Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Wal-Mart's Attempt at Green-Washing Doesn't do Anything for its Workers

By Catherine Capellaro, Huffington Post. Posted September 19, 2007.


Wal-Mart continues to abuse and neglect our world's most important natural resource: people.
Advertisement

Wal-Mart, the world's largest corporation, has been grabbing headlines with environmentally friendly initiatives, like increasing the fuel efficiency of their fleet and pushing compact fluorescent light bulbs. But Wal-Mart continues to abuse and neglect our world's most important natural resource: people.

Peoplepower

By virtue of its huge market size, Wal-Mart maintains control over supplier products, costs and behavior. The upside of "big" is that efforts the company makes to, say, decrease packaging of products by suppliers, can be deployed without significant resistance. Who's to say no? The downside of "big," of course, is that the company's depressed wages and benefits create a floor upon which the entire discount industry stands. Wal-Mart should use its economic power to pull its workers up instead of holding them down.

A 2005 UC Berkeley study revealed that Wal-Mart paid hourly workers an average wage of $9.68 per hour, with other retailers averaging $11.08. Wal-Mart offered its hourly workers benefits worth 73 percent of comparable companies. And cases and lawsuits alleging off-the-clock labor dwarf those of comparable companies. Annual reports for 2004-2005 reveal no instances at Target and CostCo. For Wal-Mart, reports list 44 cases in the previous 10 years.

A Woman's Place?

Wal-Mart also has a long way to go to create an environment that's friendly for women. The behemoth faces the largest class-action suit in history, exceeding 1.6 million workers. This contrasts sharply with the magnitude of gender discrimination reported for comparable discount retailers like Target and Costco. According to numbers compiled by the plaintiffs, female store managers earn an average of 86 percent the annual income of male counterparts. And while women comprised 79 percent of hourly paid department heads, a mere 15.5 percent are store managers.

Wal-Mart and Unions

Wal-Mart's notorious union bashing also sets the industry bar. The company's strategy includes personality tests that determine applicants' union sympathy, anti-union videos, and a 56-page managers' manual on how to remain union free. Any sign of union activity, and the company dispatches a strike force from Bentonville. The store eliminated all its meat-cutting departments after butchers in a Texas store voted to unionize. And the company shut down a store in Quebec that voted for a union.

Benefits Free Loaders

Of course, for Wal-Mart "associates," as Sam Walton proudly christened them, no one is "holding a gun to their head" to work there. But, is somewhere short of felony assault the place to set the bar for responsible conduct by the largest company in the history of the world? The company claims the U.S. government should step up to the plate and level the playing field with a universal health care system. Universal health care is long overdue, but let's not let Wal-Mart's PR machine hijack reality. It's their job to play on the field that exists and that field is desperately tilted, with mothers grabbing at the sidelines, children in tow. Wal-Mart has gained a reputation as a free loader, topping the list of employers that are major users of state-provided health insurance programs aimed at low-income families in 11 of 13 states that have reported. One in nine Wal-Mart family members is getting state-provided health care, according to WakeUp Wal-Mart.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: wake up wal-mart, labor, greenwashing, workplace, wal-mart



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Wal-mart blues...
Posted by: indiangreek on Sep 20, 2007 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My husband and I have both worked at Wal-mart at least once in our lives and we know how we were treated while working there, which, was not very good. They emphasize great personal sacrifice for very little wages, and they dangle that little carrot of a great retirement in front of you every single day, supposedly to help encourage you to continue sacrificing while you have to put up with rude customers and shoplifters and dirty and unsafe working conditions and supervisors who want you to give up your own life and "join the Wal-mart family". They keep reminding you that you are a "part-owner" in the store and that you "share" in the bottom line, therefore, your sacrifices will benefit you in the long run. What a bunch of hype!! I know a lady who worked there 20 years, and she retired with only $17,000. Was it worth it? NO!! Unfortunately, Wal-mart has a stranglehold on our little community's economy, and we end up having to mostly shop there, since we don't have many other stores around, and most of the other stores have higher prices than Wal-mart, and the Wal-mart store has the availability of stuff that we can't get anywhere else locally. If I ever was able to be rich, I would never shop at Wal-mart again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]