Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Do Snap Judgments Amount to Bias in the Workplace?

By Freada Kapor Klein, Jossey-Bass. Posted November 30, 2007.


An expert on workplace diversity and fairness explains in her new book how unconscious bias routinely creeps into split-second decisions in the office.
14157797
lklkl
Advertisement

The following is an excerpt from Giving Notice: Why the Best and Brightest are Leaving the Workplace and HOW YOU CAN HELP THEM STAY," by Freada Kapor Klein (Jossey-Bass, 2007).

Stare at these words for a moment.

Did you read: THE CAT? Most people do. Now look again. Notice that the symbols for H and A are not actually letters -- they're identical, nonspecific symbols. This wasn't a problem at first glance. Our brains filled in the information we needed, using pattern recognition based on past experiences. This is an inherent part of being human. At one time, this pattern recognition was a survival mechanism: Red mushrooms make you sick. Red mushrooms make you sick again. Stop eating red mushrooms. In the starkest Darwinian system of natural selection, you either figured it out by recognizing the pattern or you died.

When people consider the patterns they live by, most would deny that they include stereotypes. And it's true -- after hundreds of years of the most egregious racism imaginable, most people in this country today are not overtly biased. It's true in the corporate world too. Ask a group of CEOs, and they'll tell you that they can find genuine talent regardless of gender, race or sexual orientation.

But consider the example (above) when your brain automatically filled in the information that was missing. And then consider this: What information is your brain implicitly providing when you walk into a conference room and see a person dressed a certain way, a person whose skin is darker or lighter, a person whose hair or size or style or age is different than what you are used to?

On a cool fall day, after spending the weekend in the office wrapping up an intense but creative project, Eric Johnson shrugged off his coat as he stepped into his manager's office to talk about his next assignment. He was hoping to be given a lead role with a new initiative that looked like a sure money maker. He was more than hoping, really.

Eric's patterns continued to be influenced by his childhood in Detroit, when his parents, both auto factory workers, taught him to live in shifts. He saw his life in strict time blocks for both his personal and professional goals. He knew life wasn't fair, and he'd seen how the ups and downs of the auto industry -- the epitome of big business -- impacted his own day-to-day existence while growing up.

But now he was playing that corporate game, fueled by career ambitions, working to understand it, tame it and win it. Eric knew that his success on his prior project, coupled with his track record for hard work and creativity, put him at the top of a small heap to head the new assignment. So he was stunned when his manager told him he had already decided that leadership spot should go to Eric's straight, white male colleague -- a man with slightly lower productivity and accomplishments than Eric, but a chipper man, a good worker, and a positive and friendly person.

Eric's manager, when he made this decision, wasn't blatantly thinking: "Eric's black and gay, so I can't put him in charge." In fact, he considered Eric to be a talented and motivated team player; it's just that he wasn't all that comfortable with Eric. There wasn't any perceptible tension or discomfort. Indeed, Eric's manager prided himself on his open-mindedness. He made sure that Eric was given assignments he could handle, and that if they slipped a day, it wasn't mission critical. Yet Eric's manager never stopped to reflect that Eric had never missed a deadline and was often completing assignments early and offering to help out his colleagues. Completely unconsciously, Eric's manager assumed that Eric had been an "affirmative action hire" (someone who wasn't as qualified as his peers), and acted accordingly.

"It's nothing against you at all, Eric. You're doing great. Just stay focused on your current projects. Mark is a better fit: He's worked with many of these business units before and went to the same school as Chip, the big boss. Since they're both such loyal alums, I thought it would actually help all of us," his manager explained.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: hiring, fairness, job interview, freada kapor klein, giving notice

Freada Kapor Klein is the author of "Giving Notice: Why the Best and Brightest are Leaving the Workplace and HOW YOU CAN HELP THEM STAY" (Jossey-Bass, 2007) and founder and board director of the Level Playing Field Institute, which promotes innovative programs focused on revealing and removing barriers to fairness from the classroom to the boardroom. She has worked on issues of diversity for 30 years, having co-founded the first group on sexual harassment in the United States.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Who thinks they are unbiased?
Posted by: YogiBear on Nov 30, 2007 12:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Almost all of the people taking this test describe themselves as unbiased at the onset

What world do they live in? We all have biases. I wonder if identifying one's biases is at all helpful in avoiding them, or if doing so only serves to cement them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Irrelevant demographics don't affect how professionals think.
Posted by: utilitarianist on Nov 30, 2007 12:47 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This isn't Iran where people get into positions of economic power through family connections, they wouldn't be in their position if they had no control over their subconscious which is essentially a mental disability. You shouldn't be whining about unproven subconscious racism in the elite when conscious racism occurs blatantly on a large scale amongst the poor of all races and on a regular basis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Trial by fire
Posted by: YogiBear on Nov 30, 2007 12:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those who do make it into the job interview

Can't tell you how many job interviews I've blown by being honest. My number one rule for interviewing these days is to tell them what they want to hear and nothing else. Interviewers take every nuance, however slight and multiply it into a picture of your personality. I can totally see how a small difference could be nuanced into a major reason not to hire or promote a person.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Trial by fire Posted by: cynik
As usual
Posted by: Marlena on Nov 30, 2007 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "tests" are designed to give a preordained outcome, and do not account for the complexity's of reality, and are therefore totally useless

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Abusing Darwin
Posted by: pdxstudent on Nov 30, 2007 7:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I barely get into this piece, and I see what should by now be understood as an abuse of Darwin.

"In the starkest Darwinian system of natural selection, you either figured it out by recognizing the pattern or you died."

It's more like, you were genetically pre-disposed in someway to recognize the pattern or die. What the author describes is not Natural Selection, Darwinian or otherwise. This wouldn't be noteworthy if there wasn't a wide-spread ignorance of the basic mechanics of evolution. It's little mis-recognitions and abuses like the one I quote above that contribute to bulk of skepticism towards evolution, if not science itself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Taken one step further... Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Abusing Darwin Posted by: talkville
"Split second decisions" have a tendency to get folks fired. Also, exactly how important is this?
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Nov 30, 2007 9:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the workplace, the science is clear: Unconscious bias routinely creeps into those "blink," split-second decisions in the office, impairing business leaders' ability to make intelligent, intuitive judgments.

In the anecdote given, if it took a split second for a manager to decide whom to award a major project, then that's a sign of a poor manager, not necessarily a skriminnatin' one, unconsciously, subconsciously, or otherwise. The best managers are usually thoughtful and deliberate, and most don't appear to *instinctively* have the answer to complex, important questions pop miraculously into their heads. Of course, here I give away my bias towards thoughtful, deliberate personel, and against eager-beaver yesmenorwomen. Arghh; color me a 'skriminator, if you must.

Beyond that, here the author offers a thorough exploration of the obvious: of course biases exist. The NOI is not going to elect to be their Big Man, any more than their ignorant besheeted counterparts are going to elect me to be their Big Magician.

Believe it or not, genuine, demonstrable racial favoritism--whether malicious or not--does still exist. It isn't just in business, you can find it more or less written into sections of penal code, it is institutionalized when our legislators abandon the fundamental, Constitutional guarantee of equal protection under the law for their pet causes, and you can of course find bias in various social settings.

So, while the author does indeed give us a brief glimpse into what is broad common knowledge, mayhap it might be more productive for more of our citizenry to be involved in addressing the ugly, ignorant, three-headed racial monsters we can see (disparate sentencing, governmental guidelines that fall afoul of equal opportunity, and outright bigotry in the workplace), before chasing the ones we--by the very definition of "subconscious bias"--imagine.

Now, disparate sentencing guidelines, wanton abondonment of equal protection under the law, and workplace bigotry are just some of my priorities; I'm sure others harbor their own prejudices as to what is most important regarding this issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
ABOUT INTERVIEWS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 30, 2007 2:40 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one is really him or herself at an inter-
view. It's role playing and doesn't work at either end. Too much head shrinking and too little real discussion about the job. I've also found that the person doing the interview seldom knows much about the 'job'. We could do with more honesty. Most of what goes wrong on the new job should have surfaced at the interview, but people are pressured into some ceremonial corporate dance and miss the point of it all. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the more racisim and bias we have more to each other....
Posted by: eosrk on Nov 30, 2007 5:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the more embolden terrorism becomes, for they are a equal-opportinity employer!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Surprise
Posted by: ArtemInox on Nov 30, 2007 7:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Racism did not go away, and not gone very far. There has been a lot of progress, perhaps more percieved than real, but progress regardless.

This ugly problem is still very real and very much alive everywhere. As the article started out saying, it is human nature to categorize and classify. The study about resumes says enough.

Here's a little something for the white guys that feel compelled to lapse into a jive slang when talking to black or brown people. Don't do it. You're not one of them, you didn't grow up in the environment where people talk that way. They don't think you're anything but an asshole for doing it.

Imagine someone imitating the way you talk, imitating because that isnt how they normally talk. Visualize this. Then, ask someone of a different ethnicity to talk the way you sound to them.

Okay, enough said. Don't be that guy, that dick.

http://www.addictedtoaggravation.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Easy enough. Posted by: ABetterFuture
"Mark is a better fit"
Posted by: talkville on Dec 1, 2007 12:12 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Each of us occupies a unique space-time singularity in a Real world. How is one to expect "un-biased" practices? Most especially in a privately organized hierarchy which is, after all, operating in relations of power.

The problem is structural and can be mitigated and counter-acted only within certain limits (which will ultimately be met with reaction and co-optation in ever ascending and reproducing cycles).

It will always be 'the fit' which controls a 'superior's' judgments.

Let's hope the 'best and brightest' who leave stay out and work towards organizing OTHER forms and relations of power SHARING. No capitalist organization will 're-form' itself in the direction of equality -- that would be contradictory and self-destructive.

At IBM or McDonnel Douglas or 'work-places' galore, the only ones who 'succeed' are those who divorce themselves and undertake to Personify the Brand. One can always identify them by a kind of 'deadness' in their eyes and an automatic tone in their voice. They are 'well compensated' for their Service. And, regardless of their name or gender, they fit.

Even more than 'bias', it's a matter of orientation: does one want to be Human or does one want to be Idea? Meanwhile, the struggle for fairness and equity will remain one of power, with the victor already named a-priori. It simply fits The Model.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bias can be racist
Posted by: desidid on Dec 3, 2007 7:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
*What happened to Eric was neither overt bigotry nor an anomaly. Researchers have now refuted the notion that only racists use stereotypes and instead confirmed the uncomfortable fact that stereotypes are an inherent part of how we all relate to each other.

But of course the manager's bias was rooted in his racism. He assumed that Eric had been hired due to Affirmative-Action, not any particular talent or skill. (Because Lord knows we Blacks have no particular talents or skills)
And when you change the word racism to bias it somehow mitigates the behavior. This has been a long held attitude of the majority culture. Racism only exist when and where they say it does, and that bias, though uncomfortable for some, doesn't rise to the level of outright bigotry. What a load of bull.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

complaints complaints.......
Posted by: kkmedia1 on Dec 24, 2007 6:33 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
online casinos USA | leather jackets The essential one-step product for Il migliore Casino Online complete leather care. URAD NEUTRAL buy cigarettes |brings back and revives the original buy diamond earings color and is remarkable buy cigarettes online |leather and fur is always great leathers to casino bonus |mint condition. Also, it offers efficient casino and poker no problems, Casino Online casino and poker no problems. Whether used as a simple shoe polish, as a cleaner for golf shoes or as a online casino gambling Online Casino Games
das beste internet casino best internet casino best online casinos casino spielen | blog for all | conditioner for Best Online Casinos leather and fur is always greatblog for all |car interior, URAD will surpass Das beste casino | any other product as to ease of use, dry time and leather and fur is always great on leather furniture and saddles, and URAD COLOR to bring a Das beste casino | better shine and hide scuff marks play bingo online casino and poker no problems.
online Casino bonus | Livonia transmission repair shop Michigan | Online Casino Gambling leather and fur is always great casino links and casino and poker no problems on we also have online casino links and more like cigarette links exchange always great| tamiflu, viagra, cialis buy tamiflu, viagra, buy cialis | pharmacy links | link directory, free link exchange | Online Casino United States | online casino US players leather and fur is always great judaica, kotel, menora | Casino Bonus Code | free casino bonus

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]