Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Bad Mouthing De-regulation

By Ralph Nader, Nader.org. Posted January 19, 2008.


The assault on regulation over the past quarter century caused a mortgage collapse that is producing hundreds of thousands of foreclosures.
Advertisement

It was at a large wedding reception in New York City that I saw Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, sitting down to dinner one spring evening in 2000. Having heard on the grapevine that the Federal Reserve was finally going to do something about predatory lending--an area of enforcement under their jurisdiction--I went over to his table and asked him this question:

"Mr. Chairman, I hear that you are going to crack down on predatory lending practices." He nodded and said quite firmly, "Yes, Enough is Enough." Since it was, after all, a social occasion, those words were enough for me and I returned to my table with the good news. For years, my associates, Jon Brown and Jake Lewis, had been working to document the prevalence of predatory lending and communicate our concern to the federal banking agencies and members of Congress.

Jon Brown developed detailed computerized maps of bank redlining in low-income areas, city by city, which were geographic guides to places where there were plenty of predatory lending practices.

As it turned out, Chairman Greenspan's Federal Reserve did nothing about either traditional predatory lending or the rise of the latest version of that abusive pattern--the now notorious sub-prime mortgage scandals and mega-losses that are shaking the financial industry to its foundations

Actually, Mr. Greenspan often lauded leveraged, collateralized sub-prime lending as helping lower-income people to get home mortgages. He did not give much weight to the deception and imprudence and gouging of the lenders lurking in the fine print and flowing from the silver tongues of the salespeople.

The Federal Reserve touts itself as the agency where lots of smart people work - economists, statisticians, forecasters--and, of course, the often-described very smart Chairman. Yet as the speculative greed that developed, sold and resold ever more abstract and risky financial instruments comprised of bundled home mortgages went toward its final orbit of collapse, these "best and the brightest," failed to act. They failed to regulate.

The business assault on regulation and its drumbeat demands for de-regulation over the past quarter century have now caused a burgeoning sub-prime mortgage collapse that is producing hundreds of thousands of home foreclosures. The housing market is plummeting. Giant banks are desperate for infusions of capital from abroad to save them from insolvency. Huge mortgage lenders are teetering on bankruptcy, looking desperately to be taken over by other financial companies.

Foreign banks and municipalities around the world that assumed these risks are marking down big losses.

All this has been caused by a combination of speculative greed, taking on huge risks for higher returns and the refusal to apply financial law and order--i.e. regulation--by the Bush regime. All this was preventable by institutional prudence and a vigilant Federal Reserve.

So what are all these giant financial corporations on their knees begging for these grim days? They are begging the Federal Reserve to use every bit of its authority to save them through lower interest rates and by using a variety of other more abstruse tools the Fed has to rescue the very banks that help fund its budget and dominate the regional Boards of the Federal Reserve.

It is true that corporate heads have rolled--most notably the CEOs of Citigroup and Merrill Lynch. By and large, however, the remaining top culprits who got their banks and mortgage lending firms into such deep losses for investor-share holders are staying put with their enormous compensation packages.

When the big boys get into trouble, they expect Uncle Sam to bail them out. Who pays the ultimate bill? You guessed it. The small taxpayer and the consumer.

So next time your hear the words--deregulation or over-regulation--by the thoughtless think tanks, heavily funded by business money, remind yourself that you believe in tough law and order for big business and your demand that politicians weigh in with a strong enforcement crackdown on corporate crime and fraud.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: fed, greenspan, housing bubble, deregulation, debt crisis



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
How Can We Go On?
Posted by: Spyder on Jan 19, 2008 2:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, Ralph, you are so good to us! Why do you even bother? How do you drag yourself out of bed every morning? You have been telling us about corporate America for forty-two years now and nobody listens. CNN has declared who our Presidential candidates will be long before many of us even have the chance to vote! They are doing to John Edwards what they have already done to you, Al Gore, Howard Dean, and Dennis Kucinich, but the moronic public just keeps on letting them get away with it! The MSM has become Unsafe At Any Speed. Even Lou Dobbs just wants to sell books. You are one of the premiere Americans, Ralph. Why can't the sheeple see it? Bush has just placed a small bandaid on a humongous, bleeding wound that he and his buddy Al Greenspan (and others) directly caused. The real tragedy is the consistent support of income inequality by our leadership.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ralph, Where's My Country?
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jan 19, 2008 11:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How did America get so stupid so fast? Did someone distribute amnesia Kool-Aid to most Americans while I was living overseas in the 1980's? Maybe it was the New Coke that had it's 15 minutes of fame...

What I find more alarming than Republicans acting like, well, Republicans are the actions of people and groups that are ostensibly Democrats. None if this could have happened if members of the Congress had done their job and I mean all the way back to Reagan. The Democrats could have simply stayed home and denied the NeoCons a quorum, kind of a political 'Blue Flu'.

Instead, self described 'Blue-Tick' Democrats (read DINO) and DLC members sold out the working people and the nation, voting away a half century of progressive work in everything from consumer protection to environmental laws to our very civil liberties. The few who have stood their ground have been marginalized or left to twist in the wind.

I'm not a Green, not a Libertarian and damn sure am not a NeoCon Republican, but have almost nothing in common with today's Democratic Party. I'm beginning to think the Progressives need to walk away from the DNC and set up a permanent and viable Progressive Party where commitment is more than a vague promise, slogan or ideal.

Party building takes time, but reality is getting ready to smash the reality distortion field of this 'free market' Friedman nightmare we have been living lo these many years. The wake up is gong to be way past Coyote Ugly or a Mardi Gras hangover and if we are ready, we can lead the way.

If God smiles, when all is over the Repugnicans will be he new Whig Party and will dry up and blow away. The southern Blue-Ticks can have the Democratic Party and the Progressives can then claim their rightful place as the mainstream left.

Don't count on this bunch to live up to the Democratic Party name. The moneychangers are not just in the temple- they own it and run it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fraudulent Foreclosures, Debt Collection Abuse, Court Collusion
Posted by: BarbaraAnnJackson on Jan 19, 2008 11:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This comment illustrates effects of PREDATORS. Freddie Mac and Wells Fargo are engaged in real estate and mortgage fraud racketeering here in Louisiana. Aside from what is written here, IRREFUTABLE, MANIFEST PROOF is posted at: www.lawgrace.org.
---------------FACTS-----
Debt collector attorneys file foreclosures naming defunct mortgage companies, or companies which no longer hold the notes; or affix collectors' fees exceeding "Acceleration Clauses." If homeowners sue for "Unfair Debt Collection Practices," collectors make more $$ through protracted litigations.

In States like Louisiana, because Wells Fargo and Freddie Mac greatly benefit from fraudulent foreclosures ANY representation about $$$ billion dollar losses due to people defaulting on mortgages should be weighed against legal fees to law firms which outmaneuver -and even persecute people who file court proceedings in opposition to fraudulent foreclosures.

*For a purported debt of $86,000.00, via a non- existent mortgage company, attorneys racked up more than a quarter of a million dollars in litigation fees. The property was later sold to a 3rd party for $37,000.00. Investors got nothing, nothing practical was accomplished by evicting the homeowners, neighborhood property values declined.

BECAUSE OF FRAUDULENT FORECLOSURE PROCEEDINGS, SCORES OF PEOPLE HAVE NOT LAWFULLY LOST OWNERSHIP OF THEIR PROPERTIES, AND LEGALLY ARE STILL THE OWNERS, but they do not know it!

Debt Collection Abuse and Deception is the most Lethal kind of Foreclosure Fraud! The following actually happened: In August 2005,Freddie Mac evicted Louisiana property owners because Freddie Mac claims to have purchased their property in year 2005, from a mortgage company which has been defunct since year 2002. **See:
www.lawgrace.org/2008/01/05/united-states-chief-justice- robert%e2%80%99s-aim-to-raise-to-raise-federal-judges-pay-
is-revolting-new-orleans-federal-judiciary-call-to-impeach-
judge-g-thomas-porteous/
***Also posted on the lawgrace site, is a year 2004 Affidavit from the "successor in interest" to that defunct mortgage company.

Moreover, neither the succeeding mortgage company, nor the defunct company, nor Freddie Mac was holder of the note for that particular property in year 2005! As of February 2002, Wells Fargo became the holder of the note, but Wells Fargo has never filed foreclosure on that certain property! Therefore, however Freddie Mac purports to have acquired that property, the acquisition WAS NOT lawful because the non- existent mortgage company without promissory note ownership cannot sell property to Freddie Mac, nor anyone else.
==============================================
Some LINKS:

*Mortgage Mess, Foreclosure Fraud and Impediments to Justice
http://newsblaze.com/story/
20071203130614tsop.nb/newsblaze/TOPSTORY/Top-Stories.

*Comment on the Foreclosure of Judge Reginald Badeaux's Home
http://www.lawgrace.org/2007/12/08/my-december-7-2007
-comment-posted-to-the-times-picayune-blog-about-the-
news-article-entitled-%e2%80%9cjudge-gets-debt-reprieve
-badeaux-has-skipped-mortgage-payments%e2%80%9d-the-
foreclosure-of-this-lo/

*Federal Judges' Pay Raise; New Orleans Federal Judiciary Call To Impeach
http://newsblaze.com/story/20080101084831tsop.nb/
newsblaze/TOPSTORY/Top-Stories.html
=================================================
Barbara Ann Jackson
www.lawgrace.org

**In order to paste web address links to browser, first join the entire web address.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ralph , Should we Fire the Federal Reserve ?
Posted by: mmckinl on Jan 20, 2008 12:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has become obvious to everyone that the privately owned and operated Federal Reserve is Not operating in the best interest of the public, and hasn't been for its entire existence.

When do we show them the door, install a Public Central Bank and when do we get rid of the debt money and use the lawful printed money of our government?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ralph , Why do we use Debt based Money ?
Posted by: mmckinl on Jan 20, 2008 1:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is debt based money ? It is Federal Reserve Notes and currency. The current method of 'creating' money is by the banks counting your loans as assets, then lending more out based on those assets. So, simply put , if the United States and all the people paid off all our debts we would run out of money because the banks wouldn't have any loans to turn into assets to make more loans. There would be no money in circulation.

A 'Greenback' money system simply means that the government creates the money simply by printing it , Not turning loans into assets.

What's wrong with debt based money ? Very simply we will always need more and more debt to have enough money because there are more people, more loans to pay, more inflation, and now more trade deficits every year. We can never get out of debt without crashing the money supply and bringing the economy to a halt !

The answer , Fire the privately owned and operated Federal Reserve and use Government created money , not money based on debt.... 'Greenbacks'

Ask yourself this: Why do we have a Federal Debt when the government has the right to print money and pay it off saving Trillions in interest over time !

See : Debt as Money

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy-fD78zyvI

The Video on banking they don't want you to see...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Common sense and Rumors
Posted by: carbon-based on Jan 20, 2008 6:03 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, Ralph, seems the banking community got what they deserved. There is no problem investing or lending in high risk areas for high returns, so long as it is balanced.

When it gets to the point that it can financially overwhelm giant organizations, something more than deregulation etc is the problem. Where are all those Harvard MBA's or Big 5 CPA firms certifying financials. Anyone with half a brain knows a family of 4 with a household income of $40,000 /yr isnt going to be able to buy a $500,000 house!

I could say they (banks) got what they deserve - but instead the small guy AGAIN gets screwed and underperforming CEO's are getting richer by the day!

BTW Ralph, you were wrong on the Corvair but your nonsense drove the price of the car down so much I bought beautiful 1965 for almost nothing. Now, maybe you can start some rumors on Mercedes!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» There Were Two Corvairs Posted by: Spyder
» Corvair Clarification Posted by: Spyder
» RE: Corvair Clarification Posted by: carbon-based
Just another shakedown
Posted by: PaulC on Jan 20, 2008 9:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is so sinister about the right wing fundamentalist "free market" ideology is that it is all a big scam. Their real agenda is to destroy the federal government, looting it in the process, and to replace it with a Corporate State, which we are very close to realizing. This mortgage crisis is just another in a long list of "crises" that the right wing strategists orchestrated. But they are not so much crises as they are the wealthy "cashing in" and "shaking down". It is equivalent to the farmer going out to harvest the crops, only these "farmers" don't own the crops they are "harvesting".

Every attempt to implement "free market" ideology has been a complete disaster for the country involved, but the CEO's see victory in defeat. It is always a new generation of CEO's that are "taking their due", walking away from each such disaster with wheelbarrows full of cash, jumping from the burning plane with their own "golden parachute". And they don't even care about the long term viability of their own corporations - it is all about cashing in and getting out.

Neither do these CEO's care about the fate of the US - they have sold us out to the lowest bidder, which came up Communist China. That's right COMMUNIST China was handed our entire industrial and technological base for a few hundred million in graft here, a few hundred million there. Each time, a few men became fabulously wealthy while Americans sank lower and lower into poverty and despair.

That, my friends, is the true meaning of "free market" thinking.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Capitalists and their ilk
Posted by: Doubtom on Jan 24, 2008 2:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many here have put their finger on the problem of unregulated capitalism and Ralph Nader has been trying to inform the nation for more years than I can recall, but the point that is seldom addressed is that these tycoons would just as soon step over their own mothers in the pursuit of money and that they will even sell their own nation down the drain for the right price. They are pragmatic as hell and realize that they're only here for a finite number of years and they fully intend to make the most of it whatever the cost to the rest of us or to the nation in general. They simply don't care---caring is for suckers. This is the inevitable outcome of unregulated capitalism.
Pray that we learn from this particular cycle and pray even harder that we learn to keep private money out of our elections as that is the main cause of unregulated capitalism. "With money all is possible" and we have to realize its power and regulate it. We were not meant to forever be economic slaves to the corporations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]