Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Middle Class Held Hostage by Fat-Cat Corporate Raiders

By David Sirota, Creators Syndicate. Posted December 14, 2007.


Brutes like billionaire equity guru Henry Kravis haven't amassed such treasure by playing nice.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by David Sirota

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

As a central villain in the famous book Barbarians At the Gate, Henry Kravis has become one of the world's richest mavens of private equity -- the Wall Street sector that buys up companies, breaks them apart and sells their assets. In 2006, Kravis made $450 million, or more per hour ($51,000) than the average American household makes in a year. Incredibly, his wealth puts him right within the average for executives in this largely unregulated industry that oversees about $400 billion in annual business.

Brutes like Kravis haven't amassed such treasure by playing nice. During their takeover rampages, they often crush workers and leave communities for dead. And now, as we've seen over the last month, when the tax man comes calling, these barbarians start taking hostages.

Congress, you may have noticed, is trying to prevent the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) from hitting the middle class. This tax was originally designed to prevent billionaires like Kravis from using creative accounting to avoid paying any taxes whatsoever. However, the AMT did not adjust for inflation, and so the tax now threatens to hammer millions of ordinary Americans.

To prevent this unintended consequence without adding to the national debt, Congress has to find about $50 billion. That is roughly the amount stolen each year through a tax loophole allowing those like Kravis to pay a lower effective tax rate than the servants who tend to his 26-room Park Avenue penthouse. Instead of paying the 35 percent income tax rate, private equity managers are permitted to pay the 15 percent capital gains rate on most of their earnings. They are also allowed to use offshore corporations to shelter their income from taxes.

In November, House Democrats passed a bill to prevent the AMT from hitting the middle class. The legislation included language shutting down the Henry Kravis Loophole. William Stanfill, a Colorado venture capitalist who testified to Congress in support of that provision, correctly says there are no negative side effects to "taxing rich white guys the same as the rest of the population."

However, when the bill hit the Senate, the Washington Post reported that "a sprawling, big-money lobbying campaign" stopped it cold.

In the first nine months of 2007, the private equity industry spent about $20 million on campaign donations and lobbying. That kind of cash is barely a fraction of what just one executive like Kravis saves each year thanks to the tax loophole. But it was more than enough to convince a bipartisan group of senators to block the loophole-closing bill, thus creating today's hostage situation.

The first set of hostages are those honest people who -- rather than trying to avoid taxes like the Henry Kravises -- paid too much in taxes. The IRS says that up to 32 million tax refunds could be delayed because the AMT tax bill has been indefinitely stalled.

The second set of hostages is the middle class. If the private equity executives' campaign ends up killing the AMT bill altogether, millions of households making between $50,000 and $100,000 a year could be forced to pay an average of $2,000 in new taxes -- not exactly helpful at a time of ballooning health care premiums and mortgage payments.

Then there are millions of kindergartners, most of whom don't yet know what a tax is. If Congress passes the AMT relief measure without paying for it, those kids will be forced to pay the added interest on the national debt when the bill ultimately comes due.

To fathom the boldness of this hostage-taking, note that it is all happening at the very same time Bloomberg News reports that the IRS has launched an investigation "into suspected tax abuses at hedge funds and private-equity firms after determining many firm partners don't file returns and may have improperly characterized transactions."

But, then, as a new movie series from Brave New Films shows, this is the typical behavior of the greediest in a "me" culture spinning wildly out of control. The videos, which you can watch at www.warongreed.org, use Kravis to show how the barbarians are no longer at the gate. Today's Attila the Huns are inside the Capitol, hobnobbing with our congressional representatives and merrily manufacturing a standoff. If they are successful in preserving their tax scheme, the rest of us will feel the consequences either this April 15th, or many April 15ths in the future.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: corporations, taxes, middle class, wealthy

David Sirota is a nationally syndicated weekly newspaper columnist for Creators Syndicate. He is the New York Times bestselling author of Hostile Takeover: How Big Money and Corruption Conquered Our Government and How We Take It Back (Crown 2006). He is also a senior fellow at the Campaign for America's Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network. His second book, The Uprising, is due in the Spring of 2008

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What to Do?
Posted by: Tim Brown on Dec 14, 2007 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
David,

As always, you make it a point to demonstrate the consequences of actions taken by craven "public servants" in the service of corporate profiteers. In this case it is those of us who work hard and play by the rules who will bear the financial burden of others who bribe hard and make the rules.

This begs the question: What do we do about it? Without revealing too much from your upcoming book, can you share with the rest of us how we are supposed to take effective action to correct this malfeasance?

Tim Brown
Common Sense Magazine

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» We need a new New Deal Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: We need a new New Deal Posted by: AhavahbatSarah
Bribery is now not only legal (unless you are unbelievably stupid)
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Dec 15, 2007 3:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but institutionalized!

When it becomes virtually impossible to attain public office in the first place without selling your soul to the corporations, one shouldn't be surprised that our entire government is corrupt. It would be amazing if it were not - and that honesty would last exactly one election cycle - until a new batch of politicians could be purchased.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

evading frank discussion of the democratic deficit
Posted by: wli on Dec 15, 2007 3:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the article attempts to avoid admitting is that there is what's called a democratic deficit and a degeneration toward illiberal democracy in the US, if such is not already a fact on the ground.

The causes for all this are manifold, having to do with the specifics of the Cold War, the historical defeat of the Left, espionage, and more. The failure of the article to put the "barbarians at the gate" in this broader context, at least in summary or acknowledgment, severely limits its explanatory power.

It is not mere greed that's conquered the halls of government. Conquest is accomplished by force.

Without understanding that, leaders and activists will just end up dead and behind bars as usual. The fact that's what happens and has been happening all along is a good part of why no one's left to stand in the way of these "barbarians at the gate." Evasion of the topic is untenable; frank discussions are required.for the survival of any countervailing movement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporate Crime Inc – Amerika Co
Posted by: Number_6 on Dec 15, 2007 6:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not about some random collection of "fat cat corporate raiders" as Mr. Sirota would have us believe.

Kravis and other brutal manipulators only do what an utterly crooked and corrupted system will allow. Flashy players like Kravis are rank amateurs compared to those who own the system. That system was hijacked for a criminal ruling class nigh on 100 years ago when the private Ponzi farce “Federal Reserve” Corp was enforced over the U.S. economy.

Another poster above cited a systemic-wide fraud as “Illiberal Democracy” (a term coined by Fareed Zakaria who is himself an MSM apologist for multinational corporate rule).

There is no need for red herring slogans for this age-old phenomena.

It’s called FASCISM for the merger of state and corporate power where freeloading corporate crime rules political stooges, media hacks and their institutions like low rent prostitutes.

People like Mr. Sirota do good work but won’t bust this core fraud for suspect reasons. Clearly, the same or similar reasons supposed “progressive” outlets like Alternet and others barely touch on it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

if a dog is rabid...
Posted by: wolfgangmo75 on Dec 18, 2007 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We do something final to it. Perhaps the working classes need to realize that these mad dogs need to be dealt with finality. Consider it a civic duty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: if a dog is rabid... Posted by: JSquercia