Immigration Debate: Court Puts "No-Match" Letters on Hold; First Step in Protecting Workers
Also in Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace
Digital Dollars: Why the Marketing and Ad Industry Are Afraid of New Regulatory Watchdogs
Jeffrey Chester
We're Doing a Heckuva Job Helping Those Devastated by the Economic Meltdown
Karen Dolan, Diana Pearce
America Without a Middle Class -- It's Not Far Away As You Might Think
Elizabeth Warren
Congress Can Kill Outlandish Bonuses for Wall Streeters: Why Won't They?
Sam Pizzigati
Let's Get Rolling on Unemployment -- We Need a Direct Govt. Jobs Program
Isaiah J. Poole
Related Stories
Bush's Looming Immigration Crackdown a Painful Exercise in Futility
Yesterday a San Francisco federal judge extended for 10 days a temporary restraining order (TRO) that blocks the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from using backlogged and error-prone social security records to enforce immigration law. Before October 10, the judge will rule on whether or not to permanently stop the Social Security Administration (SSA) from sending "no match" notices to approximately 140,000 employers across the country.
The new social security "no match" regulations may be "tough" enforcement, but they're not smart enforcement. Sending out "no match" letters based on a backlogged system full of discrepancies will lead to unfair firings of legal workers, wrongful detention, and a chaotic churning of workers across industries.
The Social Security administration's own internal reports suggest that hundreds of thousands of the "no match" letters will be incorrect. That means that thousands of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents will be forced to run the Social Security Administration's bureaucratic gauntlet in order to keep their jobs. In most cases, employers aren't likely to wait out the red tape to re-verify a worker--employers will fire first and only the most well connected workers will be able to ask questions later.
This unwise, piecemeal approach will lead to chaos--not order--and untold misery for many our nation's hardest, most underpaid workers. If left unchecked, "no match" regulations will push all low-wage workers deeper into the shadows, breed division, and benefit the most unscrupulous, off-the-books employers.
It's time to end this divisive, ill-conceived man-hunt. It does not make this country stronger to round up hardworking men and women who work 14 hour days picking vegetables, mopping floors, and handling meat on a factory line. Our government is wasting precious resources to ravage local economies and spread fear and isolation.
The promise of America used to be that people could come here, work hard and succeed. These hasty attempts to sweep our country of hard working immigrants do not embody the principles this country was founded upon. It's time to stop the indiscriminate round ups and get back to finding solutions that strengthen--rather than divide--our nation.
See more stories tagged with: immigration, no-match, crackdown
Eliseo Medina has served as international executive vice president of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) since 1996. He currently is leading SEIU’s efforts to help workers in 17 states in the Southern and Southwestern United States unite in SEIU.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.