Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Economic Meltdown: A 'Teachable Moment' About Socialism for the Rich

By Dean Baker, TruthOut.org. Posted March 24, 2008.


Rather than taking this opportunity to tighten the screws, many progressives are actually cheering on plans to bail out the ridiculously rich.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Progressives usually fight for the interests of those at the middle and bottom at the expense of those on top. However, during this period of unprecedented financial crisis, when the Wall Street rich are begging for the helping hand of the government, most progressives appear to be on the sidelines. Rather than taking advantage of this extraordinary opportunity to reduce inequality and educate the public about how the economy really works, progressive voices have been unusually quiet.

While the basic story on the economic crisis should be well known, it is nonetheless worth repeating. The Federal Reserve Board allowed the growth of an $8 trillion housing bubble ($110,000 of housing bubble wealth for every homeowner) in the years from 1996 to 2006. While this bubble was easily recognizable to competent economists, the entire political and financial establishments managed to ignore the housing bubble until it began to burst last year.

The collapse of the bubble is now pushing the economy into a recession. This is the result of both the direct effect of the collapse on the housing market and, more importantly, because of the indirect effect the loss of trillions of dollars of housing wealth has on consumption. Homeowners are rapidly scaling back their consumption after losing much of their life's savings in the last year.

The collapse of the housing bubble has inflicted enormous pain on tens of millions of people, but it is also inflicting pain on Wall Street and the financial sector. The honchos in this sector include many of the richest people in the country. With the collapse of the housing bubble, we are finding out they were far less financially sophisticated than any of us could have imagined. Many banks, brokerage houses and investment funds took highly leveraged bets that assumed the housing bubble would not burst. Now that it has burst, some of the richest people in the country face the risk of a middle-class lifestyle - unless the government comes to the rescue.

This is where things really get painful. Rather than taking this opportunity to tighten the screws, many progressives are standing by the sidelines or actually cheering on plans to bail out the ridiculously rich. The same people - who, on other days, are fighting to raise the income tax rate on the rich or for preserving the estate tax - are just watching as the Fed hands taxpayer dollars to Wall Street, and hoping Congress will come up with tens of billions for buying the bankers' bad mortgage debt.

There is, of course, a cover story - there always is. We have to let the Fed bail out the banks or the financial system would collapse. This would hurt everyone, especially ordinary workers. And the mortgage bailout is supposed to help low- and moderate-income homeowners.

But the cover stories don't hold water. We can keep the banks running without bailing out the incredibly rich people who drove them to ruin. England showed us the way earlier this year with its takeover of Northern Rock, a major bank that got itself in trouble with bad mortgage debt.
We can also help homeowners without bailing out the banks. The rescue proposals currently on the table would have the government buy or guarantee mortgages on homes that are still hugely overpriced. These proposals could give hundreds of billions of dollars to the banks, while providing little help to homeowners. Most would still be paying far more on their mortgage, property taxes and insurance than they would to rent a comparable home. Furthermore, the bailout conditions virtually guarantee they will never have a dime in equity.

As an alternative to bailing out the banks, we can temporarily change the rules on foreclosure to give homeowners the right to rent at the fair market rate. This would provide them with security in their home. More importantly, it would likely create a situation where most homeowners stay in their house as owners, since banks would rather renegotiate mortgage terms than end up as landlords.

The Wall Street boys got themselves in a huge mess through their own greed and stupidity. Now is the time to make sure they enjoy the fruits of their labor.

These are the same people who don't think they should have to pay higher taxes so kids can get health care and childcare. There is no reason the rest of us should pay higher taxes so they can keep their mansions in the Hamptons, their private jets and retinue of personal services. Let's leave this one to the market.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: recession, lending crisis, fed bailout, corporate welfare

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Great Article: Take the Next Step ... Fire the Fed ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Mar 24, 2008 4:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As you yourself wrote "The Federal Reserve Board allowed the growth of an $8 trillion housing bubble".

They are also allowing a hundred trillion dolllar market to operate at our peril without regulation, the derivatives market.

Why shouldn't we fire the privately owned and operated Federal Reserve and establish a public central bank that creates our countries money at no interest?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Brief History of the Federal Reserve Corporation
Posted by: mmckinl on Mar 24, 2008 4:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Time to fire the privately owned and operated Federal Reserve. Past Time !

A Brief History of the Privately owned and operated Federal Reserve ...And what has happened since the privately owned and operated Federal reserve was established in 1913?

- 1914 - 1920 easy money inflation, WWI debt ... 1921 Severe Crash

- 1922 -1929 leveraged easy money inflation ........... Great Depression 1929-1940 .... 1933 Gold bullion confiscated ...

- 1940-1962 Massive borrowing for war, WWII and Korea - Fed appeased ...

- 1963-1970 War debt paid, Fed not happy ... Kennedy tries Silver ... Viet Nam ramps up government spending ...

- 1971-1979 Nixon goes off gold, Viet Nam winds down ...The Fed allows inflaion to reach 20%

- 1980 - 1986 Volcker raises interest rates to 20% to stem the tide of the previous Fed incompetence. Economy dives ... Reagan defense spending goes crazy,, biggest non war deficits ever.

- 1987 Greenspan causes stock market drop and lays seeds for the S&L Crisis and the bond crisis.

- 1989-1991 S&L and bond market crisis due to deregulation ...Massive Governnment bailout...

- 1991 - 1997 further deregulation even though Congress has asked the Fed, Greenspan to regulate loan underwriting ... Greenspan does nothing begins inflating again ...

- 1998 - 1999 LTCM crisis due to leverage and derivatives leads to Asian crisis and Russian default ... The Fed inflates more, deregulates more, ,stocks go hyper bolic.

- 2000-2003 Stock Market Crash, more Fed deregulation, Fed endorses tax cuts, lowers interest rates to 1%. Iraq War funding and Tax Cuts send budget debt and national debt hyperbolic.

- 2004-2006 Fed endorses exotic loans, refuses to regulate loan underwriting ... Derivatives markets become trillion dollar markets for the banks , the Fed declines to regulate or even offer a framework for the derivatives market ... Huge bubbles form ....

- 2007 Real Estate crash begins, Fed says everything is fine ....

- 2008 The bailout begins, hundreds of billions of tax payer dollars, loaned to first member banks then expanded illegally to nonmember broker dealers.


Thomas Jefferson -

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» all based on lies! Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Mar 24, 2008 7:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need for voters to be able to jack out into the street any politician foolish enough to forget who elected them. We need a...

Vote of Confidence Amendment


VOCA, Now!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bullshit
Posted by: rickiey on Mar 25, 2008 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bail out the banks? Are you insane?

Look, at the moment, our economic model is capitalism. Banks work off capitalism. IF thats the way it is, thats the way it is.

Bailing them out is a socialist measure. When you inject socialism into capitalism, neither works.

THe banks MUST be forced to deal with the bad decisions they made. If that means some of them close their doors, so be it.

Under the capitalist model, that is what should happen.

Under a socialist model, the bad loans wouldn't have been made in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Mar 25, 2008 7:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is shocking - the relative silence on this subject - but Hillary Clinton has addressed it.

I think there should be a retroactive tax on these financier's incomes to address the terrible abuses done in the market to those who could not afford it. And their tax rates are obscenely low while bridges fall down and healthcare and housing and college costs soar.

Until we have an educational system that informs our youth about the dangers of sophistry, advertising, media inflammation to buy, buy, buy, heuristic voting and so on, we should make amends by helping those who can least afford to lose their homes. But not those who were investors nor those who have large incomes. Any kind of help should be means tested - otherwise it's a waste of money, as is the "stimulus plan" - another egregious waste of money without any means testing at all.

Why do you think the carried interest issue got dropped so quickly? It's the same problem we've had before....Wall Street lobbyists crying in their beer that they won't get a bonus and then begging Congress to save them from the horror of it...(mind you this is while they have suppressed worker's wages and made them pay more for healthcare and so on)...and so many workers who truly need it don't get a bonus at all.

Where are the activists? We need to teach more civics and we need to care more about activism than iPods, XBoxes, and HDTV. The one thing I care about is not lining another Wall Street banker's pocket with my spending which is a thought as enjoyable as anything.

Some day we may have someone strong enough to take these overpaid and coddled titans on. Until then, we have only ourselves to blame for taking their lobbyist money, listening to their economic garbage (especially supply side mantras), and so on. Good luck America until campaign reform is truly enacted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No One will like what I have to say...
Posted by: JaylieWoW on Mar 26, 2008 12:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but all sides to this "economic saga" should be analyzed.

As much as it will make me sound cold and cruel to say this, I don't believe EITHER of the parties in the "housing bubble" should be excused.

Many good reasons for not bailing out the banks have already been presented, and I agree for the most part we should not be rewarding the banks for making such incompetent (and quite frankly STUPID) decisions.

But, what about the borrowers themselves? Isn't it a form of theft to make a promise to pay for something you know you can't afford? Did any of the lenders point a gun to any of these people's heads and FORCE them to take out their risky loan proposals?

You cannot on the one hand argue to dismantle the Fed if on the other hand you sincerely believe home owners were duped into these pricey loans. Both sides deserve equal blame. Consumers were too busy keeping up with the Jonses' and satisfying their desires while the FED & the banks just kept the party going with all that "easy" money.

I agree the FED needs to go, but I also agree that all parties should be accountable for their own bad decisions. If the FED, therefore, is bailing out the banks, in all fairness they should bail out the home owners too. Hey, I'm for equality! Don't just reward some bad decisions, why don't they just reward all the bad decisions.

I'm more inclined, however, to believe we need to let this bubble burst rather than blowing it up further. It has already significantly impacted people who actually saved money by devaluing the dollars they earned and saved.

As the saying goes, drinking a beer in the morning to cure a hangover is nothing more than postponing the inevitability that at some point you WILL have a hangover. In this analogy the hangover will happen when the beer (easy money) takes us into our next great depression.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Irresistable force has finally met immovable object
Posted by: Gegner on Mar 27, 2008 11:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our 'debt-driven social model has finally, fatally, collided with what Einstein call 'the most powerful force in the universe, 'compound interest'

If the 'juice' on the 'paltry' 9 trillion the fed owes is 2+ billion a day, we can only imagine what that figure is for the 600+ trillion in debt floating around out there...

In this respect, capitalism has 'hit the wall'...it can't move forward because the sums involved just to keep the system 'solvent' stagger the mind.

Worse, if we fail to correct the 'original problem' we will keep returning to it regardless of what we do.

Time to convert to a sustainable 'labor driven' social model now!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sometimes simple solution best,
Posted by: Andie927 on Mar 27, 2008 1:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please, no pity for the Realtors, the Mortgage Brokers, or the Invester/Bankers! They all made BIG MONEY on the front end! They, personally are sitting pretty, made their money! The 'suckers' holding the paper, well they have a problem!

Forclosure right now is an automatic process! The 'lender' hire a law firm that specializes in this, they fill in the blanks on the forms, and a Judge rubber stamps it! The local Sheriff, enforces it!

Instead, the Judge sends it to Court Ordered Arbitration! The actual current value of the property is assertained, the difference between the morgage and the value is split, the lender then re-negotiates the loan, to a fixed rate, 5% above Prime!

This limits the lenders loses, but should make it possible for the home owner to keep his house, and avoid bankrupcy!

No government bailout for anybody, but the Profits are limited!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement