Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

The Poor and the Middle Class: Income Soul-Mates Left in the Dust

By Sam Pizzigati, Too Much: A Commentary on Excess and Inequality. Posted April 16, 2008.


It's becoming clearer that there are two economies -- one for the very rich and another for the rest of us.
Advertisement

Over the past two decades, reports a new state-by-state analysis of income in the United States released this week, America's poor and middle class have been soulmates -- in stagnation. Between 1987-1989 and 2004-2006, the average incomes of the bottom fifth of U.S. families increased just 11.1 percent -- less than 1 percent a year -- after adjusting for inflation. Over those same years, families in America's middle fifth of families saw their incomes increase at an almost identical rate, just 13 percent, also less than 1 percent a year.

But Pulling Apart, the new income analysis from the Washington, D.C.-based Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, finds a totally different story at the top of America's income ladder.

Families in America's top fifth have seen their incomes jump 36.1 percent since the late 1980s, with most of that jumping at the top fifth's upper reaches. Over the last two decades, note Pulling Apart co-authors Jared Bernstein, Elizabeth McNichol, and Andrew Nicholas, incomes for America's top 5 percent have catapulted 59.8 percent.

Actually, the report takes pains to note, incomes at the top have increased even faster than that. The Census Bureau data Pulling Apart crunches, the authors emphasize, do not include capital gains on the sale of stocks and other assets, income that pours overwhelmingly into America's richest pockets.

Pulling Apart, in broad strokes, traces the same rising inequality patterns that other income scholars have identified over recent years. But Pulling Apart offers plenty of fresh detail.

For starters, Pulling Apart offers an unusual glimpse at how much income U.S. families really have available to spend, after paying their federal taxes. The study, tapping data the Census Bureau collects every March, may not cover capital gains. But Pulling Apart does tally every other significant revenue stream that flows into American households, from Social Security and food stamps to interest and dividends.

Pulling Apart then breaks this data down by state, a step that documents the truly all-American phenomenon that inequality has become. Income gaps are widening in America's every corner.

Some states, to be sure, are growing unequal at faster rates than others. In Connecticut, the state with the nation's most rapidly growing income gap, the top fifth of families have enjoyed a 45 percent household income increase since the late 1980s, from $116,939 to $169,378, after inflation-adjusting to 2005 dollars.

Over that same period, the poorest fifth of Connecticut families have watched their average incomes drop 17 percent, from $25,570 to $21,133.

Two decades ago, Connecticut's top fifth of families averaged 4.6 times the incomes of the state's poorest fifth. Top-fifth Connecticut families now make 8 times the incomes of the state's poorer families. The state's income gap has nearly doubled.

What difference does this rising inequality make, in Connecticut or anywhere else in the nation? The authors of Pulling Apart do pause from their number-crunching to tackle that question. Wider gaps, they note, reduce "social cohesion" and widen "discrepancies in political influence." With gaps growing greater, "families at the upper end of the income scale have less and less contact and familiarity with the problems faced by low- and middle- income families."

These wealthier families eventually come to live in a separate world. This separation, in turn, unleashes a dangerous dynamic. One example: Affluent families that send their kids to private schools "can lose sight of the need to support public schools." The predictable result: "Support for the taxes necessary to finance government programs declines, even as the nation's overall ability to pay taxes rises."

The victims of this dynamic, Doug Hall of the New Haven-based Connecticut Voices for Children advocacy group charged last week, will always end up to be a society's most vulnerable. In deeply unequal Connecticut, he points out, lower-income families are struggling to make ends meet because they live amid an economy where the presence of extremely wealthy families has bid up the cost of housing and other basic commodities.

At the same time, Hall adds, Connecticut's deep inequality has bred a political system remarkably insensitive to the needs of the struggling. Advocates for low-income children have tried 28 times to enact an earned-income tax credit for Connecticut's poor. They've so far failed every time.

"We remain," notes Hall, "the only state in New England with an income tax that does not have an earned-income tax credit."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: inequality, middle class, lower class, income disparity, stagnation, pulling apart

Sam Pizzigati is the editor of the online weekly Too Much, and an associate fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Revolution
Posted by: jwhitneywise on Apr 16, 2008 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems like we're experiencing the same conditions that led to the French Revolution. I say bring it on. There are most definitely enough of us to bring down the elites so why not just kick them out of their mansions and take over? The sooner the revolution comes, the better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's interesting how this and the other thread about job creation get NO attention while stuff about
Posted by: yellow on Apr 16, 2008 11:55 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Iraq, Jews, penises, torture and the sex industry log hundreds of comments. Let's grow up and be real progressives, people!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hmmmm...
Posted by: tbone on Apr 16, 2008 1:18 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting report, what I would like to see is the numbers of households that fall into that top 5%, on a map, with names and addresses...then I will be visiting Wal-Mart...to exercise my 2nd amendment rights.

Absolutely disgusting is all that can be said about those folks who feel they NEED that much god-damned money. Won't be long before the poor/mc rise up and fight back, just a question of how they will do it, the old "use your vote" way doesnt seem to be affecting much change as evidenced by this report. I for one can't wait to literally EAT THE RICH (I wonder if they will taste like chicken or ass). Good luck hiring security you dill-holes, they probably won't think twice about taking your money and then watching the hoardes break into your gated community to put your heads on pikes. VIVA LA REVOLUCION!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's time for pitchforks, torches and storming the gates of the
Posted by: thekidde on Apr 17, 2008 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
wealthy to take back what has been stolen. It's up to the policitians (for a very short period) to help with this peacefully. If they don't, America must take to the streets and take back our country from the corporatists, neo-cons, evangelists and bankers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah! While they bring on the latest 21st century weapons.
Posted by: nightgaunt on Apr 17, 2008 2:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Between the surviellence robot drones,armed drones (QM-1 'Predator'with 4 Hellfires,and QM-9 with 8 Hellfire missiles),various anti-personell ordinance,Gatlings,mines,autoguns(tripwire sensors) and many others. Search the Internet about it.
Even one AH-64L would blast your mob. I know I would. Not even counting how many infomants and agents setting your group up for the fall either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kkessler
Posted by: kkessler on Apr 24, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not blame the rich but instead our greedy government - both Federal and Local. It seems like they all have their hands out for more and more of our hard earned money. The middle and lower income groups in this country are in desperate need of some tax relief and have been for a long long time. Look at the percentage of taxes taken out of your weekly paycheck and tell me exactly what it is we get for that money. I see wasteful government spending everywhere. Then I see families struggling to put food on the table and I wonder what is more important to us - taking care of our families or nice neat looking sidewalks?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]