Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Profiteers Squeeze Billions Out of Growing Global Food Crisis

By Geoffrey Lean, Independent UK. Posted May 5, 2008.


Speculators blamed for driving up price of basic foods as 100 million face severe hunger.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Geoffrey Lean

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Giant agribusinesses are enjoying soaring earnings and profits out of the world food crisis which is driving millions of people towards starvation, The Independent on Sunday can reveal. And speculation is helping to drive the prices of basic foodstuffs out of the reach of the hungry.

The prices of wheat, corn and rice have soared over the past year driving the world's poor -- who already spend about 80 per cent of their income on food -- into hunger and destitution.

The World Bank says that 100 million more people are facing severe hunger. Yet some of the world's richest food companies are making record profits. Monsanto last month reported that its net income for the three months up to the end of February this year had more than doubled over the same period in 2007, from $543m (£275m) to $1.12 billion. Its profits increased from $1.44 billion to $2.22 billion.

Cargill's net earnings soared by 86 per cent from $553m to $1.030 billion over the same three months. And Archer Daniels Midland, one of the world's largest agricultural processors of soy, corn and wheat, increased its net earnings by 42 per cent in the first three months of this year from $363m to $517m. The operating profit of its grains merchandising and handling operations jumped 16-fold from $21m to $341m.

Similarly, the Mosaic Company, one of the world's largest fertiliser companies, saw its income for the three months ending 29 February rise more than 12-fold, from $42.2m to $520.8m, on the back of a shortage of fertiliser. The prices of some kinds of fertiliser have more than tripled over the past year as demand has outstripped supply. As a result, plans to increase harvests in developing countries have been hit hard.

The Food and Agriculture Organisation reports that 37 developing countries are in urgent need of food. And food riots are breaking out across the globe from Bangladesh to Burkina Faso, from China to Cameroon, and from Uzbekistan to the United Arab Emirates.

Benedict Southworth, director of the World Development Movement, called the escalating earnings and profits "immoral" late last week. He said that the benefits of the food price increases were being kept by the big companies, and were not finding their way down to farmers in the developing world.

The soaring prices of food and fertilisers mainly come from increased demand. This has partly been caused by the boom in biofuels, which require vast amounts of grain, but even more by increasing appetites for meat, especially in India and China; producing 1 pound of beef in a feedlot, for example, takes 7 pounds of grain.

World food stocks at record lows, export bans and a drought in Australia have contributed to the crisis, but experts are also fingering food speculation. Professor Bob Watson -- chief scientist at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, who led the giant International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development -- last week identified it as a factor.

Index-fund investment in grain and meat has increased almost fivefold to over $47 billion in the past year, concludes AgResource Co, a Chicago-based research firm. And the official US Commodity Futures Trading Commission held special hearings in Washington two weeks ago to examine how much speculators were helping to push up food prices.

Cargill says that its results "reflect the cumulative effect of having invested more than $18 billion in fixed and working capital over the past seven years to expand our physical facilities, service capabilities, and knowledge around the world".

The revelations are bound to increase outrage over multinational companies following last week's disclosure that Shell and BP between them recorded profits of $28 billion in the first three months of the year -- or $6 million an hour -- on the back of rising oil prices. Shell promptly attracted even greater condemnation by announcing that it was pulling out of plans to build the world's biggest wind farm off the Kent coast.

World leaders are to meet next month at a special summit on the food crisis, and it will be high on the agenda of the G8 summit of the world's richest countries in Hokkaido, Japan, in July.

Additional research by Vandna Synghal.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: agribusiness, food crisis, greed corporations

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
You mean we're addicted to food as well as oil?
Posted by: Rune on May 5, 2008 12:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who knew?

In both industries, it is the same game. We are dependent on a concentrated, mature industry that has been working to cripple competition on both the supply and demand ends of the system. Until we relearn and reinvest in systems that give us more local and direct control over the resources we depend on and quit looking to multinational corporations to run the things we need most in the world, we will be paying a very high price for a remedial education in international finance and macroeconomics over and over again. There is no free market or anything like it at work here. If you are not in a position to rig the system for your own benefit, it is time to divest, because the political-economic system we have been relying on is corrupted and eating itself from bottom to top.

Coming up next, who owns your water system? Also featured tonight, who controls your government?

Now, just come down and breathe . . . while you can still afford to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Food is a necessity - oil is not. Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» RE: Food is a necessity - oil is not. Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» The Core Problem is this... Posted by: Cathyc
The Perfect Storm ... Why Countries Need Food Sovereignty.
Posted by: mmckinl on May 5, 2008 1:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Grain stores have been falling for over 4 years. Drought, peaking oil supply, food being diverted to fuel and the Big Ag Conglomerates with the help of EU and American crop subsidies and WTO agreements have devastated small farmers and food sovereignty worldwide.

Thanks to IMF and World Bank loans countries have been forced to embrace intensive farming using far more water, pesticides and fertilizer than they would normally as the seeds they are sold require these inputs to grow. The farmers are shackled to these practices by WTO rules and regulations while tariffs that once protected them are slashed and subsidized crops from the EU and the United States flood in, putting them out of business.

These countries then become reliant on ever more imported food that is subject to the whims of a worldwide market that only responds to price and not need.

We saw this in the deregulated energy markets in the State of California. Inputs were no longer priced in long term contracts but on a day to day basis, producers were sold off, thereby opening the market to speculation and manipulation. State regulators were talked into lifting protections for short term gains that stalled long term safety of supply. Big Ag is now playing this same game with the world's supply of food. They control the producers through inputs and the means of distribution as countries become more dependent on imported food.

Food sovereignty must be a primary goal for every nation. Letting outside forces capture once local markets leaves poor countries with little or no recourse against currency variations, supply problems elsewhere and rising oil prices. No, every country cannot feed itself, but most can, through protection from tariffs, establish healthy and ongoing agricultural sectors that can feed many more people than they do now. In doing this the demand for imported food diminishes worldwide establishing a layer of safety for currency swings, energy shortages and crop failures in other countries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gee, we didn't see that coming!
Posted by: ankhet on May 5, 2008 1:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As has been said elsewhere, "Wow. What a surprise. And it just sprang up, fully formed, right out of the blue like that - boom! and nobody was expecting that would happen. Nobody could have seen that coming. After all, 35 years isn’t enough time to catch on to the shell game, is it?

Where the blinketyblank have all the watchdogs been all this time? Hasn’t it been glaringly obvious for some time now that you really shouldn’t trust the fox to guard the hen house (no matter how charming the pro-corporate fairytale)?

First, you need to stop drinking the anti-government koolaid. The government is you - see to it that the people you hire do their job properly, that is, take care of business for you the way you want it done. Shift the dynamic. Reclaim it. Be vigilant. The govt is not your nanny, it’s your servant. Stop paying attention to the “anti-government” manifesto because the corporations are the biggest welfare queens around. That whole anti-government gospel was a big manipulation. And they’re laughing at you, and not just for falling for it over and over. Remember Enron’s comments on grannies and the manufactured power failures and how they laughed? Remember how they laughed at you then? Newsflash: they still are. It’s the same laugh you hear from the mugger in the street.

This is it - the ruling spirit of our age - you are plunder, nothing more than farm animals, criminals by default, deadbeats, cannon fodder, needy, fearful little ids to be pushed around.

The corporate predators must be leashed again. The shorter the chain the better. If global starvation, drought, environmental depletion, degradation aren’t enough to show you that the system is faulty to the core and killing people, and to mobilize you, you need a brick upside the head.

It was government action that gave your parents and grandparents the good life you resent them for now. Their mistake was their lack of vigilance coupled with complacency. You must see to getting your government back shaped the way you want it, and you will be able to end these rapacious practices that are killing millions. And become citizens again.

There will be blood."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "There will be blood" ? Posted by: Cathyc
Another Final Solution ?
Posted by: Last Chance on May 5, 2008 5:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps the big food corporations have decided upon a brutally effective answer to overpopulation, price millions of poor people out of the food market and let them starve to death?
If Saving the Earth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another Final Solution ? Posted by: Last Chance
It is more than Academic - where's your next sandwich coming from?
Posted by: sln70 on May 5, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The food crisis is already showing up in my kitchen. Yours too? The price of beard and all grain-related products has shot up. Even beer, we Canadians have been warned - is going to cost us more dearly soon. Egads! I want to stock up.

Anyone interested in commenting on how the various crises - oil, food, credit - is affecting their lives is welcome to do so here:
Freedom Love Money
it's a new space which I began after being fired from my job. Reflections on how to live ethically in hard financial times, etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Capital Liberalization & Intellectual Property Rights are at the center
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 5, 2008 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1) Capital liberalization means that speculators can mount attacks on the fledgling banking systems of developing countries - which is why the World Bank and the IMF and the U.S. Government and our elected members of Congress and every single U.S. President since 1952 have pushed for it.

If you have a retirement fund, you can't pull money out of it without a large penalty, for obvious reasons - yet the U.S. has demanded that right for U.S. investors in foreign countries - that is always THE central issue in our "free trade agreements".

A country with a destroyed banking system can't make credit available to farmers. They might get food aid from the U.S., but that food aid is only for purchase of U.S. agricultural commodities - so the dollars go from the U.S. taxpayer to the U.S. treasury to the IMF to the country of interest and back into the pockets of large agribusiness corporations in the United States.

This is why small agricultural nations find themselves in the position of having to buy food from overseas, when you would think that the situation would be opposite - a small agricultural nation would normally be trading food for technology and manufactured goods.

What is going on now in the commodities sector is called futures hoarding. The farmer sold the future some time ago, and now the future is being traded up by speculators - so even the farmers aren't making any money off this latest manipulation of the market.

2) Intellectual property here refers to the owning of plant strains by biotech and seed companies like Monsanto and Syngenta. Their goal is to set up seed monopolies - in their ideal world, all farmers would purchase seed from them and from them only. These guys are the ones raking in the cash right now:

"Defensive sectors like Agriculture are performing pretty well lately. Syngenta (NYSE: SYT) is hitting all-time highs every month, benefiting from crop expansion and protection. Valuation is getting demanding, but it is still cheap versus Monsanto (NYSE: MON).

Syngenta's big holders are Wellington, Vanguard, Fidelity, Janus (of Enron fame), and Munder, etc.

Monsanto's big holders are Fidelity, Vanguard, Marisco, AllianceBernstein, PRIMECAP, Barclays, Capital Research, Janus, etc.

If you look up the ownership of the major U.S. corporate news conglomerates, you'll find many of the same major shareholders - which is why the U.S. press doesn't publish front page articles on speculators driving food prices through the roof, or on the effort by international agribusiness and biotech corporations to establish monopolies by using patented GMO crops.

This is also why the New York Times Co. features Paul Krugman trying to blame it all on ethanol demand and the "free market" - a theme which was echoed and repeated by Amy Goodman on the left, and Rush LImbaugh on the right. (Rush: See, I Told You So: Ethanol Will Lead to Corn Price Crisis).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Help Oxfam respond to the food crisis
Posted by: fanny666 on May 5, 2008 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Help Oxfam respond to the food crisis


By the way, this should be on the front pages, but food shipments to refugee camps in and around Sudan were just cut in half about 10 days ago because continued attacks make the UN Food Programme convoys so unsafe. Please call 1-800-GENOCIDE, it's an easy, recorded call that gives talking points then connects you right with the correct reps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No concern about the Future- because they don't beleive in one
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 5, 2008 9:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been so caught up in the fact tha tCorporationist have been running amok with out a care in the World, and esp th eFuture of mankind, I failed to see the Doctrine which fuels it. Now I SEE- It's not that the Inc's are pushing mankind on to the global Auction Block though economic and Resource shortages. They must be Fellow 'End of Days'- Followers of such Sociopaths as Hagee, who has the Political and Corp support to make it a Self fulfilling Prophecy. they don't give a shit about future generations- because they are they are rigging the Outcome!
Rev Wright was a Red herring- offensive but not dangerous! Hagee and his supporters ARE a
CLEAR & PRESENT DANGER! His agenda requires a Pre- emptive Stike on Iran, thus provoking the USSR to respond. they are trying to bring on 'End of Days' so THEY may Be the Generation to be 'RAPTUED'.
Our military MUST COME HOME!!We have Domestic Enemies in Very High Places. No wonder they have exhausted our Service personnel, our resourcees, Our economy and Stolen ALL Our Rights! Damn Right I'll Cling to MY 'God' and Guns, they just might be needed to save mankind!NOW I'M TERRIFIED!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get what we deserve
Posted by: jstepp590 on May 5, 2008 9:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as we let corporations and foreign governments decide who we can elect, in fact give us our choices (which is why we always get left to choose the best from bad choices), by funding their campaigns then we get what we deserve. We will continue to watch our jobs go overseas, our middle class shrink, S&L's crash, housing bubbles burst, prison systems grow, education standards fall apart, bankruptcy of our economy, and the very country we all love go into the toilet for the greed of the few.

Think about it, as an example we have a president who gets paid $400k per year but he had to spend $300 million to get the job. Who do you think he's working for? The people who pay him $400k or the people who paid 300 million, have full time lobbyists to keep pushing and expect a hefty return on their investment?

Polititions are not going to stand up to these corporations as they will lose their jobs. Until we bring in a Clean Election system, and not one initiated by these very polititions, we will continue to have these problems. Maybe we deserve it for letting it happen to us, but the rest of the world does not.

Then people here wonder why people from other countries cheer Osama! When we do things like this we can expect them to want to do worse than cheer for our enemy. Eventually they will join him. Eventually, this will lead to war. Of course, the "defense" industry would love it!

"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power."
Benito Mussolini

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» America is a Fascist State Posted by: Cathyc
If you want to reign in the multinationals, go local and repeal the red tape against growing local.
Posted by: GrantBurkeVT on May 5, 2008 10:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did any of you ever take the time to look at both the Republicans and Democrats blindly supporting multinationals all the while STIFLING the growth of local farms but putting in more bureaucratic red tape and obnoxious licensing fees and other stipulations MNCs never had to go through? Help your local businesses and save the world from slave labor by going local.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Going Local... Posted by: Cathyc
» Going Local will be big! Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: Going Local... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Going Local -yeah baby! Posted by: Purple Girl
Ain't it grand?
Posted by: willymack on May 5, 2008 10:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What unchecked greed can cause? All the wrong people are making tons of money, while leaving the rest of us to suck hind tit. Well, gotta run and hoard now, so bye.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ain't it grand? Posted by: Livemike
Competetive corporate capitalism puts everyone in competition
Posted by: LeftWright on May 5, 2008 11:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for everything, even basics like food and shelter.

Does anyone NOT understand this?

A co-operative model is the way forward.

Let's leave competition for sports and spelling bees.

9/11 truth exposes the corruption at the heart of this, brothers and sisters, and this is why more and more of us are focusing on it every day.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Funny how
Posted by: jc1234 on May 5, 2008 12:36 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they say demand has accelerated so fast as to explain the increased price along with decreased supply. I simply do not believe it. Its kind of like saying a house is now worth 2-3 times what is was 10 years ago, we know how that rubbish happened and Bear Stearns was the symptom that flagged the bubble as what it was.
The most reasonable explanation is that speculating is causing the price spike, just like housing. The AG interests are just exploiting it all. Speculative money is looking for a place to hide from the subprime and derivatives bubble and it chose commodities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not so funny Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Not so funny Posted by: Livemike
A Peaceful, Reasonable Revolution
Posted by: dockboy on May 5, 2008 1:01 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What you liberals ought to do, is get jobs with these corporations. Work your way up the corporate ladder, and silently take over these companies from the inside.

In the end, when you have positions of power, cease the practice of making profits. Stockholders be damned, they're only capitalists. Just maintain a break even on the balance sheets. This way, you can keep the costs of goods down. Everyone will be happy. Of course, this means getting a job and doing some work, but still, it's a viable solution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Orwellian term alert: Speculation!
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on May 5, 2008 1:55 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Speculation:

This is what we call it when the government comes in and subsidizes a commodity, such as corn via ethanol, without taking a moment to consider what the increased demand for fertilizer-hungry corn will do to the broader market. Now witness the result: The top performing fortune 500 stock of 2007 was a fertilizer company.

This is called speculation??

Shrug.

It is called the market reacting to an unnatural gap created by government subsidy. End result? We end up paying more for food AND fuel. Pushing up the price of fertilizer is a very dangerous game. Half the world's population is mortally dependent upon industrial chemical fertilizers.

This is just the latest example of thousands of examples of the government doing more harm than good via subsidy. But it's always those damn speculators! It's like there's a big pile of stinking poo on the floor, with flies buzzing all around it. And articles like these love to blame the stench on the flies.

Solution?

Kill all the flies and the stench will go away! For just $2,000,000 we'll sell you the ultimate robotic flyswatter.

Oh that didnt work? Here give us 20 million and we'll send a dozen more ultimate robotic flyswatters.

That is government in action. They are NOT stupid. It's a scam. It's only meant to look stupid, as a cover. In reality, the naive public are the stupid ones. And all the scammers know it.

Hillary knows it. When she talks about how those evil oil companies need to pay the tax on gasoline this summer. Yeah, tax them more, so they can raise their prices, and OPEC can raise theirs, and we end up paying more for gas, and a larger portion goes to OPEC.

And yes, McCain knows it too. He wont attempt to pay for a gas tax cut by taxing the oil companies. He'll just borrow the money to pay for it! Which will devalue the dollar even more, and that will in turn raise prices even more. It doesnt matter that it was the borrowing that resulted in oil costing so much money.

Just the simple fact that they even had the gall to propose something so idiotic just goes to show how dumb they deem the public.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Simple priorities
Posted by: JohnJlws on May 5, 2008 3:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This piece now has 35 comments, 36 if you count this one.
McCain preacher has 33 comments.
Moyers Black vs. White preachers has 134 comments.
At USAToday (I just chose some place) the only title of any article that even mentions food is "Rice presses Israel on roadblocks," which of course isn't about edible rice, but one about Wright hurting Obama in the polls has so many comments (over 500) they turned off commenting.

We spend $12 billion a week in Iraq. We spend more on our military than all other industrialized countries combined. I've read where stopping this expenditure even for a few minutes solves the world hunger problem.

This is simple priorities. We, our country, do not care enough to stop the death by starvation that is in its infancy and yet claims tens of thousands of lives every week (10K per day; approximately 21 9-1-1s every week).

JESUS CHRIST where did we get so wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The World's Growing Food-Price Crisis – A Crime Against Humanity.
Posted by: Wilfred on May 6, 2008 1:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are seeing a new demonic face of hunger in which people are being priced out of the food market. Sharp food price hikes are hurting the poor and sparking violent protest all over the world. This is happening against a global campaign against the production of Biofuels with the United Nations having declared it a Crime Against Humanity.
This is devastating for the two billion poor people worldwide who live on less than R14.40 a day.
The re-balancing of food prices in relation to the price of energy is likely to cause severe social distress.
Climate change is also playing a role and appears to be increasingly destructive as massive droughts and storms, such as a cyclone last year, destroyed R4 320 million worth of rice in Bangladesh.
The rising cost of oil is the major contributor to the food crisis, affecting the cost of production, transport and fertilisers. This is driving the switch to biofuel production as an alternative to hydrocarbons and the race among western countries to produce Biofuels is responsible, in significant part, for the escalating food costs. The logic is simple: When countries put corn aside for energy, the amount available for food is in greater demand, and prices rise. If demand is already high, the effect is amplified.
Generous government subsidies for ethanol in the U.S. have lured thousands of farmers away from growing crops for food. Nearly a third of the corn output in the U.S this year will be used to make an estimated 9.3 billion gallons of ethanol.
There is enough food in the world for everyone but it is the pursuit of profit that stops people from having enough to eat. Capitalist governments and the imperialist powers who are complete servants of multinationals will not raise an eyebrow if not pushed by mass protest. These giant corporations are prospering and profiteering at an alarming rate in an environment of neo-liberal policies.
There is no long-term solution under capitalism, because the overriding interest of food manufacturers and distributors is profit.
Corruption, governments’ collusion with profit-hungry traders, food manufactures and multinationals coupled with drought & bad weather, high oil prices stocking transport costs, spiking bio-fuel demand and low reserves are the contributors to this malaise.
There is no guarantee that governments will positively respond, but public attention can often illuminate otherwise ignored problems.
The South African populace needs to be vigilant as our cabinet has approved the development of an Industrial Biofuels Strategy in late 2005 and released its draft strategy in late 2006.
The demand must be made for governments to swiftly implement policy measures that include (1) price controls on most staple food items, (2) the establishment a State-owned Commodity Marketing Board that must be the sole buyer of particular commodities and/or operate a guaranteed price/purchase scheme for others, (3) the sale and transfer agricultural inputs & technologies to farmers, at subsidized prices, that lower input cost but contributes to higher yields and increased productivity and (4) a state entity for the production of some basic commodities.
These policies and programmes must allow for (1) market interventions to alter the food prices directly, (2) support to improve competitiveness of the agricultural sector and above all safety net interventions in support of poor households.
Governments around the world must come under pressure from protest movements to fix food prices and even nationalise some food production. The organs of state, including parastatals, must implement and prioritise programmes to alleviate the plight of the poor and improve the quality of life of the people. Let us all join hands and fight against this crime against humanity.

Wilfred Alcock Pretoria-South Africa www.live.blat.co.za

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Teh people who make Decisions which result in Hunger should be held responsible
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 7, 2008 12:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is time to stop allowing these vile cowards to continue to hide be hide the Brick & Mortar facade. tehre are Inidviuals who make these decisions and policies knowing full well what the effects will be on mankind- it is not only Immoral and Unethical -They are crimes against Humanity. Not until we hold the top brass personal responsible and Personally punishable will this Business Philosophy end. Fines have not worked, nor have the 'ssupension' of contracts- mere slaps on the wrist to the Inc and nothing to the person who is Directly responsible.
Warning- dangerous radical thought about to be expounded.(got me banned from Huffpo)
Those indiviuals who Practice such business doctrines should be personally prosecuted for Crimes against humanity. blood is on their hands not just from the starvation but also the Wars they Cause in a battle for Resources.Anyone who takes on the leadership of an organization that ultimately effects human life and welfare should feel wrath when their policies and practice result in loss of life( human & plantary).this also includes the Banking industry who hold the pursue strings to all resources. they take loans never agreed upon to bolster their own Profits- they should be personally held responsible to pay them off- or held accountable when they are in default- regardless who the creditor may be- domestic or Foreign- they 've been writting Bad checks off our Account for Decades-Stolen our identity- it's time to to them over the the Proper authorities and Creditors!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Food companies, oil companies, it's all the same thing
Posted by: cherylholmes on May 8, 2008 11:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The New Orleans psyche op worked. Thet got away with killing and destroying thousands of poor. Why shouldn't they now do it on a grander scale? That was the plan all along.

With the new Medicaid and Medicare cuts, mandating denying any healthcare to Medicaid patients, and patients over 60 years old in the event of natural or other disaster such as a terrorist attack, pandemic. they can wipe out millions in the name of "record profits." Oh yes, blame it on scare hospital "resources" but don't tell anyone the reason resources are scare is because you laid everyone off to raise the profit margins.

I read the new income eligibilty for social services including Medicaid is going to be $6800.00 (down from $11,000.00) for 1 person, $11,000.00 (down from $15,000) for a family of 3. Every year it continues to drop so that more and more of the elderly,poor and disabled will be thrown out of nursing homes, onto the streets without medical care, housing food or any of the basic necessities. Millions of poor were just thrown out of public housing too with these new income eligibilty guidelines. Yes, it's New Orleans all over again...

You may ask, why make them all suffer? Here's the deal, the government could enact humane euthanasia to prevent their suffering from starvation and disease, illness...but they won't because they love T O R T U R E and torture is legal in this country now. These guys love it!

Any wonder why Burma wants nothing to do with aid from us? They don't want the dictatorship that comes with it...just like Indonesia didn't either and through the U.S. out of their country. They don't want the string that come with "our" kind of help. They also know we don't even help our own because it's more important to fight useless never ending, expensive wars for world domination.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]