Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Vermont Deals a Blow to the Bottled Water Industry

By Tom A. Peter, Christian Science Monitor. Posted April 29, 2008.


The state's legislature has passed a bill that limits how much groundwater bottlers and other companies can draw.
Advertisement

With Lake Champlain, snowy peaks, and 40 inches of rain a year, the Green Mountain State isn't exactly parched. But don't tell that to Annette Smith.

Six years ago, a mining company pumped 2.7 million gallons of water from an underground well near her Danby, Vt., home. The local springs were so dry she had to spend more than $4,000 to dig a new well. When water eventually returned to the springs, the levels weren't what they once were, she says.

Such episodes have Vermonters so worried about unregulated water withdrawals that on Friday the state legislature passed a bill that establishes a water-permit requirement.

There's just one problem.

Several local bottled water companies and manufacturers worry that the new measure will boost costs and delay sales. While the measure has won praise from environmentalists, some analysts say it could violate the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) by unfairly restraining international trade.

"We're concerned that this going to add an undue cost to businesses currently in Vermont who want to expand operations," says William Driscoll, vice president of the Associated Industries of Vermont. "We're also worried about discouraging new businesses from coming to Vermont."

He estimates that the new bill would increase permit costs by 50 to 100 percent. Depending on the site, he says, a permit could cost from $20,000 to $100,000, even $200,000 in select cases.

Declaring groundwater to be a public trust, the bill aims to prevent corporations from taking more than their fair share. Enterprises withdrawing more than 57,600 gallons of water a day must now obtain a permit. (Most farms are exempt.) Gov. Jim Douglas (R) is expected to sign the measure.

"We wanted to protect our groundwater for the next several generations," says state Sen. Virginia Lyons (D), chair of the Natural Resources and Energy Committee. "If we don't have any protections, then an international company could come in and begin to extract water and take [it] without regard for the amount of resources available."

At least one Canadian bottled water company already pumps water out of Vermont, bottles it in New Hampshire, and sells it around the country, a sore spot among many locals.

"It really is commercializing and making a commodity of something that is really a staple for all of us," says Carolyn Shapiro, an East Montpelier artist who lives near a proposed bottled water site.

While Vermont is not the first state to enact such groundwater legislation, its measure is unusual because it avoids grandfathering large numbers of groundwater users -- something that has created problems in other states. Despite more than 20 years of regulation in Massachusetts, for example, an estimated 160 streams struggle to support fish and other aquatic life: Groundwater withdrawals have lowered water levels, says Kirt Mayland, director of the Eastern Water Project for Trout Unlimited, a conservation agency based in Arlington, Va.

"It's hard to overemphasize the importance of getting ahead of this problem before it's created, because trying to fix it once it's already out there is extremely difficult," says Mr. Mayland. "And from an environmental standpoint, it's almost too late because the damage has been done in a lot of these streams."

The legislation is a "good first step," says Ms. Smith, the Danby resident who also heads Vermonters for a Clean Environment. But she'd like a stronger law. "A permit is usually a permit to pollute or a permit to in some way degrade the resource," she says. "A regulatory program that permits the extraction of large withdrawals of groundwater is not necessarily one that protects the resource."

On the other side, analysts say if Vermont's permit process disrupts international companies' operations, they may challenge it on the grounds that it violates NAFTA by interrupting trade.

Senator Lyons, however, doubts this will be a problem because domestic and international companies must meet the same requirements.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: water, water privatization, water crisis, water shortage, bottled water, vermont



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's about time
Posted by: lb on Apr 29, 2008 5:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will draw the ire of laissez faire capitalists, but the bottled water business should be discouraged. Bottled water is a "manufactured" need to create growth and profit for drink manufacturers. The plastic bottles are a major source of pollution and drinking from them may expose us to harmful PBAs. Let the drink manufacturers find another product to market. Go back to tap water!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's about time Posted by: dustdevil
great start
Posted by: vailrxs on Apr 29, 2008 6:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to draw on the above comments... bottled water is for the wealthy. it's privatizing a natural resource. gov't needs to invest in its infrastructure and provide drinkable tap water for EVERYONE to use. good work vermont!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

nyydreamer
Posted by: nyydreamer on May 1, 2008 4:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope the Great Lakes states take notice of what Vermont is doing - if these lakes aren't protected I can just imagine the federal gov't taking over - then, we would see huge problems - look at BP, wanting to be able to pollute even more than before - bk

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You haven't tasted the water that comes out of the Mississippi
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on May 1, 2008 11:37 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
tap. When the river runs low, tap water tastes like mud.

Thanks Vermont, but Mississippi river tap water took
a lot of getting used to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Question for The Faithful Bottled Water Folks
Posted by: riley501111 on May 2, 2008 3:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever since I wrote a research paper on bottled water five years ago, I've gone on several message boards as well as asking people in person why they buy bottled water when it's free right out of the tap. The main defense, to explain what I believe is purely consumer brainwashing, has been that their water tastes terrible. What I've never thought to ask though was, "Did your terrible tasting tap water taste as bad before there was bottled water? If so, did you just not drink water at all?"
I remember the first time I ever saw a bottle of water standing proudly next to a bottle of pop in a vending machine. It looked oddly out of place and I found it very amusing. Now when walking down the beverage aisle in a grocery store and seeing an entire section dedicated to bottled water, I no longer find it funny. Rather, I see this as a horrifying sign of how consumers can be led to believe and obey just about anything. This is sad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]