major media why they cannot (or choose not) to educate the electorate with these facts every day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Effectively privitizing" Fannie and Freddie??
Posted by: Evelyn on Sep 10, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shouldn't that read "effectively nationalizing"? They were privitized in 1968. Now they are being nationalized, aka as a bailout. What it really is is socializing the damage, After all the benefits were privitized.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Here's a great quote Posted by: ReallyBearish
So will Obama actually stand up to tax cuts for the wealthy elite and reckless borrowing from China?
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 10, 2008 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I haven't seen him try for a push while he was Senator. With the way the Democratic Party folds its tents everytime with Obama to keep it going, I have a very bad feeling that Obama will allow himself to be Carter-ized by the rightwing media and GOP.

P.S.: Just in. The House Democrats are once again "bowing down" to the Big Oil bullies for more offshore drilling all the while ignoring Ron Paul's second attempt to put the Hemp Farming Act to work that can reduce dependence on foreign oil big time. FUCK FUCK FUCK !!! The Democratic Party deserves to be CLEANSED OF ITS TRAITORS !!!

And to you San Francisco voters ! Show that you are against this bloody war for oil in Iraq by voting for Cindy Sheehan and giving PEE-LOW-SICK a PINK SLIP for being a DUMB PAVLOV DOG !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

X-POLYGAMIST WIFE in ARIZONA
Posted by: X-POLYGAMIST WIFE on Sep 10, 2008 7:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What has McCain ever done for the FLDS polygamists in Colorado City, Arizona?

http://www.bankingonheaven.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stick to the Issues
Posted by: nativechef66 on Sep 10, 2008 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to stick to the issues that concern us individually and as a nation. Please stopping trying to figure out why the window dresser put Palin on display. This is tried and true Republican tactics, they can't stand on the issues so they'll dress the window up so much that you can't see the product. McCain's campaign knows without a shadow of a doubt that based upon the issues they can't win, they've already stated this. Continue to press the issues and watch the repugs squirm while they change the subject. Don't let them change the subject keep pressing it!!!!!!

You really want to get them where it will hurt the most? Turn your back on them the minute they start with the window dressing. We all know that McCain has committed political suicide by choosing Palin, so his campaign continues to shift the focus to a popularity contest.

Personally I could careless if any one the candidates was purple with pink polka dots as long as they had a sound and reasonable plan to move this country forward. Palin is window dressing and McCain is hollow with no new ideas to move this country forward. It's like the high school quarterback and the head cheerleader. When you see them again after 20 years their living in a trailer with half a dozen kids, working dead end jobs and collecting food stamps, constantly reliving the glory days of yesteryear.

At the end of the day just keep asking yourself if your better off now than you where 8 years ago. The answer comes into focus very quickly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GOP McCain/Palin's plan for economic salvation: "Pray to Jesus"
Posted by: stev90 on Sep 10, 2008 9:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pray to Jesus, that $100 trillion in debt (and growing), squandered by the failed, incompetent policies of the Bush/Cheney/Rove regime will somehow disappear, without any global, political or societal repercussions...

Now, get down bend over, brace yourself for more of the same policies based on lies, deceit, double-standard and hypocrisy, that will only continue the de-leveraging, the economic scrotum tightening and financial meltdown of America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Still Losing the language war I see!
Posted by: Dboy on Sep 10, 2008 12:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
entitlement programs

Dem's STILL don't have a handle on the Language War. By continuing to use "entitlement program" you are just asking for an ass-kicking. OH GOD PLEASE learn how to play this game! How about "Homeland Investment"? I never went to some fancy-ass Ivy school but yet within about 2 seconds found a better phrase. Where is the Dem's version of Karl Rove???

dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are SO RIGHT!! Posted by: truthlover
» RE: "Homeland Investment" Brilliant! Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
It's actually much worse
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Sep 10, 2008 12:06 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain's top economic advisor Phil Gramm (the Dr. Strangelove of economics, the author of the "Enron Exception") has pushed for deregulation and a financial system that's about to implode. If McCain and his VP bimbo are elected, we'll get a financial crisis that will make the 1930s look like a cake walk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's actually much worse Posted by: mmckinl
There's twisted, good news in the bad...
Posted by: blurider on Sep 11, 2008 1:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's lots of bad news for progressives and plenty for the whole society!

I'm a small scale trader and listen in the background, to CNBC as a 'contrarian indicator', occasionally watching. Most of you are likely already aware that Bloomberg, CNBC and the other 'Investment Media' are nothing more than cheerleaders for 'happy talk', bull markets as the 'norm' and Republican administrations. Most of these talking heads have dime store 'economics degrees' and simply don't have a clue, consistently dispensing useless to bad and totally wrongheaded information. Bloomberg has been sued for this at least once.

Most if not all, can't read anything but the simplest chart, have little idea of how a chart reflects on the present or the future and only shake their heads when technical traders tell them hard truths.

Most of the investor class would vote for Adolph Hitler or his reincarnation knowingly, if he promised low taxes for their brackets, corporate welfare and anything else that benefited markets and their own incomes. They care nothing for and prefer not to hear about the horrors of war and support environmental degradation and all the myths, lies and misdirection you can think of concerning the environment. Individuals like Larry Kudlow act as unpaid Republican operatives who care nothing for Palin's eccentricities for instance - or McWayne's - and only celebrate their tax and energy policies.They may not be a lot of votes but they have a lot of influence.

That good news I mentioned?? There isn't any for the economy!
The administration and the investor class have tried to fool America with their happy talk and they've used corporate socialism to patch the leaks, until most of the populace actually expects things to improve 'any day, now'. While trying to either patch up the economy or cover up the harmful or threatening issues they have made matters worse, much worse!

They tried for instance, to repair a credit crunch which was the unwinding of credit excesses - with MORE CREDIT - by lowering interest rates. It didn't work. Charts reflect that each attempt seemingly leads to more failure.

McWayne and Barbie could inherit the legacy of their heroes (Reaganomics, Bushonomics and an unsustainable, Keynesian, military economy) and find themselves helpless in the face of the cascade of failure. Obama and Biden would likely have the same problem.

It could eaasily be a hundred year event or worse on a scale that neither team is able to deal with. Can you imagine Sarah Palin in charge of our failing economy?

In that case whomever wins the election will reign over disaster and come out a total BUM on the other end!

The only good news should McWayne win, would be that he'd act out the final demise of any remaining reputation of Reaganism or Republicanism. Of course socially it could be disaster but perhaps they'd be too busy putting out economic fires to destroy the social fabric of the nation.

In such a scenario, maybe the Democrats would learn once again how to state their case, the investor class and corporations would once again be reminded of the importance of labor and consumers and the former ruling class would be reminded who they actually work for in a democratic republic!

Survivors - successful gardeners and subsistence farmers along with the very lucky, might inherit a better world!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Personal Accounts lie
Posted by: james2021 on Sep 12, 2008 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corportate America have been drooling over the untapped billions to be stolen from the working class by offering Personal Accounts instead of Social Security. Just think of the likes of Bernie Ebbers, Ken Lay, and all the other Capatalistic Theives out there in the corporate world. The Phil Grahms of the republican party cant wait to rob us blind, then tell us that we are just imagining it.

May be another Great Depression is needed to
dislodge the bulk of the american electorate so that they can see the republicans for what they are, LIARS, TRAMPS AND THEIVES.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]