Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Lawsuit: Del Monte Ripping Off Migrant Workers

Southern Poverty Law Center. Posted May 7, 2008.


Court rules the ag-giant can't hide behind middle-men.

March 21, 2008 -- A subsidiary of food giant Fresh Del Monte Produce cannot hide behind a middleman labor contractor to avoid responsibility for the exploitation of farmworkers who plant and harvest its fields, a federal court has ruled.

The order holding Fresh Del Monte Produce Southeast Inc. liable for alleged wage violations came in a lawsuit filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center in April 2006 on behalf of foreign guestworkers and domestic migrant farmworkers who were recruited to work in Georgia's Wheeler and Telfair counties. About 500 field and factory workers in Del Monte's sweet onion operation there were badly underpaid for planting, harvesting and packaging onions.

Agricultural guestworkers are brought into the United States from other countries on special H-2A visas that permit them to work only for the employer who requests them.

"Rather than paying its workers directly, Del Monte contracted with a grossly undercapitalized labor contractor to be the supposed boss of the workers while Del Monte gave all the orders," said Kristi Graunke, an SPLC attorney handling the case.

"This is a common tactic by corporations -- leaving somebody without assets holding the bag for their wage violations," she said.

The ruling means that Del Monte Southeast, the actual owner of the farm, is legally on the hook for any violations. There has been no final ruling on whether the wage violations occurred. The case could eventually include up to 500 migrant workers.

"This decision is particularly significant because it provides a roadblock to a disturbing trend by large corporate growers that import workers," said Mary Bauer, director of the SPLC's Immigrant Justice Project. "Increasingly, those corporations attempt to evade responsibility for their workers by having middlemen -- generally penniless crew leaders -- submit the applications for H-2A workers, instead of the wealthy corporations doing so themselves."

Workers were promised and were entitled to receive payment as prescribed by federal regulations, but they were consistently cheated out of the wages due them. The plaintiffs, who are indigent, left their homes and families and spent considerable sums of money to travel to Georgia to work for Del Monte.

The ruling came in Luna v. Del Monte Fresh Produce (Southeast Inc.). SPLC lawyers now must document Del Monte's wage violations.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: agriculture, guest workers, h2a visas, workplace violations, wage violations



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Is anyone shocked?
Posted by: Mexitli on May 7, 2008 2:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No.

Is anyone surprised? No.

This was done to my grandparents in the 1920's and it was done to others before them.
It's been done to Meso-Americans in the 30's, 40's 50's 60's 70's 80's 90's and it's being done today.

And it will continue to be done in the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pjmack
Posted by: pjmack on May 7, 2008 5:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have personal experience with the poor treatment of employees at Del Monte in Oregon. Del Monte flatly does not have any regard for the just treatment of any person whether migrant or permanent employees so the fact that Del Monte knowingly and willingly disregarded their obligations does not surpise me in the least. They took advantage of migrant workers in Oregon as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bycott..
Posted by: walldodger1969 on May 8, 2008 10:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bycott.. Posted by: johnbradleycopeland
» RE: bycott.. Posted by: pjmack
No More DelMonte For Me!
Posted by: johnbradleycopeland on May 8, 2008 1:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My list of companies and products to Boycott just got longer. Buy from local farmers if you can! Boycott these corporate food giants products if you can!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]