Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

The Great Corporate Tax Heist

By Robert L. Borosage, Huffington Post. Posted August 14, 2008.


Want to learn how to make $50 million and not pay taxes? More than a quarter of large U.S. corporations do it every year.
Advertisement

Remember the old Steve Martin routine on how to make a million dollars and not pay taxes: "First, make a million dollars. ... Second, don't pay taxes." Turns out Martin's joke is standard operating procedure for corporations in the United States -- only, in comparison, Martin was a piker.

Wednesday, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a study on taxes paid by corporations. In what Sen. Byron L. Dorgan, D-N.D., mildly called "a shocking indictment of the current tax system," the GAO found that about two-thirds of corporations operating in the United States did not pay taxes annually from 1998 to 2005.

Now, most corporations in America are start-ups or small, mom-and-pop operations that have adopted a corporate form to lower their tax rates. And a greater percentage of large corporations do pay some taxes. But in 2005, with corporate profits reaching new heights as a percentage of national income, the GAO found that more than one-fourth -- 28 percent of large corporations -- paid no taxes. (It defined large corporations as those with assets of at least $250 million or gross receipts of at least $50 million.) They can tell you how to make $50 million and not pay taxes.

Not surprisingly, the income collected from corporations has been declining as a percentage of GDP, with the burden transferred to your income and payroll taxes. According to a study by the Treasury Department, from 2000 to 2006, an average of 2.2 percent of GDP was collected in corporate taxes. This compares to an average of 3.4 percent in other industrial countries. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects that, under current law, corporate revenues will decline to 1.9 percent of GDP by 2017.

Why is this important? Well, the Bush administration, led by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, and conservatives, led by John McCain, are mounting a major campaign to cut the corporate tax rate even more, arguing that we are crippled competitively by having a U.S. rate higher than any industrial nation other than Japan. "America has the second-highest business (tax) rate in the entire world," says John McCain. "Is it any wonder that jobs are moving overseas? We're taxing them out of the country." But the GAO study confirms what we already knew: Whatever the nominal tax rate, U.S. corporations pay an effective rate among the lowest in the industrial world.

Yet the core of the McCain economic agenda consists of breathtaking corporate tax breaks. He calls for cutting the top corporate rate from 35 percent to 25 percent and allowing corporations to write off investments in the first year. Combined, the Tax Policy Center wonks cost these at more than $1.3 trillion over 10 years. Len Burman of the Tax Policy Center estimates that in total, McCain would cut corporate revenues by about 50 percent from current levels. They'll be making hundreds of millions of dollars and not paying taxes. This is no joke.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: corporations, taxes, corporate america

Robert Borosage is co-director of the Campaign for America's Future, and he has written on political, economic and national security issues for publications including the New York Times and the Nation.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
God bless America
Posted by: Richard House on Aug 14, 2008 1:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“Whatever the nominal tax rate, U.S. corporations pay an effective rate among the lowest in the industrial world.”

This is a good reason why so many foreign companies also take advantage and incorporate in America; sometimes they manage to avoid taxes in both countries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Collision Course with History
Posted by: bryangalt on Aug 14, 2008 2:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whenever the inequality gap in wealth exists at this level, historically speaking, leaders and the rich start to lose something they are generally fond of: their heads.

The fact that the rich and the political worms that service them have forged ahead with not even an inkling of concern should concern them and the shrinking middle section too.

It seems that the ever increasing defense budget is probably not aimed at defending "us" from Russia (or whoever is the enemy of the week), but more likely to protect "them" (the rich and the worms) from "US" (the American's who are being stepped on without mercy or care).

The current worms have already passed legislation that can be viewed as an early attempt to squash "US" in the event of an uprising. Check it out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics
Posted by: cynyk on Aug 14, 2008 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, McCain says that income taxes are what's driving corporations to move operations offshore. Where's your proof, Johnny? Income taxes only account for a small percentage of a company's cost of doing business. Their greatest cost, as any Bus. Ad. freshman can tell you, is labor. And that's why American manufacturers are moving operations to Mexico and American service companies are moving operations to India - to take advantage of low cost workers, including children. But take heart America...maybe a McCain-appointed Supreme Court will reverse Hammer v. Dagenhart.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Midway54 Posted by: Midway54
It's not the tax rate but the taxable income!
Posted by: LionHeart on Aug 14, 2008 5:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought I heard recently that more than 50% of US corporations pay no taxes. I'm not sure if thats a god number but it does bring to light the fact that Obama can increase corporate taxes all he wants, if the tax code is structured in such a way to provide credits etc sufficient to allow corp's to reduce taxable income, that tax rate increase is moot!

Playing with tax credits is a tricky thing as it drive many policies and programs, such as renewable energy investment!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain's B.S. Express
Posted by: johngary on Aug 14, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why doesnt the main line press expose McCain for the liar he is???
Why are they constantly giving him a pass.
His B.S. about the corporate tax rate is really a call for higher taxes on the middle class!!
"America has the second-highest business (tax) rate in the entire world," says John McCain. "Is it any wonder that jobs are moving overseas? We're taxing them out of the country." But the GAO study confirms what we already knew: Whatever the nominal tax rate, U.S. corporations pay an effective rate among the lowest in the industrial world."
And this doesnt account for how these corporations divert most of their income, which never shows up on their tax returns, to off shore tax shelters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The GAO is currently funding college interns
Posted by: form5166 on Aug 14, 2008 6:39 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
with taxpayer dollars to sit around padding their resumes in positions where they aimlessly surf the net for most all day. True, these are uber-connected kids and thats how it works everywhere for the uber-connected, but it still does not give the GAO much room to scold anyone else.
That said, I think that all of the employees of these corporations need to give up their healthcare, benefit packages, pensions, COLAS, bonuses, raises, expense accounts, etc. etc. in a show of solidarity in protest aganist these evil businesses that have the nerve to take capitalism seriously!
Really people, there will be no changes until the roots (the system itself) are addressed. In the meantime it's just a bunch of whining and crying.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Straight talk and lies....
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 14, 2008 6:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So once again, the MSM is giving Sen. McCain a pass! What exactly is it going to take for people to realize this joker is promoting McSame policies that haven't shown themselves effective in what 30 years! Job are moving overseas because of trade pacts that allow workers in those countries to be paid as little as .30 cents a day (yes, 30 cents)! I wonder how many Americans are willing to work for 30 cents a day! So, while these companies are not paying taxes here, they are not paying taxes in those countries they have relocated to either.

McSame would have us to believe that we must continue to lower the taxes on corporations. I say we need to increase their taxes, especially if they are moving overseas! MeSame and the MSM would pretend that these very same corporations are not receiving corporate welfare in the form of up front subsidies!

We need to cut "Defense" spending, because if you think that all of that money was actually going to the boots on the ground, think again. "Defense" spending is what keeps "Star Wars" projects going, and yet what have we received for all of the money that has gone into that debacle?! Don't believe, than why were the soldiers writing home asking to please send bulletproof vests to them!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tax the rich!
Posted by: Cybershaman on Aug 14, 2008 7:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why shouldn't the people who profit from this system pay for it's upkeep? Seems perfectly 'free market' to me!
Why must those of us who get little to no benefit from this wage slavery be the ones to pony up the lions share?
Our system has been corrupted by people who feel entitled to 'game it' because of their familial wealth. The big lie is that if you work harder you will be financially rewarded for it. That if you are not financially secure it is because you are lazy.
These lies have been used for hundreds of years because they work. The hardest working people are the ones getting the lowest pay. THAT is a fact you can see on the street every day.
There is only one way out of this.
STOP BUYING STUFF!
Grow a garden, start hunting and fishing. Do not be conned into buying all the new toys they parade in front of your eyes. Screw digital TV! Stop watching the GD idiot box and find things to do without spending money. Go to the library or the park. Watch the system collapse and be prepared for it.
Do not riot! They are prepared for that.
If you must buy something, buy local, not corporate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The forgotten part of the equasion
Posted by: reelectnoone on Aug 14, 2008 7:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People tend to think taxes on corporations are always a good thing but what they forget is that "corporations" don't pay taxes. People pay taxes. If I have a corporation and I pay a big tax, that tax will be built into the price of my product and when the public buys it, they are really the ones paying those taxes. A heavy tax on a corporation only means a higher price to the consumer.

Likewise highway taxes on trucks and their fuel. Those become part of the cost of moving goods which we then pay at the store in the form of higher prices. And then you pay a sales tax. People pay taxes.

This means that even your food is taxed. Not directly but you pay the taxes as part of the price when the producers and shippers pay higher taxes to bring products to your local store. People pay taxes.

What needs to be done is not taxing corporations but making sure the people who OWN them pay more of their share on their incomes.

Wealthy People don't pay taxes. but they want the rest of us to do so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tax profits as income Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Tax profits as income Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Not really Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Tax profits as income Posted by: BigElectricCat
» RE: The forgotten part of the equasion Posted by: progressive-life
Taxes
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 14, 2008 8:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The more I keep in my pocket, the better.

JT
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Taxes Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Taxes Posted by: vivachavez
When You Own The Candy Store
Posted by: Southern Gal on Aug 14, 2008 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you own the candy store government as our corporations do, you can eat all of the candy you want and not pay for it. It should be clear to the people of this country that corporations and their corporately controlled government consider the people of this country to be cannon fodder for the military and slave labor for the corporations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Change the Rules for Corporate Lobbyists...
Posted by: ranchero42 on Aug 14, 2008 10:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and introduce total transparency to the process. K Street is a wasteland, find a way to start desertion. The MSM feels no loyalty to any but those that grease the wheels, not of progress but the headlong plunge into the abyss. Where are the heroes amongst the Judy Miller clones? Time to call the 110th back into "action".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wake up and smell the Crapplejuice
Posted by: Blue Heron on Aug 14, 2008 10:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know you all think Apple is this adorable company that makes cute, slick toys that amuse yuppies to no end. And maybe you even think that because of said 'cuteness' and 'coolness' they can do no wrong. Well, I hate to smash your comfy, delusional fantasy world, but you'd be wrong. They have all sorts of creative ways to get out of paying Uncle Sam. One of them is to keep 'Permatemps'. I know you may have heard me go on about this before, but I feel it needs exposure. Apple keeps many employees at Permatemp status for years to avoid paying them benefits or give them stock options. These poor souls also end up paying the Medicare taxes that Apple should be responsible for. Why doesn't anyone else say anything? My guess is that these same poor sods are just grateful to have a job.

The agencies these Permatemps work for do charge Apple plenty, but this extra charge is simply deducted, as they are 'just temps' after all. Still think Apple is all cute and fluffy and doe-eyed? Ain't no rainbows and unicorns here my friends, though we all know how good Apple is with PR. That's the only credit I'll give them in the genius department.

Let's please all stop being suckers. You think not paying taxes is bad? I'm sure this is just the tip of the iceberg where Apple and most other mega-corporations are concerned. But sadly, they continue to have converts. Oops, I meant consumers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Losses" At Former Big 3 Auto...
Posted by: ranchero42 on Aug 14, 2008 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is another big scam. These corporations have their asses covered since long ago. What's really going on is an attempt to break UAW. Foreign nameplates assembled in American factories with overseas parts by non-union employees can only have one conclusion: Machiladoras everywhere in North America. The weak dollar is a sign, the sign says"America For Sale". Why haven't we seen asset hemorrage on a scale to match the bullshit? Maybe Toyota should BE number one, but the last vehicle I will ever own was built in 1990.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a slong as bloggers keep blaming republicans,,,
Posted by: christianslayer1955 on Aug 14, 2008 1:43 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as bloggers and other liberals keep blaming only Republicans for our society's ills,we'll never see change.Republicans do not give a damn what we think about them.On the contrary,they welcome and bask in our contempt for them.We stand much more of a chance if we attack their enablers and protectors;I am speaking of Democrats.Is must be clear to most of us by now that the liberal and progressive movement has been getting it's ass kicked royally by the criminals on the other side.....We have allowed people with a D.after their names to fool us into thinking they are on our side...Every time you attack a Republican,make sure you also attack his or her enabler and,hopefully we'll start to see some change in behavior...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I keep hearing
Posted by: bruceslog on Aug 14, 2008 2:04 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I keep hearing our rich, elected representatives saying that if we allow workers to unionize and get more pay, then our companies will leave the country. If we keep taxing corporations, they will leave the country. If we take care of our people instead of our corporations, the corporations will leave the country.
The end result of all of this will come to be severely underpaid, under-insured, overworked citizens living in third world conditions...
and I, for one, do not want to live in a third world America.
So, if the corporations want their workers to live poorly and in third world conditions, then let them leave to third world countries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I keep hearing Posted by: akbirdwm
Why not cut down the war spending in addition to tax cuts for those making over $200,000 a year?
Posted by: jwverez on Aug 14, 2008 2:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All that money could sure as hell be used to repair America's languished infrastructure ! Oops, I forgot, we're borrowing money from China to pay for this shit so I guess China won't allow us to use their borrowed money to repair America's infrastructure unless they have full rights to ownership and takeover ! Damn fucking BIG GOVERNMENT !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporate Taxes and Economic Justice
Posted by: sfpearce on Aug 14, 2008 3:43 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One would think that raising corporate taxes would be a straightforward process, but it's more complicated.

Here's an interesting two-minute video with links to the GAO study and to another paper with relevant IRS information.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who's payin and where it's goin
Posted by: crisler on Aug 14, 2008 4:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I try to tell my middle and lower class family and friends who support R's, their party taxes and spends every bit as much as the D's. It's just a matter of who pays how much into the system and where the money goes.

No president has spent more than George Bush - and that doesn't include funds for the 'war'. That was accomplished with the aid of a Republican congress. But they don't like inconvenient stuff like infrastructure, health care, equal educational opportunities, the arts, etc. Ain't no profit in that. Besides, it pays those lazy and inefficient bureaucrats too much in salary and bennies.

So how to get the public money? First scare them. Whether it's the commies, the Muslims, the Chinese, et al. Now you can funnel the treasury to defense corporations and security firms (who recycle a chunk back to their benefactors) and extend hegemony to more parts of the world. It's an exacta that all former dictators have used to consolidate power.

Think for a second how hard it is in a competitve market to make a million dollars. Or a billion. The R's who profess to love competition and markets so much, in reality despise it. What they really love is cost-plus, no bid contracts that make them instantly rich with little oversight and fewer consequences for the fraud.

What sane person actually believes we need more military spending? It's Reagan redux but on a much larger scale. Government is not the problem so long as the money is shoveled into the right hands.

And for those who think they got a tax break the last eight years, balance the money saved on your income tax with the increases in regressive taxes such as sales, gas, state, local, property and user fees. If you still came out ahead, it's clear why you might be a Republican.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Long Decline III
Posted by: yellow on Aug 14, 2008 4:25 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At this point I would like to address the issue of military spending as an economic stimulus. It is often woefully ignored as both a cause of inflation and as an indispensable tool for stimulating an essentially stagnant economy.

One of the interesting things that was noted by both Marxists and Left Keynesian economists was the impact of military spending on the business cycle. In the recession of 1957-1958, the production of consumer declined a mere 5% while the production of capital goods declined by 20%. This attests to the fact that the capital goods industries are the major factor in the boom and bust of the normal business cycles. The reason has to do with the accelerator effect that demand in the consumer goods industries has on the capital goods sector; a small increase in demand in the consumer goods sector multiplies into a proportionately much greater amount of demand in the capital goods sector. Furthermore, it is the capital goods sector which has much greater amounts of investment and pays much higher wages per person employed. It is also technologically quite sophisticated and has abnormally high long term fixed production costs. Adjustments are more difficult and overcapacity more common. Thus, the economic significance of military spending for the business cycle is not so much the amount of spending but its high levels of concentration in the capital goods sector which upon which business cycle swings have a far more volatile effect. According to a Survey of Current Business report from the period refering to the 1958 recession, the structure of US industry, that is to say the prominent position of the capital goods sector, was heavily affected by US defense spending. According to the report, federal government spending generated the following percentages in total demand in capital goods industries: engines and turbines, 20%; metal working machinary and equipment, 21%; electric industrial equipment and apparatus, 17%; machine shop products, 39%. It is easy to see how military spending mitigates the swings in the business cycle by continuing to prop up demand in this sector in the downswing so as not to allow prolonged periods of stagnation caused by slack demand for consumer goods which would otherwise have an exaggerated effect on the capital goods sector and thus the entire economy. Military spending thus reduces the problem of recession and unemployment from even the severe levels that we see today and in the past. It is for this reason that America is constantly at war and has what Sy Melman referred to as a permanent war economy.

Most of the US manufacturing sector that has been shipped overseas is in the consumer goods sector, particularly final stage assembly. The US domestic capital goods sector continues to grow and receive a large share of capital investment in R&D and equipment upgrades. The idea that there is no manufacturing in the US is a myth. In 2006, over $4.6 trillion in manufacturing output was produced in the US much of it in the US capital goods and machine tool sector. One reason for this is mammoth defense contracting levels that feeds this sector. US defense order and those from foreign allies who purchase expensive US weapons systems support US capital goods production through the Pentagon. Military spending continues to support the US economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Long Decline III Posted by: crisler
» Liberal whores Posted by: edgar1
Lot's of false talking points today.
Posted by: pinkfloydd on Aug 14, 2008 5:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forgive, but I tire of the incessant, repetitive bs that gets shuffled around these parts on the double.

There is no excuse for corporations of any size getting bys on taxes when the lowliest consumer gets raped by the IRS for not filing a freakin tax return.

And how quickly we forget that the major heads of this present administration (I know little of previous administrations' track record on this) including Bush and Cheney have major, MAJOR, MAJOR conflicts of interest concerning defense spending. It's incredible that this bit of info isn't headlining news every single day.

If it is not apparent to everyone in this sham of a country that every Republican politician and half of the Democrats are getting their hands greased by the very corporations this article references, then articles such as this are moot and irrelevant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Should Corporations Pay Taxes at all??
Posted by: gellero1 on Aug 14, 2008 7:40 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Disbursed profits go to individuals, and individuals pay taxes. Zero sum game.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

% of taxes to dividends
Posted by: tr on Aug 15, 2008 6:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to see a study that compares taxes paid to dividends paid out over a 10 year period. What would that percentage be?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

let them eat cake...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Aug 15, 2008 7:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... while we buy up all their corn for ethanol!
and then write the whole thing off as a loss and deduction for the taxman!

starving minions indeed!

R&D in private hands is good business indeed, pass or fail!...
whats that... the university of "whatitsname" ....already did that research...
and have the same results as we do too?
well I'll be damned!... good for them!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Long Decline IV
Posted by: yellow on Aug 16, 2008 7:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One reason for chronic stagnation is the $4 trillion in tax cuts for the rich that have taken place since 1981. They have spurred very little additional, if any, economic growth over the pre-1981 period and have led to chronic stagnation, deficits, debt, and financial crisis. Putting this money in the pockets of the rich has led to a swelling of the financial sector, particularly stocks and bonds, which have only increased debts and deficits and the interest on national debt by shifted tax obligations to sovereign debt instruments like Treasury Bonds. In addition, the maldistribution of income has led to less consumer purchasing power and slower annual average GDP growth over the last two and a half decades.

According to economists at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Real per capita tax revenues fell in 2001, 2002 and 2003 after the Bush tax cuts. After the upturn in late 2003 tax revenues rose to about 2% above their 2001 levels, mostly due to stock market growth. Most post WWII business cycle upturns promoted federal tax revenue growth at an average of 12%. In addition, the 1990s saw higher average annual GDP growth rates after tax increases than the 1980s after major cuts in the top income tax bracket. Finally, average tax revenue growth over the course of the 1980s was 1.7%. Tax increases in the 1990s raised revenue growth to 3.5%. The mammoth Bush tax cuts lowered average annual revenue growth to a mere 0.8%!! This is the main cause of federal government debt and deficits. It has also led to financial crisis and instability.

British economist John Maynard Keynes advised counter cyclical fiscal policies that slightly raised taxes in a business cycle upswing to control the pace of growth and inflation while accumulating sufficient revenue to spend the economy's way out of the downswing and short recessions. Fiscal policy in the US has been the opposite, especially since the Reagan era. Taxes have gone down consistently at all phases of the business cycle (except for the 1993 tax increase) with deep spending cuts in social programs and job creating public investment. This has concentrated wealth, created high average unemployment rates, sent real wages plummeting and spurred the growth of the financial sector and consumer and government debt. The result has not only been financial instability and the loss of tax base and revenues but a long term tendency toward chronic stagnation.

Military spending has traditionally acted as an effective break on such stagnation by stimulating the capital goods sector during downswings through its multiplier effect on consumer demand and consumer goods production. Since, the 1980s, however, the US capital goods sector has been in decline and has lost out to foreign competition from the EU and especially Japan. Defense spending, which sustained the US economy through the first three decades of the post-WWII era has less and less of a stimulating effect. At this point defense spending, which is now about 5% of the total US GDP, is simply adding to growing inflation.

The current malaise can only be turned around by progressive taxation and public investment to create full employment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Aug 22, 2008 8:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just wonder how much longer corporations can get over with this one. Gee, taxes are already low and corporate profits at an all time high...CEOs on the take every minute...and just look at the economy! Why, it's clear the gusher works, just in the opposite direction - certainly not towards the working man. First we have to stop the gravy rip-off train by stopping all write offs for CEO salaries above $200K...and that includes write offs for options gifts, perks including health insurance, and all the rest. What has the world come to when someone making $11 million a year or so isn't ashamed of having a company pay for his health insurance or for that matter, any of these other unnecessary and princely gifts?

Then we should make huge write offs possible for those corporations that raise wages for workers, fund pensions, and give health insurance.

There are many ways in which we can still have business friendly policies. However, we must use taxation (or the lack of it) as an incentive to do the right thing by the common man, first and foremost. The rest doesn't matter, because as we have seen, no one is more adept at taking care of himself than the top dog (but what has to stop is this at the expense of everyone else).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]