Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

The Mad Corporate World of Glenn Beck

By Norman Solomon, AlterNet. Posted December 19, 2007.


Glenn Beck has a selective enthusiasm for the issue of "full disclosure."
Norman Solomon takes on Glenn Beck
Advertisement

When I picked up a ringing phone Monday morning, the next thing I knew a producer was inviting me to appear on Glenn Beck's TV show.

Beck has become a national phenom with his nightly hour of polemics on CNN Headline News -- urging war on Iran, denouncing "political correctness" at home, trashing immigrants who don't speak English, mocking environmentalists as repressive zealots, and generally trying to denigrate progressive outlooks.

Our segment, the producer said, would focus on a recent NBC news report praising the virtues of energy-efficient LED light bulbs without acknowledging that the network's parent company, General Electric, sells them. I figured it was a safe bet that Beck's enthusiasm for full disclosure from media would be selective.

A few hours later, I was staring into a camera lens at the CNN bureau in San Francisco while Beck launched into his opening. What had occurred on the "NBC Nightly News," he explained, "was at best a major breach of journalistic integrity." And he pointed out: "The problem isn't what NBC is promoting. It's what they're not disclosing."

A minute later, Beck asked his first question: "Norman, you agree with me that they should have disclosed this?" The unedited transcript tells what happened next.

* * *

Norman Solomon: It's a big problem when there's not disclosure. I'm glad you opened this up. And I wouldn't want any viewers of this program to be left with the impression that somehow General Electric is an environmentally conscious company.

On the contrary, they have a 30-year history of refusing and actually fighting against efforts to make them clean up the Hudson River, which GE fouled with terrible quantities of horrific PCBs, other rivers as well. People told they can't fish in the Hudson River. General Electric still lobbying to not have to clean up.

General Electric, even today -- and this report is very timely -- General Electric is lobbying to get Congress to pass $18 billion in taxpayer-backed loan guarantees for a huge GE product which is General Electric components for nuclear power plants. So we should not be fooled in any way by efforts to greenwash General Electric or any other company.

Glenn Beck: You know what's amazing to me? GE has a bigger budget for -- special interest budget than all of the oil companies combined, and yet nobody says anything. Let me reverse this.

Norman, do you think if I got on as somebody who says I don't know what we can do about global warming, I'm not sure man causes it, and I certainly don't want to have laws and regulations on this, if I got on and said that but I was being -- my corporate -- my corporate parent was Exxon Mobil, do you think I'd get away with that for a second without that being on the front page of the New York Times?

Solomon: Well, other networks, including General Electric's NBC, have been very slow on global warming. And in fact, General Electric has major interest in components and products used by the oil and gas industry.

I think if you look across the board, all the major networks, even so-called public broadcasting, which has Chevron underwriting its 'Washington Week' program every Friday, there is a problem, as you say. I think your words are very apt, 'promoting' but 'not disclosing.'

But let's be clear about this, Glenn. I have a list here, for instance, that I jotted down.

ABC, owned by Disney. ABC doesn't disclose in their relevant news reports about Disney's stake in sweatshops.

Fox News -- and now as of the last couple of days now, Wall Street Journal owned by the same entity, Rupert Murdoch's News Corp -- they don't disclose that the ownership is entangled with the Chinese government to the detriment of human rights but to the advancement of the profit margin of the parent company.

Beck: See --

Solomon: We would be remiss, Glenn, if we left out CNN, because CNN has a huge multi, multibillion-dollar stake in Internet deregulation and the failure of the Congress to safeguard so far what would be called net neutrality. So every time CNN does a news report on the Internet, on efforts to regulate or deregulate or create a two- or three-tier system of the Internet, CNN News should disclose that Time Warner, the parent company, stands to gain or lose billions of dollars in those terms.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: corporation, advertising, media, cnn, glenn beck, general electric, nbc

Norman Solomon's latest book Made Love, Got War: Close Encounters with America's Warfare State (PoliPointPress) is available now. For more information go to www.madelovegotwar.com.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Very impressive
Posted by: MediaMatters on Dec 19, 2007 3:27 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was watching that particular episode of the show and i thought you were superb. You really gave CNN and Beck an excellent eye opener. How ironic of Glenn 'sleep number' Beck' to go after NBC for their own corporate connections. Also, how hideous do you find Beck's constant advertising of his new book? Your appearence was truly inspritional to all journalists out there and i thoroughly applaud you for your integrety.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New perspectives
Posted by: saltoafronteira on Dec 20, 2007 5:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, honour on you, Solomon.
But I would like to express a feeling I had while reading your article, that troubled me.
Being an outside observer (I'm not american) and getting an opinion only by reading in the internet (I avoid going to TVs or Big newspapers) I'm beginning to realise that new political entities are appearing. And the new entity I felt is some kind of low energy civil war now occuring in the USA. Some sate of pre-dictatorship installing and a peaceful pre-insurrection response that honours america; something like your described attitude.
But let me ask you something. Are you still in time to keep the reichstag from burning, by those means ?
The problem is: will the david and goliath story repeats, if david keeps fighting only in the arenas goliath allows him to?
In war, you go straight to the jugular or you loose.
Press and Tv are military weaponry in this brave new nightmarish world. Treat it as such !
Dont expect to face the legions with argument.They will kill you in a second.
By now, only force will stop the forces who threaten your freedom, of wich those media are only one (effective) weapon.
If you dont stop them now with all the strenght you can get, one day the world will have to.
And can the world stand for world war IV ?
I think not.
If you dont stop them now, it is armaggedon for us all !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ahhhhh...
Posted by: Marshalldoc on Dec 20, 2007 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So wonderful to see Glen Beck get served on his own program...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What did he mean?
Posted by: sliver on Dec 20, 2007 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What did Beck mean in his last statement:
"Wouldn't it be nice if once in a while somebody came on and said, you know, I don't really have an agenda except the truth? It's my truth. If you don't like it, you should go someplace else."

Is he claiming that the truth should be told except when it points out his flaws?

Shouldn't he be fired for such a cowardly statement?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» He should be fired Posted by: Ellie1
brilliant.
Posted by: Jackrabbit on Dec 20, 2007 3:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you Mr. Solomon. This is what we need to make media look like every day. Shills for the corporatocracy need to be called out daily.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Colonel (ret).
Posted by: Spock on Dec 21, 2007 9:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who really wants to understand things like this is an expert on Operation Mockingbird (Google it, for openers). One device of the Mockingbird Media has given us the rigid idea that anyone and everone who "speaks truth to power" will be eradicated. When anyone, therefore, gets away with it, it proves what a free country we have. Uh-uh - that's now how it works. To let someone speak truth to power merely tells all the ignorant and the fence-sitters here in the Land of the Free that power is democratic, benevolent. "See - this realy is a democracy; we really do have freedom of speech!" One voice in a crowd is nothing, except that when the crowd agrees to discuss with the one, the crowd appears to be tolerant. And nothing changes - except more or the ignorant are willing to say things like "the system works." The fact is that even ninety percent of the public "speaking to power" is getting us nowhere. Someone explain to me why it is that with everyone in the U.S. straining to contribute to the War in Iraq, even giving life and limb, one, small segment not only gives nothing, but in fact, profits immensely. That should tell you about "speaking truth to power." When the elections are over, it will be business - government nowadays is merely a corporate concern, let's not forget - as usual. Open borders, and all the rest included (some of that "truth spoken to power" - huh?)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He should have been fired early on in his CNN run
Posted by: RozMcD on Dec 22, 2007 11:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When he made the same comment that got AL Sen. Denton ousted in the 1980s: that married men expect sex from their wives. In other words, women give up their right to say no to sex once married.
ALABAMIANS didn't put up with that attitude THEN. Where is this country headed to?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]