Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Best U.S. Manufacturing Jobs in Rising Jeopardy

By Mark Trumbull, Christian Science Monitor. Posted February 17, 2008.


In an era of corporate-led "globalization," U.S. factories are competing by trimming workers and wages.
Advertisement

A new round of cutbacks by Detroit's automakers carries a larger message -- that America's manufacturing workers are under new pressure in jobs where labor unions had once been able to command middle-class wages for assembly-line jobs.

The point was punctuated this week as General Motors announced the largest ever annual loss by a maker of automobiles. In a bid to restore profitability, GM said it would offer incentives to convince older, highly paid assembly workers to retire early. Ford and Chrysler are pursuing similar worker buyouts.

The moves signal what some analysts say is an accelerating effort to trim wages and workforces. Essentially, the old Big Three are becoming a much smaller three. The pressures facing Detroit fit a larger pattern. Many US manufacturers are facing rising pressure from foreign rivals. The good news is that US factories are becoming more competitive. The bad news is that the needed streamlining is coming at the expense of American workers.

"Those jobs are going and they're not coming back," says Gary Chaison, a labor expert at Clark University in Worcester, Mass. In part, he says, manufacturers see moves such as the job buyouts as "a path for them to become low-cost producers by eliminating the high costs of American labor."

Not every industry faces the same degree of foreign competition from challengers based overseas. The US remains a big manufacturing nation, accounting for about 10 percent of US employment and 12 percent of annual economic output. And the high productivity of American workers still allows them to reap higher pay than their peers overseas.

Furthermore, the falling value of the in relation to foreign currencies makes American workers more competitive globally.

But as worker productivity surges forward around the world, the balance of power has shifted. America's heavy industry isn't producing the number of jobs that it used to.

The US lost 3 million manufacturing jobs between 2000 and 2006, according to the Economic Policy Institute in Washington, citing figures from government reports.

Meanwhile, the average hourly earnings of manufacturing workers have grown more slowly than pay in service-sector jobs, even though productivity has risen much faster for manufacturing workers.

"All of US manufacturing is competing on a global basis," says Michelle Krebs, senior editor of Edmunds's AutoObserver.com, which tracks the car industry.

A Weaker Dollar Should Help

One bright spot for US manufacturers: Since 2002, a weakening exchange rate for the US dollar has been helping to make US exports more attractive to foreign buyers.

Exports have been growing steadily, and have been a key factor behind a narrowing trade deficit, seen in new numbers released Thursday. This gap by which America's imports exceed its exports fell to $712 billion for the 2007 calendar year, down from $759 billion the year before.

"We believe we are in the early stages of a manufacturing renaissance," David Rosenberg, an economist at the investment firm Merrill Lynch, wrote in a recent report to clients.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: workplace, globalization, offshoring, middle-class squeeze

Mark Trumbull is a staff writer at the Christian Science Monitor.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's Time for an Industrial Strategy
Posted by: mmckinl on Feb 17, 2008 1:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first item is of course health care. In every other manufacturing economy the government pays for healh care. To make all our jobs competitive we must go to single payer. We all know the figures, health costs are 14% of GDP and we still have 50 million uninsured whereas other nations spend half as much, cover all their citizens and have equal or better outcomes.

The second item is tariffs. The emerging economies specifically in Asia practise unfair trade practices by manipulating their currencies and dumping product. China subsidizes energy costs as well. Then there is the environmental damage by overseas operators that our producers have to mitigate. Side agreements just won't work, they are unenforceble by in large. Tariffs are the only real leveler that can be implemented and can be used to help pay for single payer health care. Our current trade deficit is unsustainable and many of these products can and should be made right here to create jobs, reduce world pollution and energy usage. Tariffs will also force more foreign companies to manufacture here, again creating more jobs.

America must retain and develop more manufacturing capability if only to serve our own market. Should the current trends continue we will have nothing to trade to the world. Remember those food, tech and service sector trade surpluses, that's right, they are all trade deficits now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Partners in Progress
Posted by: carbon-based on Feb 17, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GM's 2007 loss resulted in large part from unused tax credits, which just means they didnt earn enough money over the past few years to use them.

Its good to see that unions finally realize they cannot continue to demand unrealistic concessions from companies and still expect those companies to remain profitable.

US auto companies are putting out some excellent product, we just now need to convince Americans that buying American cars isn't a loss of status.

Who knows maybe this new idea that workers and employers are actually partners in the business may yield some unforseen opportunities.

Help America, buy American

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Partners in Progress Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: Partners in Progress Posted by: carbon-based
All Hail The $14/Hour Auto Worker
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 17, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the last of the current crop of UAW members is gone, an era will go with it. New hires will make around $14/hour compared to about double that today. With it will pass the Middle-Class Auto worker...

What that means is that a single worker at GM will not be able to afford the products that he/she makes in the age of the $30-40k family sedan. It also means that they will be making less than workers for Toyota, Subaru, and Honda here in the U.S.

If you want to make some money where the US auto plants are located you might as well invest in a trailer park, because the new generation of auto worker won't be able to afford a house on their income.

In a race to the bottom, the U.S. is running out of options. I guess the 40 hour week and child labor are next to go. The greed of American enterprise knows no bounds or limits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lean Production is the strategy in US durables manufacturing. It's the only way to keep any jobs.
Posted by: yellow on Feb 17, 2008 2:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Automation and digitation is the strongest trend in US durable goods manufacturing. Strong global pressures to remain price competitive have forced the largest auto manufacturers and their suppliers to consolidate and automate production allowing them to shed jobs and keep wages low. Wages in the US auto manufacturing industry have dropped in real terms over the past thirty years.

An excellent example is the case of American Axil Manufacturing (AAM) whose North American plants are 70% automated. The plant is a top tier supplier that churns out 30,000 forgings and 9,000 axles daily, Quality control as well as manufacturing is all done by state of the art computers. About three quarters of its output is absorbed by GM but the firm supplies Form and Chrysler as well. AAM also manufactures in Mexico, China and Europe. New technologies also allow greater production coordination between plants across the globe. Digital modeling eases globalized production by connecting and coordinating not only vehicle design but manufacturing engineering and production.

Foreign Direct Investment in the US has gone from providing 1.75% of total employment in 1979 to nearly 5% of total employment just before the 2001 recession. Though some of the plants, many of them Japanese, have located in the deep south the majority tend to locate in the mid-west and east. Automation and high tech lean production which keeps labor costs as a portion of total overhead costs low allows the continuation this trend.

Globalization isn't only about shifting production to the low wage areas like China. Most of the world's manufacturing is still located in the rich countries due to the ability of firms to use high tech production, design and quality control techniques to shed labor and greatly lower the wages of those workers who remain in their employ.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, DUH!
Posted by: rickiey on Feb 18, 2008 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is what happens when the unions get too much power.

It isn't the skilled trade salaries that are the issue. The market deals with skilled trade salaries.

The problem is the unskilled trades salaries.

Quite frankly, sweeping a floor is not worth $35 bucks an hour. But the unions require their janitors be paid that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's all manipulation
Posted by: Gegner on Feb 21, 2008 11:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If a pig is a pig and a duck is a duck then why isn't a dollar a dollar?

Which is to ask if the commodities purchased with money are identical then the 'value' of money should be identical as well.

Which leads us to some interesting conundrums like you can buy 8 Yuan for a single dollar but a single yuan has 4 times the 'purchasing power' of a dollar!

Why? Manipulation...foreign currencies are priced subjectively by those who desire to exploit them...you can't live on $2 a day...well neither can the average foreign worker...you'd starve to death and so would they!

Which is to point out that there's more than a little 'hocus pocus' going on here, and our hollowed out economy is the end result of this blatant thievery!

Whosoever controls [the value] of your money, controls you...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]