Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

The Fed and Crony Capitalism

By Thomas Palley, AlterNet. Posted March 25, 2008.


The Fed's decision to grant Wall Street access to special borrowing facilities constitutes a massive subsidy to the irresponsible.
Advertisement

The Federal Reserve's recent decision to grant Wall Street access to special borrowing facilities smells of special dealing for special interests. The decision subsidizes the biggest most powerful investment banks, thereby distorting financial markets in their favor. Behind the decision lies the problem of excessive representation of Wall Street interests within the Fed.

The Fed's response to the crisis, combined with its earlier massive policy failure to address asset price bubbles, raise grave questions about its independence and judgment. At this stage, Congress should launch formal hearings into the governance of the Fed, which has remained largely unchanged since the 1930s.

The Fed's new Primary Dealer Credit Facility (PDCF) effectively gives Wall Street's primary government securities dealers, which includes all the large investment banks, access to discount window borrowing. That means access to funding at the bargain basement interest rate of 2.5 percent, and all that is asked is borrowers post some form of investment grade collateral.

This arrangement constitutes a massive subsidy, which would be large in normal times. However, it is especially large at a time of market uncertainty and liquidity shortage. While other market participants are being forced to de-lever at fire-sale prices, the Fed's friends are being given near-free government money to snap up assets.

Wall Street has been quick to embrace the facility, and within four days borrowing reached $29 billion. Erin Callan, Chief Financial Officer of Lehman Brothers, enthusiastically declared the facility to be "incredibly attractive... Our ability to access that form of financing to do more business for clients is incredibly interesting."

Morgan Stanley Chief Financial Officer Colm Kelleher described the facility as being "there for normal business. It's not meant to be there as a last-recourse thing." A Goldman Sachs spokesman declared "we think the Fed window provides a good alternative to the secured funding markets and we welcome the initiative."

The new facility represents a complete break with the past. Previously, discount window borrowing was restricted to regulated depository institutions, and access was always described as "a privilege and not a right." That meant banks could only get access to cover seasonal shortfalls of funds or dire emergency needs, and any borrowing was subject to regulatory disapproval - so-called Federal Reserve "frown" costs. Now, the Fed has apparently made the discount window available to Wall Street as a source of ordinary business finance.

This means the Fed is providing risk capital to the likes of Goldman Sachs at paltry interest rates that confer a significant subsidy. Moreover, the mere right of access enables them to borrow more cheaply from other lenders because of the back-stop reassurance provided by discount window access. It also establishes incentives for future excessive risk-taking.

These subsidies are a travesty. Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, and Morgan Stanley are extraordinarily profitable companies. They have also been the drivers of the worst trends in the American economy over the past generation, pushing excessive CEO pay that has spread like a cancer throughout corporate America, even reaching into universities and non-profits. Additionally, they have pedaled the shareholder value paradigm, that has pushed companies to emphasize short-term gain over long-term investment, and contributed to ripping up America's social contract. Meanwhile, their business model has promoted speculation that is behind repeated asset and commodity price bubbles.

Subsidizing these firms is an insult to Main Street. Many families are losing their homes as part of the mortgage crisis. If they had access to 2.5 percent financing that would not be happening. Likewise, manufacturing firms are being forced to close because of lack of affordable capital, which is destroying jobs and the economic foundation of communities.

The Fed will claim it had to institute these measures to calm Wall Street. That is nonsense. The fair and economically efficient way to deliver emergency liquidity to Wall Street is through an auction facility that is open to all financial firms, and in which participants supply good collateral. Those who need the funds most will bid the highest. That way, taxpayers get properly paid for their support, and the funds go to those who need them most.

Geologists say they learn the most from extreme events like earthquakes that reveal the reality of the earth's crust. For the past twenty-five years, critics of the Fed have been dismissed, and the Fed's high standing has blinded the reality of its revolving door with Wall Street and its class-based conduct of policy. Now, the Fed's response to Wall Street's panic has revealed the reality of its crony capitalist world. That provides an opening for long-needed reform.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: corporate welfare, bailout, recession, lending crisis

Thomas Palley is the founder of the Economics for Democratic & Open Societies Project. Read more of his work at www.thomaspalley.com.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Time to Fire the privately owned and operated Federal Reserve ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Mar 25, 2008 10:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is time to establish a Public Central Bank. A bank that will not charge us interest on our own money. A bank that will honor its fiduciary duty to the public. A bank that will truly be independent of the interests it regulates.

The privately owned and operated Federal Reserve has throughout its ninety-five-year history promoted the interests of its members over the good of the country. Over the last twenty years we saw bubble after bubble, panic after panic, each more serious than its' predecessor and yet the mantra was always "free markets," "less regulation" and more "financial innovation." And for what? The profits of their member banks who own all the shares of the corporation known as the Federal Reserve.

This crisis is far from over, and in the meantime the public is subsidizing the very interests that caused the disaster. The problem is that there are much bigger catastrophes looming. Tens of trillions of dollars of Credit Default Swaps and hundreds of trillions of dollars in derivatives that are in a market that is not regulated and has no financial standards for counterparties and no legal framework for determinations. Our entire gross domestic product is only about 14 trillion. The loss of even a small percentage of these markets will bankrupt the country. The failure of the Federal Reserve to regulate these behemouth markets is in itself reason enough to give them the boot.

We need a Public Central Bank that will act in the interest of the country, a fiduciary duty that has always taken a back seat in the privately owned and operated Federal Reserve.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Rubbish! Posted by: ReallyBearish
» So? What's your point? Posted by: ReallyBearish
» Your "facts" are wrong Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: Your "facts" are wrong Posted by: joeunix
» RE: Your "facts" are wrong Posted by: dronkenpiraat
» Yes, two is greater than one Posted by: joeunix
» Belch #2 from Peanut Gallery WEEPY... Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» Speaking of bufoons Posted by: joeunix
» One problem is people like Eustace Mullins Posted by: Adler Berriman Seal
» RE: One problem is people like Eustace Mullins Posted by: Adler Berriman Seal
» RE: One problem is people like Eustace Mullins Posted by: Adler Berriman Seal
» Paper money is "honest money"? Posted by: ReallyBearish
» I'm terrified of your threat, Joe!! Posted by: ReallyBearish
Liberals and Progressives Need to take on The Fed Now !
Posted by: mmckinl on Mar 25, 2008 11:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is the privately owned and operated Federal Reserve that is the culprit of the mess we are in today. Congress told them to regulate loan underwriting, watch apppraisal practices and their reason for existence was to regulate markets that would effect bank solvency. They have failed miserably and even promoted this disaster ...

Thank You Alternet for publishing this article, besides an editorial in the Nation the progressive and liberal media have been silent if not complicit in a media blackout about the real reasons for the mess we are in and in this bailout of the interests that engineered the financial mess we are in.

Wake up liberal America, the Fed IS the problem !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Congrats! You just became a right wing nutter! Posted by: Adler Berriman Seal
» Nuke the Federal Reserve! Posted by: Adler Berriman Seal
Now where are those "small government" wackos?
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 25, 2008 11:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're the same motherfuckers who rail against government helping people but seem to be awfully silent when it comes to "bailing" out Wall Street. ABOLISH the Federal Reserve !!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Funny Posted by: Artkansas
They Won't Be Happy Until They Crash The System
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 25, 2008 11:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that they have totally screwed up private credit they are further debasing our currency by bailing out the 'free market' Friedmanomics crowd with borrowed public money. Just imagine what a mess the country would have been in if Bush had privatized Social Security money in private accounts exposed to Wall Street shenanigans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ask the candidates what they think - and prepare to wince.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Mar 25, 2008 12:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What do the candidates have to say? First Hillary Clinton - she thinks we should set up a commission headed by Alan Greenspan and Robert Rubin (of Citigroup!) to decide whether or not to halt the foreclosures.

Obama's position is not that different - more-or-less identical, practically speaking, with calls for a commission rather than any direct promises: Obama refuses to denounce taxpayer bailout of Bear Stearns.

McCain is singing the typical Republican song - provide "a responsible bailout" for Wall Street, but don't change the system, keep adjustable mortgages in place, and don't rescue "irresponsible homeowners".

The one leading candidate who didn't take hundreds of thousands of dollars from the entities behind the subprime fraud was John Edwards, who was trashed heavily by the corporate press for not being on their master's payroll. He's also the only one who mentioned the corruption in government regulatory bodies that allowed this to take place at all.

Supporting information from opensecrets.org

Obama's subprime contributors:

Goldman Sachs - $474,428
Ubs Ag - $298,180
JP Morgan Chase & Co - $282,387
Lehman Brothers - $274,147
Citigroup Inc - $247,436
Morgan Stanley - $190,026
Citadel Investment Group - $173,950

Clinton's subprime contributors:

Goldman Sachs - $426,100
Morgan Stanley - $368,670
Citigroup Inc - $353,900
Lehman Brothers - $254,400
JP Morgan Chase & Co - $231,220
Merrill Lynch - $165,750
Bear Stearns - $145,090

McCain's subprime contributors:

Merrill Lynch - $177,475
Citigroup Inc - $161,000
Goldman Sachs -$104,950
Credit Suisse Group - $81,700
Bank of New York Mellon - $79,300
JP Morgan Chase & Co - $74,200
Lehman Brothers - $70,150
Blackstone Group - $66,250
Morgan Stanley - $63,851
Pinnacle West Capital - $61,700
UBS AG - $56,465

(those are all donations from employees of said firms, often bundled - this excludes soft money donations to PACs, etc.)

Obama's still the best person for the job of top government manager - but all this "hero on a white horse" talk is making me nauseous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Be careful, thoughtcriminal Posted by: joeunix
Bear Stearns is "THE LAST STRAW"!!!
Posted by: PeaceForUsAll on Mar 25, 2008 12:38 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
REPUGnican = no standards, no regulations, no oversight of anything!
REPUG = Katrina & Tainted Pet Food
REPUG = Lead in Toys. Where’s our Gov’t?
REPUG = Disappearing JOBS
REPUG = High Food Prices
REPUG = Gasoline at about $3.30 per gallon
= More WAR & saying “Water-Boarding Isn’t Torture”
= 900,000 homes in foreclosure RIGHT NOW!
= The party of Hate... Race- & Gender-Based Attacks
= Lies, Lies, Lies From Our Own Gov’t
= Airport Bathroom Sex
---
McCain: Angry, Confused & Unstable
---
* NO COPYRIGHT. ALL/PART OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE COPIED & REPOSTED.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Truth = Private Sham "Federal Reserve" Corp for Criminal FASCISM
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Mar 25, 2008 1:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What Thomas Palley with other pretend and mealy-mouthed MSM "Fed" critics fail to mention is the fact that "capitalism" DOES NOT EXIST (by definition that would require real competition and free markets of thought and industry that also DO NOT EXIST). This is due to utter frauds like the "Federal Reserve" Corp private bank cartel set up by monopoly FASCIST oligarchs FOR monopoly FASCISTS.

The "Fed" bank may have its members appointed by the bad theatre of a puppet President and Congress but it is a private and UNCONSITUTIONAL snake oil sham in direct violation of Article 1, section 8 of the Constitution. Only the American people through an untainted Congress have the right to coin and regulate the nation’s money – not private corporate criminals (FASCISTS) that charge the nation interest for the privilege of creating worthless fiat money out of thin air that has lost over 95% of its value since the “Fed” was foisted almost 100 years ago.

By its own admission – the “Fed” created the Great Depression and thus every boom-bust panic since. (economic panics before the “Fed” was tricked into place were ALL created by monopolist organized corporate crime FASCISTS that used their own criminal acts as a motive to palm off the “Fed” for private control over the economy).

The “Federal Reserve” Corp should be NIXED not “reformed” as Palley and others meekly suggest. And it should be replaced by a public bank that makes inflating and degrading the currency for private corporate crime ILLEGAL as it was meant to be.

By now it’s no secret that all 3 presidential stooges for the White House are funded by Wall Street that in turn owns and operates the “Fed” swindle, Big MSM, Big Oil, and all the rest.



“I would like to say to Milton and Anna: Regarding the Great Depression. You're right, we did it. We're very sorry.”
Ben Bernanke (Federal Reserve Governor at the Conference to Honor Milton Friedman, University of Chicago 2002)

“The Federal Reserve [Corporation] definitely caused the great depression by contracting the amount of currency in circulation by one-third from 1929 to 1933.”
Economist Milton Friedman (On NPR. Quote 1996)

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
President FDR (on de facto Fascist rule in a letter to corporate con man “Colonel” Edward M. House, founder of the Council on Foreign Relations and political fixer for the ruling class. House also handled President Wilson. 11/21/ l933)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ignorance for a FASCIST Status Quo Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
You're right, but much too mild
Posted by: dayahka on Mar 25, 2008 3:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're somewhat right in claiming that the Fed is subsidizing irresponsibility, but you should have used stronger words, like con men, crooks, and the like. But the thing is that the US economy is nothing but a paper jungle, worthless pieces of paper traded and sold and bundled and unbundled ad nauseum because the country is insolvent and has no worthwhile assets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shock Doctrine
Posted by: ClassAct on Mar 25, 2008 3:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Readers of Naoimi Klein’s book The Shock Doctrine should recognize the problem with this article. Croneys are not the problem, corruption is not the problem, disaster is the plan because of the opportunities it ushers in for the survivors. The connections of the players do not constitute croneys, nor conspiracies, but a class that needs a constant supply of new territory in which its bulls can stampede. The bears then eat the weakest bulls and the FR then “throws money at the problem,” a solution that the finance industry loves when they are the recipients and dreads when anyone else is a recipient.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

9/11 and the "International Banking Cartel" comment?
Posted by: Adler Berriman Seal on Mar 25, 2008 3:44 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
9/11 and the "International Banking Cartel".

Stung by what he said are false accusations of anti-Semitism, Brigham Young University physics professor Steven Jones said Wednesday he has decided to stop talking about who might have been behind what he has alleged was government involvement in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.


I will let the actions and events speak for themselves in this case. The only thing I will say in order to be clear about what I do not believe is that I do not believe Dr. Jones meant "the Jews". I do not believe that he was thinking in terms of ethnicity at all.

The charge of "antisemitism" sure is a powerful means of evading scrutiny. Remember the Misha Defonseca scandal. Before she was exposed she won a $2,000,000 law suit against her publisher who did not want to publish her book. All Misha had to do was cry "antisemitism" and she won. Misha is not even Jewish, as it turns out.

Could someone commit a crime as heinous as 9/11 and evade prosecution by issuing charges of "antisemitism" against their accusers?

Is there an "International Banking Cartel"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Another Right-Wing Gasbag "Speaks" Posted by: ThoughtPolice
AP Headline: Benefit Programs in Trouble (But not for Wall St.)
Posted by: Snowpuppy on Mar 25, 2008 4:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While the Bush administration claims that Medicaid and Social Security funding will run out in a few years, the welfare programs for Wall St's predatory lenders run unabated.

Congress - are you watching this???

Fellow people - are you waking up to this reality??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The financial institutions don't trust each other enough to extend loans at high rates
Posted by: Rune on Mar 25, 2008 5:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
so our government decides this is the time to trust them with loans at below market rates? What happened to the the line about trusting people to do as they wish with their money instead of having the government decide for them? At a minimum, if the government is going to make stupid and irresponsible loans, it should make them available to the people who will have to pay for them, one way or another, instead of handing over billions to institutions that have already demonstrated that they will not be responsible for the entirely foreseeable consequences of such fiascoes. That would at least provide some temporary help for the people being swept away in a flood of home foreclosures.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

D B COOPER is alive and well on wall street
Posted by: fred g sanford on Mar 26, 2008 5:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The thieves were let into the temple long ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good grief! Everybody calm down a minute!
Posted by: sawdust on Mar 26, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article really grabbed a lot of people. The comments are all over the map and some are very heated. I'm not prepared to go whole-hog over either side of the issue, but it does seem that a giant wrong has been commited. This whole event has been an enormous knee-jerk reaction by an administration made up largely of jerks. What do you expect? Much of what has been done is done and cannot be undone. And many on Wall St. will get even richer and the 900,000 homes in foreclosure are already lost and we can't reverse much or perhaps even any of it.

What we can do is vote responsibly ASAP and lobby for revisions and modifications to the FED and the banks to make sure this never happens again. It is all immoral and obscene, to be sure, but four letter words and ranting won't bring Humpty-Dumpty back together again.

We are in a recession (and don't give me any of that downturn nonsense)and it is going to get worse. Cinch up your belt, vote old men and cronyism out of office, declare war on greed (politically)and start holding government accountable instead of giving them free passes. You elected them, now fire them. Get sluggards like Bernanke, et.al., safely hidden away somewhere, where they can't hurt anybody else and let's get organized. We all sit back and relax and watch until it is too late, and then we throw temper tantrums and wonder why we are broke, gas is way too expensive and our 401K is suddenly worthless.

Get busy, get off your butt, join an organization for change (of your choosing), stop blaming everyone else, take a stand on the war and immigration and the upcoming election, leave your religion at home and DO SOMETHING! This mess is all about greed, which is capitalism run amok, and we have to fix it. If we don't, it will all only get worse, much worse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reform... Mme Guillotine
Posted by: DaBear on Mar 26, 2008 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I got an 18th century reform tool fer all the rich folk in the U.S. She's guaranteed to lighten their load from the shoulders up.

Every time you give a rich person a penny they'll find a way to strip you naked, leave you in the street and make you thank them for it. Until 'Merkuh wakes up to the reality that is wealth in this nayshun, this shit will continue.

Reform need not be complicated... five fingers curled into a fist, hurled at the rich brat at the end of contracted muscles around two skeletal posts is sufficient.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FED's new discount thievery window
Posted by: amacd on Mar 26, 2008 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From Sunday’s NYT report, “In Washington, a Split Over Regulation of Wall Street” comes this little description of activity at the new FED ‘discount thievery window’:

“Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers and Morgan Stanley voluntarily disclosed that they had taken loans under the Fed’s new program, in part to reduce any stigma about it.”

Yes, we took a little just so that others wouldn’t feel shy.

FED to US citizens:

“We’re opening this new window just to stabilize the markets and expect only a few investment banks that really need help to take us up on this offer — however, just to stabilize the general population we are also suggesting that all of you also assume a stable position by bending over and grabbing your socks while Wall Street's crooks give you the 'hard high one'.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Question About the Housing Bubble
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Mar 26, 2008 12:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recently, every time the subject of the burst housing bubble comes up, my husband makes a comment about the "McMansions" and how obvious it was that this kind of extravagance could not be sustained. I finally told him that I didn't think it was the "McMansions" that were the problem, and that the subprime mortgages were more to blame.

I also repeated what I've read many times, that minorities, particularly black Americans, were much harder hit than caucasians. But as we talked, I realized that I have no actual facts concerning this issue. I don't know if most of the problems came from new housing, middle class borrowers who overstretched their budgets, low income earners who were duped, or from existing homes with inflated prices.

Is there anyone who can explain this to me? Like the notorious John McCain, I have very limited experience in economics. I do well personally, but the big picture of American or global economics is pretty foreign to me.

I'd appreciate some facts and figures, percentages of black Americans as opposed to white Americans who were damaged by the subprime mortgages, the numbers of wealthy who ran into foreclosure compared to the middle class, and any other related statistics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This makes me sad...
Posted by: mregensberg on Mar 26, 2008 1:33 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article, but especially many of the comments, show that some people have little to no understanding of economics. I have an undergrad education in economics and I currently own a small business in NYC. It's fairly little knowledge compared to a graduate level economics course, but it gets the job done.

The Feds HAD to liquidate 30 billion of Bear Stearns assets. Bear Stearns had TRILLIONS of dollars invested in OTC swaps and other derivatives. Imagine if Bear Stearns fell, you'd witness a MASSIVE sell-off of those marketable securities (or "insecurities" in this case). Remember the last time there was a massive sell-off of securities on Wall Street? I'll give you a hint: think October 29, 1929.

The Feds in a massive effort, curbed a huge depression. Not to mention as a positive consequence to this, the stock market bounced back and is now doing quite well.

I know many of you are against "corporate welfare" and even as an advocate of generally free markets myself, I am too. But we have to realize that this was definitely the best action to take no doubt, and in this case corporate welfare benefited us all.

Best regards and I mean no hard feelings
Matt Regensberg

P.S. You may pelt me with e-stones for being a businessman, the greedy, selfish, arrogant a-hole that you all hate so much. :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» addendum Posted by: mregensberg
fractional reserve banking as economic parasitism
Posted by: vzn on Mar 26, 2008 7:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
thought you might find something interesting.
a paper I wrote called "fractional reserve banking as economic
parasitism"

endorsed by two phd economists. printed in nexus
magazine, 60k world circulation. #1 top downloaded
economics paper. used by economics
teacher in australia as standard classroom material.

more info on request.


"fractional reserve banking as economic parasitism"



recent supporting material:



The Shock Doctrine: Naomi Klein on the Rise of Disaster Capitalism


Confessions of an Economic Hit Man: How the U.S. Uses Globalization to Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions


John Perkins on "The Secret History of the American Empire: Economic Hit Men, Jackals, and the Truth about Global Corruption"


Video, senator/pres candidate Dennis Kucinich at last years 2005 Monetary Reform Conference


money as debt video by Grignon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stealing Directly from the people
Posted by: BeyondBeliefs on Mar 27, 2008 11:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The OWNERS of America SET the prices, SET the wages and CONTROL inflation to collect your Time, Labor, money and Life directly from YOU the People.

TRILLIONS go into their pockets. Enough to BUY every one of our media outlests.

The stock market falls when The OWNERS take OUR MONEY out of THIER stock market.

They made a fortune selling you the poisoned starch and sugarwater, and now make a fortune selling you the alleged antidotes, diet pills, experimental drugs to ''cure'' your failing internal organs.

They ASSESED, TAXED and then FORCLOSED on you, and Grandma, taking BOTH your house, your money, and your Life of Labor.

They don't need Mexicans here any more, they have YOU.

You will have to join thier military to get your schooling and your monthly allowance. You will clear cut the continents for them to occupy, rob, enslave and expand their empire at the expense of all living things.

Good Luck getting out of this one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bailout was a sell out of Bear Sterns. Blackwater wasn't ready.
Posted by: nightgaunt on Mar 27, 2008 1:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was a reason why the Fed waited to help JPMorgan buy out Bear Stearns. A depression must come at their time. Blackwater will be the spearhead of keeping the populace between the cities under control along with InfraGard within the cities.(Also with the militarized police and the shells of Nat'l Guard units not overseas)
Milton Freidman's dictum being used here for disaster capitalist innovations as have been used in Iraq. Expect a managed depression.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Make the Bush tax cuts permanent
Posted by: master09 on Mar 27, 2008 2:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone please tell me when you think the American people are going to wakeup; the ruling class has subverted our government and are very close to destroying this country with all of this bullshit( Rev Wright, make tax cut permanent,privatize social security,let the American people keep more of their money, do away with the irs, Obama is a Muslum, Iraq freedom, Christian right, conservative, liberals, fu.king brain dead people that call themselves republicans) its no more than good old Americans greed; all of you highly educated citizens keep thinking that Rev Wright is the problem in america you know that he is just the messenger.So cut the BULLSHIT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rudy Was Right
Posted by: ronheri on Mar 27, 2008 4:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After announcing his quest for the Republican nomination was over, Rudy the NY Mayor was heard to proclaim that "Ron Paul actually won all of the debates". Ron Paul who has proclaiming for years that the wars of choice are bankrupting America, and the Federal Reserve along with the IRS are Unconstitutional and must be abolished. Well, Rudy finally got one thing right. Now its up to the voters to write in the name of Ron Paul.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The problem with welfare in this country is not the amount that goes to those with greatest need and
Posted by: boblecht on Mar 27, 2008 6:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
least means. It is the amount that goes to those with greatest means and least need. "Fascism should rather be called corporatism, as it is the merging of government and corporate power."--Benito Mussolini

Government of the people by the corporations and for the corporations is not democracy--it is Fascism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]