Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Immigration Raid Breaks Up Organizing Drive at Iowa Meatpacking Plant

By Simone Landon, Labor Notes. Posted September 9, 2008.


Employers are using immigration enforcement by ICE to hurt workers, both natives and migrants.
Advertisement

Undocumented immigrants are criminals but law-breaking employers should get off scot free -- at least, that seems to be the position of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The federal agency has come under fire from community groups and unions following its May raid on an Iowa kosher meatpacking plant.

In the largest single-site immigration raid in U.S. history, ICE detained 389 workers, mainly Guatemalan and Mexican immigrants, from the Postville Agriprocessors plant. Federal prosecutors went on to press criminal charges related to identity theft against 306 of them.

The raid is the most glaring example of ICE operating as a "rogue agency," said Scott Frotman, a spokesman for the United Food and Commercial Workers union, which was trying to organize the plant. ICE's actions not only halted the UFCW's drive but also disrupted an Iowa Department of Labor (DOL) investigation into abuses at the plant.

Worried that ICE was preparing a raid on Agriprocessors, UFCW Vice President Mark Lauritsen sent a letter to the Department of Homeland Security in early May requesting ICE not interfere with ongoing DOL investigations. Though the agency has a policy not to obstruct other government bodies, ICE ignored the letter.

UFCW claims ICE actions hamper union activity by intimidating potential members. The union sued the agency in 2007 following similar raids at five Swift meatpacking plants where the union has members.

Lauritsen noted that the Postville arrests amounted to eliminating hundreds of witnesses to labor violations at the plant.

Ironically, the raid did bring proof of allegations against Agriprocessors. Of the raid's detainees, 29 were underage. Three months after the raid, the Iowa DOL released a report detailing 57 child labor violations at the Postville plant -- including children as young as 13 working on the kill floor -- and has recommended the state prosecute the company.

Plant 'a Nightmare'

The child labor violations are only a fraction of what Postville workers have endured, according to UFCW, which has been trying to organize the plant since 2005 with little success.

"Workers' rights are a nightmare," said Doug Mork, organizing director for UFCW Local 789 in Minneapolis. "Wages are extraordinarily low, basic worker safety and protection is miserable.

"It's intensified by the immigration situation, by the fact that this employer was able to come up with a more vulnerable workforce and abuse it over the long haul."

UFCW has alleged that one worker had his eyes duct-taped by a supervisor and was beaten with a meat hook. The worker did not come forward for fear of losing his job. Workers have also reported being bullied into buying cars and renting apartments from company agents.

"The company suppressed every aspect of their life so they were unable to come forward and speak out about the atrocities going on in that plant," Frotman said.

The company's union-busting strategy didn't help, either, said one of the UFCW organizers in Postville.

The organizer said company agents followed UFCW representatives on home visits and made threats against workers they spoke with.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: immigrant rights, raids, postville


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
RE: Unions shouldn't get in bed with illegals!!
Posted by: JoesUnionReview_com on Sep 9, 2008 1:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, let me get this straight. You agree that companies should be allowed to have a slave class of workers here in your country?

Ahem, the sole purpose of illegal aliens being in a union is to assure that the wage standard is on par with that of the person who is legally entitled to work. At least that the way the Supreme Court of the US explained it in 1984, "helps to assure that the wages and employment conditions of lawful residents are not adversely affected by the competition of illegal alien employees.".

You see, the employers usually get a slap on the wrist if anything at all. As far as AgriProcessors, they are slated to get the huge fine of $500,000 to $1 million. The supervisors who knew what was going on, nothing. Jail time, nope. That's a very low amount by far.

As far as your own union local not having illegal aliens in it's ranks, how on earth can you verify that, because none of em are Mexican? That's a silly assumption.

Get your head out of your ass, and see how the Government and huge corporations are encouraging illegals to enter the country to drive all of our wages down and fracture the labor movement, ICE also has a very odd habit of entering the picture exactly during union organizing drives,if it wasn't for the UFCW, AgriProcessors would have gotten away with their misdeeds forever.

This is what has happened since 9/11, we have BS arms of the government, such as DHS which are supposedly protecting us from "terrorism" and are acting as if they are the long arm of the corporations. In fact, since it's inception as a branch of the US Government there has been at least a quadrupling of undocumented workers here, but how would we know, they are undocumented, and if they were so staunchly against 'terrorism', why are they allowing a class that earns peanuts, when a 'terrorist' could get them to place an explosive device for a pittance.

I hear your anger, but I myself have learned that this is the way 'they' want it, why else would they replace all the working pedestrian signals which once glared "walk" in green or "don't walk" in red with ones that have a red hand signal and a green walking man? They weren't broken, they just want to encourage the non-use of the English language, so we cannot communicate and tell these people what they are supposed to get paid and what conditions they are supposed to work under. Oh yeah, before I go, who do you think paid for those new lamps?

Divide and conquer, that has always been the rules, it's always Religion, racism, political point of view, and now language, which is further enhanced by our division between the sides of the issue. We are an ignorant bunch, the rich get richer while we fight ourselves.

Eventually a movement will come and lead and show us that we are all just flesh and blood, and the greed that is human nature will fade and the world will learn peace, but till then keep pointing fingers at 'those illegals', cause that's just what 'they' want you to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

human beings are not illegal caveman
Posted by: AdamG on Sep 9, 2008 1:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And your ancestors had an open invite to come here and stay?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You Are Simply Against the Principles of the United States
Posted by: kyledeb on Sep 10, 2008 8:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just because someone has broken the law does not give anyone the right to exploit them to their hearts content. It's simply against the principles of the U.S. to argue that way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Border Agents Operate Within 100 miles of the Border
Posted by: ranchero42 on Sep 10, 2008 12:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When they set up checkpoints on the highways (oh, yes, they do!) they're not looking for the union label. Perhaps the libertarians who object to identity checks would feel better about it if it was presented as union busting. If you're pro-union, and I am unconcerned about aliens in my union, then you need to stop buying cars built with foreign nameplates by scabs down south. If we place an embargo on cars not built in that state being sold in that state, this would go along way towards giving auto workers clear choices on whether or not they want collective bargaining plus a contract outlining whether or not these offshore corporations respect the American worker as much as the American dollar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]