Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Tiger Woods' Partnership with Chevron Legitimizes the Worst of Corporate America

By Dave Zirin, The Nation. Posted May 26, 2008.


For all his cultural capital, Woods has refused to take stands on issues that should hit close to home
Advertisement

Tiger Woods is perhaps the most famous, and most dominant, athlete in the world today. The 32-year-old golfer with the multicultural background he once proudly described as "Cablinasian" has somehow accomplished the impossible: made golf on a Sunday must-see TV.

Woods is a trailblazer and already a legend for his ability to perform when the spotlight is at its hottest. But he has also established a reputation for reticence when confronted with the real world off the greens. For all his cultural capital, Woods has refused to take stands on issues that should hit close to home, such as restricted golf courses, or even when the Golf Channel's Kelly Tilghman suggested young PGA players "lynch him in a back alley" in a "joke" about how they might overcome his dominance. Tiger has largely maintained the tight-lipped silence of a Benedictine monk.

After the lynching comment, ESPN's Scoop Jackson became so frustrated with this disciplined quietude he wrote, "Because of who he is, Tiger Woods has the power to make people listen. Not just hear his words--but embrace what he has to say.... It's a stand he needs to take because people who change the world eventually have to take stands. Whether strong or silent, good or evil, they take stands not to prove their beliefs, but to rectify a situation or condition."

His defenders have always said that behind the scenes Woods has been an agent for change, and that he shouldn't be criticized just because he does his good deeds without media fanfare. They say he wields that influence through his nonprofit Tiger Woods Foundation. Go to the website, and a virtual Woods walks right onto your screen and welcomes you to a place where "kids can achieve anything." The site boasts: "more than 10 million young people have benefited from the Tiger Woods Foundation since its inception in 1996. What started out with limited access throughout America, now reaches out to young people around the world."

Yet now the Foundation is "reaching around the world" in a way that has human rights activists concerned about a business partnership that smells like sulfur.

The Tiger Woods Foundation has entered into an extensive five-year partnership with Chevron Corporation, with the oil and energy giant becoming the title sponsor of the Tiger Woods Foundation World Challenge Golf Tournament.

"Chevron has a track record and a commitment to bettering the communities where they operate," Woods said in a press release on April 3. And Chevron's executive vice president chimed in, "Chevron, Tiger and the Tiger Woods Foundation share similar values...as well as a deep commitment to make a difference in local communities."

They have certainly "made a difference in local communities," but it's nothing they should be bragging about, and certainly nothing with which Woods should want his name attached. Chevron is in full partnership with the Burmese military regime on the Yadana gas pipeline project, the single greatest source of revenue for the military, estimated at nearly $1 billion in 2007, nearly half of all the country's revenue. These are the same people who are blocking international aid workers from assisting the victims of Cyclone Nargis. The death toll has been estimated at 78,000, but this number can explode as disease spreads and help isn't allowed through the military lines. Even the US State Department has called the actions of the government "appalling."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: corporate accountability, chevron, tiger woods

Dave Zirin is the author of "What's My Name Fool? Sports and Resistance in the United States." Read more of his work at Edgeofsports.com.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
He probably doesn't even know about Chevron and Burma.
Posted by: fanny666 on May 26, 2008 2:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not that it's an excuse, it's not. But I'm guessing that everything he knows about Chevron and Burma is not the result of web-surfing on progressive newsletters.

Contact former Chevron board member Condoleezza Rice (politely and intelligently) and ask her to use her influence at Chevron to get them to help victims of the Burmese cyclone.

Contact Chevron (politely and intelligently) and ask them what they are doing to help the victims of the Burmese cyclone.

Contact Tiger Woods (politely and intelligently) and ask him to use his influence at Chevron to help the victims of the Burmese cyclone.

It's probably more important to get food and water to these people then it is to write angry letters about the government there.

Join the US Campaign for Burma

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America the almighty
Posted by: carbon-based on May 26, 2008 5:07 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with the liberal community is they cannot make up their mind. Lets see, in Iraq, Saddam was a good guy and America was the devil killing thousands with sanctions.

Now we want to punish the military regime of Burma. Is what goes on in Burma any of our business? I think not.

Now, as for companies to partner up with, can you name one energy company, with the funds available to fund Woods foundation?

Even further, what has anyone done re purchase of fuel. Anyone boycott Chevron?. I bet not, especially if their gas is cheapest.

It isn’t up to tiger Woods to speak out against another country or be swayed by unsubstantiated charges against a sponsor.

I think we’ve had enough of Americans thinking they are above the rest of the world having the right to decide what course another country should take.

If the $$ from Chevron are making a difference, go for it… if not let the liberal community chip in to make up the difference…

Lets focus on problems in THIS country first.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Straw-liberals, maybe Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Straw-liberals, maybe Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Straw-liberals, maybe Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Straw-liberals, maybe Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Straw-liberals, maybe Posted by: Joshua Holland
» PS Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Straw-liberals, maybe Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Straw-liberals, maybe Posted by: sanity
» RE: Straw-liberals, maybe Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Straw-liberals, maybe Posted by: sanity
» RE: Straw-liberals, maybe Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Straw-liberals, maybe Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Straw-liberals, maybe Posted by: carbon-based
» America, the almighty hypocrite Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: America, the almighty hypocrite Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: America, the almighty hypocrite Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: America the almighty Posted by: racetoinfinity
It's Up to Us
Posted by: AlexLawyer on May 28, 2008 12:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's unfortunate that someone of Woods's phenomenal talent and charm lets himself become a shill for such an unsavory outfit--one whose board was once graced by Condoleezza Rice. Regardless, we don't have to put money into their coffers by buying their products.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prostitution
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 28, 2008 3:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great discussion topic.

I want to throw up every time I hear a Who song on a car commercial. I'm sure the band has done plenty of charity work, but there's something disgusting about selling out, no matter how much money they may throw at disadvantaged kids.

Perhaps we want them to stick their neck out, since they can afford to. But I guess most are human, just like most of us, and would rather give where they can and avoid unnecessary risks to their careers.

If you were in his position, what would you do? What do you do in your position now?

I believe in many progressive causes, but I haven't chained myself to anything or been on many hunger strikes lately. Why should I? The same old scumbags get away with everything like they always have. And most of the people they're screwing keep voting for them or buying big screen TVs from their companies...So I give to a few charities, help my neighbor sometimes, and try to put my recyclables in the right bins. How about you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Prostitution Posted by: PJAW
» RE: Prostitution Posted by: sanity
Chevron or Mobile?
Posted by: PJAW on May 28, 2008 4:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not that it matters a great deal, but didn't Condaleeza Rice sit on the Exxon-Mobil board? I see a couple references here about her working for Chevron.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Chevron Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Chevron or Mobile? Posted by: AlexLawyer
to Dave Zirin and The Nation
Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters on May 28, 2008 5:17 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless you are out there pumping gas and you have your own gas stations, well honestly... shut the (bleep) up. Tiger Woods is also sponsored by GM and American Express, are we going to dance all over that too?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Golf going the way of the dinosaur
Posted by: xvictor on May 28, 2008 5:56 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The new generation of Americans have shown very little interest in golf. That is confirmed by falling TV ratings and low attendance numbers at the tournaments. These folks are savvy enough to know that the sport is a big drain on natural resources and want no part of it. Plus, it's an exceedingly boring game.

So Tiger Woods can swing a club. Big deal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What?! Posted by: BCcovers
» You are totally misinformed. Posted by: xvictor
Tigers Voice is his own
Posted by: Timberbee on May 28, 2008 6:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We see a wrong and... want others to respond to it as we would, or, rather, as we think They should, for, we are not doing it. If we were... we would have less concern for what they should be doing and more concern for what they Are doing.

This author falls into that trap.

Attack Chevron for what they do. Tiger Woods plays golf. Why does he need to be an activist? People pay money for his image, Corporations do. To sell to Us, to soften their image with Us. Tiger Woods does not cause me to buy one product over another, or to lend my support to one corporation over another. I simply watch him and am amazed at his prowess on the Golf course.

I believe that trap, the one where we expect those who have achieved some media noteriety, to stand up, to drum their fists, raise their voices, to shout out in righteous anger, in righteous fury, at all the injustices of the World... the Ones WE see, anyway. I believe that is a "what if" trap. Or an "if only".

If only I was Tiger Woods, this is what I would do...

This makes me say; It is time I stood up, drummed MY fists, and fought for what I believed. Let Tiger Woods walk his own Path. And the author theirs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

STFU!!
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on May 28, 2008 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Weepy bleeders like this author spend their waking hours neurotically seeking ways in which to knock down others of whom they are obviously jealous.

There are many many people who are more intelligent, more successful, better looking, have more, have accomplished more than I and have done things which I wish I could do.

I have no need to attack them with my pettiness.
I find it so much more satisfying to do whatever I am capable of and enjoy being in my own skin.

Zirin certainly doesn't seem to understand this concept of being within one's self.

BTW-Being out on the golfcourse is to experience the wonderful scent of new mown grass, hear the birds talking with each other and, in MY case, being in or very near the woods & water.
The ambience is great and, it's also good exercise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Eureka! Posted by: Ignatz deFyre
» RE: STFU!! Posted by: racetoinfinity
Tiger Woods doesn't give a shit about human rights.
Posted by: arclight7 on May 28, 2008 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's the same as Michael Jordan - out for himself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Like you know Posted by: realveive
Tiger is not a problem.
Posted by: HughScott on May 28, 2008 9:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tiger Woods is a distraction, not a problem. We are ALL to blame for high energy prices.

The major cause of $4/gallon gasoline, for example, is the devalued American dollar, not indifferent PGA players and their oil company associations. The Iraq War hasn't helped matters, either.

Unfortunately, drilling for oil offshore won't solve the problem due to our limited ability to produce gasoline from crude. Because of environmental concerns, no new refineries have been built in the United States since 1976. Some experts believe this is why we are becoming more and more dependent on the imports of finished gasoline, as opposed to incremental crude oil.

The quickest way to reduce pump prices is to impose a 55-mph national speed limit like President Nixon did in 1974. The restriction would decrease gasoline consumption 10 - 15% and cause oil companies to lower their prices accordingly. Sadly, neither Democrats nor Republicans seem willing to make the needed speed change.

Finally, the petroleum industry is a special interest of mine because I majored in geology at Texas A&M and worked as a seismologist for ARCO in Utah before entering the Air Force. My late father was also in the oil business -- in his case, 45 years.

If Ed Scott, a former chief geologist and vice president of UNOCAL, were alive today, he would scare the crap out of you about the "peak oil" problem, which is something else politicians of both parties aren't addressing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tiger is not a problem. Posted by: bornxeyed
Sports builds character?
Posted by: tap17x on May 28, 2008 11:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right, if "character" means a narrow ignorant view and caring only for yourself. Think of OJ Simpson and countless other athletes who have made the news. Sports builds narcissism and stupidity for the most part. It builds character about like being a Republican or a televangelist does, that is, someone who'd sell their daughter into white slavery if it made a buck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» did you get picked on by jocks Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» RE: Sports builds character? Posted by: AlexLawyer
» RE: Sports builds character? Posted by: BCcovers
Money is Money
Posted by: Liborio on May 28, 2008 2:49 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tiger don't care about his father, money is money
and smell good. He is living the American dream
and don't care abour Burma, Iraq or other place.
I can't believe what you said about 10 millions kid helped, impossible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» 10 million "helped"? Posted by: zipper696
Do you really
Posted by: Knobby on May 28, 2008 4:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
think that Chevron would give up their partnership with the Burmese military regime on the Yadana gas pipeline project, just because Tiger Woods says they should?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Do you really Posted by: markw4786
leftbank
Posted by: markw4786 on May 28, 2008 8:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tiger's father's words about his son's legacy and impact is part of the Tiger Woods Myth, the Woods BRAND. It's marketing, plain and simple. Stop the BS; Tiger's agenda is Tiger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No excuses
Posted by: racetoinfinity on May 28, 2008 11:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tiger Woods has no excuse for not informing himself of these appalling facts about Chevron before getting involved with them. They are, not to equivocate, evil. This is what unregulated capitalism is: its only value is in increasing the short-term bottom line and shareholder dividend value. It is amoral to the point of evil, unless informed strongly with a moral imperative to care for the larger community and the planet, but that takes effort - that is not the way corporate capitalism is "built".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kitty woods is just another sell out
Posted by: spanky on May 28, 2008 11:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The guy practically has the Nike logo branded into his scalp. Walking billboard. He has also whored prominently for Gillette, Buick, AmEx, GM, and Gatorade among others. He is staggeringly wealthy but continues to suck the corporate teet. How many dollars does one person need?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No golf in 10 years?
Posted by: TennMom on May 29, 2008 12:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I seem to recall similar dire predictions about MLB after the strike. After baseball, golf is the oldest major competitive sport in this country. Golf has now been played in America for 120 years - longer than basketball and American football. If you think lower TV ratings will lead to golf's demise, you have another think coming. In case you haven't noticed, TV viewership is down for all programming, sports included. Fortunately, those of us who love sports realize that as long as the big name sponsors are on board, golf will remain a TV staple, and as long as weekend tee times are scarcer than hen's teeth golf will continue to thrive as the frustrating-yet-fulfilling pastime beloved by millions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No golf in 10 years? Posted by: zipper696
Leave Tiger ALONE!!!
Posted by: Kym525 on May 29, 2008 12:55 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is so typical of the so-called "liberal" left. Pick on a young man who has not only changed the face of golf forever, but has given MILLIONS of his OWN MONEY to help inner city youth be the best they can be through his various foundations and tournaments. Of course, that doesn't matter to the limousine liberal contingent here in alternet. Why? Because he's black (or cablasian if you prefer) and we all know blacks, cablasians, etc are always held to an unfair double-standard. Tiger is no shill, just a human being who happens to be the best in a sport once played by bored white guys with too much money and not enough sense.

Just like all the white upper-class feminists demanded he not play at Augusta, but have never demanded that of say, Phil Mickelson or even Vijay Singh. I'm getting rather tired of my liberal bretheren playing these kinds of nonsensical games.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Leave Tiger ALONE!!! Posted by: wisegalah
Tiger Ain't No Muhammad Ali
Posted by: rgoalierob on May 29, 2008 7:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gone are the athletes that are willing to REALLY take a stand.
By the way....Tiger giving "millions" to his foundation is a)a great tax break. b)chump change to Tiger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't get side-tracked
Posted by: pete ess on May 29, 2008 10:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This post is less about Tiger than it is about disgraceful big corporates who are doing real damage to all of us. Seeing Tiger taking their money and in effect endorsing them, is a convenient time to lay bare their nefarious activities. Joe Soap's ears prick up when you say "Tiger", not when you say "Chevron", so please stay focussed. This is about exposing the Bush corporates.
It's a good post, don't miss the point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]