Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

It's the Obscene Profits, Stupid! Exxon's Enormous Gains from the U.S. Keep Growing

By Nomi Prins, The Wip. Posted May 6, 2008.


Exxon is working to assure that whoever gets into the Oval Office doesn't try to tax some of their profits away.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Nomi Prins

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

How sad. Exxon Mobil, the universe's largest publicly traded company, which also happens to be enjoying some of its biggest profits ever thanks to the almost doubled price of oil during the past year, didn't quite live up to Wall Street expectations this week. In fact, its stock fell nearly 4 percent the day it announced its first quarter of 2008 earnings.

Unfortunately, this does not make the pain at the pump pulsing through the nation any more bearable. Apparently, Exxon could have made more profit, had it not chosen to hold back further gas price hikes. Instead, earnings in its refining business (which converts crude oil to gallons of useable gas) weren't as strong as it had wanted. Yes, that's right - Exxon would have made even more money had they passed more pain onto the public. They were just being "nice." Right.

As people contemplate paying $4 per gallon for gas, not to mention the havoc those higher oil prices wreak on their home fuel costs, Exxon isn't really skimming less off the top in order to be a Team America player. Nor does Exxon feel the same pain from these high oil prices that ordinary citizens feel while driving to school, work, the grocery store or childcare. The $21.7 million paycheck (18 percent more than last year) of Exxon's CEO, Rex Tillerson, certainly covers a whole lot of gas.

No, that Exxon didn't quite live up to Wall Street expectations is just pre-election spin, ensuring that whichever candidate gets into the Oval Office doesn't try to take some of their profits away by taxing them. (Not that they'd have to worry if John McCain wins the election.)

Exxon posted an almost $11 billion profit for the first quarter of 2008 on a staggering $117 billion in total revenue, which was up from $87.2 billion in revenue last year (or, more than a third of the projected 2008 $311 billion US deficit.) Part of Exxon's windfall still came from higher gas prices, which on average, rose about 30 percent over the year, as oil prices rose from $60 to $100 at the end of the last quarter it reported.

Plus, Exxon's earnings were up 17 percent versus the same quarter last year, pulling in the second-highest quarterly earnings in US history for any corporation. To put it in perspective, Exxon's last earnings for all of 2007 were a record $40.6 billion, which puts them in the running, if oil prices stay where they are, to come in at about 10 percent above that for 2008.

So, is Exxon joining the "go-green, don't be dependent on foreign oil" mantras popular in this election cycle? Are they spending some of that hard-earned cash on alternative energy sources? Not so much. Instead it was busy investing in itself, buying back $31.8 billion of its own stock out of that $40.6 billion profit, compared with just $3.3 billion in US capital investment. Says Tyson Slocum, Energy Director at Public Citizen, "This discrepancy certainly shows that motorists aren't getting any bank for their buck out of it."

And Exxon wasn't the only one struggling to beat their previous record profits. Oil companies around the world were feeling the love from record crude oil prices. Firms like BP and Royal Dutch Shell Plc, despite flat production over the quarter, posted stellar, even better than expected first quarter earnings, up 64 percent and 25 percent in profit respectively. ConocoPhillips' first-quarter earnings increased 17 percent to $4.1 billion.

On Friday, Chevron added to the oil company euphoria, posting a net income rise of 37 percent for the first quarter of 2008, and revenues of $65 billion, up from $33 billion, though also citing more limited refining profits (the 'downstream' part of their business - upstream is oil production). Like Exxon, Chevron also chose to use its profits to buy its own stock - underscoring that the best investment for oil companies is - oil companies. The firm bought back $2 billion of its own stock during the first quarter.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: oil, war profiteering, exxon, gas prices, windfall tax

Nomi Prins is a senior fellow at the public policy center Demos and author of Other People's Money and Jacked: How "Conservatives" are Picking your Pocket (Whether you voted for them or not).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on May 6, 2008 12:48 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FREE AMERICA


Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Terrorist Posted by: Crazy H
Today they control the price of gasoline, tomorrow they'll control the price of "Water"...
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on May 6, 2008 3:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course they don't want any kind of regulation of their greedy ambitions, they Need all the money don't you know to buy up water rights to continue to build the future control of every creature on earth...

Already big business have so modifided our agriculture that the HUGE quantities of corn that is produced each year isn't even fit for human consumption but rather is a commodity they barter with while the world goes hungry... Its time we stopped and asked ourselves what is more important... Making huge amounts of money, or survival as a species???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Refineries down/summer blends, etc.
Posted by: Sushi on May 6, 2008 4:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has anyone out there ever verified the claims that prices are soaring due to switching to "seasonal blends" and "refineries being down"? No one ever says exactly WHICH refineries and where. Anyone ever chart the history of blend changes affecting prices? From what I can see, the old "supply/demand" thing is a farce...there are about 1/4 of the cars on the road these days and very few big rigs lately. And who the hell can afford to pack up the family for a big long road trip-type vacation like the good old days?

Sushi
"Imagine what life will be like when these are the good old days."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rn
Posted by: mnatra on May 6, 2008 5:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article. I cant conceive of how using terms and figures in the many billions translates to every day language. Is that a lot of money for the oil companies to pocket?
according to peak oil, the major companies are buying back the stocks due to the increasing scarcity of oil and its extraction'.This is proof positive that the world has reached peak oil and it wont go away.Where is the movement , a strike by all of us drivers against them?We should have a major no drive day at least one weekday a week
in protest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: rn Posted by: ChairmanMetal
It is the Obscene CONSPIRACY...not PROFITS
Posted by: Elurby on May 6, 2008 5:38 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
#######
#######


Blame both Left and Right for
gross distortion of markets;
but the Left is in control of
this GLOBAL CATASTROPHE, as it
has captured the Right and
distorted capitalists' markets
--TO BE FAIR. Read and learn:

You'll not get any closer to
the truth about what's afoot
with Bush's GLOBALIZATION, and
this looming food crisis, than
my below thoughts and links
((copy and send to friends
and colleagues; and note
that I REPEAT MY PREMISE
OVER AND OVER AGAIN, TO DRIVE
HOME THE POINT)):

The Third-Way push of
socialism/capitalism to
equalize the world's
economies has caused
this looming food
crisis, NOT CAPITALISM.

Socialist/communist leftists
have captured capitalism
and enslaved it to EQUAL/
"FAIR" outcomes.

Of course, you'll have to
think more deeply to find
the truth.

Read and learn the truth:

What we are facing in 2008
is a Third-Way (socialist/
communist/capitalist)
conspiracy to equalize the
world's economies, as preface
to installing one-world
government; a plan hatched
during the 1940s GATT
formulations, which were
socialist/communist, in
effect.

Keep in mind that there is
no PEAK OIL crisis, only a
decades-long, purposeful
cap on searching and drilling
and refining for oil, in order
to put the world in crisis-mode.

Using food to produce fuel
is part of the conspiracy to
generate food riots, in order
to destabilize governments;
and this so-called "war on
terror" is also part of the
secret plan, although its
primary beneficially is Israel
in the exchange of blood
and treasury for oil--as
payoff for protecting Israel
from an ever-threatening,
encircling Islamic Arabism.

The secret plan?: to create
one-world government under
GLOBAL ECONOMIC SOCIALISM.

This is a conspiracy-driven
dismantlement of the West's
financial underpinnings,
for a certain purpose: TO
EQUALIZE GLOBAL ECONOMIES,
for future installation of
one-world government.

I've provided all the details
in my essay, "Planned
Destruction of America"
(linked below), which is my
report on Lt. Col. Archibald
Roberts' 1968 booklet: "The
Anatomy of a Revolution".

http://planneddestructionofamerica.blogspot.com/

Study my essay, then write as
if we're all being led down
a path to hell on Earth by
secretive, elite movers and
shakers on the Left and Right
(path to hell aka "Third-Way
Global Economic Socialism").
Read and learn and teach:

The EU and the coming North
America Union are products of
the 1940s GATT formulations,
and very few analysts are
aware of it ((GATT, NAFTA,
and CAFTA are socialistic
attempts at equalizing global
economies, in order to in-
stall one-world government
under THIRD-WAY Global
Economic Socialism)).

The NAFTA Debacle (1995)
http://naftadebacle1.blogspot.com/


#######
#######

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hold the shareholders responsible!
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 6, 2008 5:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ExxonMobil's top 10:

Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Ltd
STATE STREET CORPORATION
VANGUARD GROUP, INC. (THE)
FMR LLC (Fidelity)
Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
AXA
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY
NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION
WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLP

Chevron:
STATE STREET CORPORATION
Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Ltd
AXA
Capital World Investors
VANGUARD GROUP, INC. (THE)
Capital Research Global Investors
DODGE & COX INC
WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLP
Capital Research Global Investors
WASHINGTON MUTUAL INVESTORS FUND

ConocoPhilips:
Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings Ltd
AXA
STATE STREET CORPORATION
DAVIS SELECTED ADVISERS, LP
VANGUARD GROUP, INC. (THE)
WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLP
Capital Research Global Investors
FMR LLC (Fidelity)
Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Capital Research Global Investors

State Street is worth paying some attention to here, because they manage many major pension funds across the U.S., including one of the largest, the $200 billion California Public Employees Retirement System.

Imagine if all the public pension funds pulled their money out of all fossil fuel and military weaponry corporations and invested it in renewable energy?

However, what if those industries are not as grossly profitable as Exxon is? Do California's baby boomer retirees, in other words, care about anything but the bottom line - the size of their pension checks? The other shareholders sure don't - every time some small group of shareholders in these large corporations try to bring up issues of fairness and basic morality - such as "let's agree not to use slave labor in Burma" - they are voted down, time and again.

So, when people write about corporations, they really ought to also talk about the people who own those corporations. For some reason, nobody does, and so those holding companies - Barclays, State Street, Vanguard, Fidelity, AXA, etc. - are able to operate without any public discussion.

All these shareholders are dependent on the exploitive and undemocratic behavior of a large number of corporate structures for their cash flows. They need to be held accountable for the damage that they have engineered.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Supply-side ignorance Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: Supply-side ignorance Posted by: jroth420
» Starting to get it... Posted by: frantaylor
» I love my commute! Posted by: frantaylor
» I'm trying Posted by: frantaylor
» Perfectly natural Posted by: frantaylor
» You got it. Posted by: Aimleft
» did it ever occur to you Posted by: frantaylor
People who buy oil by the billions of barrels...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on May 6, 2008 5:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...are looking at people who are buying SUV's by the hundreds of thousands, and have failed to yet perceive a ceiling on the amount of oil that Americans, in aggregate, are willing to pay.

The clearest, most accessible weapons available to many of our 300M citizens in the fight against high gas prices are bus tokens, bicycles and car-pooling in subcompacts for those of you who enjoy life in Far Far Away From Workland. Eventually widespread commuter rail may also offer significant gas offsets, once the demand is strong enough (read: no more room for people in buses, and no more room on the streets for more buses).

Oil is a world commodity, in an increasingly shrinking world, with ever increasing numbers of Indians and Asians earning enough to purchase cars.

Downsize your gas bill? Downsize your need for it. Gas at $5.43/gallon will net the federal government a dollar out of ever gallon, or about $10-20 dollars everytime you fill up, depending on the size of your tank. In other words, folks commuting in large passenger vehicles will be buying our infrastructure--but as fewer folks continue driving, or driving as much, much of that federal windfall should be diverted to public transport.

And send your tank-a-week-Excursion driver a big thank you for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Drive Weekend
Posted by: FSadley on May 6, 2008 5:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There has been an email circulating that we should all stay home Memorial Weekend. DO NOT DRIVE that whole weekend. It would be a good comment on the war also, instead of using the weekend to party, we all really remembered those who have suffered the ultimate sacrifice to fight a war for oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Destroying capital
Posted by: veig on May 6, 2008 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Instead it was busy investing in itself, buying back $31.8 billion of its own stock out of that $40.6 billion profit, compared with just $3.3 billion in US capital investment."

This is tantamount to destroying capital in favor of the speculation on the stocks, just to up their value. Hell, that money doesn't even end up in the pockets of the shareholders, unless they sell their shares after the stock prices have raised significantly.

This is so shortsighted that I'd love to pluck the eyes out of the financial analysts who decided to do this. The company they're managing might collapse some day because we've run out of oil and it won't have used its obscene profits to fund research on a substitute energy, or try and do business in other activities.

An the trouble is, these guys don't care because within two years they'll be working in another company, and they don't give a damn what may happen to this company in 5 or 10 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This person is definitely not an economist
Posted by: helenb1azes on May 6, 2008 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A windfall profits tax is not a solution by any means. And, once you have windfall profits taxes on oil companies, why not apply windfall profits taxes on MicroSoft or any other company that makes a lot of money. Where would it stop? It is not that I am against governmental regulation of companies. I am very much for governmental regulation of companies since companies are not, by nature, altruistic but instead are greedy corporate entities. Certainly, the the repeal of the Glass-Steagel Act, basically deregulating the banks, contributed to the subprime mess we now find ourselves in. Economists should be advising our politicians in these matters. And, the author of this article is certainly no economist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wrong Posted by: frantaylor
» "Mistuh Friedman - he dead." Posted by: thoughtcriminal
Obscene is right: 50 cents profit to govt, 8 cents to oil companies
Posted by: EagleX on May 6, 2008 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who is the glutton?

at least with oil companies we get efficient reinvestment into finding and drilling new oil sources -- the government wastes any money it receives.

for example, congressmen driving around in $1000 a month gas guzzling rental cars at taxpayers expense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Legalize Cannabis, REFORM PT, and stop supporting Big Oil, Coal, Nuclear, Chemical, etc ...
Posted by: maxpayne on May 6, 2008 6:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's the best way America and in fact the rest of the world can save itself. Check your pols to see who'll even bother to give the 26000+ industrial uses of industrial hemp a chance and who will still buy into the "reefer madness" propaganda and Citizen NAZI Kane BULLSHIT. Remember, like Thomas Frank would always say, the corporate interests can't get their way unless they successfully inject their phoney cultural "populism" into the debates and the Left doesn't put progressive populism first and foremost.

And join me in making our cities REFORM public transportation by improving those bus routes and switching to light rail trains that use far less oil and coal. Make your pols DIVERT the current spoonfeeding oversubsidization of Big Oil, Coal, Nuclear, Chemical, etc ... towards improving America's public transportation infrastructure that has been in DECAY for nearly 3 decades. And let's all reward each other for cutting down on heavy plastic usage such as making the most of each trash bag and making the best of the gadgets we buy. 9 out of 10 times, your next cell phone or iPod is no better than the previous one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Left is the problem
Posted by: EagleX on May 6, 2008 6:46 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there is 5 times the oil that Saudi Arabia possesses in the Western US that is not being exploited because of democrat policies hijacked by environmentalists.

we could eliminate our account deficits by eliminating our dependence on foreign energy AND reap tremendous tax revenue from allowing American companies to removing oil from shale inthe western US.

untapped wealth denied by democrat policies

for those who question the feasibility of removing the oil -- we are already buying millions of barrels annually from canadians who are extracting oil from shale.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Typical rightwing bullshit Posted by: GrantBurkeVT
» RE:BULLSHIT Posted by: cwilsondrum
» EagleX = Troll Posted by: Aimleft
Stop complaining
Posted by: frantaylor on May 6, 2008 7:53 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Buy oil stocks. Stop using so much oil and buy some oil stocks with the money you save. Stop complaining about the natural forces of economics and take advantage of them.

You can grovel and grumble and complain about the price of oil, but NOTHING is going to make the price come back down. Get used to that concept and get on with life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stop complaining Posted by: Luther Blissett
» Human Nature Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: Human Nature Posted by: Xynyx
» You Bet! Posted by: frantaylor
» Yup, just like Nature Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: You Bet! Posted by: Aimleft
» What a crock Posted by: frantaylor
» Victim!!! Posted by: frantaylor
» Watch out, Max Posted by: Aimleft
More stupid rhetoric
Posted by: mtnclimber on May 6, 2008 8:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pay attention!

When will people learn that you do not save money by taxing a copmany. Al they will do is raise the price at the pump to recover the cost!

The companies are not raising the price of the oil, it is the hedge funds, the commodity investors, with China and India trying to get their share, etc. The price is up partially because our economy is down! the Dollar is down against any currency so when we import things, they cost MORE LIKE OIL!

Adjust the gasoline price you pay for inflation and look back 10 or 20 or 30 years. What you find is that the price is fairly uniform. We got used to cheap oil in the 90's and what do we want??? WE WANT MORE CHEAP OIL! Now, who is greedy - US or the Oil companies? Besides, who bought the SUV's?

Most of the comments reflect a real knowledge of the oil industry and refing gasoline. It costs more to make gasoline in the summer! Believe me, I have a PHD in Chemical Engineering and it does cost more seasonally.

Now economists, why shouldn't a company buy back its stock? Actually, it is a sign of a healthy business. Not buying stock or selling it is the same as borrowing money. Buying back stock is reducing their debt, increasing shareholder value and giving you all a better return for your investments. Since we all own a piece of them via mutual funds, index funds, etc. and want good returns, we should be happy they are making a profit.

If you want to have gasoiline at the pump tomorrow, you had better hope that the oil ocmpanies are financially healtyhy enough to explore for it, recover it, refine it and distribute it to YOU! YOU are the source of the problem by your life style and demands and businesses follow the trend selling you what you want!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» huh? Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: huh? Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: what? Posted by: WyrdSister
The only logical conclusion
Posted by: reason on May 6, 2008 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only logical conclusion I can come up with is this administration is having an unecessary war for profits, while allowing charges for essentials like gas and health insurance to be unregulated.

Taxes are too low on these windfall profits. They are draining the coffers of the average American and America itself.

They should be arrested, from Bush on down and the owners of these companies should be arrested, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm as troubled
Posted by: Ignatz deFyre on May 6, 2008 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
by fuel cost as much as the next guy, but $11B
profit on revenues of $117B is only 9.4%. Without getting hung up by the magnitude of the numbers let's face it, a 10% return is hardly a "windfall", for any type of business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hooray!!! Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: You're batshit crazy Posted by: cwilsondrum
Just wondering
Posted by: Knot_Rich on May 6, 2008 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just wondering, if Nomi owned the only bookstore in a college town and was making good profit selling textbooks, would he believe he should be forced to use some of his profit to help students find alternatives to shopping at his store? Now don't get me wrong, I'm not a big supporter of these incredible oil company profits, but, we should sit back and think about who are the people pumping the money into their accounts. It's normal for companies to buy back stock when times are good, and c'mon, companies don't go using their profits to finance ways for people to avoid using their product. Why should the oil companies be inventing to persuade people to give up their gas guzzlers and buy more efficient cars? This is something people should be doing, all by themselves, anyway. Just maybe Soccer Mom doesn't actually need to drive little Johnny to school when the public bus runs right by their house. Every morning there are long lines of SUVs burning fuel waiting to drop kids of at the door because their parents believe their kids are too good to ride the bus. Many extra miles of asphalt are laid, covering more green area, to cater to them. We want cheap goods so we send our jobs overseas, creating more people competing for the oil we believe is our right to buy cheap. We continually refuse to adjust, to attempt to conserve, whining and demanding that someone else do something for us. It's not the oil companies job to make us by more efficient cars, it's not their job to make us conserve, it's not their job to fund research for alternatives to their product. It's our job folks, we need to downsize our vehicles, we need to think about our trips more carefuly, and if we start buying alternative products like solar panels the market for them will increase and the profits will shift from the oil companies to the manufacturers of these products. Then we'll whine that the manufacturers of solar hot water heaters are making too much money so we need to force them to invest their profits in research to find us alternatives to them. This article is all about lazy and dependent thinking, wanting someone else to take responsibility for the things we should be doing ourselves. Times are changing, as they always do, and we need to move along with them. We didn't expect the makers of horse drawn wagons to use their profits to finance Henry Ford, they'd have kicked your butt out of their shop for trying to force them. It's up to us to determine where we go from here. If we expect and demand the oil companies to finance our future, we'll go where they want us to go. If we do our own research, as as everyone here knows, there's a ton of information available out here, and begin to purchase alternatives, we'll drive the research and direction of our future. Where there is a market, there will be people who will meet it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» loser Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: Just wondering Posted by: WyrdSister
speculators at the trough
Posted by: WolfieSense on May 6, 2008 10:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CEO of ATA James C. May (smartskies.org) points out: last quarter financials indicate that 13.5 times more oil was traded than the volume of oil actually consumed! as long as there's no oversight on traders, hedge fund operators and all other sorts of concocted tradind schemes, oil, food and other comodities will stay artificially inflated

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nature of the beast Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: Nature of the beast Posted by: WolfieSense
» oops Posted by: frantaylor
» I am one who chooses not to drive Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: Nature of the beast Posted by: WolfieSense
» Divest yourself Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: Divest yourself Posted by: WolfieSense
» It is too a free market Posted by: frantaylor
An aside: you'd generally expect "climate concerned young progressives"...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on May 6, 2008 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...to be singing the praises of pie-in-the-sky gas prices--well, by American standards, anyway.

It even supports their notion on peak oil, not to paint with too broad a brush.

So, armed with newly minted economic evidence that the supply of oil is, indeed, imminently, er, "leaving", and with the understanding that high enough gas is going force people with the oldest, craggiest, least fuel-efficient car-things off the road (not to mention making lots of folks/families shelve their hummers/suburbans)...I have to wonder: why the long faces amongst folks claiming to abhor the act of exhaling (emitting CO2)?

Could you achieve a better environmental goal than raising gas prices above a threshold that would put the possibility of owning a conventional internal combustion engine-driven vehicle out of the reach of 20-30% of current drivers, and force many of the remainders to severely scale back their consumption?

Now, I'm more pragmatic than to buy into this notion, but were my only concern CO2/environmental impact--I'd be doing a touchdown dance for every penny gas rises in this country...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Running scared
Posted by: willymack on May 6, 2008 11:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody has, or will, acuse energy company executives of being stupid. They can see far enough down the road to the day when using combustibles of ANY kind is not only NOT a solution to future energy needs, it may well be suicidal to much of humanity. They no doubt, feel compelled to extract every dime possible from their rapidly diminishing resources, and are hard at work doing just that. What's not clear is if they're attempting to develop post-combustion, enviornmentally neutral energy sources for the future, because they wouldn't tell anyone about it until such time as they could establish a monopoly and maximize profits. It's time to nationalize energy companies if only for this reason, but also, in the case of Exxon, to make them pay the multibillion dollar settlement imposed on them for the poisoning of Prince William sound, in full, and right now. From there, they could be made to use some of their obscene profits to accelerate research into more enviornmentally friendly and renewable energy sources.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Liquidation
Posted by: rbredberg on May 6, 2008 11:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact is that the oil companies are in the process of liquidation. They control only 5% of the worlds oil reserves, production is falling, their infrastructure is aging and in need of replacement. They have weighed all of these factors and made the conscious decision to not invest any more into exploration, refining or their workforce than they have to other than to keep the system tottering along until they can wring all of the oil out of their proven reserves. Which process should take about 15-20 years. After that they will be done, or moved into some other business.

People need to face the fact that all of the best and easily accesible oil is going going, gone. What is left is heavy crude, tar sands, or shale. While there is plenty of oil left, what is left will be harder to extract and refine. The era of $15-$20/barrel oil is over, the price will never be below $80/barrel again and it will only go up from here. Also we will never be able to produce more than 90 mbpd, ever. And that number will go down with each passing year, while the demand for oil will keep going up every year.

There is no conspiracy, no plot to steal from the middle class. We are oil junkies, all of the world's economies cannot exist and grow without oil. We eat oil, every calorie of food that we consume requires the input of 8 calories of energy from fossil fuel to get it from the field to our plates.

There is no combination of alternatives that will replace oil 100%. The world is in for a bad time going forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to Nationalize the American Oil Companies..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on May 6, 2008 1:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The solution is so simple the time has come to Nationalize the American Oil Companies..and all holdings..!

Here we go again I'll try and explain it..

First 49% of OPEC is the American Oil companies so Exxon-Mobil is not paying $120 per barrel they only pay around $40 dollars per barrel..!

Then they make around 33% on the gasoline you buy at whatever price it is set at..

Now there is even some talk that Oil may go to $200 per barrel well do you know how large a barrel of Oil is..no not 55 gallons only 42 gallons so at $200 per barrel you will be paying nearly $5.00 per Gallon for raw crude Oil..out of the ground $5.00 per gallon for what Oil..not at all refined just the crap they pump out of the ground..?

Now if we Nationalize the American Oil companies we can cut costs by at least 33% even more and create an economic boom that will effect every single American and almost if not every business this would be the great economic boom since the post WWII boom..!

Then we would have still around $50-60 billion per year to develop alternate energy and new technologies, new engine designs perhaps even fusion..

Remember the American Oil Companies are not in the business of putting themselves out of business nor are they in any way patriotic or in the least concerned for the national well being..so to think they will truly develop alternative energy is delusional..!

It's like Buddy Rich inventing the drum machine..!

Our idiot lying politicians say they want a Manhattan type Project for energy well this is it..!

Remember also that the worlds most successful Oil entities are state run..and also still traded..

Oil is a national infrastructure vital asset and this should be considered a national security and national vital resource not something to be screwed with as we see with these companies not just Exxon Mobil but all of them..

They are bringing America to it's knees all to create corporate wealth for the sake of wealth..as we see with these companies buying back their own stock..

When Exxon Mobil made $38 billion last year they bought back $37 billion of their own stock..what a waste imagine what that profit and investment could have done to enhance America's security, self reliance and energy independence..the technologies we could have developed and those already existing we could have subsidized..

Our politicians are idiots and all too many American confuse supporting corporate wealth and "corporate personhood" with patriotism this is lunacy and a suicidal philosophical fatal error..

The future will be an America that provides energy to it's people and companies and businesses or there will not be much of a future..for us..which is how it's beginning to look more everyday..

If you don't think it's time to Nationalize the American Oil Companies then you're just not there yet but believe me you will be soon enough..

Sadly these three candidates none of them have any sense of Macro-economics, not a clue as to how to run a great nation and make it greater..

We must Nationalize the American Oil Companies and all Holdings eventually all major energy..IE. all Electric power as well..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sure, but Posted by: frantaylor
» RE:There's more to this here..! Posted by: TJ-stars4peace
» RE: There's more to this here..! Posted by: TJ-stars4peace
Hummer drivers
Posted by: WyrdSister on May 6, 2008 1:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
have small penises.

imho

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hummer drivers Posted by: thekidde
I partly Blame the Iraq War for Rising Oil Prices. Before 2003, Oil was $20/barrel. Now it's $120
Posted by: yellow on May 7, 2008 1:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The effects of the War on global markets, production and the sudden post-2003 surge in oil commodities futures speculation were obvious. The war obviously had the intended consequences for big oil which has profited handsomely from the incredible surge in international crude prices.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oligarchy
Posted by: ray burchard on May 7, 2008 2:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is how the American populace is served when we allow our elected officials to sell access to influence through ‘Corporate Lobbying’.

While logic dictates that avarice is effectively an inspiration to America’s progress, it is also an overriding cancer, that when left unmanaged will dominate its host without the slightest concern for the host’s well being.

It’s well past the time for America’s governance to regulate corporate America’s greed instead of rubber stamping it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Mongoose Trick - speaking truth to tyranny & tyrants
Posted by: Spock on May 9, 2008 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ha! After decades - and hundred billion in "oil depletion allowances" and a dozen more examples of creative rhetoric - what does the taxpayer who paid the TAXES one would otherwise call "an investment" or "buying stock" get? Why, he gets the same chance to pay through the teeth, this time at the pump. Any other corporation in business would have to pull a "Savings and Loan" bailout - the taxpayer again - or a "Mortgage Lender" bailout (it's coming) scam. Unless you're military industrial - then you just fake a reason to invade somebody. Isn't corporate capitalism and government by corporate capitalists wonderful? You pay at the IRS, you pay at the pump, or you pay the grocery counter, but you pay. Do you have any say in the matter? Nope, no "say" - just "pay."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]