Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

The Destructive Rise of Big Finance

By Kevin Phillips, Huffington Post. Posted April 4, 2008.


The unfettered expansion of the finance industry has led to debt, inflation, the oil crisis, and an eroding dollar -- and there may be no way out.
Advertisement

Economic, financial and regulatory issues should dominate politics and government in the United States for the next two or three years, which is important enough. National discourse may also have a new and deserving bogeyman. Franklin D. Roosevelt had Big Business, Ronald Reagan had Big Labor, and my guess is that the new president inaugurated next January will have Big Finance.

True, finance has been whupped by presidents before. Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson, for example. But that was in the quill-pen era when the financial sector was a pup. Today's financial services sector, by contrast, is a grasping, gargantuan combination of banks, stockbrokers, insurance men, loan sharks, credit-card issuers, hedge fund speculators, securitization mavens and mortgage operators. Over the last five years, financial services has reached a swollen 20-21% of U.S. GDP -- the largest sector of the private economy.

Manufacturing led financial services by 2:1 back in the 1970s, but by 2006 beaten goods production had shrunk to just 12% of GDP.

Do most Americans understand this? Of course not. Newspaper front pages have shunned any discussion; 60 Minutes has not even spared the transformation sixty seconds, despite its vast implications. This upheaval is probably "the greatest story never told" about the two decades between, say, 1986 and 2006.

Nor was it an economic accident. Computerization was a prequisite, as was the rise of financial mathematics. However, I would say that the two most important underpinnings of financialization lay in the rise of public and private debt as a mainstay of American culture and economics and the perpetual liquidity and bail-out support of the Federal Reserve Board under Alan Greenspan. During Greenspan's 1987-2005 tenure, the sum of public and private debt in the United States quadrupled from just over $10 trillion to $43 trillion. Finance became the industry that was not allowed to fail but was permitted to enlarge and metastasize its behavior almost at will. Regulation was minimal. Favoritism was omnipresent.

The result, alas, has been all over recent headlines. America's biggest ever housing bubble, with 57 varieties of exotic mortgages and home prices now plummeting at rates unseen since the 1930s. The United States turned Credit Card Nation, with a citzenry in thrall to plastic, 20% interest rates and late fees for just about everything. Huge banks like Citigroup feel no shame in paying billion-dollar fines for colluding with Enron's tax and accounting deceits. And since mid-2007, national and world credit markets have been panicked and paralyzed by hitherto obscure instruments -- the stand-outs are collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) -- that not even their designers and packagers can explain.

Adolescent versions of Frankenstein finance became a crash and a disaster for Americans in 1929 when the industry was new and represented only 10-15% of the economic weight of American manufacturing. Now, by contrast, the unraveling of a second financial sector-turned casino involves literally the biggest force in the American economy. Who knows how much of this hubris and malfeasance is going to unwind unpleasantly or how long that will take?

In fact, phony Washington statistics and warped market measurements make it doubly hard to tell. The federal Consumer Price Index is already regarded by many Americans as a con job, and the press periodically quotes investors who state their belief that current U.S. inflation is really 6 to 9 percent a year, not the 2-4 percent the government alleges. I agree. On top of which, because the value of the dollar has dropped so far, the Dow Jones Industrial Average at the end of March was not really 12,200, a number barely up from its 11,700 peak in 2000. If you measure the Dow in Swiss francs or euros, two strong currencies, it has already lost some forty percent of its 2000 value. Too many Americans live in a dream-world of economic misinformation.

I began writing about these matters with a 1990 book entitled The Politics of Rich and Poor, and in several other volumes since then. Today, the economic negligence of Washington and Wall Street, more than two decades in the making, has led to a multi-dimensional crisis in which this country faces an unprecedented convergence of problems: unprecedented debt, tumbling home prices, reckless money supply expansion, growing inflation, insufficient and expensive oil, and an eroding dollar. Sadly, there may no longer be a plausible way out.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: big finance, regulation, wall street, government oversight, economy



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The NWO answer to America's problem
Posted by: drfun on Apr 4, 2008 12:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
will be the North American Union and the Amero as its currency. The agenda was set into motion long ago and many bought into its theme not realizing the repercussions.
But there is a little more wealth to be squeezed from the Middle Class before this will happen.
Those that don't want to go along with the program will be getting a train ride to a FEMA camp near them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MISSING the POINT (of FASCISM)
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Apr 4, 2008 3:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The federal Consumer Price Index is already regarded by many Americans as a con job, and the press periodically quotes investors who state their belief that current U.S. inflation is really 6 to 9 percent a year, not the 2-4 percent the government alleges..."

Heavily cooked inflation data is just one of a thousand and more economic and 9/11 war lies that a Washington-MSM axis has run on behalf of corporate crime rule over the nation.

The obvious truth that Philips, Naomi Klein and the usual gang of MSM approved actors won't touch is that America is a systemic FASCIST state and has been for years.

Denial and deception is THE paying profession out of the Washington-MSM circus. The lies are harder to sell these days but they pay very, very well. And the only cost is human life and human misery.

What a deal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: MISSING the POINT (period) INDEED Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
Doug the nomad
Posted by: Dougthecruiser on Apr 4, 2008 4:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally! Succinct and timely! I'd like to see this topic expanded and relentlessly pursued... but it is a head-in-the-sand finale, "there may be no way out"! We are all in this mess together - the fat cats as much as us. Where we all go from here is the issue. From my heart I hope that we can unite and proceed ahead to a new paradigm based on compassion and understanding. If not now, when?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What Doug said! Posted by: hagwind
» RE: What Doug said! Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: What Doug said! Posted by: dover23
» In Phillips's defense . . . Posted by: hagwind
There isn't a way out
Posted by: Trazom on Apr 4, 2008 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have to implode and reach rock-bottom. Then we can begin anew. The problem is three-fold: 1) we still have a ways to go before hitting rock bottom, 2) many people in the US are still in denial that this is happening to them and think the government is there to actually help them, and 3) the global bankers/elite have a plan for us all when we do hit rock-bottom, so we must be prepared to fight it with every ounce of strength we have.

Please try and convince as many people as you can that things are NOT going to get better, that they will only get harder and harder for the non-wealthy middle and lower class. When they deny this, ask them how they imagine they're going to pay for college for their 3 year old, when private college tuition already tops $40,000 year. How are they going to pay next year's heating bill when home heating oil now tops $4/gallon. How are they going to pay for next year's groceries with corn and wheat prices set to soar again? Ask them if they plan on receiving a 30-40% raise from their employer to make all that happen.

Honestly, I look for the glass to be half-full but I just don't see it. All common sense seems to point to the alternative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There isn't a way out Posted by: zeofredo
» RE: There isn't a way out Posted by: ciccio
Face it, except for the top 10%, the glass is empty.
Posted by: thekidde on Apr 4, 2008 7:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And Interest Rates?
Posted by: dover23 on Apr 4, 2008 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interest rates are set by the Fed (under Congressional oversight?)and the artificially low rates we have seen this decade are arguably the root cause of many of the problems indicated. And yet, somehow the "free market" will continue to be blamed for these ills and the crooks that caused (and benefitted from!) them will be given new powers to "fix" the problems.

Here's an idea... market intervention by politicians is about effective as nation building in the middle east and FEMA rescue operations, and that's the very short list.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Financial Sector is Just Another Type of Organized Crime
Posted by: bettina9292 on Apr 4, 2008 9:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The interest rates that were lowered by Greenspan by the Fed were at first glance, a push to edge the financial markets into easier credit for the average consumer. But this was just a facade. The credit had and is cheaper and easier to obtain for those at the very top. For the average consumer, good FICO or not, the prices of credit and risk has always been higher. The burdens are always heavier at the bottom. The hedge funds and equity firms and large investment firms were and continue to be just more sophisticated loan sharks just selling debt from group A to group B, etc. Always hedging, A point here or there--with billions of dollars at risk. Even the average stockholder is around for a point of profit here too. The biggest problem here is the availability to take a large hit or lose it all, when the debtor cannot pay the loan shark. The average working class person doesn't and should have to be forced to gamble with his safety or sanctity of life to obtain a home loan or credit line. The interest rate of 20% on credit cards, 150% on payday loans, 15%-20% on on 2nd piggy bag home loans becomes crushing for the average consumer who cannot afford to lose anything. We have become gamblers with an insatiable appetite "to keep up with the Jones". We have been duped by the financial sector who is in bed with advertisers that having it all was and is the American Dream. Our loan sharks cannot kill us outright, as a warning to our neighbors to not gamble anymore.
Sadly we cannot drive them out of town because the government is still lending them low interest rate money that have to loan out even when they cannot meet their margin calls, keeping Bear Sterns and the greediest afloat.
We might be slowly punished internationally, with the falling dollar. But this is very slow to come and most do not follow international currencies and exchange rate unless we are traveling-(which most of us cannot afford). The government should be a regulator and watchdog. They need to lend less to these entities,not bail them out and let them die. These houses of cards need to fall. We will keep our homes, because collateral, no matter how minimal it might be is something-when there is a debt involved. Credit card debt is another issue. They can get judgments against us and garnish us to death--so what. Blood from a rock?!
We will survive and maybe the bad guys will get a taste of their own medicine and be thrown out on the streets with no where to hold their card games anymore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Roosevelt's legacy, part I: the New Deal.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 4, 2008 9:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The wave of bank crashes and home and farm foreclosures of the Depression led to the subsequent election of Roosevelt, the greatest president in U.S. history.

Roosevelt took on a number of powerful corporate interests, such the private electricity empire set up by Sam Insull, the early 20th century version of Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling of Enron fame. In 1932 Roosevelt gave a speech on energy supplies in Portland, Oregon:

"As I see it, the object of Government is the welfare of the people. The liberty of people to carry on their business should not be abridged unless the larger interests of the many are concerned. When the interests of the many are concerned, the interests of the few must yield.

It is the purpose of the Government to see not only that the legitimate interests of the few are protected but that the welfare and rights of the many are conserved. These are the principles which we must remember in any consideration of this question."


Fascinating, huh? He then goes on to discuss the secretive rise of the great private electricity monopolies:

"There has been in the past few years, as the Federal Trade Commission has shown, a systematic, subtle, deliberate and unprincipled campaign of misinformation, of propaganda, and, if I may use the words, of lies and falsehoods. The spreading of this information has been bought and paid for by certain great private utility corporations. It has permeated the schools, the editorial columns of newspapers, the activities of political parties, the universities and the printed literature in our book stores. . ."

Shocking, isn't it? A presidential candidate discussing corporate propaganda efforts run by financial and energy corporations? Then, he discusses the Enron/subprime collapses of the day:

"The great "Instill monstrosity," made up of a group of holding and investing companies, and exercising control over hundreds of thousands of operating companies, had distributed securities among hundreds of thousands of investors, and had taken their money to an amount running over one and a half billions of dollars--not millions, but billions!

. . .The investing public did not realize then, as it does now, that the methods used in building up these holding companies were wholly contrary to every sound public policy. They did not realize that there had been arbitrary write-ups of assets and inflation of vast capital accounts. They did not realize that excessive prices had been paid for property acquired. [deja vu!]

They did not realize that the expense of financing had been capitalized. They did not realize that payments of dividends had been made out of capital. They did not realize that sound subsidiaries had been milked and milked to keep alive the weaker sisters in the great chain. They did not realize that there had been borrowings and [endings, an interchange of assets, of liabilities and of capital between the component parts of the whole. They did not realize that all these conditions necessitated terrific overcharges for services by these corporations."


The sad fact is that today, most of our politicians are in the pockets of the very interests that Roosevelt described. As a case example, take the 2005 Energy Bill: 2005 Energy and Water Bill, Senate Vote.

That bill actually gave $6 billion to nuclear weapons development, $642 million to fossil fuel research, $257 million for "clean coal", and zero - yes, zero - for wind and solar energy R&D. It passed the House 416-13 and passed the Senate 92-3, over the objections of a few senators who wanted the few renewable energy provisions stripped. (notably, McCain).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Economic Science (for a change)
Posted by: ClassAct on Apr 4, 2008 10:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of even greater concern will be the total drying-up of industrial production because all businesses, including the US government, operate on borrowed cash, leveraged to the maximum amount based on their income. Tight credit reduces the cash that can be leveraged, forcing a cut-back in operations that must lower income – and thus we face a death spiral to which government has also ill-advisedly shackled itself.
The pseudo-science we have known as economics must be replaced by the genuine science of thermodynamics. Production controls economy, thermodynamics controls production, and therefore thermodynamics controls economy. The Marxist analysis recognized that political power flows from economic power, but Marxist economic theory was simply a variant of Adam Smith’s theory. It did not take note that if labor is the source of value, then profits are impossible because of the second law of thermodynamics. The appearance of profits in the economy is an indicator of the necessary presence of victims of the production and distribution processes. Indeed the rate of profit is most directly indicated by the ease of victimization, of “externalities” befalling the animals, the public at large, the consumer, the worker, the unemployed, and anything insufficintly protected by law, rather than by thermodynamic efficiencies of the transactions themselves.
The object of economy is the production and distribution of the goods and services of the world. The purpose of maintaining the social feature of economy to accomplish this is the just and equitable distribution of employment. The interceding goal of “profit” is not capable of directing the economy to self-sustaining optimization and is therefore the true “market distortion” that poisons society. Claims that supply and demand and labor and capital are equivalent forces in the market are false because supply and capital are active forces, directly winning political accommodation sought or unsought, while demand and labor are passive forces that can only become active through collective political organization. Democratic decision-making by the body politic is the necessary antidote to the self-serving and self-reinforcing decision-making of the propertied class.
See these websites regarding thermodynamics and economy:
www.eco.uni-heidelberg.de/ng-oeoe/research/papers/ Faber%20et%20al%20AEE%201998.pdf and http://dieoff.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Economics from the lunatic fringe Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: conomics from the lunatic fringe Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» Go back to thermodynamics Posted by: ReallyBearish
» Second that. Posted by: thoughtcriminal
Roosevelt Part II: The Robber Baron's Response
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 4, 2008 10:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The response of Wall Street interest to Roosevelt's New Deal was to first attempt to instigate a fascist coup: The Plot to Seize the White House, Jules Archer

"The first important fact he learned was that the government no longer had to back up every paper dollar with a dollar's worth of gold. This meant that the Roosevelt Administration could increase the supply of paper money to keeps its pledge of making jobs for the unemployed, and give loans to farmers and homeowners whose property was threatened by foreclosure. Banks would then be paid back in cheapened paper dollars for the gold-backed dollars they had lent.

Conservative financiers were horrified. They viewed a currency not solidly backed by gold as inflationary, undermining both private and business fortunes and leading to national bankruptcy. Roosevelt was damned as a socialist or Communist out to destroy private enterprise by sapping the gold backing of wealth in order to subsidize the poor.."


Enter Ron Paul... dedicated Roosevelt hater...

The second response of the Robber Barons was to move large investments into Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. This wasn't all of Wall Street, by any means, but it did involve massive interlocking financial relationships between the Nazi industrial combine. I.G. Farben and several U.S. companies such as ExxonMobil, as well as financial institutions like the Union Banking Corporation, of which Prescott Bush was a director. There were several main motivations for this - the primary one being that wealthy U.S. investors thought that fascism would protect their financial interests, which were under threat by Roosevelt's New Deal. Germany was also eager to buy airplane fuel and war supplies, and U.S. firms were happy to oblige.

Roosevelt knew all about this,as described in Trading with the Enemy, the Nazi American Money Plot

"As for Roosevelt, the Sphinx still keeps his secrets. That supreme politician held all of the forces of collusion and betrayal in balance, publicly praising those executives whom he knew to be questionable. . .By using the corporate leaders for his own war purposes as dollar-a-year men, keeping an eye on them and allowing them to indulge, under license or not, in their international tradings, he at once made winning the war a certainty and kept the public from knowing what it should not know. . .

. . .Why did even the loyal figures of the American government allow these transactions to continue after Pearl Harbor? A logical deduction would be that not to have done so would have involved public disclosure: the procedure of legally disconnecting these alliances under the antitrust laws would have resulted in a public scandal that would have drastically affected public morale, caused widespread strikes, and perhaps provoked mutinies in the armed services. . .


Concentrations of wealth and power are fundamentally opposed to democracy, and will always seek to hide behind totalitarian governments that survive via repression and warfare - and Roosevelt helped defeat the worst of those:

"In Germany, the I.G. Farben chemical trust allies itself with Adolf Hitler shortly before he took over as chancellor, on the promise that he would support Farben's experiments to produce high-quality synthetic gasoline from coal, even though this would cost ten times as much as gasoline refined from petroleum. By 1943, with the use of countless slave laborers whom the Nazis systematically worked to death, synthetic gasoline production had been cranked up to 142,000 barrels per day. . .The turning point in Hitler's ability to fuel his tanks and airplanes came in the spring and summer of 1944, when Allied bombers smashed the vast Leuna complex and reduced production to almost zero."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is a way out.
Posted by: ribh on Apr 4, 2008 5:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a way out : it's called Sharia compliant finance. See that link : http://ribh.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/sharia-finance/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There is a way out. Posted by: Trazom
One of the most important things you need to know
Posted by: Trazom on Apr 4, 2008 8:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is that economics must follow the same basic rules as science. I refer to Newton's Third Law:

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

If anyone disagrees that what we have gained (or thought we gained) over the past 8 years cannot be undone, then it is only because their timescales for such comparison are not appropriate.

Question, why is it that an ounce of gold was more or less the same for almost 100 years, in dollars? From 1830 through 1930. About $20/ounce. Now, it's $910/ounce, more or less. Why exactly is that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We must Restore the Constitution
Posted by: ronheri on Apr 5, 2008 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Constitution forbids this private bankning cartel, known as the Federal Reserve. It is the head of the beast, and must be eliminated. Is Ron Paul the only one in Washington who cares about America?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GO READ EVERYTHING KEVIN PHILLIPS HAS PUBLISHED AND
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Apr 6, 2008 9:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
memorize it. He is sane and insightful. If you can get him nominated, I will vote for him for president.

Our wealthy are now so rich that they can never hurt. There is a fair chance that the rest of us will enter the third world through the back door.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]