Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Alec Baldwin: Writers' Strike is Studios' Fault

By Alec Baldwin, Huffington Post. Posted November 8, 2007.


Hollywood writers getting short-changed; studios reneged on promises made 20 years ago.
writers
Advertisement

Editor's note: The video to your right, produced by the Writers' Guild, lays out exactly what the writers' beef is in a very clear way. If you haven't followed the strike closely, it's a great primer.

When I look back on the years I have worked in the film and television business, since beginning in 1980, there have been many obvious changes. Most of those are technological ones and those technological developments have profoundly altered the soul and the math of the business. Cable TV and then satellite, VHS and then DVD and then DVR, and now MP3. Three networks dominating everything and then those three networks dominating nothing. HBO producing original broadcasting that competed with the Big Three for audience share. David Chase giving everyone a reason to stay home on Sunday to watch TV. Who'd a thought?

In the movie business, among the biggest changes is the background, personality and capabilities of your average head of the studio, head of production and their marketing departments. I recall, through the admittedly distorted prism of time, that Mike Medavoy was the kind of old school studio boss who looked at his release schedule and decided to burn one on "the side of the angels." He had a movie and a filmmaker that he truly believed in and, inside of a slate of 20 or 15 or even 12 movies, Medavoy made one with little regard for the box office prognosis. He wanted to make a good film and believed that audiences would follow the filmmaker, and him, to the theatre.

There are no Mike Medavoys running the studios today. There are no Fred Silvermans running the networks, either, Silverman being the television-savant-as-executive, a breed that seems to have all but vanished, save for Garth Ancier, who apprenticed under Silverman. The studios are run by men and women who know very little, if anything, about how to make a good film. That is why so many studio films are so shamefully (or shamelessly) bad. These are men and women who simply do not have the recipe, although each fancies himself as a modern day Cohn, Warner or Zanuck. From what I read of Hollywood history, Zanuck had more talent for how to fit the disparate elements of filmmaking together in one finger than most of today's crowd has in their whole production department. Make no mistake, there are extraordinarily talented and capable people at the studios and networks. Ron Meyer, once the greatest talent agent of them all (he was mine, and I mean every word of that) and Brad Grey are two smart men who have had remarkable careers and yet run major studios that answer to demanding corporate parents.

The writers' strike is upon us because the writers want more of the back end and the studios claim they don't have it. If the studios don't have it, it's more their own fault than anyone else's. We are now in the fully realized age of the modern entertainment corporation, with lawyers and accountants calling nearly all of the shots. Some say the old studio system was bad. However they look more and more like the Medicis compared to what exists today. Even in independent film, so much of the product seems tired. (If I see one more Indie Icon Guy and Indie Icon Gal put one of their parents into a nursing home, while the lighting is dialed down real low to hide the cheap set design, I might cry.)

Many contributors disparaged the striking WGA on this site. I was dismayed by this. Do you honestly believe that most writers are ultimately responsible for what goes on screen, even if their name is on it? That's like saying a plumber is responsible for your taste in fixtures. Sometimes a writer is like a plumber: he installs what he is paid to install. Most writers I know have a great script in one file and a commercial one in the other. They have BILLY BUDD and PORKYS all in the same computer. Don't ever judge a writer by any screenplay that gets made. Unless you're saying something admiring about a real giant, with real power, from another time. Like Welles or Mankiewicz or Robert Towne.

Everyone in the film industry seems to be searching for the risk-free project. There is no such project. Movie-making, music, theatre and TV, even publishing…all creative enterprises that struggle to discern the taste of a mass audience are in a risky business. We need more risk-takers to make movies and produce TV. We need more Mike Medavoys. And let's hope the strike ends soon.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: wga, labor



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Like Alec Baldwin lecturing his "30 Rock" exec character
Posted by: war_on_tara on Nov 8, 2007 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Slightly surreal, hilarious in spots, and informative.

Oh yeah, it's Thursday - there's certainly no reason to stay home tonight if Earl, 30 Rock and The Office are in reruns because of the strike!

No doubt a bunch of TV-hating AlterNetters will crawl out of the woodwork to blast this one... via computer. (But aren't they the audience for those Indie flicks about the nursing homes?)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The proof is in the pudding
Posted by: cbmtrx on Nov 8, 2007 2:48 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Consider, for instance, the BBC. It can be called many things, but it nevertheless manages to produce some remarkably original material.

The Office is arguably one of the most original sitcoms in decades, yet without the extraordinary comedic writing talents of Gervais and Merchant, who were free to pen whatever social gratuities they could dream up, the show might easily have been forgettable. (The US version of the Office is good, but there are many examples of Brit shows that have died an early death in translation. I don't know whose fault this is--the writers, the networks, or the audience--probably a bit of everything).

On point about sitcoms: I am intellectually fatigued by the tripe that is paraded across the screens at prime time. It is, quite literally, all the same. I watched Kelsey Grammer's new show for a few minutes, to see if his sitcom status would somehow have produced a superior show. It did not. I recognized, within just the first few minutes, the very same, very comfortable, very risk-free formula at work that I've seen in countless, countless others (people walking across the set merely to deliver their smarmy one-liner, and not because they were actually going somewhere to DO something; the ubiquitous end-of-scene, pre-commercial break musical missive that serves no purpose other than to remind the viewer that they're watching a comedy; the endless and exhaustively unoriginal yuck yuck jokes, again, and again, and again; the stereotyped angry-mom-and-overweight-dad characters acting like...angry-mom-and-overweight-dad characters; the insipid, sophomoric dialog that is supposed to be aimed at adults, but sounds instead like it's aimed at the tame, mild-mannered, God-fearing, homophobic, sexless, uneducated, helpless, and ultimately useless humans one might have noticed in "Jesus Camp" or at Nascar).

American sitcoms have become as comfortable as American beer.

I agree with the strike, but I hope it doesn't backfire. But if the networks capitulate, I charge the writers with truly earning their pay by encouraging--no insisting--that the networks give their scripts teeth and soul.

No more vanilla. No more Wonder bread. No more soda pop, cotton candy comedy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I Just Saw One... Posted by: grumble-bum
POWER & PRIVILEGE
Posted by: stryder on Nov 9, 2007 1:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had a conversation with a filmmaker who interviewed Gene Hackman for a documentary on the film business. After the official onscreen interview— Gene Hackman pulled the man aside and told him there was no way he could be honest about the “studio business” on camera.

Hackman asked the filmmaker: “Do you really want the truth?”

The filmmaker was flabbergasted but admitted that he did “want the truth”.

“It’s all about the script,” said Hackman.

Gene Hackman went on to say that – but for rare exceptions – directors were traffic cops who got to their cozy positions through studio politics and connections, luck or some such combination. The bottom line was and remains that good filmmaking is all about the story.

In other words Hackman revealed the worst kept secret in Hollywood. Good films come down to writing and the writer.

As Alfred Hitchcock said, “To make a great film you need three things - the script, the script and the script.”


In an age where Studios are now part of a monopoly corporate media sham that sold gullible Americans “war on terror” at Iraq War and a dozen other outrages – holding writers down is not just an economic issue. It’s also about making sure writers are kept under the cultural monopoly thumb of the same Fascist Mafia that run the studios, Washington, and a cesspool “Mockingbird” media machine.

Make no mistake. For cozy studios bosses and their crypto-Fascist masters, money is just a way to keep score.

As in every part of public life – in the absence of justice, this is about power and privilege.

Who owns it and who serves it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: POWER & PRIVILEGE Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
» RE: POWER & PRIVILEGE Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
Thank you Alec Baldwin
Posted by: agathena on Nov 9, 2007 4:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes,it is 'the scripts' that are the product of the writers' ideas, imagination and originality. So it appears that the modern studio does not want imagination and originality it wants 'the tried and true.'

Studios need to wake up to the changing audience. We know the tv audience has changed by the success of some really great shows.

In the past some great sit-com fell by the wayside:
Examples:
"My World and Welcome to It" 26 episodes, 1969 - 1970, writers: R.S. Allen & Danny Arnold
"My So-called Life" 19 episodes, 1994, writer: Winnie Holzman

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enough of the writer's strike already!
Posted by: cjohnson44 on Nov 9, 2007 9:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like no one ever called a strike before. With most of the junk that passes for "entertainment," they can stay out forever. Maybe that'll force some Americans to actually pick up a book.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Art and Revolution-
Posted by: WitchyNy on Nov 9, 2007 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks Alternet-for publishing this article I posted about here- yesterday. Now how about writing something on Dennis Kucinich- bravely-honorably-fighting for Cheney's impeachment???

Regarding Alec Baldwin-he understands a Revolution NEEDS IT'S ARTISTS. Why do you all think there are so many
-stupid- stupid movies, songs, and magazines today?

The rich who rule us- understand very well that they must control the art of our culture-but they can't. We downgrade our own art today-by saying that they are 'just' movies, music, and magazines-and online blogs like Alternet...but this IS our art. It IS important.

The writers working under this repressed system are forced to send out symbolic messages-but the people DO get them....

Alec Balwins movie-THE JUROR-was REALLY about the corrupt political system we live under-and that We The People must take matters into our own hands to save ourselves and our children from these monsters.

His movie THE EDGE--(one of my favorite movies-and I am a vegetarian!) about stranded men lost in the Alaska wilderness-being chased by a man eating bear-was REALLY about -the solution to their problem was chasing them the entire time-they just had to realize it and figure out what to do-and fight back-to survive.

As WE THE PEOPLE must do now.

Bush and his gang ARE the bear. Bush and his gang ARE the Mafia. And we outnumber them 3 million to one!
We need to take back our country. We need to take back our world. We need to put our lives on the line (as they already are) and fight these bastards.

The Democrats should make Bush veto EVERYTHING!
The Democrats should be supporting Kucinich!
And if that fails-
WHEN IN THE COURSE OF HUMAN EVENTS-IT BECOMES NECESSARY....

Come on ALTERNET!
Sites with articles about Kucinich and the impeachment-

Daily Kos
Huffington Post
Common Dreams
Crooks and Liars
Michael Moore

There are many anti-war groups supporting the impeachment and organizing with phone numbers and petitions to sign. One is called Peace and Freedom. And support the writers strike-it IS about you and me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Art and Revolution- Posted by: WitchyNy
Here, Here, Alec! However....
Posted by: Voicedude on Nov 9, 2007 10:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...there's a lot more at stake here!

Let me first address your article:

I agree that the entertainment business is still stuck in the mechanics of the past, while those that run it are hopelessly trying to plug into the future (hard to do when you can't grasp the past nor present). They clearly don't understand that while it's always been called 'Show Business', there's always been an artistic side - one that must come first. While they rush into securing rights to remake a sequel to a film based on a commercial (or some completely unoriginal idea), I know that there's a hundred guys walking around the LA area right now with at least one script that's better than anything you've seen this year (hey, I might even be one of them). These same scripts have no hope of ever reaching the right people - or even the right people's assistant's secretary - and SOP is that they do immediately find the cylindrical filing system. The same union you defend makes sure to keep aspiring writers at more than an arm's length, often spending big bucks just to have lawyers threaten them with 'don't ever bother us with a great idea again or we'll sue!' or the like. I know that the studio’s bookkeepers find clever ways of declaring that a worldwide mega-hit like “Forrest Gump” didn’t make a profit (as they claimed to author Winston Groom). And the recording industry is even worse. But I digress...

As a voting member of SAG, I know we'll be expected to follow the Writer's Guild into a strike. Although it will pass, I will vote against it - just as I did seven or so years ago when the two unions had a short strike. My reasoning is as simple now as it was then: at a time when producers are lining up with the next copy of another 'reality' program, this would NOT be the best time to say 'let's see you make stuff without us writers & actors!' Because right after the last strike, that's exactly what they did! Since the current glut of moronic reality shows is a direct result of that strike, what awful batch of programming will we be subjected to after this one? There's also a whole lot of crap in films & TV that's been rushed through the green light process in anticipation of the strikes, and without the usual time to care about quality. 'Just get it out there quickly and cash in!' So we can expect a lot of lousy, almost unwatchable entertainment in six to nine months thanks to our strikes.

And Alec, don't expect a lot of 'community support' for these strikers either! While the public may support the teachers or bus drivers who strike, they'll have a hard time mustering up some pity for what they look at as overpaid Hollywood elite. When the grocery clerks went on strike and were almost threatening us into supporting them by NOT going into their stores, I pointed out that my union also went on strike - but no one stopped watching TV or going to the movies (in fact, both saw a rise in numbers). Sorry, Mr. $25 an hour grocery clerk - but you didn't support my union, and I gotta have food!

You make a lot of good points, Alec, and I agree with just about everything you said. But what we really need to do is strengthen our union, so what we vote on actually counts. Remember when we voted to slow down the credits at the end of TV shows? That vote passed! Yet the credits now are sped up AND squished off into a corner so badly that no one with even a big screen & a digital freeze frame could possibly read it! So, what's the point of our votes if they're ignored?

I guess the real point here is 'what will our future really look like after the strike?' A little bit more ‘money on the back end’ for the same old, cranked out crap? And even fewer projects for us to write for or act in?

"Yay, us!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HOLLYWOOD IS BAD ART SO WHO THE FUCK CARES?
Posted by: SOWILO on Nov 9, 2007 11:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NONE OF THESE FILMS THAT HOLLYWOOD HAS PUT OUT IN THE LAST 20 YEARS HAVE BEEN ANY GOOD. ITS ALL CLICHED, IGNORANT, FORMULAIC SPECTACLE.

Watch Foriegn and Indie film. Watch complex stories with moral speculation, history, etc. Stop with the flashy spectacle, cinematography, and 3rd-rate storytelling. FUCK TV and its ignorant cultural narratives.

John Sleshinger, John Cassavetes, Todd Haynes, Catherine Brellait, Fassbinder, - these are examples of good directors/writers.

To paraphrase British playwright Howard Barker, TRAGEDY is the highest form of art because it is not about education or entertainment. It is pain for pain's sake and nothing else. It teaches us about our fallibility as humans and gives us a place to breathe via art. It is a place where we can be both philosophical and immoral.

In film and theatre, the entertainer, the satirist, and the political educator play the spoons in an authoritarian culture that decides narratives for the masses. The true revolt is in high art.

FUCK THE HOLLYWOOD SCREENWRITERS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HOLLYWOOD IS BAD ART SO WHO THE FUCK CARES? Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
We must support ALL workers
Posted by: lilcheese71 on Nov 9, 2007 2:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Risk takers are needed in every area of the media. We are entertained, but not enlightened. We are placated so we will not rise up and demand democracy. It is high time for the American people to wake up and smell the proverbial coffee. We must support ALL workers who are standing up to the powers that be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We must support ALL workers Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
"The Writers Strike Back"
Posted by: what now cartoons on Nov 10, 2007 2:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I support the WGA writers in their strike. As an animation artist myself we see no residuals for the work we do under the studios draconian work for hire contracts. I wish we did, my life would be so different considering the mega money makers I have worked on in my career. Even though my corner of the entertainment industry sees no residuals, I want to see the writers get theirs. In the hope that someday we animators could get a small piece of the pie. If the writers are shut out of the future technology then our lowly corner of the entertainment industry doesn't stand a chance, and to completely loose all hope is something none of us wants to experience.
With this topic in mind I present my latest cartoon, "The Writers Strike Back", it's up at my website now.
www.whatnowtoons.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]