Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Corporate America Prepares for Battle Against Worker Campaign to Roll Back Assault on the Middle Class

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted August 8, 2008.


Big business has prepared a war chest of at least $150 million to stop progressive economic legislation that would seriously tax the rich.
Advertisement

There is nothing more terrifying to corporate America than the prospect of dealing with its workforce on an even playing field, and, along with allies on the Right, it's pulling out all the stops to keep that from happening. At stake is much more than the usual tax breaks, trade deals and relentless deregulation; corporations are gearing up for a fight to preserve a status quo in which the largest share of America's national income goes to profits and the smallest share to wages since the Great Depression -- in fact, since the government started tracking those figures.

There will be many heated legislative battles if 2008 shakes out with larger Congressional majorities for Democrats and an Obama White House -- fights over war and peace, energy policy, health care reform and immigration. But it may be a bill that many Americans have never heard of that sparks the most pitched battle Washington has seen since the Civil Rights Act. It's called the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) -- a measure that would go a long way toward guaranteeing working people the right to join a union if they so choose -- and it has the potential to reverse more than three decades of painful stagflation, with prices rising and paychecks flat, for America's middle class and working poor.

The Chamber of Commerce, D.C. lobbyists, firms that rely on cheap labor and a host of "astroturf" front groups are building a war chest that could reach hundreds of millions of dollars in an effort to build a firewall against EFCA and other efforts to put a check on corporate power and rebuild a declining middle class. A recent report on the front page of the Wall Street Journal about how Wal-Mart -- the nation's largest employer -- is "mobilizing its store managers and department supervisors" in an effort to discourage its workers from voting Democratic this fall generated quite a bit of controversy. According to a report in the National Journal that received less attention, "several business-backed groups ... (including) two fledgling coalitions fighting labor-supported legislation and the conservative political group Freedom's Watch are trying to raise $100 million for issue advocacy and get-out-the-vote efforts to benefit about 10 GOP Senate races."

It's the EFCA -- the idea that working people who want to join a union can -- that has corporate America quaking in its collective boots. The bill passed the House easily in 2007 -- by 56 votes -- and had majority support in the Senate. But it didn't reach the 60 votes required to kill a GOP-led filibuster, and that massive war chest being amassed by the corporate Right is, in part, an attempt to maintain a firewall of at least 41 anti-union senators -- mostly Republicans joined by a few corporatist Dems -- to kill the bill in the 2009 Congress. President Bush threatened to veto the legislation if it had passed in 2007, but this time around, they fear that a Democrat will be sitting in the White House. Obama was a co-sponsor of the 2007 legislation; McCain opposed it.

The prospect of a filibuster-proof majority that's sympathetic to the needs of ordinary working Americans, according to the National Journal, is making "business groups jittery." Polls show that the economy is Americans' number one concern going into this fall's election; fully 75 percent of Americans believe the country is on the wrong track, and these well-funded groups are intent on keeping it firmly on that track.

American Wages and the Law of Supply and Demand

At the heart of the bloody cage match that's likely to come is this: In economic terms, the wages of many -- probably most -- Americans represent a "market failure" of massive proportions. Even the most devout of free-marketeers -- economists like Alan Greenspan and the late Milton Friedman -- agree that it's appropriate and necessary for government to intervene in the case of those failures (they believe it's the only time that such "meddling" is appropriate). But the corporate Right, which claims to have an almost religious reverence for the power of "free" and functional markets, has gotten fat off of this particular market failure, and it's dead-set on continuing to game the system for its own enrichment.

About 1 in 4 Americans has at least a four-year college degree, and many of those degrees are even worth something in the labor market (sorry, art history majors). Others -- Derek Jeter, Bill Gates, a gifted artist or a writer who can turn a decent phrase -- have specialized skills that allow them to command an income that's as high as the market for their scarce talents will bear. There are also people with more common skills who have the scratch (and/or connections) and fortitude to establish their own businesses -- think George W. Bush or a really great mechanic who owns his or her own shop.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: center for union facts, chamber of commerce, senate, corporate america, labor, efca

Joshua Holland is an AlterNet staff writer.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Blah, blah, blah!
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Aug 8, 2008 12:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This nation has scorned the worker since its inception. Sweatshops, mill towns, child labor, "coolies," racism, anti-feminism, outsourcing, union busting and more. So, a bunch of insulated pundits say big change is looming and I say blah, blah, blah. Whether now or in January, 09, there will be no change because money talks and suckers walk. If you can swallow the Bush menu for 8 goddam years, on top of Reagan to Bush and every stop along the way, what the hell suggests that suddenly, miraculously, the same morons that elected the perpetrators are going to replace them with a better ilk? Oh, Pelosi and Reid will lead us to the promised land of Obamarama? Huh, whatever the hell that is. I have more faith in Dennis Kucinich and Paul Volcker, whose retirement from the Federal Reserve Board precipitated the neocons trashing of the economy. Now, with Kucinich as Speaker and Volcker back in place there would be real hope for economic progress and balance that will help the labor movement and without them I see blah, blah, blah because the public are stupid and Congress is corrupt through and through.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Blah, blah, blah! Posted by: jstepp590
» RE: bitch, bitch, bitch Posted by: fearn
» RE: bitch, bitch, bitch Posted by: jstepp590
» RE: bitch, bitch, bitch Posted by: culheath
» RE: bitch, bitch, bitch Posted by: hagwind
» Top Post Posted by: BlueGorilla
Nothing Can Be Done About It...
Posted by: ranchero42 on Aug 8, 2008 1:09 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is the wrong attitude to take. It's a tangential argument that could only have its origins from the right. This logic springs from the same quarter as the idea that the government is a mindless, faceless, amorphous mass. I have no power against this entity and therefore cede all power it would want to a "thing" in which I can see no reflection of anyone or anything I know. I feel sorry for those who continue to allow themselves to be blinded by the neo-con shit-slinging machine. What most people don't understand about the right wing is that the edge they seem to have in the political arena is all smoke and mirrors-being resolute in this campaign of shit is no real advantage if you know it's all just shit. Capisce?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unions are centralized and conquerable
Posted by: synx on Aug 8, 2008 1:38 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're kidding, right? Unions are going to save us? Unions?

Unions are like any centralized group of people, only as good as the people in charge. Who has time, money, food, and resources to run a union, especially one pitted against a major corporation? I'll tell you who has that much time. A major corporation.

What is to stop the awful nasty corporates from pretending to be workers, and forming a "union" that they then strongarm other workers into joining? Did you know that there are quite a few jobs out there where union membership is a mandatory condition of employment? That's right, the company will not hire you if you don't pay the union its monthly union dues. Are these companies just so intimidated by this fearsome union that they dare not hire anyone who isn't under its benevolent protections? Ha! Here's the truth of it, companies make fake unions, to prevent workers from making their own. Companies generate artificial imaginary conflict and negotiation, but somehow the union keeps getting bogged down in closed door negotiations and mysterious legal technicalities.

Okay, here's a good illustration of just what wool they're pulling over your eyes. Which do you like better: Coke or Pepsi? Answer: they both taste the SAME, they are both cola! Even if there are slight differences in taste, the two companies are not competing, and they are not rivals. Instead, they are merely two parts of a greater whole, a headless market beast that seeks to destroy us all just to siphon wealth up to its top stockholders. Coke and Pepsi deliberately pretend to fight, and pretend to be different, so that they can prey heartlessly on your instincts of loyalty and community. And in this imaginary, fake conflict, nobody ever realizes the whole thing is one big complex question. Which do you like better, Coke or Pepsi? i.e. You drink cola, and you enjoy drinking cola, and now that you're forced to agree with that, which brand do you like better? My answer is water! Guess how many other people I've met with an answer like that? Zero.

It's the same with unions. Didn't anyone watch The Matrix? Just like the metaphor of how machines fabricate a Zion to slake mankind's need to have something to fight against, so do the corporations and their marketing departments form false fake corpuses that they try to pass off as unions. Any real unions they destroy. Any they can't destroy, they infiltrate with management. And eventually membership to this false union becomes mandatory for employment, and once that happens the union is no longer a union, merely another branch of the company's human resources department.

Unions aren't around today, because corporate marketers have successfully found crippling unresolvable flaws that totally compromise everything a union would stand for. They weren't destroyed by some kind of corporate battering ram, they were devoured from within. If you think unions are going to come back like the New Haven Elm, you got another thing coming.

I am fully in support of any laws that help workers organize. It just seems like too little, too late. I just don't know what we can do at this point. You lose more money working than you do not working, and faced with that kind of horror how do you feed yourself?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Excellent points synx Posted by: dover23
» RE: xcellent points synx Posted by: Mr Nelson
» RE: xcellent points synx Posted by: dover23
» Way to go, Beck! Posted by: hagwind
ONE CORPIRATE NATION RULES THE WORLD! Decorpiratize or go Bust!
Posted by: williameon on Aug 8, 2008 2:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is on every TV show,
It's on all the Radios
Just one big pile of:
Corpirate BU__ SH__!

It's in all the magazines and
On all the movie Screens
Just one big pile of:
Corpirate SH-T!

The Homogenization of Human Life
To the lowest
Corpirate Common Denominator
GREED!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unions 'Leaders' that actually serve the Rank & File ??
Posted by: Purple Girl on Aug 8, 2008 3:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Michigander I have seen how Unions can help workers and screw them.
Far too many union 'leaders' are in th epocket of the Corps - nothing more then Co Conspirators. Hold a fee union meetings, talk the talk- then walk the walk right out the door and on to the Golf Course with their Corp Buddies.
There are union officals who are pulling down salaries, twice the amount of their workers they are meant to be advocates for.As a Journeyman my husband made about 40,000 last year- the 'BA's' took home about 80,000-salaried. When work is slow- too bad for the members/workers, but the 'mamangemet' will still get theirs.
Many Union 'leaders' are members of the 'Good Ol' Boys' Club too!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Union Busting
Posted by: US Citizen on Aug 8, 2008 5:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But first we get to live through the 2008 Presidential election when John McCain will pick "Blackwater Mitt" Romney as his vice president. Blackwater is just itching to fulfill its true mission which is domestic union-busting right here in the United States.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Union Busting Posted by: jstepp590
» RE: Union Busting Posted by: maxpayne
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
The term "Middle Class" has been redefined in the last 28 years. Let the "economy" collapse please.
Posted by: jwverez on Aug 8, 2008 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our system is too corrupt to be cleaned. Let's all just finish slopping up the fossil fuels, go nuclear, trash our planet with GM BULLSHIT, and get it over with ! Oh by the way, if you really want change, don't vote for either the Democrats or Republicans as they're all rubberstamp/pansy ASSHOLES !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dark Knight Posted by: LeaderofMen
False Labor Hopes
Posted by: david.model@senecac.on.ca on Aug 8, 2008 6:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clearly, the new EFCA legislation will be a step forward for workers in America but any delusions that workers will be close to a level playing field are misplaced. There are simply too many flaws in our free market system to overcome with a bandage solution while ignoring the real structural problems.

One of the mosr critical problem in the principle that price will be determined by the laws of supply and demand ignores the piece of the price that is missing, namely externalities. Companies to not pay for environmental damage which they cause or the harm and inadequate wages of those products imported from sweatshops.

Without any external discipline in the free markets, both high executive salaries and dividends to shareholders can suck wealth away from the pot from which workers draw their salaies.

Another serious problem is the growth of monopolies and oligopolies which have so much control over the market that it is impossible for any real interaction between supply and demand to have any effect. The pharmaceutical industry can be considered oligopolistic with ten or fewer companies worldwide. Not only do they have more control over the market but they can lobby government to adopy policies favorable to their industry. Lobbying is another factor in the so-called free market that interferes with the dynamic between supply and demand.

As well, the WTO, IMF and World Bank are external forces acting on governments in developing countries that influence price and availability of goods and services.

Another external force that has had a major impact on wages and prices are all the trade agreements that have been signed recently such as NAFTA.

So while there are external forces operating on workers and consumers there is little in the way of similar pressures on producers. To understand all the issues in the global economic system, you need to abandon the myth about free markets and think about realities of how and why so many people suffer under this system.

http://www.stateofdarkness.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: False Labor Hopes Posted by: jstepp590
Hey, wow, I can't wait for the movie!
Posted by: hagwind on Aug 8, 2008 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They'll probably have to shorten the title, though. Corporate America Prepares for Battle Against Worker Campaign to Roll Back Assault on the Middle Class is quite a mouthful. Still, it does sound dramatic, bombastic, and all that good cinematic stuff.

Trouble is, as a spin it's pretty useless in providing guidelines for serious organizing. "Assault on the middle class" -- what is that, exactly? Where's the front line? What's this "worker campaign" about? This article discusses a piece of top-down legislation, EFCA, but if (as the author states) hardly anyone knows about it, exactly how widespread is this "worker campaign"? Maybe to someone born around 1980 this legislation sounds new! revolutionary! or at least significant! It doesn't sound all that new to me, and in my adult lifetime the only new! revolutionary! legislation that passes Congress by large majorities is the kind that benefits some special interest or another. Penalties for violations sound good on paper, but enforcing those rules and regs nearly always involves a legal battle. I can see why lawyers would get behind this bill in a big way, but I don't see lawyers throwing their briefs into the breach to stop this "assault on the middle class." How often does legislation create or strengthen a grassroots movement? Nowhere nearly as often as grassroots movements drive the development and passage of legislation. That's the kind of legislation that tends to have far-reaching effects. This top-down stuff gets forgotten or co-opted, which is, not infrequently, the intent.

And who are we going to cast as "Corporate America," the hero/villain of the film? God and Satan are the only obvious contenders, and they're not free till after the election.

Wait a second -- is this a remake of Paradise Lost?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unions, hah.
Posted by: dayenta on Aug 8, 2008 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a union job, still don't make a living wage & have crappy benefits. Don't think they're the answer anymore until they get some teeth. All they're good for now is taking a big chunk out of my already meager check each month.
Bring back the guillotine!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Unions, hah. Posted by: jstepp590
The Long Decline.
Posted by: yellow on Aug 8, 2008 7:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real problem is that for about three decades, capitalism has been a system in steep decline. Between 1946 and 1976, per capita national income cumulatively increased by 90% while the average annual income of the bottom 90% of earners kept pace with a cumulative increase of 83%. Between 1976 and 2006, the cumulative per capita growth in national income dropped to 64% while the average annual income of the bottom 90% of earners cumulatively increased by only 10%. The income of the top 1% cumulatively increased by 232% in this same period while it only increased by 20% between 1946 and 1976!! This trend becomes all the more remarkable when it is considered that the average annual rate of population growth in the US sharply declined after 1972 never to return to the average annual growth rates of the first thirty years of the post WWII "baby boom" era. Had average annual population growth rates after 1972 continued at the 1950-1972 rates which nearly doubled the more recent rates, the trend in per capita national income growth over the last thirty years would have been much lower than the recorded 64% and probably closer to 35%. In addition, wages would have probably been even lower due to an oversupply of low wage workers so stagnation might have even been worse!! It is clear that the concentration of income and income gains has slowed the average annual rate of GDP growth in the last thirty years and that it was the relative income equality and large middle class that spurred the growth of the US economy between the end of WWII and 1976.

One of the problems has been tax cuts which have not gone into domestic investment in output and full employment but rather into financial speculation and mergers and acquisitions thus concentrating the economy and reducing competition. This more than monetary policy has lead to steady price increases. Prices have built in the financial costs of mergers and the expected rate of return for large shareholders who expect stock prices to increase after a costly merger or acquisition. This is hardly the way the system was meant to operate. Further, the income gains by the rich have been so large that they pay a larger share of taxes even though they received substantial tax cuts and the proportion of the income that they pay in taxes has declined. The rich have made income gains at a rate that far exceeds the increase in their share of the national tax burden. The real issue is that it is effective tax rates and shares of after tax income that are the proper measures of progressivity in the tax code and not the proportional share of the nation tax burden born by each individual income strata. This regressivity has lowered effective consumer demand and slowed GDP growth. It has led to the current crisis of stagnation and the financialization that has destroyed the stability of the US economy and the middle class.

A program of union campaigns, progressive taxation, massive public investment to create full employment and financial regulation is needed to restore the system. The current trends will only lead to a further decline in US capitalism and ultimate social breakdown.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Long Decline. Posted by: jstepp590
» RE: The Long Decline. Posted by: edgar1
» RE: The Long Decline. Posted by: yellow
» RE: The Long Decline. Posted by: globalgirl
WW III just began
Posted by: xi_people on Aug 8, 2008 7:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While people are prattling about inanities in this forum, the fuse has been lit for a world war involving the major powers in South Ossetia. Russian tanks are rolling into the area, against the US-supported Georgian army.

Remember what you were doing today. It might be a solemn marker to a world dissolving into chaos.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WW III just began Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: WW III just began Posted by: edgar1
More union members = more union teeth!!!
Posted by: mnlefty on Aug 8, 2008 7:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the reasons unions don't have more 'teeth,' as you say, is that the government has so effectively chipped away at workers' rights to join them. The power in any union is in numbers. Unions are precariously weak right now, but they still fight to protect workers and those protections extend to private jobs as well. Their ability to do that will be strengthened if it is easier for people to unionize.

I work in Human Services for a Union county. The few counties that are non-union look very closely at our contract when deciding their own benefit packages and salary scales. If they aren't competitive, people will leave for the Union county jobs. It's easy to say the Union doesn't do any good since County X has the same benefits and no union dues to worry about. But County X would have lower salaries and fewer benefits if they didn't have pressure to match the Union counties.

Will unions save America? I don't think it's that simple. However, we need to remember that most employers want to pay the minimum possible to retain the maximum profits. Unions raise that line a little higher.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great article, Mr. Holland
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Aug 8, 2008 8:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a conservative I've always supported workers' right to organize. I don't see how supporting limited government should also include being against the worker's rights to organize.

As a conservative I don't believe the government should be involved in the labor market at all and that the individual's right to form trade guilds or labor unions is implicit because nothing in the Constitution specifically states that they don't have that right. Unions are a good thing but, like any other organization, they can go very bad when they have bad leaders.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Great article, Mr. Holland Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Great article, Mr. Holland Posted by: jstepp590
SO, NOTHING WILL WORK - WHY BOTHER?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 8, 2008 8:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of these comments are more about attitude than ideas. The best of times in this country for some strange reason corresponds with high union membership and laws that required companies to treat employees fairly. That's not a coincidence. Nurses, teachers, college professors, are almost all union. It's not just about blue collar and Joe Six Pack. Stop being a bunch of snobs. And yes, there are always games to be played. This may be the Obama's great contribution. Cash in on it, don't bash it. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SO, NOTHING WILL WORK - WHY BOTHER?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 8, 2008 8:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of these comments are more about attitude than ideas. The best of times in this country for some strange reason corresponds with high union membership and laws that required companies to treat employees fairly. That's not a coincidence. Nurses, teachers, college professors, are almost all union. It's not just about blue collar and Joe Six Pack. Stop being a bunch of snobs. And yes, there are always games to be played. This may be the Obama's great contribution. Cash in on it, don't bash it. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bloody Fight?
Posted by: BobBrrz on Aug 8, 2008 9:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's been nearly 70 years since American Labor put up a 'bloody fight' for their rights. The idea isn't to get knocked around by goons and cops. Instead those goons and cops may need a little knocking around--maybe even some of the suits that pay [off] the goons and cops.

Every significant advance in the lives of American workers has come about after some cops, deputies, marshals or National Guardsmen have got their noses bloodied.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bloody Fight? Posted by: jstepp590
Wonderful! With Unfit McCain on the verge of winning the election...
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 8, 2008 9:17 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternetters are anow arguing about UNIONS!

Having been a member of two labor organizations -- the Teamsters and Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) -- I know firsthand the pros and cons of union representation. But no way will I waste my time addressing distrations like the article above.

The enemy is John McCain, folks -- America's NUMBER ONE NEOCON! Stop the AlterNet bickering and focus of our nation's REAL threat: continued iron-fisted rule by the rightwing GOP.

Otherwise, here is what we'll get after President McCain takes office in 2009:

If McCain wins in November, the neocons in Washington will increase their power, Bush's incompetent cronies will remain in office, our nation will become more divided, we will never know how many White House crimes were committed over the past eight years, and U.S. armed forces will attack Iran. America deserves a better future than that.


With love,

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam veteran [For the benefit of first-time AlterNet visitors]
Seven Reasons to Vote Against Unfit McCain

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hugh... Posted by: edgar1
The biggest issue and where is it in the news?
Posted by: edgar1 on Aug 8, 2008 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This card check is the biggest economic issue. It separates Obama from McCain. Without strong unions, all of Obama gimmicks, like the windfall tax, the "green" jobs that "can't" be outsourced(oh you poor naive Harvard fellow) and the health care mean nothing.

Union rights have to be #1 for Obama if he has any pretense of "change". He must be prepared to veto every pork loaded bill, including defense and "homeland security" (oink oink) appropriations for four years, deprive Congressmen of sleep(see bios of LBJ) blackmail whoever he has to and break every arm in both parties until this basic civil right is established. If workers can't get basic rights, the soldiers and their dependents who benefit from a welfare state of their own right now should get squat and go to work in the private sector.

Obama the eloquent (and he is) must be prepared to have a weekly news conference and frequent speeches to educate the ignorant public about their own history of labor struggle and rights.

As for the Wrinkly One, well, I don't expect him to give a damn about unions; he's been on the govt payroll all his life. BTW, are Cindy McCain's workers at the Bud facilties unionized?

Cmon Matthews, Brokaw, Schieffer, Mitchell, Maddow Olbermann the Liberal and Blitzer. Where are your labor-oriented questions to the candidates, including the congressional candidates? Enough of is Obama nice to Hilary discussions.

No union bill by Feb 1, 2009, shut the govt down for four years. We'll save money and lives and the standard of living won't be any better or worse.

Then, I guess we'll see if the market truly will regulate open borders and if home schooling works! One thing for sure: the average worker losing his job in Ohio won't be any worse off than he's been under Clinton or Bush. He/she needs unions. And they need them NOW!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Solving the problem
Posted by: Big Cow on Aug 8, 2008 10:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Edwards, John Edwards, where are you when we need you? If anyone can stand up to the corporations and win, he is the guy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Solving the problem Posted by: jstepp590
» John Edwards Posted by: arieden
» RE: Solving the problem Posted by: pomes
Which Middle Class?
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 8, 2008 11:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you make 35K a year? How about 50K? 100K, well you're still not in the middle class. Middle class in America is above 200K a year. Wall Street doing all this bitching is because folks are'nt buying their stocks anymore and people want the wealthy to start paying their fair share in taxes,with no loop holes.
I think a 91% tax on the wealthy would go a long way towards making this country run better. It damn sure would lower the cost of living. How? Well,when the rich have a heavy tax bracket they may fall into,they start lowering prices to keep up a lavish lifestyle on the cheap. Even when we had a 91% tax bracket,the rich had a lot of loop holes to keep them from paying any taxes at all.
Maybe we should institute a non-refundable,non-deductable 45% tax on all Corporate Gross Profits. That would be a tremendous help to the society at large. Why? Because Corporations get to deduct way past zero tax to the point the gov't pays them millions in refunds,and that's not counting the corpie Welfare they've been getting for decades. We killed welfare for the poor because they were a drain on the budget. GET
FUCKING REAL!!!! Welfare for the poor cost the American taxpayer 25 cents a day, Welfare for Corporations cost us $3 a day. I don't know about you,but I live on a pension,a small one,
and I have 25 cents a day to give to someone worse off than me but I damn sure don't have $3 a day to give to some money grubbing pollution bleching,worker killing, society wrecking god damn Corporation. I don't think you do either.
Big Business does'nt need help from the gov't,The People do!!!!! Until we get the fools in office that owe a lot of favors to the corpies out, we will never have a sane gov't.
A sound social policy or the Healthcare we need because the system has let Big Business poison all of us....for money. That's not governance that's elitist wannabe ruler shit. We deserve better. We'll have better.
We just have to 'take out the trash'
WRITE-IN Jeffrey7 for Prez '08

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 -