Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Hot Commodities, Stuffed Markets, and Empty Bellies -- Finance Industry Fuels the Food Crisis

By Ben Collins, Dollars and Sense. Posted August 12, 2008.


Prices of basic agricultural commodities have skyrocketed worldwide, threatening to further impoverish hundreds of millions of the world's poor.
Advertisement

Since 2003, prices of basic agricultural commodities such as corn, wheat, soybeans, and rice have skyrocketed worldwide, threatening to further impoverish hundreds of millions of the world's poor.

Shifts in fundamental supply and demand factors for food grains have undoubtedly contributed to higher food prices. Prominent among these shifts are the increasing diversion of food crops for biofuel production in the United States and Europe; sustained drought and water scarcity in Australia's wheat-growing regions; flooding in the U.S. grain belt; rising prices for oil and fertilizer worldwide; and the adoption of European and American meat-rich diets by the growing middle classes throughout Asia.

On top of these recent developments, long-term threats to worldwide agricultural output have eroded the world food system's resilience in the face of changing supply and demand. Although decades in the making, a loss of agricultural capacity worldwide caused by soil depletion, climate change, water scarcity, and urbanization has begun to take its toll on food production. Moreover, half a century of import restrictions and cheap agricultural exports by wealthy countries has devastated domestic food production capacity in poorer countries, forcing many countries that were once self-sufficient to rely on imported food from the world market.

At the same time, however, the growing presence of buy-and-hold investors in commodity markets has prompted heated debate among commodity traders, economists, and politicians over other possible causes of higher commodity prices apart from supply and demand shifts. Since 2001, the declining value of the U.S. dollar, low U.S. interest rates, weak stock market returns, and accelerating inflation have drawn investment dollars away from stocks and into non-traditional investments such as commodities. This flight to perceived safety in commodity markets turned into a stampede in 2007 and early 2008, as a credit-induced financial crisis in the United States compounded these existing stresses on global financial markets.

Rising commodity prices and financial speculation on food are not new phenomena. The 1970s saw a similar rise in commodity prices in the United States, and in the 1920s, U.S. investors formed commodity pools to bet on commodity price movements. But the quantity and liquidity of money flowing through today's global markets is unprecedented in human history. The current commodities boom could be a sign of looming agricultural scarcity, or it may prove to be a short-lived speculative bubble that will deflate over the next few months or years. But regardless of where agricultural commodity prices are headed, the boom has already begun to transform how food is financed, grown, and sold, and may dramatically change how people around the world eat (or don't).

Commodity Investment Goes Retail

Commodity exchanges exist as a mechanism for the producers and consumers of grains, energy, and livestock to transfer risk to financial institutions and other traders. For example, wheat farmers might seek to reduce the risk of price fluctuations by selling a contract for the future delivery of their wheat crop on a commodity exchange. This futures contract will guarantee a price for the farmer selling the contract, enabling them to pay for their planting costs, and avoid the risk that the price of wheat may decrease between the date they sell the contract and the date they agree to deliver the wheat. Food giants such as Kraft and Nabisco, as well as smaller bakers and grain consumers, typically purchase commodity futures contracts to avoid the opposite risk -- that the price of their raw materials may increase in the future. (Commodity markets also trade "spot" contracts, which entitle the purchaser to the immediate delivery of a commodity.)

Because producers and consumers seek to reduce risk, they function as so-called hedgers in commodity markets. In contrast, commercial trading firms and other speculators bet on the price of a commodity rising or falling, buying and selling futures contracts frequently in order to profit from short-term changes in their prices.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: agriculture, food prices, commodity markets

Ben Collins is a member of the Dollars & Sense collective and a research analyst at KLD Research & Analytics, a sustainable investment research company. Mr. Collins's views do not necessarily reflect those of KLD or its clients.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Very poor.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Aug 13, 2008 12:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While the article does extensive lipservice towards blaming Enron for everything, it does little to explain the world food market, and the depth and breadth that futures markets have on it.

Was there any mention at all of the fact that food is now a world-wide item, subject to the whims and discretions (and hoarding) of states? I didn't see it.

How very, very shallow. How very, very predictable. It's easier to blame dead people (Kenneth Lay) than come up with a well-argued thesis, eh? Might as well join the legions on the far right and chalk up all the evils in the world to "them dam libburuhls". At least then you'd have some shelter in numbers, amongst the unthoughtful herds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You miss the point. Posted by: yellow
» RE: You miss the point. Posted by: SDogood
Globalisation a much bigger problem than Biofuels and unregulated financial markets
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 13, 2008 3:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whilst unregulated financial markets cause massive bubbles and busts, and converting food into fuel is outright insane (as the full process uses more petroleum energy than the ethanol contains) its Globalisation that is Starving Millions of the World's Poor to Death.

The World "Free Market" benefits only the very richest in society.

Millions of the poorest people throughout the World are effectively being forced by their Governments and Western Slave Owners to produce cash crops for export for currency to pay interest on highly corrupt loans from rich Western Nations. These loans supposedly "given" for Development purposes enrich no one except the lenders and the countries corrupt leaders. The extent of this corruption is very well documented by the likes of Joe Stiglitz and John Perkins.

To compound this outrage, the US has been heavily subsidising its own vast agri-business - and has been dumping food on 3rd World countries at prices so low - that local farmers producing local food for local consumption cannot compete and go bust.

The US then pulls the food by converting it to fuel and more than doubling the price for anything thats left.

The whole process is designed to commit genocide of the World poorest and is totally sick, immoral, corrupt.

Meanwhile the US public thinks their Government is being "generous" in providing Aid - yet the only real aid they supply in addition is the effective dumping of guns and ammunition such that the starving hordes can shoot each other as they fight for the remaining scraps.

The only solution is for Poor 3rd World Countries to Throw out their Foreign Rich Western Slave Owners, and put up the Barriers to "Free Trade" and support their own farmers such that they can become self sufficient.

Globalisation and Gross Exploitation has to be unwound.

The way the American Empire does Business is completely disgraceful.

It is a complete Outrage. A curse on humanity. The sooner it collapses and the World becomes Free the better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

how the 'Left' helped the Oil corps prove their Point
Posted by: Purple Girl on Aug 13, 2008 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Corn is better than Oil" short sighted cheers helped the oil industry not ony prove 'biofuels' were Not the answer, but increased their profit margins.
Funny these 'environomentalist' could not see past their noses that a switch to corn would have devasting effects on the food supply.
Not only did Agribusiness change crops to be able to sell this food source to the oil companies instead of people, they guzzled more petro producing it.
What Non Self righteous, forward thinking person did not see this one coming?
Who hasn't realized the over Zealousness was short sighted and plagued with conflicts?
Funny all those who screamed for 'Corn Fuel' haven't bothered to apologize for Drinking the Corp Koolaid Too.
These are most likely the same fools who helped defeat Gore in '00 by calling him a 'Traitor' and voting for Nadar!
So now insted of having energy from Solar and wind, which can generate electicity for vehicle power, we have gas stations offering both envirnomentally dangerous fuels. Failed to look before they leaped- amazing how quickly the oil corps jumped on Corn Ah? Now they get to use this as a 'told you so' advertisement which will undermine any other attempt at alternative power sources.
What those who want energy independence and Safe energy should be fighting for is to Remove Energy from the private sector entirely. A Ministry of Energy in the US!
As for those all geared up about 'Off shore drilling' as a way to end our reliance on 'foreign oil' have failed to recognize is that WE will Not own that OIL EITHER!
innate responisblities of a federal Gov't
National Security and Economy
Food
Health
energy
Commerce
Defense
Education
It is time we end the Private contractors reign over these basic national issues
Take energy,financing and Food products off the Stock exchange.
Fire the Federal Reserve
Revoke all land and water leases by Oil & energy companies.
Return farming to the Free Market- FARMERS!
it's time -after a century - to make the Federal Gov't manage the issues of this Country.
The claim by corp Pirates they could do it better has proven a Con- They have raped this country blind, and have proven they have taken no oath or have any allegience to US!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Food and Water Not Profits
Posted by: david.model@senecac.on.ca on Aug 13, 2008 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Food and water are basic human rights not commodities and people should not be subject to fluctuating prices and supply in the privatized, unregulated, profit-oriented market that benefits investors and multinational corporations. Treating food and water as commodities is the quintessential example of profits over people. It makes no sense to allow one group to earn profits at the expense of another group’s ability to feed itself.

The speculation boom is one extreme example of investors funneling their money into speculative exchanges rather than into real production that contributes to the economy. Speculators have also contributed to the rapid rise in oil prices which also contribute to the expense of growing food,

Even some of the so-called natural factors that contribute to a worldwide shortage of food such as floods and droughts may very well be related to global warming which is partly a result of the government’s refusal to manage greenhouse emissions and seek alternatives to fossil fuel.

Government has turned a blind eye to the privatization of water and the regulation of water consumption, and toxins which pollute the water. Forty percent of American rivers and streams have been so severely polluted that they are dangerous for fishing, drinking, and swimming. For a number of reasons, a major part of the United States is running out of water. For example, California has a twenty year supply of freshwater remaining, New Mexico a ten year supply, and Arizona is out.

The problem is worldwide. In addition to companies such as Coca Cola and Nestle depleting aquifers in India and countries turning to biofuels which requires large quantities of water, countries have been forced by the IMF, largely under the control of the U.S. Treasury, to privatize their water putting the price beyond the reach of most people.

The trend of profits over people has penetrated our basic needs as human beings and is no longer only sucking the dollars out of our pockets but the food and water from our mouths. Governments need to recognize that their mandate is to serve the people not the coffers of large corporations and actively engage themselves in this problem.

http://www.senecac.on.ca

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But How? Posted by: edgar1
» arizona is out of water? Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» Is your head under water? Posted by: Ignatz deFyre
Our World Has Become So Incredibly Evil And Corrupt That I Find It Hard To Believe
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 13, 2008 7:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have spent my life working very hard just to make ends meet and provide a reasonable standard of living for my wife and family.

I simply didn't have time to investigate in any depth a whole array of issues that weren't directly relevant to my career.

But much of my work was about analysing a vast array of information to find solutions to problems and to follow that through to produce real things that worked and to improve on them so they worked as well and reliably and efficiently as possible.

And then 4 years ago I retired.

I wanted to find out about the real world - its history, its politics its economics etc - all the things I didn't previously have time for.

Searching for the truth is extremely difficult because many people have already done a great deal of research before you and have much greater expertise. About any subject there tends to be a consensus - a majority opinion commonly accepted as true - and then a contrarian opinion.

Often the contrarian is in such a minority - that he is almost overwhelmed by the prevailing majority opinion.

And so - after having an open mind on the subject for 25 years - and not knowing what side to believe - I revist the views and research of Professor Peter Duesberg - and even find a recent radio broadcast.

Surely the World cannot be that Evil.

Yet we have 9/11, War on Terror, Financial Collapse, Planned Starvation, Aspartame, Illegal Wars, Drugs that killed my sister she didn't need, the list goes on and on..

But not that.

Not after 25 years.

Professor Peter Duesberg still makes more sense than the Billions spent to discredit him.

I'm slowly coming round to his view about HIV and AIDS

I really didn't think we could have reached such a level of evil and depravity

But Mass Genocide By Every and All Means is Definitely On The Menu of Our Fascist Governments.

And most people have been mind bombed to such an extent that their intelligence has been so diminished that they cannot see it.

We're Fucked

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» On Duesberg and Aids Posted by: bingahaba
» RE: On Duesberg and Aids Posted by: opmoc
» Dubious claims, endangerment Posted by: bingahaba
» censor Posted by: bingahaba
And how about bringing back GRASS-fed meat and diary and putting the CORN-FED shit to rest ?!?!?
Posted by: jwverez on Aug 13, 2008 7:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For about 50-60 years, BIG GOVERNMENT and BIG AGRI have turned out to be toxic partners in RIGGING the market to PRIVATIZE true and healthy food. Despite the fact that corn-fed shit burns more crude oil and the otherwise unnecessary antibiotics needed to suppress the e.coli formed due to the fact that these animals were never meant to eat petroleum manufactured corn/grain feed and growth hormones to further fatten up the sales at the cost of both the health and the environment, the goddamn motherfucking market is RIGGED to keep corn-fed shit artificially "low" all the while small farmers, most of who specialize in grass/pasture fed meat and diary, are PERSECUTED by BIG GOVERNMENT and Big Agri and get ready for NAIS to do the final DAMAGE !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NAIS: Putting Local Ranchers Out of Business
Posted by: jwverez on Aug 13, 2008 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems Congress is now trying to help the US Department of Agriculture make what has been billed as a voluntary system, mandatory, and in the process shut small farmers and ranchers out of the farm-to-school program. The system is the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) which is a USDA plan to electronically track every livestock animal in the country (an ill-conceived, bureaucratic nightmare that masquerades as a food safety measure).

Today, the House Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee will take up a provision of the 2009 Agriculture Appropriations Bill that was introduced last week by Committee Chair Rosa DeLauro (D-CT). It would require all meat products for the school lunch program be purchased only from livestock premises registered with NAIS. Long story short: The extra cost NAIS imposes on small ranchers and farmers will in many cases put them out of business and out of the farm-to-school program.

Ironically, the farm-to-school program is all about improving children's nutrition while providing family farms with a reliable market.

A lot of groups are opposed and are trying to get the measure defeated. If you're interested in supporting local agriculture (and if you're a Slow Foodie you probably are), you owe it to yourself to get smart on NAIS and actively oppose it.

Here are some good sources:

The Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance. Based in Austin, it's a leader in the fight against NAIS.
The Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund, which is filing suit against the USDA to halt the implementation of NAIS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Prince Of Wales Attacks "Disasters of Industrial Farming" in Today's UK Daily Telegraph
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 13, 2008 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
linked text

Extract

But my suggestion that Big Food, industrial-scale operators, are the way ahead sends him whizzing off piste. Jabbing his finger at me, he lets rip: "What, all run by gigantic corporations? Is that really the answer? I think not. That would be the absolute destruction of everything and... the classic way of ensuring that there is no food in the future."

Bouncing in his chair, the Prince sets out his nightmare vision, a world in which millions of small farmers "are driven off their land [by global conglomerates] into unsustainable, unmanageable, degraded and dysfunctional conurbations of unmentionable awfulness".

If that's how it's going to be, he says, "count me out". We are missing the point. We should be discussing "food security not food production".

Without naming names, he goes after the "clever" genetic engineers who have put us on course for the "biggest disaster environmentally of all time". We should be working, he says, "with Nature.

We have gone working against Nature for too long." But these corporate monsters have engaged in "an experiment that's gone seriously wrong, causing untold problems which become very expensive and very difficult to undo". Monsanto, I imagine, will not be on his Christmas drinks list.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SPECULATOR SPEAKS
Posted by: edgeofnowhere on Aug 14, 2008 10:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Trading commodities as a speculator i.e., one who has no interest in the delivery of the commodity, but simply bets whether the price will go up or down, is a time honored mechanism for regulating markets. Speculators bet either way -- they don't care if the price is moving up or down, just as long as it keeps moving. Thus, if a large chunk of money goes long on beans and the price rises, speculators see the market as overbought and go short beans, betting that the price will top out and those longs will have to start selling their positions. The problem with the most recent imbalances in the commodities markets is the massive injection of liquidity into the system, mainly in the flood of USdollars looking for a place to make a profit. After the housing bubble blew out, all the newly released USD that the Fed conjured out of nothing flooded into the commodities market in search of profit. This created another financial bubble that is just now deflating as commodity prices begin falling. One example is the USD/EUR currency trade. For months the dollar consistently fell against the Euro and traders rushed in to sell dollars. Now, in the last few weeks, the oversold market topped out and the shorts had to cover, driving the Euro down. Fundamentally, the USD is still doomed as the Fed creates billions of new money out of nothing. However, you cannot continue to debase a currency forever, and here the speculators serve to bring the issuing monetary authority back into line with reality with the message that if you continue to inflate the money supply, we will short that depreciating currency against a more stable currency. If that issuing authority ignores the market, speculators will drive that currency to zero eventually, taking profits on both sides of the volatility. Don't blame speculators -- blame the fools who gin up money from nothing. Blame the short sighted and corrupt morons that injected billions into the nutty ethanol from corn scheme, thus running up the price of corn to insane highs that begged for speculators to short their bubble. And blame the counterproductive US farm program that favors huge multinationals and industrial farming corporations instead of small farmers. Gotta go now -- looks like some good opportunities in coffee today!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HEMP!
Posted by: garry minor on Aug 14, 2008 2:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only is the cannabis hemp seed the single most nutritiously complete food source on Earth and will help to end world hunger, but anything made from oil, coal, timber, or cotton can be made ecologically friendly with it. All paper, plastics, packagings, fuels, lubricants, textiles, plywood, structural components, insulations, many cosmetics, health foods, and medicines, over 25,000 products can all be made from the #1 source of biomass on the planet. It is at the very minimum four times more efficient per acre than corn, kenaf, or sugar cane for ethanol production or than timber for pulp. Farming just six to eight percent of our land in hemp would satisfy our current demands for oil and gas.
Henry Ford built and fueled a car primarily with hemp, the cellulose plastic panels ten times stronger than steel. Synthetic plastics were developed using cellulose technology. We could make plastics that could be chopped up for fertilizer instead of filling our landfills with poisons. Neither Ford or Diesel intended to run their engines with petroleum. Up until the early 1920's alcohol and gasoline were sold equally as fuel, prohibition pretty much ended alcohol's chance as a fuel source.
Canvas is Dutch for cannabis. For thousands of years all ships sails, most clothing, rope, netting, and fine paintings were of cannabis fibers which are the longest and strongest in nature. Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, and Lincoln were all known to use cannabis. It was illegal not to grow hemp in Colonial America. The original draft of the Constitution and Betsy Ross' flag were of hemp fibers. The early Pioneer's wagons were covered with it. The War of 1812 was fought over it. The list goes on and on. These people would not believe we prohibit its use in the year 2008. How un-American!
In 2000 Dr. Manuel Guzman of Complutense University in Madrid Spain re-discovered what our Govt. found in 1974 and hid from us, that THC destroys tumors with no negative side effects whatsoever. In 2005 Dr. Xia Zhang of the University of Saskatchewan found that THC promotes the growth of brain cells. That same year researchers at the Scripps Institute found that cannabinoids both prevented and may cure Alzheimers. All these findings have since been verified over and over, but yet we hear nothing.
All mammals, birds, fish, and reptiles have cannabinoid receptors throughout their body that work independent of those that govern the heart and breathing which is why cannabis can't kill you. It is the safest medicine known to man. It has also been found very helpful treating epilepsy, autism, arthritis, chronic pain, migraine, asthma, emphysema, diabetes, MS, ALS, ADHD, OCD, obesity, lupus, cystic fibrosis, tuberculosis, depression, glaucoma, alcoholism, herpes, Parkinsons, Huntingtons, Tourettes, Crohns disease, and more.
The answers to the problems we face today can all be found in the Tree of Life, kaneh bosm, cannabis, hemp.
Food, fuel, shelter, medicine, pleasure, spirituality, and unity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HEMP! For Christ's sake! Posted by: garry minor
UK Tiffany Jewellery ON SALE
Posted by: qqNageli on Sep 7, 2008 7:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tiffany Inspired Jewelry. High quality silver jevellery including silver charms, silver rings, silver chains and more.Just click on banner above to look the whole collection & choose from fine silver jewelry available at
outstanding prices.
Sterling Silver Jewelry Store, Wholesale Silver Jewellery: Rings, Earrings, Charms at low prices.
Tiffany price
Tiffany
Tiffanys
Tiffany co Jewellery

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]