Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

The Economic State of the Union, 2008

By Charles McMillion, Manufacturing and Technology News. Posted January 29, 2008.


Unprecedented debt and soaring numbers of unsold homes are driving down inflated prices for all kinds of assets.
Advertisement

In just the past seven years, U.S. household debt almost doubled and federal debt soared by near two-thirds, rocketing by a combined $10.5 trillion. The total combined debt of households ($14.4 trillion) and the federal government ($9.2 trillion) is now 168 percent of GDP, far higher even than in the brief spike during World War II. All other levels and ratios of debt also have soared far beyond any past precedent.

Yet, this record-shattering explosion of debt stimulus created the weakest seven-year job growth (4.4 percent) and one of the weakest periods of real GDP growth (18.1 percent) since the Depression: less than 6 million new jobs ($1.8 million of debt per job) and a mere $4 trillion increase in GDP.

This period began with the collapse of Wall Street's stock market bubble from the late 1990s and ends now with the collapse of Wall Street's housing and other debt bubbles. That such massive mortgage and consumer borrowing, tax cuts and war spending produced such remarkably weak real economic results suggests the months and years ahead could be quite difficult.

Yet, along with the Fed rate cuts for cheaper debt, the only policies seriously considered by this year's crop of Wall Street-funded political candidates is more short-term household and federal debt "stimulus." Locked into a failed, 30-year-old ideology of deregulation and debt, there is still no option to compete with the remarkably effective industrial and trade policies pursued by China and others.

2008 will be the ninth consecutive year the U.S. economy grows slower than the world's growth while China grows more than three times faster. In the past seven years of sluggish growth, the United States accumulated manufacturing trade deficits (production shortfalls) of over $3 trillion with full current account trade losses of $4.3 trillion; more than the entire nominal growth of GDP.

At the same time, now in the third year of their remarkable eleventh Five-Year Development Plan, China's accumulated Current Account surplus soared by nearly $1 trillion since 2001, near 13 percent of GDP in 2007. These surpluses are funding China's now $1.5-trillion war chest of foreign currency reserves.

Record trade losses have accelerated the hollowing-out of the once dynamic U.S. economy. For the first time on record, in 2002 the United States lost its historic global trade surplus in advanced technology products (ATP). Worsening sharply, since 2004 the ATP deficit became larger than the U.S. trade surplus for intellectual property services, royalties and fees. That is, for the past four years the United States has a worsening combined deficit in technology goods and services. Technology no longer pays any part of the U.S. import bills for oil, cars, electronics and clothing, etc. China now accounts for half the U.S. manufacturing trade deficit and more than the entire deficit in technology.

Reflecting the production shortfall from the trade deficits, BLS data show output growth since 2001 is among the weakest since the Depression and the gain in total hours worked (just 0.5 percent) is, by far, the weakest. This is why productivity growth has appeared misleadingly healthy; productivity is a measure of output per hour of labor.

Another powerful measure of the hollowing out in the economy is the radical shift in the job market. Of the 5.92 million total new jobs in the last seven years, only 4.32 million were in the private sector while 1.66 million were in state/local governments, mostly for public education, health and prisons. The federal government cut jobs in the Postal Service.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: lending crisis, debt, economy

Dr. Charles McMillion is president and chief economist of MBG Information Services in Washington, D.C.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Now is the Time to Discuss much needed Capital Controls.
Posted by: yellow on Jan 29, 2008 2:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author of this post has pointed out what has been belabored by everyone for a long time. Growing public and private debt amidst slow US GDP growth rates accompanied by stock market and real estate bubbles distorting the economy. This is a direct consequence of trillions in tax cuts for the rich over the past two and a half decades which has gone into financial speculation of all kinds given that effective consumer demand fails to be insufficient to stimulate investment in domestic productive output. Hence, overcapacity raises unit production costs of firms who scramble abroad to find cheap labor and lower unit costs to be competitive in the domestic US consumer goods market. Offshoring and lean production at home sheds jobs and intensifies the ongoing pattern of maldistribution of income and wealth upwards. The US continues to consume more and more of the world's savings in order to run balance of trade deficits, finance the current account deficit, and hold up the dollar in order to import more goods produced by foreign US manufacturing subsidiaries. All this is done at the expense of the stability of the US financial system and of the well being of the US working class. A dangerous financial crisis is looming on the horizen.

The US is long overdue for capital controls. The fed cannot possibly regulate the system in an age of unregulated global monetary flows. Raising interest rates to slow inflation is great until foreign funds enter the system and flood the economy with so much liquidity that the rates go down again. Raising interest rates would only make US banks uncompetitive under such circumstances anyhow.

A one percent Tobin Tax on currency speculation is a good start in order to stabilize exchange rates so they reflect less speculation than realistic economic conditions and levels of trade. Over a trillion dollars daily crosses borders well exceeding the global levels of trade in goods and services. Much of this is short term currency speculation which the special tax could make unprofitable. Fixed exchange rates could be useful as well but would have to be accompanied by capital controls lest high interest rates depress the economy in question and defeat the purpose of amassing domestic liquidity for economic expansion. Fixed exchange rates, as existed during Bretton-Woods, could cause global inflation by not allowing one currency to appreciate in response to an inflating currency to which it is "fixed" thus inflating prices in other economies to offset the fact that the fixed currency can't rise against the inflated one. This is how the Bretton-Woods system broke down in 1971 with inflated US dollars building up in European central banks threatening to spead inflation to Europe. This could be avoided by mutual agreement on fiscal restraint policies to avoid inflation. The European Monetary Union has had good success with this policy.

Capital controls, such as fixed exchange rates, taxes on cross border capital flows and taxes on speculation can stabilize the financial system and reduce government debt service. In addition, it can prevent the most damaging consequence of unregulated cross border capital flows, capital flight which, in the early 1980s, led to global competitive interest rate hikes to prevent capital flight. Such a problem can become a vicious cycle. Capital controls gives monetary authorities better control of interest rates and the money supply and hence fiscal policy. Currently, capital is flowing into the US to protect the US economy as the world's export market. This was not a creation of monetary policy but corporate globalization. It is starving the developing countries of needed development capital in the interest of a poorly conceived export led growth strategy. It is also an anti-jobs policy for the US. Capital controls can give incentive to keep investment and employment in the US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can't make conclusions from bogus numbers
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Jan 30, 2008 1:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Job creation, unemployment, average wages, inflation, GDP, etc. The numbers are all cooked by Bush and previous administrations. Any conclusions based on garbage numbers are going to be garbage conclusions. Garbage in, garbage out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]