Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Using Higher Ed.'s $340 Billion in Endowments to Make the World a Better Place

By Don Hazen and Jan Frel, AlterNet. Posted May 5, 2008.


Morgan Simon of the Responsible Endowment Coalition is helping student activists across the U.S. leverage their school endowments.
Advertisement

Socially responsible investing, the use of financial investments for social good, is a powerful tool to promote economic and social democracy. It convinced Home Depot to stop using old growth timber, RJR Nabisco to discontinue its "Joe Camel" advertisements and ARCO to withdraw its operations from the totalitarian state of Burma -- and it's gaining popularity as a tool for activists.

But what about on college and university campuses across the country?

Campus activists have traditionally gone after corporate offenders on issues such as fair trade and sweat shops, and the multi-hundred billion dollar growth in school endowments in recent decades is a huge opportunity to change corporate behavior. Enter the Responsible Endowments Coalition (REC), which helps students and other university members to push corporate reform on human rights, environmental responsibility and equal opportunity. AlterNet caught up with REC executive director Morgan Simon to discuss the crucial role that endowments can play in forcing economic change.

AlterNet: Why is responsible investing a key vehicle for change on campuses, and why are students responsive to working on endowments as a form of activism?

Morgan Simon: Students are naturally interested in changing their campuses for the better, thinking about the structure of society and what's going to be effective: Sometimes that means taking over buildings, but it also means doing petitions and raising awareness on important social issues. Students are really starting to explore where their leverage point is in society.

Nationwide there's $340 billion worth of endowments at U.S. colleges and universities -- that's the leverage point and a pretty powerful message. Capital markets have the power to transform the society we live in. For me as an undergrad at Swarthmore College, which has a $1 billion endowment, I started thinking that this is where I could make some real impact. In general, the students that I talk to are thrilled to learn about responsible investing as a form of activism, because it is a a tactic and a tool kit that can be applied to all social and environmental justice issues. It doesn't matter if you're passionate about the environment, diversity issues, or equal opportunity on gender or race, genocide, the list goes on -- but students can apply responsible investment to all.

AlterNet: How do you deal with the obstacle of how complicated the various financial instruments are and how they operate?

Simon: One of REC's major emphases is helping students from all class backgrounds understand what a mutual fund is. A big hurdle is getting students to be fluent about the role of money in society -- that they aren't afraid of it. But the truth is that students don't have to understand everything about the market.What's key for them to understand is that their school is probably sitting on a big pot of money, and that there are a lot of fairly simple things those students can do to make the schools change their attitudes and practices with that money to support social justice and the environment.

AlterNet: Your literature also explains that you're also focused on reaching out to trustees and the college administration.

Simon: Yes, we talk to administrators and tell them that a focus on responsible investing is a great way to show student and alumnae what your values are, and teach your students to learn more about the financial world. It ties the student body much closer to administrators. And when this happens, the feedback we hear from students is, "Gosh, I had no idea how hard it is to run a school; how much it takes to run an endowment and that trustees are very often volunteeers who really care about the school." It builds relationships of trust.

There's also the issue for school administrators that colleges and universities are nonprofit, mission-driven institutions; they don't pay taxes. Is it the case that there are financial institutions that happen to run a school, or are they mission-based institutions that believe in a cause and have an investing arm that's part of it? Are a school's assets supporting its mission 100 percent of the time? That's the same conversation that the foundation world has to consider.

This is a different tack that a lot of campus campaigns take, which frequently pit students against the administration. In many instances, the trustees just need to be made aware of the power that their endowments have from a shareholder perspective -- that you don't have to change the stocks you're holding, but that you can use the power of your stock in the company to change its practices. We can tell the school administration, "Look you'll either make the exact same amount of money, or you might even improve the value of those stocks because the responsible practices you're pushing for will improve the company's value.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: corporations, responsible endowments co, morgan simon, shareholder power

Don Hazen is AlterNet's executive editor. Jan Frel is AlterNet's senior editor.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENTS"
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 5, 2008 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
have been around for a long time. It's easy to find specific companies and mutual funds that publish information about what they do to comply with various social concerns. Pollution, various forms of discrimination, outsourcing, treatment of employees, foreign affiliations, etc. They're out there. You just have to do a little homework. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Selling Brand America to the public: TP#1 - responsible investment
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 5, 2008 8:22 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Socially responsible investing, the use of financial investments for social good, is a powerful tool to promote economic and social democracy. It convinced Home Depot to stop using old growth timber, RJR Nabisco to discontinue its "Joe Camel" advertisements and ARCO to withdraw its operations from the totalitarian state of Burma -- and it's gaining popularity as a tool for activists.

Sorry guys - all it is corporate social greenwashing. I'm not even sure what the right term is here, but it's well-known in the various clean air, clean water and clean food movements. I recommend http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=243 by Josh Karliner, as the best introduction to this topic:

"As the contemporary environmental movement built momentum in the mid-to-late 1960s, undermining the public trust in many a corporation, newly greened corporate images flooded the airwaves, newspapers and magazines. This initial wave of greenwash was labeled by former Madison Avenue advertising executive Jerry Mander and others at the time as "eco-pornography". . .

As the 1980s produced the Bhopal, Chernobyl and Exxon Valdez disasters, the environmental movement gained in strength. In response, greenwash advertisements became even more numerous and more sophisticated, peaking in 1990 on the 20th anniversary of Earth Day. It was during that year of eco-hoopla that "corporate environmentalism" came into its own in the US. . ."


It looks like a similar large-scale public relations movement is now underway to do the same thing with U.S. trade relationships - instead of colonial slave labor, let's call it socially responsible international investment - sounds one hell of a lot better, even if in practice it is the same thing.

Speaking of ARCO and greenwashing effort, it is worth nothing they have some experience here:

"In response to this phenomenon, the corporate world went to great lengths to market itself and its products as the greenest of the green. . . Simultaneously, some of the world's greatest polluters spent millions putting on a shiny new coat of green paint -- both literally and figuratively. The oil company ARCO, for instance, concealed its Los Angeles facility behind a facade of palm trees and artificial waterfalls in what one commentator labeled an "industrial version of cosmetic dentistry."

DuPont worked with Madison Avenue giant BBDO to produce an ad full of seals clapping, whales and dolphins jumping, and flamingos flying, all set to Beethoven's Ode to Joy, to project its newfound green image. And Dow Chemical, the largest producer of chlorine in the world, used the image of the planet Earth to tout its "ongoing commitment" to the environment, which it claims can be traced back to the founding of the company.


Let's also note that when Unocal was faced with dissent over their Burmese operations, prior to their sale to Chevron, their shareholders dismissed it:

Unocal Shareholders Reject Bid for Dissidents' Access to Board; The proposal stems from discontent over the energy firm's stake in a gas pipeline in Myanmar.;
Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles, Calif.: May 25, 2004. pg. C.2


Abstract (Summary)

Unocal Chairman and Chief Executive Charles Williamson defended the company's continuing presence in Myanmar to shareholders, saying it was "good for stockholders ... and the country."

El Segundo-based Unocal faces lawsuits in state and federal courts by villagers who said they or family members were raped, murdered or forced to work on the pipeline by the Myanmar military, which guarded the project from 1993 until its completion in 1998.


Maybe we can go back to an older phrase to describe social greenwashing: lying.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's put it this way:
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 5, 2008 8:42 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No doubt, all readers have heard the phrase, "socially responsible investment" before.

How many of you have heard the phrase "socially responsible government regulation"?

Yet, government regulation backed up by the law and criminal penalties is by far the most effective means of changing corporate behavior - whether it is in regards to selling tobacco and other drugs to kids, or in regards to doing business with a dictatorial, brutal and anti-democratic regime.

So, should we spend our efforts lobbying corporations in an effort to get them to behave better, or should we go to the government and demand that they regulate corporate behavior?

Obviously, the second choice is far, far more effective. The corporation will give you a pat on the head and a lollipop and send you on your way, and then they'll role out a new marketing campaign to replace the one you spent years "convincing" them to end.

Kalle Lasn, founder of Adbusters, says this in his great (and short) must-read, Culture Jam:

"We, the people, have lost control. Corporations, these legal fictions that we ourselves created two centuries ago, now have more rights, freedoms and powers than we do. And we accept this as the normal state of affairs. We go to corporations on our knees. Please do the right thing, we plead. Please don't cut down any more ancient forests. Please don't pollute any more lakes and rivers (but Please don't move your factories and jobs offshore either). Please don't use pornographic images to sell fashion to my kids. Please don't play governments off against each other to get a better deal. We've spent so much time bowed down in deference, we've forgotten how to stand up straight."

Amen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporate Academics, Corporate Media - are we pushing for total corporate control?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 5, 2008 9:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is one of the most distorted articles I've read on Alternet all year, and the more I consider it the more annoyed I get. I'll put it down to ignorance on the part of the authors, Don Hazen and Jan Frel, and try and raise a few points:

Exhibit A: The University of California, #1 generator of patented research. Who operates and controls the UC endowment (hint - the same bank controls the California Public Employee Retirement Fund) -

State Street Bank is the University’s official “book of record” and calculates performance of the General Endowment Pool (GEP) and High Income Endowment Pool (HIP) supplemented with data from the University of California Office of the President’s (UCOP) Endowment and Investment Accounting office. Beginning in fiscal year 2005-2006, all relevant investment performance data for Foundation assets managed by external investment managers is being supplied by State Street Bank.

That's some $9.6 billion dollars - a pittance next to the $200 billion in CalPERS, which is supposed to finance retirement for California employees.

So, could all the money be reinvested in renewable energy and organic agriculture? Yes - but it won't, because State Street is also one of the main banks with multi-billion dollar investments in fossil fuels, pharmaceuticals, etc. A quick check shows, for example, $5 billion in Pfizer Pharma, $18 billion in Exxon, $8 billion in Chevron, etc.

Will investors be pleased if their socially and environmentally responsible behavior means their profit margins shrink? Who are we trying to kid - that is all that investors ever look at, is return on investment.

Corporations - they are bad for your health, bad for the environment, bad for international peace, and are just generally bad for the future of the humanity.

Make the shareholders legally responsible for the behavior of the corporations they invest in - then you'll see a change in their behavior, but not until then.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

energy futures traders and relief at the gas pump..
Posted by: latino_567 on May 6, 2008 9:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kuddos to Ms. Simon for her continued effort to raise awareness about socially responsible investing. It is true that more students at the highschool and college level need to learn about global finance and the "cause and effect" of corporate profit-taking. As an NASD registered broker I am committed to informing my clients about the benefits of investing in alternative energy, developing country economies, bio-friendly agriculture and peace of mind retirement and succession planning.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]