Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Free College for Poorest Students Puts Ivy League to Shame

By Leonard Doyle, Independent UK. Posted July 26, 2008.


Berea University in rural Kentucky is one of the wealthiest colleges, but it accepts the poorest applicants and gives them a free education.
Advertisement

Berea University in rural Kentucky is one of the wealthiest colleges in America but it only accepts the poorest applicants. The dropout rate is negligible and its students go out into the world debt-free, unlike the majority of those who emerge every year from America's universities, proudly clutching a degree but burdened by massive debts.

Berea is lucky. It has a $1bn endowment which, wisely invested, produces enough income, topped up by fundraising, to teach 1,500 students. Some of Berea's students even leave with money in their pockets.

Alex Gibson graduated in philosophy this year with $17,000 to his name. Now he is off on a year-long world study tour, funded by a generous travel grant.

Although it ranks among the wealthiest colleges in the nation because of its trust fund, Berea is not one of America's elite colleges. Those are the crown jewels of the US education system and they are far wealthier than Berea.

Harvard's endowment is worth $35bn for example; Yale's $23bn; Stanford's $17bn and Princeton's $16bn -- amounts that make them among the world's richest universities. But there is a drumbeat of criticism about whether they are doing enough for the public good to deserve their tax-free status or just hoarding money for the benefit of an intellectual elite.

Harvard (annual tuition $35,000) is now racing to offer reduced tuition fees to low-income students and protect its tax-free status. But middle-class parents are so furious at the 11 per cent average annual rise in the tuition costs at run-of-the-mill colleges that it has now become an election issue.

Barack and Michelle Obama only paid off their student loans recently and he has promised to bring radical changes. One proposal is to provide free college tuition in return for a year's community service work. Mr Obama also wants a GI Bill, of the sort that gave 7.8 million veterans of the Second World War a chance to attend college. John McCain, his opponent, opposes it, saying it would deplete the ranks of the military.

As parents across the country write out their first tuition checks, the focus has turned to the issue of affordable education. And Berea's no-fee model which has been around for 158 years, is suddenly attracting attention.

The college uses its nest egg to attract students who otherwise could not afford college and draws exclusively from the bottom of the economic pile. It is extremely selective, rejecting 75 per cent of applicants as it tries to find those with the most potential. Those who apply have often endured appallingly bad secondary education and come from dysfunctional homes.

Mr Gibson is one of those and he has thrived at Berea. He earned his savings working on-campus, a requirement of this unusually public-spirited university. Every student must put in at least 10 hours a week, whether helping on the college farm, working in the admissions department or making furniture in Berea's crafts workshop.

Mr Gibson did community outreach. "It was great," he said, "we organised anti-Iraq war demonstrations."

Though not, by his own admission, a top scholar or the hardest worker, he also pulled in lots of academic scholarships.

"Every department has lots of money to give away. It's a question of applying," he said. The coup de grace was an award of $25,000 to finance his round the world trip starting in a week.

Mr Gibson, who is black, will spend his time studying biracialism, beginning in Tokyo next week. "I come from one of the poorest and most disturbed backgrounds you could imagine," he said. "All my family were involved in violence and drugs and I was brought up by a single parent and then no parents when my mother died while I was 16."

"Living in rural Appalachia, I suffered some extreme racism and it is only thanks to this college that I am now in this lucky situation."

Friends of his at other universities are not so lucky. One is paying back $37,000 after a three-year degree. Next year, Mr Gibson will attend graduate school in Pennsylvania, where he hopes to qualify as a lawyer and possibly enter politics.

For many US parents, the thrill of a letter of acceptance is soon spoiled by the arrival of the first tuition bill. For millions of working families, the pathway to the American dream runs straight through a college campus. But fees are going through the roof.

Ivy League members

Brown University

Endowment: $2.8 bn

Tuition and fees per year: $36,300

Columbia University

Endowment: $7.15 bn

Tuition and fees: $37,200

Cornell University

Endowment: $5.5 bn

Tuition and fees: $34,800

Dartmouth College

Endowment: $3.76 bn

Tuition and fees: $35,300

Harvard University

Endowment: $35 bn

Tuition and fees: $35,000

University of Pennsylvania

Endowment: $6.78 bn

Tuition and fees: $35,900

Princeton University

Endowment: $15.8 bn

Tuition and fees: $34,300

Yale University

Endowment: $22.5 bn

Tuition and fees: $34,500

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: kentucky, berea university



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Other Shoe
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jul 26, 2008 1:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It should be noted that the school in the article is a non-sectarian Christian school. I say that not to rub anyone's noses in it, but to note that some Christians actually do walk the walk. It is a powerful thing in action.
Please remember this the next time some charlatan claiming to be a follower of Christ appears as the subject of a story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Other Shoe Posted by: heathenmommy
We Need More Bereas
Posted by: Urstrly on Jul 26, 2008 5:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Education has always been the route to upward mobility in the US, and Republicans have found a way to stop it in its tracks.

Sadly, as the numbers of poor people have grown in this country, they have become less visible and blamed for their own misfortune. There are many schools shy of the Ivy League in which poor students could thrive if given the opportunity. Unfortunately, Antioch College, which had a work-study program similar to Berea's, bit the dust this year. Berry College, funded by the Rockefellers on a similar model in the Georgia mountains, soldiers on, but you hear less about it.

Working class students in some ways are more disadvantaged than truly poor ones. Their families have less cushioned finances than the middle class, they receive less tuition aid and assume enormous debt because the government refuses to provide loans or regulate rates.

It's about time the Ivy League acknowledged the economic realities that it helps create, but the government is not blameless here either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We Need More Bereas Posted by: BobKincaid
It's also happening in New England
Posted by: BobKincaid on Jul 26, 2008 5:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Williams College in Williamstown, Massachusetts, consistently listed as the best liberal arts college in the U.S., has recently dedicated its endowment to free tuition for its economically disadvantaged students. Its policy extends to even those students whose parents "can pay," to the extent that tuition costs are offset along an economic scale. Williams, too, has highly selective academic admissions criteria, but strives to give weight to students arriving from scholastically and/or economically impoverished regions.

Williams accomplishes this without the goofy religious flummery (and the required classes in said flummery) to which Berea still sadly clings. One cannot help but wonder how an atheist student would fare at Berea, or whether Berea would waive its sophomore year flummery class for such a student seeking to remain altogether free of the intellectual poison inherent in all religious indoctrination. Following some tired, outdated, outmoded dogma is not a condition precedent to being a good human being. It is regrettable that, for all its otherwise forward-oriented positions, Berea still hasn't figured out that part and rid itself of its awkward, intellectually incompatible connection to religion.

In both instances, flummery or no, what is apparent is that liberal arts colleges are again leading the way as compared to institutions that view a college education as trade school with an ivory tower facade and a tinny rendition of "Gaudeamus Igitur."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about middle class kids?
Posted by: European American on Jul 26, 2008 7:08 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Colleges took into account how much money mommy and daddy made when considering what grants and scholarships I qualified for. The problem with that was, mommy and daddy raised me with a little bit of pride. Although they had money saved for my eduacation, I did not ask and they did not offer. Instead, I subsidized my education with 250 dollars per month from the Army National Guard, about the same amount earned as a part time life guard at the school pool and 2 nearby YMCAs plus an army ROTC scholarship. Now I can say with all honesty, I've earned what I currently have and owe nothing to anyone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

janakawa
Posted by: janakawa on Jul 26, 2008 7:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope the rest of the information is more accurate than the title. The school is Berea College not university. It was founded with the idea that all the students would work. They built buildings, cooked food, washed the laundry and got a top drawer eduction. It was always co-ed and (I believe) racially integrated. It was the labor of the students, not the endowment, that was the original engine of the place. It is a great place to visit and please read its history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What kind of investments?
Posted by: Rey Hinckley on Jul 26, 2008 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That sounds like a model educational institution. The only question that I would have is what is the endowment invested in? It seems to me that the only companies that make a profit that could earn that kind of ROI would be war related, not life affirming.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

punishes kids who come from middle-class families
Posted by: cyr3n on Jul 26, 2008 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's this HUGE misconception that life is good and easy when someone comes from an upper-middle class family. I feel that these practices punish kids who are emancipated from their parents.

During the Clinton years, I had a friend who was rendered homeless because he was put in the same tax bracket as his estranged father who was declaring him as a dependant. My friend worked at a Johnny Rocket.. barely scraping by.

How is it fair to give people all these benefits purely from an economic stand point?
There are plenty of students from seriously effed up backgrounds (incest, abuse) which wouldnt show up on a credit check.
The poor kid and middle class kid with the same academic skills should be regarded as equally eligible for aid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wildly Misleading Article
Posted by: mario517 on Jul 26, 2008 8:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Harvard is hardly "racing to offer reduced tuition fees to low-income students." It's already FREE for low-income students.

The Ivies are free or mostly free for families making <$60,000. This is hardly "putting them to shame." At 4x the poverty level, $60,000 is solidly middle class. Yet, the Ivy's go even further, for example, Yale offers a 90% discount to families making <$120,000 per yer. This is hardly, putting "the Ivy League to Shame."

Harvard was free (room + tuition) to anyone making less than $60,0000/year. Deeply discounted up to $200k/year (10x poverty level).

Brown is free to family making < $60,000/year.

Stanford free at <$60,000.

Duke free <$40,000

Yale free <$60,000, <$120,000 and only pay 10%.

Dartmouth free <$75,000

Upenn Not totally free, but close to it at <$50,000/year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's hear it for the common man (for a change)
Posted by: willymack on Jul 26, 2008 10:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Universal, single payer health care. Guaranteed schooling through college, including post-graduate degrees for acedemically qualified students. Voters' rights. Equal pay regardless of gender. Vote of "no confidence" provision enabling us to rid ourselves of criminals like bush. No electoral college. A REAL EPA with regulatory and legal teeth. Reinstatement and ENFORCEMENT of anti-trust laws. These are but a few of the things sorely needed here and common throughout Europe and Asia. Would this mean Socialism? Maybe, but so what? What's the rampant, unchecked capitalism going on here done for YOU lately? The nations in Euroue & Asia have their democracies, which is more than can be said for us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's also the Near-Ivy's
Posted by: oekosjoe on Jul 26, 2008 12:08 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Challenging Harvard is far too easy. Cambridge is one of the few cities in Eastern Massachusetts that has its own water system, and higher water rates for big users. Not at all coincidentally, Harvard and MIT flush a lot more than the domestic user, and pay accordingly. Yet Harvard also pays $7.5 million in Payment in Lieu of Taxes - where the REAL audits ought to be done.

In contrast, Tufts, with a $1.6 billion endowment, pays $75,000, or 1% of what Harvard pays; has hustled $50,000,000 in the past four years for "service learning"; and defines that learning by "maple sugaring near a housing project." Not only that, but they've learned to generate million dollar grants to "improve access to college" while sending VISTA volunteers to their nearest school and eliminating tuition as a fringe benefit for their janitors.

Finally, and significantly, Harvard, MIT, Tufts, BU, Northeastern, Emerson, Suffolk, Lesley, Emmanuel, Wheelock, and Simmons, among others, share a congressional district which has the the lowest high school graduation rate in the state. The most undergraduates of any district in the nation live - in the most densely urban area outside of New York City - with their least probable classmates. Town and gown are further apart the more densely they reside together. One can only guess at the traditional relationship intended by that density and those college boys.

It's not a matter of taxing them - there are serious constitutional issues there - but most surely they must be held to account to meet their endowed purpose of promoting education to those most able to change the world. Their endowments insult the memory of their own alumni, let alone the freedom rides and struggles of the last century!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pouring more federal dollars into the coffers of price fixers only fuels the flames
Posted by: edith on Jul 26, 2008 12:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Colleges and universities are all state or federally chartered, even if they are "nonprofit" rather than part of a university state system.

The public and Congress have stood by while colleges raise tuitions year after year far in excess of normal inflation. Indeed, many college employees outside of top research faculties are often underpaid, like graduate assistants, janitors and clerical staff. What gives. Pouring more federal subsidies at this point into these ripoff schools or increasing Pell grant levels only provides more dollars to fuel inflation and fat salries for administrators and tenured faculty who also receive substantial non-cash benefits. Colleges receive billions in research grants from the feds, foundations and the states. Yet they continue to jack up tuition.

There is no incentive to run efficiently, eliminate courses that overlap with nearby schoools, or to run joint programs with other colleges where it can be done conveniently and to the benefit of the students. If Obama is elected, more money no doubt will be requested for federal "aid" to colleges and college students, with NO madates to the colleges to justify their ridiculous tuitions. Ironically, the Ivies, as a previous poster has shown, do at least make it possible for anyone offered admission to attend.

But these repesent only a miniscule number of students in the overall picture. The problem also exists with state legislatures being lobbied by their own state universities which continue to raise tuitions to levels that private schools charged only a few years ago.

Perhaps putting a few college presidents and Trustees chairs in hard time federal prisons for antitrust and conspiracy charges would send the right message to these "public servants".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Talking about poverty.
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on Jul 27, 2008 3:27 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While on his Poverty Awareness tour. John Edwards, while Elizabeth Edwards is battling breast cancer, got busted. John Edwards was busted in LA Hilton by reporters. He was attempting to sneek out of the hotel after spending the night in Rielle Hunters hotel room. When confronted by the reporters questions about staying in Ms Hunters room he ran to a bathroom and played tug of war with the door with the reporters while they asked questions till hotel security intervened and excorted John Edwards out of the Hilton. What a PIG! How completely disrespectful to his wife and famly. His wife is fighting CANCER damnit and this calus son of a bitch is screwing around on her! Thank GOD this prick did not get the Democratic Nomination. This story has not been reported by CNN. Not reported by MSNBC. ABC News. Nothing on ALTERNET. Only Fox News is reporting this story. Alot is said about Fox but other news outlets and Alternet are obviously only reporting what "they" think we should hear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Talking about poverty. Posted by: VZEQICVA
» Addendum Posted by: mainspark
» Tuesday Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
AN EASY SOLUTION
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 27, 2008 7:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The need to be exclusive and cater to only the "right people" is a natural inclination. That changed after WW11 and the GI bill. Turns out that rich does not translate to smart. Given something to look forward to and an opportunity the worst of kids see some light and behavior changes. It's the hopelessness that keeps them right where they are. All the testing in the world won't give a person hope. It protects the school's funding and nothing more. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]