Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

The 'Mortgage Meltdown' Was No Accident

By Kai Wright, The Nation. Posted June 30, 2008.


How the mortgage industry stole black America's hard-won wealth.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Kai Wright

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Research support for this article was provided by the Investigative Fund of The Nation Institute.

George Mitchell's wife, Lillian, took her last breath in the house she loved, on New Year's Day 2006. "Right there in that spot," says George, 77, nodding to the far end of his worn, floral-print couch. "I think the last words she spoke was my name."

"Yup," confirms his youngest daughter, Chandra Chavis. "I was trying to perform mouth-to-mouth resuscitation at the time." She points out the living room window to the small, sloping front yard and drive. "There was no address on the house, so I had to stop doing that to get the ambulance to come in." But Lillian's heart had seized, and Chandra knows there's not much she could have done anyway. She figures if even the trauma team at Atlanta's century-old public hospital couldn't revive her mom, she must have been long gone. "Nobody can bring you back if the Lord calls you," concludes an older daughter, Gwen Russell.

It was Lillian's tenacity that led the Mitchell family to Atlanta's Westwood neighborhood, in 1968. "She was determined," Chandra explains, "not to have her children in an apartment -- I know the story; I've heard it a million times -- so she found somebody, a real estate agent, and they came out and they looked in this neighborhood. I don't know what brought them to this part of town, 'cause at the time they were living in Dixon Hills" -- then an up-and-coming black neighborhood -- "but she decided she wanted a house, and this is where she found it."

"All I did was sign the paper," says George with a shrug.

That made the Mitchells one of the first African-American families to move into Westwood. Atlanta has long been known as the "black Mecca," a place where African-Americans have been able to claw up the socioeconomic ladder and plunge into America's consumer culture. Nowhere is that striving more visible than in the massive subdivisions of large, new homes that Atlanta's black bourgeoisie have erected, reaching far into the suburbs. But the process began generations ago in a cluster of inside-the-beltway neighborhoods wedged into the city's southwestern corner, including Westwood. Today that area is reeling, having been one of the nation's communities hardest hit by the one-two punch of subprime lending and home foreclosures. The Mitchells have not been spared. Like hundreds of thousands of Americans, they are scrambling to keep the house Lillian found for them.

Nearly 18,000 homes faced foreclosure in the Atlanta area during the first quarter of 2008, an almost 40 percent jump from the first quarter of 2007. In Fulton County, which encompasses most of the city's core and is heavily African-American, one in 122 homes was in foreclosure in the first week of April. A digest of Atlanta's March 2008 "foreclosure starts" was as thick as the phone book, and the Mitchells' 30310 ZIP code topped the list.

The area boasts an old stock of quaint, midcentury houses painted in bright yellows and crisp blues, accented with quirky touches that now feel more haunting than homey. On block after block, as many homes sit vacant or bank-owned as not. Boarded-up windows lurk behind white-columned front porches, and the yards are slowly going to weeds and trash. On one block, eleven boarded-up houses line the street, making the area look like it's been hit by a natural disaster.

But the disaster is depressingly man-made. And this neighborhood reveals a deeply troubling dimension of it, one that will echo long past the recovery everyone hopes will soon come: for black America, the "mortgage meltdown" looks less like a market hiccup than a massive strip mining of hard-won wealth, a devastating loss that will betray the promise of class mobility for tens of thousands of black families.

As the mortgage crisis unfolded, observers of all political stripes repeated a boilerplate line: the "affordability products" that have flooded the lending market in recent years -- from subprime to interest-only loans -- have done more good than bad by fueling a surge in black and Latino homeownership. But while minority homeownership may have grown in the short term, the long-term outlook promises quite the opposite, as southwest Atlanta painfully illustrates.

First-time homebuyers have originated less than a tenth of all subprime loans since 1998, according to a 2007 Center for Responsible Lending analysis. As recently as 2006, just over half of all subprime loans were refinances of existing home loans. The expected foreclosure toll from these loans will outpace the ownership gains by nearly a million families, the center estimates.

That's particularly true in established black neighborhoods like Westwood, where banks and brokers targeted vulnerable longtime homeowners and lured them into needless and rapidly recurring mortgages they clearly couldn't afford and from which they never stood to gain. More than half of all refinance loans made to African-Americans in 2006 were subprime, according to an analysis by the advocacy group ACORN. That's nearly twice the rate among white borrowers. Among low-income black borrowers, 62 percent of refinance loans were subprime, more than twice the rate among low-income whites.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: mortgage industry

Kai Wright a writer in Brooklyn, New York, is the author of "Drifting Toward Love: Black, Brown, Gay and Coming of Age on the Streets of New York." Research support was provided by the Investigative Fund of The Nation Institute.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Congress is complicit as well ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Jun 30, 2008 12:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Officially it is known as the The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005. What it is , is a virtual debtor's prison for people who declare bankruptcy, unless of course you own a second house or yacht.

You see the loans on your primary residence cannot be lowered by a bankruptcy judge or as they call it reduced with a "cram down" ( of the loan amount ). BUT your second home and or yacht can be reduced by a bankruptcy judge!

Coincidence that this bill passed in 2005? I think NOT! Congress knew that this credit crisis was on its way but left the yacht owners and second home owners a nice little loophole.

And on it goes as 50% of the bankruptcies filed were for medical bills while another 25% were for job loss or divorce. So while only 25% of people filing for bankruptcy had dubious reasons, Congress even knowing this, chose to punish them all for the profits of the financial industry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is no short cut to real wealth
Posted by: Bobsays on Jun 30, 2008 1:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We saw the same bogus policy pushed by so-called progressives: that the poor could become home owners if they could only borrow 100 percent on their mortgages. It was a deceitful way to offer the illusion of social advancement, without really creating wealth for these people. And when you owe the bank, the bank owns what you got: it is that simple.

If they were honest, they would have instead said: "Look, if you want to own a house you need to save for a deposit." By giving away these mortgages, the government created a bubble, which in turn made houses more expensive, and it ironically harder to save the money for a deposit. What is needed is a return to conservative banking practices, where people get loans based on income and savings.

People need to be told the truth, not fairy tales.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Seems A bit Off-point Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: Seems A bit Off-point Posted by: camanokat
» RE: There is no short cut to real wealth Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: Sure there is... Posted by: Sushi
» RE: Sure there is... Posted by: Dboy
» The American Myth Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: Sure there is... Posted by: Sushi
Basic Hogwash!
Posted by: pinnacle on Jun 30, 2008 4:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In hindsight we can certainly say there was some preditory lending going on over the past several years. But to indicate the government or, for that matter, banks simply looked the other way is so much "______"!

If you take the time to look around you will see that whether one is white or a person of color, the lending practices did not discriminate. Anybody fool enough to sign up for a loan that required nothing down, was "interest only", or was at an adjustable rate that climbed to a ridiculous level, was, in fact, just that ----a total fool. Time hasn't changed the fact that "Nothing in life is free". And, believe me, the mortgage banks and other lenders have found this to be true. The only people to actually profit from this mess were the agents who sold the mortages and got a piece of the origination fees, most of whom are now out of work. So, too, are several CEOs.

The truth is that nearly everyone involved in the home lending mess has gotten what they deserve, including those who bought the bundled "securities" looking for a quick and unrealistic profit. Unfortunately those homeowners who exercised sound financial judgment and are now in a position where they would like to sell their homes can't do so either. And what about the shareholders of, say, WAMU. They got screwed as well! And, fortunately, so did the developers and builders who thought anything they could build would be quickly sold. And so did the local governments who used "bonds" or "Mello-Roos" taxes/fees to have the homeowners pay for infastructure that the developers should have paid for in the beginning.

Enough with trying to say a particular group was targeted! The question is have we learned anything? Do we do things that make sense or do we continue to offer bail-outs?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Basic Hogwash! Posted by: logos7
» RE: Basic Hogwash! Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Basic Hogwash! Posted by: Alcinor
» RE: Basic Hogwash! Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Basic Hogwash! Posted by: HillbillyBob
» RE: Basic Hogwash! Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Basic Hogwash! Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Basic Hogwash! Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Basic Hogwash! Posted by: Gentle Axeman
» RE: Basic Hogwash! Posted by: kelly.nickell
realist
Posted by: vincen13 on Jun 30, 2008 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wanted to read these thoughts, but 8 pages???? Good grief. Can't authors on Alter Net grasp the power of a brief communication?

Lenders targeted the subprime market filled with unsophisticated buyers. In the past lenders had regulations restraining them and performed the duty of protecting unsophisticated buyers from their ignorance.

No more! There is also evidence that African American buyers were given rates higher than what they qualified for. It did have racist motivations at times.

Read, study the economic news! Some of it was racist, most of it was just thievery, greed and usury masquerading as an honor.

Sad, sad, sad! And what is even sadder to me is the ignorance of people not caught up in this mess.

I'm very secure in my home, with no mortgage, no home equity loan, but I strive to understand this financial debacle, this corporate criminal failure to provide what the puffery of sales claims to be providing. This criminal negligence is destroying our country and we are squabbling amid the ruins. It is time for government to take regulation seriously and hold some actual culprits criminally responsible.

We live in a time of malignant capitalism and I wish Alter Net would set some length limits on their selections.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: realist - vincen13... Posted by: Quannah
» RE: realist Posted by: james_allen
Of course this is racial, though some will deny it.
Posted by: BobS on Jun 30, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it that some people simply refuse to see the obvious racial discrimination that lies in front of them plain as day? Since I don't have time to write a book here, I'll discuss just one of the racial aspects to the mortgage mess.

As a group, African Americans simply do not have the accumulated family capital available to white people. There are historical reasons for this: the economic and social policies that favored white people. There are many books on this subject such as The Wages of Whiteness, When Affirmative Action was White, The Hidden Cost of Being African American and lots more.

Not having this accumulated family capital to the same degree as whites, African Americans are forced into unfair lending situations to a much greater degree than whites.

For example, my dad was able to take advantage of the GI Bill and the inexpensive veterans' loans available after WWII. African Americans were still barred from many universities and faced widespread housing discrimination in the cheap working class suburbs that sprang up in the post WWII era. My spouse's parents had the same advantages.

By the time I was a teenager, we had moved out of a low income inner city neighborhood, to a segregated working class neighborhood, to a segregated white collar professional neighborhood. Home prices soared and the educational advantages that both our parents had enabled them to move into the professional middle class much more easily. Their kids than were given educational and social advantages based on this rise in family income.

My spouse and I were able to use this family advantage to obtain a cheap parental loan to buy a house while both sets of our parents were still living. Our kids have gotten social and educational advantages from this. My spouse and I are perfect examples of how affirmative action for white people works in this country. There are millions more like us.

Of course lots of white people get positively irrational when you point this out to them. It's wrong, but understandable. The myth of the individual "self-made man" is very strong among white people. Pop that myth and the whole white privilege thing is exposed to public view. White privilege is demeaning to white people. We're not dumb and helpless and we don't need it to live.

Maybe it's time for America to grow up and leave its Tooth Fairy and Easter Bunny racial myths behind. We'd all be the better for it.

Bob Simpson
The BobboSphere

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It has nothing to do with race Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist
» 20 % of Sweden's population is not ethnic Swedes Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist
» Americans do not like nonstarters and slackers Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist
» This is the US and enjoy every day I live here Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist
» read before signing the contract Posted by: michael1972
IT HAPPENED TO EVERYONE
Posted by: jgorilla on Jun 30, 2008 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This was not a black targeting, this whole mess targeted everyone and will affect everyone in this country for years to come. The most amazing thing in this whole mess is that I watched extremely levelheaded people get dollar signs in their eyes and take a bite of the apple. You can blame it on the banks, brokers, realtors but in the end 99% of the people caught up in this mess are responsible themselves for their predicament. The premise this author makes can only make me believe that they think blacks are stupid, cannot read, add or subtract. This is not the case but the idea of finally making some money in this country like the rich and famous we hear about every day are programmed to adore and envy causes people to go for the gold. Of course there was no gold at the end of the rainbow and it was just another pyramid scheme that people of every color got caught up in and lost. Only the super rich will benefit along with foreigners who own the country now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not a Race Issue
Posted by: tarnishedreality on Jun 30, 2008 7:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just don't see how this crisis is an attack on the black and latino communities. I have friends who were suckered the exact way who are white. At my office there are countless stories of the same thing and ethnically my office is pretty diverse from Indians, Native Americans, African Americans, Hawaiian, and the middle east. What we all have in common is the fact we've seen 35% of our office laid off and are either struggling or know someone who is to keep their home.

I was raised middle to lower middle and frankly despite being the only individual in the family to go to college and finish since 1944 I have not been able to break out of being middle to lower middle class. I had to work part time jobs to the tune of 38 hours a week to pay my way through school. Frankly, I'm getting tired of being told how easy I had it and how privileged I am.

I believe that sooner or latter we need to all realize that this is about social class. We have a huge upper class in America that wants to keep us down whether we're white, black or purple, so they can be that much richer. Are they white, yes. However, it's not about the color of your skin in comparison to theirs it's about money. I'm and artist and sell to these folks and once they establish that I didn't come from money they may hang my work on their walls, but they sometimes treat me like a second class citizen from that point on.

Yes, there are the schemes and the behind door lobbying in our congressman's offices. But it wasn't about oppressing a social group, but rather getting that much wealthier.

How long are we going to keep dividing ourselves due to the color of our skin? The longer the middle and lower classes continue to divide themselves my petty ritual the longer we'll be victims.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Pretty much nails it Posted by: stellabloo
The problem is that the US population seems ignorant about hard economic realities
Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist on Jun 30, 2008 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
* If you cannot pay interest on your income, you do not take out a loan.

* If you cannot make the mortgage payment, you do not take out a loan.

* If you cannot pay insurance and property tax on your income you do not take out a loan.

* You do not live by the principle; Buy today, pay tomorrow.

I am so confused by the American perception that credit is good, that to have Good Credit you have to have at least 2 credit lines and that you have to have used them.

Good Credit where I come from is based on:

1. Your net disposable income
2. Your outstanding debt
3. If you have defaulted on payments
4. The collateral, the property, it is a consideration but do not carry heavy weight.

The decision to lend you money is based on whether or not you can pay the interest on your net disposable income, maximised at 25=35 % of the income. In Sweden however we do not pay mortgage 95 % of all loans are ARMs. I have no problem with those.

In the US it seems that you can borrow anything as long as your credit score is high enough, it seems that income is irrelevant.

This is a problem of bad governance both by lenders but also by the lending, borrowing population. If you do not read the fine print you get shafted, as you should.

However I think that one good piece of legislation would be to have lenders show the real cost over 5 years as well s what happens after the balloon period is over and APR i.e. the factual interest rate paid, including costs and addons

But we have this legislation in Sweden and it still does not help. If you are ignorant, you are ignorant and it seems that no matter what education or regulation you put into place there will always be people that do not want to take responsibility, they always know, at least in Sweden, that the tax payer will bail them out.

This is why I am quite upset about the new legislation in the US, it penalizes cautious and well informed buyers and helps irresponsible, ignorant borrowers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let Me Help Your Confusion
Posted by: no1kstate on Jun 30, 2008 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There seems to be a number of confused people who just can't see that people of color were targeted by predatory lenders. Maybe you haven't read the entire article. Understandable. It's 8 pages long.

But here's how you know that race played a part in this mess: you look at the numbers!! Either people of color were intentionally targeted or past and present racism in the labor market and finance market finally came to head. Or, both.

Either way, to deny that people of color were disadvantaged by this at a rate exceeding that of people of privilege is to ignore the numbers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm still confused Posted by: no1kstate
» RE: I'm still confused Posted by: Alcinor
» RE: Let Me Help Your Confusion Posted by: no1kstate
» RE: Let Me Help Your Confusion Posted by: michael1972
» RE: Let Me Help Your Confusion Posted by: michael1972
» "the numbers" Posted by: rickiey
What happened?
Posted by: solrev on Jun 30, 2008 9:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I play golf with some people who work for some of the big financials and some of the conversations we had before the bubble broke scared me. These people are accountants and passed the CPA and all the other tests these people take. I would say things like the debt is 5 times the GDP there is know way we can escape this. Since most of it is home mortgages, that bubble will burst first. They would say things like the bubble will not burst. You do not understand the New World; we make our money by selling debt. Wealth is measured by how much credit someone is willing to give you. My response was you did not learn that in college. They had developed a mindset that seemed to lack any common sense. Greed, regulation, or any other label does not seem to explain how so many smart people could fall into such a brain drain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What happened? Posted by: VZEQICVA
Institutionalized Racism
Posted by: Gravitas on Jun 30, 2008 9:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This was a great, well researched article! One of the best I have read on Alternet. I am going to use it in my classes to illustrate the concept of institutionalized racism. That is racism built into the system, whether or not discrimination was the biggest motivation. No doubt, greed was the lenders chief motivation. But they also took advantage of the discrimination African Americans had previously faced in even getting lending to push their subprime loans. If it harms a particular group of people we sociologists consider it institutionalized racism. The numbers speak for themselves.

One thing though. An article this long should have bullet points before or after. Even though the American public should devote time to understanding the complex issues, they don't. So things have to be cut up into easily disgested pieces. Of particular importance was how the lobbyist were more important than the tax payers!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A warning Posted by: solrev
» RE: A warning Posted by: no1kstate
» RE: A warning Posted by: Quannah
Am I the only one?
Posted by: hms2004 on Jun 30, 2008 9:57 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who thinks this George guy the article talks about is effing stupid? Why in God's name did he take out all these loans, his house was purchased in '68, it should have been paid off! I can't feel sorry for someone who makes these poor choices in their finances.

The whole problem of this so-called mortgage crisis is because people are taking out these home equity loans so that they can spend money they don't have on things they don't need! If only Americans learned how to live more simply we wouldn't be in this mess!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Am I the only one? Posted by: no1kstate
» RE: Am I the only one? Posted by: michael1972
» RE: Am I the only one? Posted by: no1kstate
» RE: Am I the only one? Posted by: abido0
» RE: Am I the only one? Posted by: Alcinor
Shame on the system
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 30, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With all of the deregulation in the name of the "free market" going on, this is what happens. And yet the same power players continue to line the pockets in Congress in order to not have regulations put on them.

Allow me to point out that yes we are in another gilded age - and at what point are we going to say enough. After how many more S&L scandals, bank failures, etc. are we going to realize you can't have the fox guarding the henhouse and not realize it is the fox eating the chickens.

I for one would rather my tax money go to help bail out the people that need the help than to bail out the bankers and brokers that got us into this mess in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A fraction of 1% of American homes are in foreclosure. A crisis...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 30, 2008 10:34 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...of individually epic proportions has ensued. My wife and I have been saving for home for four years now, and sacrificing to do so. The lower home values go, and the more distressed residences that pop up on the market, the farther our home-buying dollars will go. We could have gotten an ARM, VA, FA, or other loan and had what we wanted now, but that would have been a stupid, stupid thing to do without saving first.

Enter the subprime sheeple.

Financial illiteracy is the problem, and probably peer pressure:

A "John and Jane just bought a house on minimum wage, why can't we..." syndrome has infected a very small number of people, who had more greed for what they couldn't afford now than resources.

Saving for a house is hard work. Hell, understanding the terms you're lending under should occupy a week of your time. These "sign and drive" home-borrowers (home owners is an idiotic misnomer in most cases) typically put there entire family's financial well-being at risk by signing up for loans they may not have understood, nor wanted--had they taken the time to understand the terms.

The home-mortgage fiasco is nothing new. There are all sorts of gizmo's on television that will promise you health, prosperity, and the adoration of all your friends, for the low-low price of _________, broken up in easy payments of ___________.

Milking willing suckers out of their cash is nothing new.

Financial education, and judicious use of your money are the answers. The compound interest formula is often the only financial education that some kids get, and that's typically only a two-day focus during college algebra.

Gee, who'd have thunk that easy money isn't so easy?

Go figure, or lose what you earn.

Understand what you sign before your risk your entire family's livelihood on a pipe-dream.

Don't overextend yourself.

Make a budget.

Live within your means.

Don't sign stupid contracts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Home-ownership.
Posted by: JoshuaR on Jun 30, 2008 2:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aside from the fact that people of lower income should not take out high-interest rate loans, does anyone ever question AT ALL the strange American obsession with home-ownership?

I think people need to live within their means, stop consuming, and think every man (or woman) needs their castle, and this is means YOU TOO white middle-class Americans. Europeans have a much bigger rental society, which I think we need to move toward.

This obsession is a delusion and I think this crisis may be a blessing in disguise to get the so-called middle class (i.e. deceived working-class) to live in reality like the rest of the globe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Home-ownership. Posted by: Dboy
» RE: Home-ownership. Posted by: Quannah
Everyone's a looser
Posted by: zorba1 on Jun 30, 2008 2:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of my sisterinlaws has refinanced her home five times with five subprime loans.
Her payments went from $1100 a month with the first loan which she could not afford to $1800 a month and is now losing the home.
Now she is crying about it.
She spent her equity each time she refinanced on new car, diamond rings her kids and vacations not saving one dime.
We tried in vain to stop her the first time, she would not listen to anyone.
Now she does not understand what happened to her "equity".
Plain and simply she spent it and gave it away.
Each time she refinanced, the loans cost her $10,000.
Her job? She works for a bank. She should have known better.
She is mixed as my wife is.
Another brotherinlaw who is a mortgae broker also tried to stop her but again she would not listen. She was not targeted, she was greedy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: veryone's a looser Posted by: Quannah
» RE: veryone's a looser Posted by: Dboy
ASK FOR THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT!!
Posted by: Sushi on Jun 30, 2008 3:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People....listen up! Don't get foreclosed! Foreclosure is a court procedure. The bank MUST produce the original signed document for the foreclosure to go forward. Most of these sub-primes were created by people who were just passing contracts off to buyers who would sell them to other investors. REALLY sloppy paperwork and record-keeping all around. If the bank cannot produce the original ink-signed document, you may be able to renegotiate with the bank...perhaps a 30 yr mortgage with better terms.

The banks don't really want your house. They become a maintenance and tax liability that COSTS them money. Banks are not in the biz to lose money. They would rather have a trickle coming in than a flood going out.

ASK FOR THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT!!!


Sushi
"Imagine what life will be like when these are the good old days. "

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nobody was "targeted" but the uninformed
Posted by: Jdog on Jun 30, 2008 4:02 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a loan officer and have been in this business for nearly ten years, before the craziness of deregulation really began...

I keep hearing that African Americans, Hispanics, and other groups were specifically targeted for subprime loans. This is simply untrue: We compete by offering the lowest rate with the best service and terms available. If I don't have it, someone else with that product will get the business. Subprime loans, with their high rates of interest, are NOT competitive.

So how did people get suckered into bad loans? Primarily they were sold on "negatively amortizing" loans that, as the name suggests, actually grew every month. Gullible (as well as willfully ignorant) borrowers were offered rates as low as 1% for up to five years upfront that were actually as high as 8%+ in the back, meaning that every time you made the 1% payment, the difference between it and the 8% or so you actually owed was tacked onto the loan. What happens when your loan grows $1000-$2000 per month while your home depreciates by at least that much...? You go upside down on the home: Your value is less than what you owe.

So who got stuck with these crappy loans: The greedy and the uninformed. People who, in many cases, were fooled...But many others just ignored the bad and focused on the good. In other words, they were sold on the 1% payment rate but either not informed, or chose to ignore, the actual rate attached to this product...

I will add that, not so coincidentally, many (if not most) Hispanics were scammed by Hispanics, African Americans by African Americans, Asians by Asians, and so on...People tend to trust and turn to members of their own community, and most of the big subprime shops in the heaviest hit communities, at least where I am, were operated by members of that community.

So getting back to the point of the article: Were certain groups specifically targeted for these shitty products? Yes, but this was not a racial/ethnic thing as much as it was a scam perpetrated by ethically challenged banks and brokers who exploited the greed and ignorance of uninformed consumers...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RKR
Posted by: Ramsdell on Jun 30, 2008 6:55 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A most ridiculous article. This mortgage collapse had to do with one thing - greed. Greed from the buyer, greed from the lender. Not too many low-income black families working at Behrs and Stearns were there? And I'd love a siding job that paid $68,000!!!!!!!!! The real tragedy is that this article wants to play these folks out as victims of corporate America - as opposed to realizing the great tragedy that a family of college educated individuals they could still make such God awful financial decisions. Tell Alternet to head north into Sandy Springs and see all the JUMBO builds that are in foreclosure. Or ask them about the Duluth contractor who shot himself in the face on the empty streets of his new subdivision when he couldn't move any of them. There are some tremendous lessons to learn from this current crisis, but if all we're going to take away is "black people are victims" it shows our press is just as stuck as the system they rip on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: KR Posted by: Dboy
more proof, this time in the midwest
Posted by: kcdrew on Jun 30, 2008 7:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Come to Kansas City if you need proof this mortgage meltdown isn't partly, at least, racial. Our local paper, the Kansas City Star, published a diagram of the city, showing where most of the refinances of mortgages would be happening in short time to come. The racial dividing line in our city is a street called Troost. To the East, it is largely African American. To the West, largely Caucasian and "other". The diagram showed, in color, on the front page of our paper, most of the refinancing, where families could have problems, were East of Troost. To the Southwest, in largely Caucasian Overland Park, Kansas, was there much evidence of mortgage difficulty? No. Absolutely not. It was very self-evident what the opportunists in the mortgage lending industry had done. They had, at the very least, taken advantage of people who didn't know better. At the very worst, they exploited a racial minority for money. Loads and loads of money, no doubt.

www.moravings.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: more proof, this time in the midwest Posted by: tarnishedreality
We Could have Settled this Easily Without Tax Payer Money..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Jun 30, 2008 8:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We could have easily settled this crisis without the people losing their homes or any taxpayers bailing the banks and lenders out..as well as the borrowers..

All we had to do was Peg the Sub Prime Mortgages at 3% above the Fed Rate or the Prime Rate not to go below 6.25-6.5% and forgive all penalties to date over 1/2 of which are illegal..

This way the banks and lenders would not have lost money no Tax Payer would have had to bail out either the borrowers or lenders out and the people black, white or tan whatever would not have lost their homes..

We haven't seen the worst of this yet either, there are millions more homes scheduled or bound to be foreclosed upon and millions an millions you will be evicted...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Public Servant
Posted by: SP on Jun 30, 2008 8:57 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blacks and Hispanics were not charged higher rates and fees because of their race, they were charged higher rates and fees because they (blacks and hispanics) in almost all cases select a mortgage broker of their own race as opposed to selecting a mortgage broker based on lowest rates and fees being offered.

In the cases cited in the article, the loan brokers who gouged these customers were black themselves.

Furthermore, research has shown that whites typically shop and compare at least two loan brokers before deciding who to go with where as blacks & hispanics typically do not shop and compare more than one loan broker. On the other hand though, research has found that asians (including those of indian and middle-eastern orgin) typically shop and compare at least three loan brokers before making application.

Blacks would be better served if they themselves would be less racist and instead be willing to use more price competitive loan brokers even if they happen to be non-black.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Public Servant Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Public Servant Posted by: Jdog
Public servant
Posted by: SP on Jun 30, 2008 9:51 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But a new Escalade is a necessity. What is one to do?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Public servant
Posted by: SP on Jun 30, 2008 9:51 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But a new Escalade is a necessity. What is one to do?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They were just trying to promote equality!
Posted by: rickiey on Jul 1, 2008 3:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
lured them into needless and rapidly recurring mortgages they clearly couldn't afford and from which they never stood to gain

Ya know, people who got mortgages that they "clearly couldn't afford" are the ones to blame, not the mortgage company.

It is a person's responsibility to manage their money. It is not a lender's responsibility to manage your money for you.

But while minority homeownership may have grown in the short term, the long-term outlook promises quite the opposite, as southwest Atlanta painfully illustrates.

Well, since it seems you MUST play the race card, then lets REALLY take a look at what happened with race, shall we?

Here is a couple simple facts:

Currently, white people have more money, higher incomes and better credit than blacks and latinos. (We can go back in time and discuss the causes or whatever, but that is better suited for a different thread.)

However, a racial analysis of mortgages was done, and of course, it showed lenders to be giving whites more mortgages than blacks and latinos (because they had more money, higher incomes, and better credit).

But of course, with the prevalent mindset that unequal outcomes must mean unequal opporturnity, the mortgage companies were required to fix the outcomes, no matter what it took. SO they redesigned the qualification process to ignore "racial factors" such as income and credit history. So they wrote a bunch of loans to minorities unqualified for them, fixing the racial discrepancy. Countrywide even got a diversity award for doing exactly that.

But when you write loans for people that aren't qualified for them......what happens?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Class struggles = race struggles.
Posted by: pinkfloydd on Jul 1, 2008 6:50 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since Jim Crow laws were reborn as 'credit scores', class struggles are race struggles. The only thing that should be relevant when banks decide to grant a loan is debt-to-income ratio. You either make enough money to get a loan or you don't. Interest rates should be set on income levels, not the ability to ascertain whether or not someone is a 'risky' borrower. Everyone is at the mercy of their job, so everyone is a risk. Surely readers here are well aware that the white majority in this country have at least a 200 year head start on creating and sustaining wealth and education. To ignore this fact is to ignore the history of this racially charged country. As late as the 50's we had Senators filibustering Congress in order to stall civil rights amendments. You think those same Congress folk didn't have anything to do with systemic racism that still permeates society today, from the all white club that is our line of Presidents to the almost all lily white club that is the Senate?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You're in denial.
Posted by: SP on Jul 2, 2008 10:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You may see it as a load of BS, but it's fact.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Jul 5, 2008 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was simply legalized robbery by a grossly overempowered and overpaid cabal of financiers. The plan was simple. Depress wages. Inflame people of all incomes with the desire to foolishly buy new cars, big screen TVs and overpriced homes to keep up with the Joneses. Infiltrate the market with all manner of overpriced and irresistible gadgets likr i-Pods and i-Phones, extend more and more credit with usury rates, and lastly promulgate the sophistry (supply side economics) as working for everyone - even median and under income persons.

African Americans made many gains in recent history...having familial homes in their possession and the like...but the one thing so many didn't see coming was the same train that hit everyone else who bought the garbage economic policies that this administration promoted. That train was the dumbing down of society..(instead of aspiration)....inflamed, stupid consumerism, lack of respect for self...the bling culture....all of that eroded the gains that in general people have made because of the New Deal and fair tax policies. (And because back in the day, saving was more important than keeping up with your neighbor's possessions.) The bling culture only gave bling to its promoters....not to the consumers.

Make no mistake about it: a legalized heist by hedge fund managers and other investment bankers has taken place and only now, finally in the face of this incredible damage - will the truth be apparent: trickle down economics is the biggest rip off of all time.

Sane economics must now take the place of this sophistry we have been subjected to, in order to recover from this disaster. And people should not care who has a BMW...a big house...whatever. If you do, you've been set up by the finance guys for a big hit....and you've been had by the advertising industry...which wants you to think you're not worth anything unless you own some high end brand name item.

This means we must return to the old days: protect yourselves. Money is power. Save some - save it all - don't give it away to the greedy financiers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I had no idea
Posted by: sicntired on Jul 5, 2008 9:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought this was the result of the banks and loaning institutions giving loans to first time buyers that they just couldn't afford.This is a whole different ball game.This is the credit card industry for home owners.Convince people that they're missing out on a huge opportunity and give them so much credit that they self destruct.This is the result of a society that's been living far beyond their means for as long as they can remember.The banks know that much of it will be lost but they just figure that into the over all picture.It's like the credit card allowable debt increase that you never asked for.Pretty soon your not making the whole payment any more and eventually your in over your head.Then it's either bankruptcy or pay the minimum until the interest piles up to insurmountable,then it's bankpuptcy for sure.This is predatory lending at it's worst.The banks should be forced to eat the losses they knew would come.Taking away someones home because they fell victim to a predator is unfair.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Its almost funny if it werent so sad
Posted by: lil ole me on Jul 6, 2008 7:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ive owned 2 homes and can honestly say i prefer renting, i may not own my apartment but Im not stuck here or saddled with a 30 year mortgage on a house I cant sell. I realize its not for everyone, but for some its a hell of a lot better than than the mess Ive seen a lot of people get themselves into. the money I save on home improvement and interest is going into my retirement fund.
who knows, someday I may buy the apartment building I live in. Naahh probably not. Ill let someone else worry about that. Ill just find a nicer apartment.
i guess the moral of my story, In my opinion, homeownership is overrated anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

washington polticians do the bidding of their contributors
Posted by: whealeydj on Jul 8, 2008 5:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the people should be mad at the 2005 Republican Congress which did the financial industry bidding. Find out where your Senators and Representative stood on that and you will know who they prioritize: their human constituents or their deep pocketed contributors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]