Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

The Mad, Mad Middle Class

By Isaiah J. Poole, TomPaine.com. Posted February 24, 2008.


Large numbers of middle-class people are mad, really mad, about the damage Bush-league conservatism has done to the country.
Advertisement

You may not agree, as Sara Robinson provocatively suggests, that the country is primed for revolution. But there is no doubt that large numbers of middle-class people are mad, really mad, about the damage Bush-league conservatism has done to the country and to their futures.

In fact, comments in a new Democracy Corps report, based on focus groups of Republicans and Democrats in Orlando, Fla., and Columbus, Ohio, reveal deep anger and frustration over policies that favor the wealthy and pull the ability to meet their basic aspirations further from their grasp.

Note comments like these:

  • Columbus man: "They talk about the economy as working for the very wealthy and I read in the New York Times that $200,000 per year is the new $100,000 per year in salary…That's the standard of living to feel like you've really made it in America, $200,000 a year. For most people, that's unattainable. They'll never see that in two lifetimes. So I think it's unfortunate that there is one-tenth of one percent of Americans own forty percent of the wealth in this country. That's an obscene number. It's a disgusting number."
  • Orlando woman: "I don't like people having like no-bid contracts over there [in Iraq]. I think that has really escalated the cost of the war too. I mean this war is just unbelievable and the cost and the money could be going to help New Orleans, use it on domestic programs and helping other nations."
  • Columbus woman: "The war in Iraq, the amount of money being spent over there, and the cost of oil. It's kind of all tied in. And then all of that filters down eventually to everyday people. And all of those costs eventually fall on our shoulders. On shoulders that are already pretty well packed."

From the rising costs of fuel to the effects of the mortgage crisis, the Democracy Corps sessions reflect a middle class that feels under siege. And the traditional conservative palliatives, as far as these people are concerned, no longer cut it.

When the focus groups were presented with two economic messages -- one based on Republican stump speeches that focuses on making the 2003 tax cuts for the wealthy permanent and an alternative that emphasized such items as investment projects, extending unemployment insurance and child tax credits, these prospective voters were, in the Democracy Corps words, "overwhelmingly drawn" to the more progressive message.

Here's how a Columbus participant saw it:

It sounds like to me that the Republicans want to make the wealthy wealthier. Cut their stock dividend tax, they should have to pay taxes on that. I have to pay taxes if I pull my money out of my 401K. I have to pay a fee. So I think that they should be taxed just like we are, us working class people. The higher end market of people should be taxed just like I am. What taxes I pay, the percentage of the same taxes I pay should be the same taxes they pay for the money that they make.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: middle class squeeze

Isaiah J. Poole is the executive editor of TomPaine.com.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Middle Class?
Posted by: RedNeckRed on Feb 25, 2008 12:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What middle class? After 30yrs of Government by, and for the wealthy, there is only the wealthy, and the rest of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mad?
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Feb 25, 2008 2:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
not mad enough.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People are confused
Posted by: Bobsays on Feb 25, 2008 4:53 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the things that are bringing down the standard of living of the American middle class would occur under a left-wing government too.

A left-wing government would allow all of the following:

- uncontrolled migration which would reduce wages and standards
- an international levelling out of living standards in order to boost the third world
- a reduction in most people's standard of living to reduce the use of big cars, big houses, too many consumer goods, too much travel etc. etc. Instead of Bushism, it would be re-branded as ethical environmentalism. But the result would be the same.

Don't kid yourself: the left's solutions would have the same effect, just a different name. Ask anyone who has lived under a leftist regime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Rightwing incompetence Posted by: ReallyBearish
» interesting input from down under Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Just today
Posted by: JSquercia on Feb 25, 2008 2:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just today I read in my local paper a Conservative Columnist's support for a Republican Tax Plan introduced By Reps Dryers and King . It is called the Fair and Simple Tax Act and as is usually the case reduces the progressivity of the Income Tax by reducing the brackets to three from six . The top bracket would drop from 36% to 30% and of course the Capital Gains tax should be cut to 10% . They further advocate cutting corporate tax rates and ELIMINATING the Death Tax which impacts .3% of those Estates . Strangley it would continue the AMT but at least adjusted for inflation .
I am with those who feel that money earned from money should be taxed the same as that earned from the sweat of one's brow . I feel that we should return to the pre Reagan Era where Socail Security and Unemployment Benefits were NOT taxed .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

taxes?
Posted by: Floresta on Feb 26, 2008 8:37 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't pay them. stop. un-fund the beast.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

interesting input from down under
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Feb 27, 2008 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The last time we looked, the shortfall between what had been promised - in the form of Treasury bonds, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and the like - and what might reasonably be collected in taxes toted up to some $50 trillion, or about a half a million dollars per family. In other words, the whole country is bankrupt... and the financial obligations of the U.S. federal government should be regarded by investors as though they were subprime debt. It is a huge debt that the debtor cannot pay.

As headman at the General Accounting Office, David Walker, has been fretting about this for years... and trying to get the politicians to cut spending and balance the budget. He might as well have been trying to get a pack of wolves to eat Greek salads for lunch. It has been a thankless, frustrating job, especially during the Bush II years. This 'conservative' administration added more to America's burden than all the administrations since George Washington - put together."

looks like we're gonna need a bigger boat- roy scheider

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Middle Class" or HUMANISM?
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Feb 28, 2008 12:06 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ever noticed Americans get their rocks off talking about the MIDDLE CLASS?

...because talking about the ENTIRE society would imply...

that the POOR are 'with us' or that WE are somehow the MIDDLE CLASS...

& those OTHER PEOPLE can be sufficiently disenfranchised or dehumanized... & discounted for 'creating their own Circumstances'.

...this is the same logic that vilifies WOMEN, yet beatifies the sanctified & innocent fruit of their uterus.


let's be honest: ... the ENTIRE society couldn't give a damn about 'everyone else'...
somewhere along the Way, corporations & their Rich counterparts have convinced Americans that *the Revolution for Human Rights* was won...

& now? its everyone for himself... quick! sign onto an all-protecting corporation!

because you can't trust any HUMANS in your social network... they're all *the competition* or those people you don't know, who are the dehumanized "Other".

pathetic.

The Ultimate "Screw You, I want MINE" will soon become "OMG I have a MASTER'Sdegree, how can I be ONE OF THEM??!?? social inequity reaching the Middle Class! omg THAT'S SO WRONG! poverty & social control is for POOR PEOPLE!!"

...the sickness of exported Americanized culture is finally coming home to roost.

Care about it NOW?


~~~
Spread Love...

BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Burr under the Saddle .
Posted by: crazy carlos on Feb 28, 2008 4:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A couple of days ago I picked up my 3-10-08 edition of "The Nation" and glanced at it and turned to the rear cover. Ther it stood--CHENYCARE.ORG. a co-sponsered bill, HR 676 and golly darn if the bill was not demanding that, gulp- we get the same medicalcoverage as all the Feddies get, not buying it thru some benevelont insurance company. My heart aflutter I promptly dialed up CHENEYCARE.ORG and enlisted my support (please follow suit).

This A.M. I had an appointment with my VA Hospital for some tune up on my aging carcass and proceeded to try anddo a little sales job for the program which eventually led to a little sit down with one of the mucky mucks as to why they could not post a copy of this notice,even thou it was now apparant that noone else was aware of this hugh breakthru hopefully) This logjam that We The People could participate and have our 2 cent say in the process.

Nope--against the law as per the government--might show favotitism.-- But no one knows it exists--We The People are the government--Drug and insurance companies don't have problems getting there view heard--for the greater good of the Soverignity-- ad finidum--no,no,no,no,no,no, no and yet again NO!

WELL FUCK YOU VERY MUCH!!

Everyone, if this is an important issue which it should be: 1. Go to CHENEYCARE.ORG. and add your 2 cents. 2. Sent this note to all your friends or MORE important the site address and get them involved. 3. Notify every blog you can think of.

This is maybe the first chabce we have to get the asholes in Disney Central a good wake up call that November is coming and we will be waiting!!

And the best reasons, let these dick heads know
the patience is running out. Crazy Carlos

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about the poor?
Posted by: cherylholmes on Feb 29, 2008 5:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone forgets about the poor and the affects of the poor economy on us. What of the elderly, the poor and the disabled? We remain invisible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]