Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Coke's CEO Dishes: The Company Plans to Prey on Unsustainable Urbanization

By Richard Girard, Polaris Institute. Posted May 29, 2008.


While water shortages are getting worse in areas of increasing urbanization, Coke is digging in their heels there to make more money.
Advertisement

As I sat in the plush confines of the Hotel Dupont's ballroom at the Coca Cola Company's annual meeting of shareowners last month, I listened as the CEO elect Muhtar Kent laid bare the company's duplicity.

Kent's deception was revealed in his guarantee of future growth for the company combined with some strategic greenwashing. He made it clear that the corporation's future will rely on and exploit rapid urbanization, a recognized problematic phenomena, while at the same time saying that the success of the business was based on the health of communities and the people it serves.

More specifically, he detailed how Coke's future profits would be based on three international mega-trends: i) rapid urbanization; ii) the rise of the middle class; iii) and the increased purchasing power of the middle class.

For shareholders and investors concerned with increasing returns on investment, these trends are very positive. According to Kent "it all boils down to the future of more consumers with more money, drinking more of our brands and beverages...we like those trends."

Kent followed this enthusiastic prognosis with Coke's new mantra that the financial health of the business is only as strong as the health of the communities and the people that the company serves.

In this instant the contradiction between corporate social responsibility and greenwashing floated to the surface of the rarified air of a packed Hotel Dupont ballroom.

When guaranteeing a profitable return to shareholders depends on exploiting and controlling resources and troubling social phenomena, rhetoric about sustainability rings hollow and self serving.

Coke in the big cities -- bigger problems and bigger profits?

Kent's excitement about urbanization is driven by recent United Nations Population Fund statistics that show more than half of the world's population is now living in urban areas. The figures show that this number is likely to increase. For Coke this is great news, more people living in less space means easier access to customers.

While the report argues that rapid urbanization can stimulate economic growth and reduce poverty -- if the urbanization is accompanied by proper urban planning and management, and this is a big 'if' -- it emphasizes that rapid urban growth in the global South is coupled with environmental and social problems.

Some of the problems caused by rapid urbanization include a concentrated social demand for human essentials such as drinking water and sanitation. Urbanization has also led to the expansion of city-based industries, which in turn exacerbate urban water supply problems. As a result, many cities in the global south are starting to turn to the countryside to find new sources of water, thus exporting an urban problem to rural areas creating social tensions and stresses on an increasingly scarce natural resource.

A clear case of this is taking place in México City where aquifers underlying the old part of city are so empty that the city is actually sinking. To deal with this lack of water, pumping stations and pipeline systems have been set up to exploit the watersheds of nearby rural communities to provide water for the ever expanding city. México's national Water Commission is actually taking control of lakes and rivers in nearby states with plans to redirect flow towards México City.

México City also provides a troubling example of how the Coca Cola Company is already actively exploiting the rapid growth and urban sprawl surrounding one of the globe's biggest megalopolises.

Coke, FEMSA and OXXO in México

México City's population has grown from 3.1 million in 1950 to close to 20 million today. Since the early 1990's growth in the city centre has stopped entirely and shifted to the outskirts where large housing developments targeted at middle- and low- income populations are exploding.

The shift of growth to the outskirts of México City can be attributed to urban planning policies, the lack of affordable land in the city centre, and competition between politically independent municipalities in the city's periphery. Between 1999 and 2005, 276,197 houses were authorized for the suburbs of México City for 1.24 million inhabitants. The vast majority of these dwellings have been constructed by large developers who capitalized on a number of policy changes that allowed them to purchase huge tracts of land in relatively remote areas surrounding the city.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: water, bottled water, mexico, coke, water privatization, coca cola

Richard Girard is the corporate researcher at the Polaris Institute.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Looks like good business to me
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on May 30, 2008 4:26 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Coca-Cola doesn't control population or demographics. They have to go where the people are going.

And it makes good sense that if you want to sell a lot of soft drinks and snack food, open a lot of convenience stores and grab the market ahead of your competitor.

If it's not one retailer it would be another. All things Coke everywhere does seem a little pernicious, but it's just too bad 500 or so other people didn't open stores in the Mexico City suburbs first. I would prefer to see a thousand family-owned bodegas, but apparently Coke was on the spot and got there first.

I suspect this will become a trend in developing areas because large corporations can afford to build early and wait for profits to pick up later.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You expect Coke to do the right thing?
Posted by: ReallyBearish on May 31, 2008 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are you crazy? Coke sells tooth-rotting sugar water that is at least indirectly involved in a number of cronic diseases. The processed food it produces and promotes is unhealthy and leads to unhealthy diets in general. I'd put them in a similar catagory as the tobbacco companies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]