Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

The Man Who Hated Work and Loved Labor

By Les Leopold, AlterNet. Posted April 9, 2008.


Long after the Democratic Party abandoned labor interests, Tony Mazzocchi continued to fight for the working class.
Advertisement

American progressives perpetually worry about the limitations of the Democratic Party and the historical rejection of third-party candidates in presidential elections. "Party within the party" approaches have led at times, to breakthroughs, if and when the thrust is part of a mobilized movement. The strategy has been demonstrably most successful in the 40-year takeover of the Republican party by its right-wing constituencies. In those 40 years, the Republican electoral victory has gradually softened Democratic electoral leaders progressivism, creating by now, two corporate parties vying for dominance and agreeing that The New Deal and Great Society overdeveloped wage worker influence on the party and the economy.

Tony Mazzocchi saw this trajectory in development. He had worked effectively within the Great Society ethos to propel worker safety and public health concerns into national policy. Les Leopold's biography of Tony tells the story well. The excerpt from the book which follows is about Tony's evolving electoral focus and his growing commitment to creating a party of and for working people to contest the two corporate parties. Tony recognized the writing on the wall as political discourse transitioned from ridiculing Reagan's voodoo economics (George Bush Sr.'s phrase) to Clintonesque regard for it as "revelation" of free market verities. And this, of course, through the magic dust of false premises, phony data, and seriously diminished active concern for people's lives as a bottom-line evaluation of societal health.

Of course third parties remain problematic. But Tony's conception of his Labor Party Advocates was not simply a political party. Instead it was a political space for teaching and learning, for building a new working-class belief in its own capacity to expect more and do something about getting it. No less, as Tony saw it, because democracy depended on it. Thinned out expectation of decency and dignity at the base of society would eventually topple the whole American experiment.

In pursuit of this political space, Labor Party Advocates was to build membership but run no candidates for at least 10 years. Tony envisaged persistent and wide-scale teaching and learning campaigns among rank-and-file workers, their families and communities. I would see Tony at the Tabard Inn in D.C. talking to advocates across sectors, eating and talking with colleagues with an ever sharp eye on who was coming and going, and who he should catch on their way in or out. In New York he helped conceive the role of the Labor Institute and the Public Health Institute as close partners with union locales to create rank-and-file education programs to break the insidious link festering in the disinformation that claimed healthy environments mean fewer jobs.

To Tony's mind, the worker's mind was a terrible thing to undervalue or to waste. That the neo-laffer curve distracting worker concern for the environment is no longer legitimate in political discourse owes a lot to Tony Mazzocchi's vision and infrastructure intelligence. Furthermore, the far-reaching growth in the last decade of coalitions, alliances and integrated strategizing between community organizers and labor organizers is exactly what Tony had in mind. It may not add up to a third party. In the end, all this could save and recommit this nation's human and capital resources to peaceful, equitable and just uses. From this work have come the local victories (as Laura Flanders reported last year in Blue Grit: True Democrats Take Back Politics from the Politicians), for living wages, for community health benefits, for truly progressive candidates winning local and state offices, and against ballot assaults on gays, education and abortion. -- Introduction by Colin Greer

Excerpt: The Man Who Hated Work and Loved Labor: The Life and Times of Tony Mazzocchi

OCAW secretary-treasurer Tony Mazzocchi, at age sixty-two, was hell-bent on pursuing his backlog of ideas and projects. Bring on the coffee!

Mazzocchi had always wanted OCAW members to have their own college. A decade earlier, he had nearly persuaded the union to buy a campus in Denver. Now he started a university without walls called the Alice Hamilton College (in honor of Alice Hamilton, 1869-1970, the first woman professor at Harvard and a founder of occupational medicine).

Mazzocchi also thought that the health and safety movement badly needed a peer-reviewed professional journal to explore worker-oriented safety, health, and environment issues. He pressed OCAW to start and fund New Solutions, ably edited by Charles Levenstein, then a professor at the Work Environment Department, University of Massachusetts-Lowell.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: labor, class, democrats, afl-cio, tony mazzocchi

Colin Greer is President of the New World Foundation.

Les Leopold is the executive director of the Labor Institute and Public Health Institute in New York, and author of The Man Who Hated Work and Loved Labor: The Life and Times of Tony Mazzocchi (Chelsea Green Publishing, 2007).



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Great Idea ... A Labor Party ... Sign Me Up !
Posted by: mmckinl on Apr 9, 2008 1:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But where are our labor leaders? Co-opted into the corpratocracy serving on Federal Reserve Bank Boards, more interested in politics than labor issues, more interested in chiding the leaders of other countries than our own.

Where is their leadership on Single Payer when almost every strike is over health care benefits? Where is their leadership on trade while the threat of out sourcing looms over workers heads and corporations are paid to leave the United States with tax incentives. Where do they withhold support from marginal politicians and support candidates that run against them to push for Single Payer, abolishing the WTO and rescinding Free Trade Agreements while enacting tariffs.

We do indeed need a labor party but the gutless wonders that pretend to be our Union Treasurers and Presidents are just as corrupt as the Democratic party itself. I've seen it first hand.

Given the current economic catastrophe there is no time like the present to ask people to look in the mirror and see themselves as working class, not middle class. But without the leverage of a Labor Party the Union Movement is destined for Public Employees and Immigrants.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Labor Party is an excellent idea.
Posted by: andabottleof_rum on Apr 9, 2008 2:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It should be called the Labor Party, too, and not have the word "Socialist" somewhere in its name. This way, Republicans would not have a hammer to bludgeon it simply due to its name. Moreover the elitist strain among progressives would be dissuaded from infiltrating it, since the very name Labor Party would evoke images of low-status work, which would repel such people.

In order for professionals to have their interests addressed by the Labor Party, they would need to conceive of themselves as workers, as laborers, and not as something separate from and above the working class. Indeed they actually are workers for the most part, even if they make more money, since they usually do not own their places of work and are instead employees in a hierarchical and authoritarian organization. (However, high-status professionals do not as often experience the indignities of the hierarchical and authoritarian structure of the organization for which they work.)

I shall purchase and read Leopold's book on Mazzocchi. No, I don't feel bad for falling for what might be a sales pitch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Labor Revitalization Post 2008 Election??
Posted by: drricklippin on Apr 9, 2008 5:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's all cyclical

The so called Reagan/Gingrich "revolution" has run its course and because of its excesses was destructive to organized labor and to the American middle class.(Bill Clinton's presidency did not help matters much)

It remains to be seen how or if Labor will rebound and if the US middle class will finally get a break.

I was a physician employed in the Chemical Industry for 25 (1974-1999) years so I knew the work of Tony Mazzocchi in OCAW.

But I did not fully appreciate his work until after I left the Chemical Industry in 1999 and became more of an activist for worker rights.

The one thing I regret about OCAW's proposals/programs under Mazzocchi was that it did not do enough about the issues of work stress for its members and what NIOSH called OOW(Organization of Work).I was intimately involved in both of theses important issues and continue to promote their relevance to worker health and safety today.

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton, Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Labor would do well to support RALPH NADER
Posted by: maxpayne on Apr 9, 2008 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of all the candidates, Nader is the only one so far who actually cares to help Labor out big time. You won't see that with the Dems or Reps.

VOTENADER.ORG

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bobby Decker
Posted by: Bobby Decker on Apr 9, 2008 7:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" WHEN THE LAST U.S. GENERAL MOTORS PLANTS
BOARDED UP LIKE A CRACK HOUSE.....IT,L STILL BE RONALD REAGANS MORNING IN AMERICA AT THE POAST OFFICE " !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good article
Posted by: WhatNow? on Apr 9, 2008 11:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Had we marched to the National Airport, 850,000 strong and joined the picket lines of the PATCO workers, the union movement would have been in different shape today."

I was a teenager then and could not understand why all if not most other unions did not give all the support they could to PATCO. This one of the most crucial times in my lifetime. I knew it signaled bad times for labor and most people's standard of living. I didn't buy reagan's bullshit as a teenager and still don't even though they've tried to sell me a load of shit for over 25 years. I could never understand how so many people could buy into their garbage, especially working class and poor people.

About the only reason I ever favored democrats was because Roosevelt's support for labor and raising a large percentage of the population's standard of living. I've never thought the democrats really represented me or labor. They were just the lesser of evils. I even hear it said now that the democratic party is the party of women and blacks. I am neither female nor black so they even go so far as saying they do not support me (labor and poor) anymore if they ever did.

I had never heard of Tony Mazzocchi. Maybe I would have if I had ever been in a union or if union were given more respect in the US. It's good to read that there may be still be some good union leaders, instead of ones the seem to be little more than a rubber stamp for managements whims.

"Labor would do well to support RALPH NADER" says maxpayne.

Most likely I will vote for him. He'll probably do more to lessen my occupational hazards and might even raise my standard of living.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Indoctrination...
Posted by: buzzsaw on Apr 9, 2008 7:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have been so well indoctrinated. The most anti-union workers I know are invariably the ones who need a union the most. How do we change this?

buzzsaw-white-collar, but definitely working-class.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Indoctrination... Posted by: zipper696
"NAFTA on Steroids": deep integration with SPP
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Apr 11, 2008 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why is it mainstream media & EVEN PROGRESSIVE MEDIA simply refuses to review the horrors of the Security & Prosperity Partnership?

seriously.

Only LOU DOBBS? come on... this isn't about the racist, zero-sum game crap that Dobbs likes to throw around...

this is about how MONEY & corporations are stamping our sovereignty the way they stomped the unions.

wake up, people... Human Rights & Prosperity isn't a zero-sum game...


oddly, I suspect that the majority of Americans had no idea what Obama meant when he talked about the fallacy of a zero-sum game

Humanism is GREATER than nationalism... ...unless you're INTO the Joy of "be afraid! ... the OTHER PEOPLE are coming to git ya... " & "git yers before non-Americans or non-WHITE folks figure out there isn't enough to go around"

think about it.

that's how they killed the union.

~~~
Spread Love...

BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian com
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
"do no harm"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]