Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Can Radical Capitalism Survive the Disasters It Creates?

By John Gray, The Guardian. Posted September 22, 2007.


The era of "free market" economic policies forced on societies after disasters happen as detailed in Naomi Klein's book The Shock Doctrine may be on the verge of ending.
Advertisement

Over the past few decades, many of the ideas of the far left have found new homes on the right. Lenin believed that it was in conditions of catastrophic upheaval that humanity advances most rapidly, and the idea that economic progress can be achieved through the devastation of entire societies has been a key part of the neo-liberal cult of the free market. Soviet-style economies left an inheritance of human and ecological devastation, while neo-liberal policies have had results that are not radically dissimilar in many countries. Yet, while the Marxist faith in central planning is now confined to a few dingy sects, a quasi-religious belief in free markets continues to shape the policies of governments.

Many writers have pointed to the havoc and ruin that have accompanied the imposition of free markets across the world. Whether in Africa, Asia, Latin America or post-communist Europe, policies of wholesale privatisation and structural adjustment have led to declining economic activity and social dislocation on a massive scale. Anyone who has watched a country lurch from one crisis to another as the bureaucrats of the IMF impose cut after cut in pursuit of the holy grail of stabilisation will recognise the process Naomi Klein describes in her latest and most important book to date. Visiting Argentina not long before the economic collapse of 2002, I found the government struggling to implement an IMF diktat to roll back public spending at a time when the economy was already rapidly contracting. The result was predictable, and the country was plunged into a depression, with calamitous consequences in terms of poverty and social breakdown.

Klein believes that neo-liberalism belongs among "the closed, fundamentalist doctrines that cannot co-exist with other belief-systems … The world as it is must be erased to make way for their purist invention. Rooted in biblical fantasies of great floods and great fires, it is a logic that leads ineluctably towards violence." As Klein sees it, the social breakdowns that have accompanied neo-liberal economic policies are not the result of incompetence or mismanagement. They are integral to the free-market project, which can only advance against a background of disasters. At times, writing in a populist vein that echoes her first book No Logo, published seven years ago, Klein seems to suggest that these disasters are manufactured as part of a deliberate policy framed by corporations with hidden influence in government. Her more considered view, which is also more plausible, is that disaster is part of the normal functioning of the type of capitalism we have today: "An economic system that requires constant growth, while bucking almost all serious attempts at environmental regulation, generates a steady stream of disasters all on its own, whether military, ecological or financial. The appetite for easy, short-term profits offered by purely speculative investment has turned the stock, currency and real estate markets into crisis-creation machines, as the Asian financial crisis, the Mexican peso crisis and the dotcom collapse all demonstrate."

There are very few books that really help us understand the present. The Shock Doctrine is one of those books. Ranging across the world, Klein exposes the strikingly similar policies that enabled the imposition of free markets in countries as different as Pinochet's Chile, Yeltsin's Russia, China and post-Saddam Iraq. Part of the power of this book comes from the parallels she observes in seemingly unrelated developments. In a fascinating and alarming examination of the underside of recent history, she notes the affinities between the policies of shock therapy imposed in the course of neo-liberal market reform and the techniques of torture that have been routinely used by the US in the course of the "war on terror." Klein begins her first chapter with a moving account of a conversation she had with a victim of a covert programme of mind-control experiments, carried out in Canada in the 1950s, which used people suffering from minor psychiatric ailments to try out techniques of "de-patterning" that aimed to scramble and reshape their personalities.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: naomi klein, shock doctrine, disaster capitalism, free market economics

John Gray's most recent book is Black Mass: Apocalyptic Religion and The Death of Utopia (Allen Lane)



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is an interesting notion.
Posted by: darkenergy on Sep 22, 2007 1:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's as if capitalism prefers to fight while backed against a corner. This draws out its full energy, its full aggression. If this is the case, then capitalism is neurotic and self-destructive. Like a tragic person, it ultimately wants to destroy itself, then suffers and complains while its willed self-annihilation is underway. This spirit is reflected in the morbid personalities that promote capitalism most vehemently, like the neocons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Naomi Klein has it right ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 22, 2007 4:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iraq was badly handled as was Katrina , by Bush .

Bush ploys have worked well. After 9/11 Bush rammed through tax cuts , the Patriot Act , the dimunition of Constitutional Rights and the Iraq War .

Bush has mishandled his portfolio in Iraq .

Klein has given many examples of different types of 'Disasters ' ... natural , intentional and accidental ...

All disasters are not created equal ... Just look at Iraq ....

According to UN figures Bill Clinton's sanctions killed over 500,000 children and destroyed Iraqs infrastructure ... yet there is hardly a peep ...

Bush screwed the pooch after Clinton softened them up ...

There is a thread running through the White House since Ronald Reagan of Disaster Capitalism. Bush was just incompetent ...

The rule is, the more disoriented , the more traumatised the society , the bigger the changes can be made...

Naomi Kleins thesis will be the model for all analysis of Capitalism for years to come ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

it is possible that the invasion and occupation of Iraq is a defensive ploy
Posted by: Suzon on Sep 22, 2007 8:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporations with dirty linen need to manufacture as much chaos as possible.

Think if all the energy that has been diverted into protesting Iraq was made available to cleaning up politics so that we could have government of, by and for the people!

What a threat to corporate power!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rfields
Posted by: rfields on Sep 22, 2007 8:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent thinking by Naomi Klein and John Gray. But I would revise one of John's sentences: rather than "the illusions by which neo-liberal ideologues were themselves blinded" I argue "the obsessions by which they are compelled." Please see www.democraticcritique.us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I remain unconvinced
Posted by: IanA on Sep 22, 2007 12:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is John Gray really trying to say in this superficial critique of Naomi Klein’s “The Shock Doctrine”. He is writing a sop for Corporatism. With the undertone that it wasn’t the corporate entities who left the mess, it just happened by incompetence of government administration, and if anyone or this book where to imply otherwise, I expect it would verge on conspiracy theory stuff in his opinion too. The fact is though, knowingly or not, arms manufacturers, security companies, and energy interests, along with their ever present bankers do unite to benefit from disasters brought about by apparently fortuitous mistakes.

Mr. Gray for example writes “Klein seems to suggest that these disasters are manufactured as part of a deliberate policy framed by corporations with hidden influence in government.” As if, Exxon, Mobil, Halliburton, the banking interests that connect them, among others did not have overt influence in government with either ex employees still getting remuneration or their important funding of political platforms and lobbies.

He writes “I remain unconvinced that the corporations Klein berates throughout the book understand, let alone control, the anarchic global capitalism that has been allowed to develop over the past couple of decades” . Well, I suggest he wake up to reality and asks papa George Bush about his remuneration from the Carlyle Group, or ask James A. Baker III why he was negotiating debt cancellation for Iraq’s creditors, while recommending Kuwait get paid its billions in Iraqi war compensation, because of a large fee being paid to his law firm on that account by them. The fact is, whether or not Mr. Gray is convinced or not, and one would expect he should know better, we do not live in democracies but, corporatocracies where more or less corrupt, more or less elected, and other individuals in administrations work principally for the interests of big money, often against the interests even of their constituencies and certainly without a scruple or moral fibre, thicker than a hair of lip service.

So, when he writes, “These [neo-liberal] ideologues were not the sinister, Dr. Strangelove-like figures of the anti-capitalist imagination. They were comically deluded bien-pensants, who promoted their utopian schemes with messianic fervour and have been left stranded by history, as the radiant future they confidently predicted has failed to arrive.” Here again we have to suffer an apologist for the “it was all a big mistake” theory, just like the Rothschild’s fortunes from the battle of Waterloo. Yes, thank you for this article, but “I remain unconvinced”.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I remain unconvinced Posted by: grangersmith
To answer the question -
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Sep 22, 2007 1:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NO. If Cheney & Bush are allowed to continue they will soon drive us all into corporate fascism, World War Three and human extinction before the 2008 election, and there are only three ways to stop them. One is impeachment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Real Money ... NSA and Pentagon contracts
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 22, 2007 3:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Based on this year’s estimated budget of at least $48 billion, that would come to at least $34 billion in contracts."

salon.com 2007/06/01/ Tim Shorrock

.

And that is just the NSA ...

Hallliburton and the usual suspects are chump change ...

And these contracts will go on for YEARS in the Black Box of DOD budgets ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PSYCHOTIC BEHAVIOR
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Sep 22, 2007 8:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is interesting and very sad that even on these open forums where people are free to say whatever they want, so many are yet afraid to mentally follow the Cheney-Bush strategy to its logical conclusion. Instead, mostly Democrats call their Administration "incompetent", that they invaded Iraq "with no plan or exit strategy" and that Bush lacks the intelligence to be an effective President. For awhile I thought such commentators were just a little naive but still good to publicly condemn the Cheney/Bush policies anyway they saw fit.

But as time and events proceed and Cheney and Bush are free to continue, I sense a Machiavellian undercurrent within the Bush Administration and within the Democratic Party and the Media. Labeling Bush "incompetent" is really an effective cover for what is now more clearly revealed as a neo-imperialist attack on the Middle East and an implied attack on the rest of the World inspired by a group of big businessmen who are so profoundly evil they are deliberately risking national bankruptcy and World War Three to accomlish their real agenda, the "New American Century", not in 10 or 20 years, but now or never!

If we look at it from that perspective, Cheney's unexpected visit to Pakistan last February shows itself to be a deliberate attempt by Cheney & Bush to embarrass Musharref and undermine his regime, and Musharref knew it because immediately after Cheney's departure he made a public announcement that no foreign leader would ever dictate to him! Since then there has been growing unrest in Pakistan especially from the Islamic majority of the nation and Musharref is may soon be driven from power, even before the scheduled elections. And as if on cue, Osama bin Laden from his safe mountain retreat, has issued a call for Musharref to be overthrown.

So, I ask myself why would Cheney do that? Surely he realizes that if a growing majority of the Pakistani people see Musharref as an American puppet there could be a coup d'e-tat, and if that happened and an Islamic cabal took over the government, India would suddenly be faced with Islamic fanatics armed with Pakistan's nuclear weapons! What could they do but immediately strike first! - the result of which millions would die and the land so saturated with radioactive contamination life might not appear again for a hundred years or more! And how could such a catastrophe be contained? What would prevent escalation to a global nuclear exchange between the USA, Russia and China? Why would Cheny and Bush provoke such a disaster? Can it be they have a not so secret agenda that includes World War Three, not by accident, but by design?! I say not so secret because if I can imagine such a scenario, so can Nancy Pelosi who, if there is any future record, will be remembered for saying "Impeachment is off the table." Are we in the middle of a Western suicide pact?!

Some have speculated that, to counterbalance the World's Islamic fanatics, America has produced a Christian fanatic who is not afraid to bring the Biblical prophesy of Armageddon into reality. But now that appears to be a lot more than just another Left Wing rhetorical ploy. The evidence is mounting that there may indeed be two complete madmen in the White House who, if not immediately impeached, will launch the World into a nuclear holocaust and the human race into extinction, the Right Wing epithet "Kill 'em all, let God sort 'em out" brought to an omnicidal fact on the ground!

Is anyone else willing to talk about this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: PSYCHOTIC BEHAVIOR Posted by: Spot
» RE: PSYCHOTIC BEHAVIOR Posted by: Constitutionalist75
Neocons Do Not Borrow Communist Ideas
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Sep 23, 2007 6:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They ARE Communists, or at least directly descended from that political movement. Look up "What Is A Neoconservative And Why Does It Matter" by Dale Vree.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Neocons Do Not Borrow Communist Ideas Posted by: Constitutionalist75
» BIZARRE AND UTTERLY REDICULOUS, Posted by: Constitutionalist75
» RE: BIZARRE AND UTTERLY REDICULOUS, Posted by: Constitutionalist75
Economic Democracy
Posted by: argyle on Sep 24, 2007 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not usually a cheerleader, but anyone interested in this topic might find the research and writings available at the Institute for Economic Democracy helpful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Internet Universities Posted by: Constitutionalist75
federal reserve, purveyor & protector of "disaster capitalism"
Posted by: vzn on Sep 24, 2007 8:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
haha. disaster capitalism. yeah thanks naomi for revealing the dark truth.
the truth is, the truth is far darker than anyone realizes or cares to admit.

federal reserve is nothing but a smokescreen for
sophisticated, veiled parasitism of the capital class
vs the labor class. but the propaganda is quite effective,
and the labor class has no problem with it, only dimly aware
of its true purpose.

"none are more enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free" --goethe

all the gory details in a paper I wrote called


"fractional reserve banking as economic parasitism"


endorsed by two phd economists. printed in nexus
magazine, 60k world circulation. #1 top downloaded
economics paper. used by economics
teacher in australia as standard classroom material.

more info on request.


recent supporting material:



The Shock Doctrine: Naomi Klein on the Rise of Disaster Capitalism


Confessions of an Economic Hit Man: How the U.S. Uses Globalization to Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions


John Perkins on "The Secret History of the American Empire: Economic Hit Men, Jackals, and the Truth about Global Corruption"


Video, senator/pres candidate Dennis Kucinich at last years 2005 Monetary Reform Conference

money as debt video by Grignon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]