Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Housing Bubble Pops; It's Recession Time

By Dean Baker, TruthOut.org. Posted September 12, 2007.


The growth of the housing bubble made this sort of collapse inevitable, just as the crash of the stock bubble was inevitable.
Advertisement

The downturn in jobs reported last month by the Labor Department provided evidence of an economic downturn that even the economy's greatest cheerleaders could not ignore. Healthy economies do not shed jobs.

During the core periods of the upturns in the eighties and nineties, there were three months in which the economy lost jobs. In two of these, the loss was attributable to major strikes. (The jobs of striking workers are not counted in the survey.) That leaves a grand total of one month in more than twelve years of recovery in which the economy lost jobs. In other words, the August job loss leaves the economic optimists somewhat less credible than the deniers of global warming.

The backdrop for the August job loss is the collapse of the subprime mortgage market. Millions of low- and moderate-income homeowners are now looking at the resetting of interest rates on adjustable rate mortgages to levels that they cannot afford. While the Fed chairman and other leading economists assured the public that the problems would be restricted to the subprime segment of the housing market, this assertion was always ridiculous on its face.

Subprime mortgages accounted for one-fourth of all mortgages issued in 2006. The equally troubled Alt-A mortgage category accounted for another 15 percent. With segments that account for 40 percent of the mortgage market going into convulsion, there was no way that the housing market as a whole would not be affected. Of course, record supplies of unsold new homes and vacant homes also ensured that there would be substantial downward pressure on house prices.

The excess supply and constriction of mortgage credit is now affecting prices. Prices in the cities that had been the hottest bubble markets, such as San Diego, Las Vegas, Phoenix, and Miami, are declining at double-digit rates. Prices in slightly less bubbly markets, such as New York City, Washington, DC, and Boston, are falling at single-digit rates. These declines are likely to continue and quite possibly accelerate as the turmoil in the mortgage market further constrains demand.

This process will set in motion a downward spiral, as declines in house prices lead to more mortgage defaults. This will both place more foreclosed homes on the market and further constrain mortgage credit as the risk of default rises. The weakness in the housing market will be further reinforced by the weakening of the job market.

The job loss will first show up in the housing-related sectors. More than 50,000 layoffs have already been announced in the mortgage banking industry. This job loss has not shown up yet in the jobs data, since these workers were still employed when the August survey was taken. Construction and real estate will also see sharp declines in employment in the months ahead.

However, the direct impact on the housing sector is just the tip of the iceberg. The housing bubble created more than $7 trillion in housing wealth. Homeowners have used this bubble wealth to support a surge in consumption over the last five years, pushing the saving rate to near zero. They borrowed against their home equity to pay for vacations, new cars, or just to meet necessary expenses. As this bubble wealth disappears, consumption of all forms will be cut back, slowing growth and leading to more job losses.

In addition, declining construction-related fees and property tax revenue will constrict state and local budgets. This will lead to pressure for tax increases, just as the economy is going into a downturn, and to cutbacks in government spending and employment. This will further reinforce the downward spiral.

The growth of the housing bubble made this sort of collapse inevitable, just as the crash of the stock bubble was inevitable. The only question was when the bubble would finally burst and the exact form that the collapse would take.

It was incredibly negligent for the Federal Reserve Board and the Bush administration to allow the housing bubble to grow unchecked, and especially to allow the sort of mass fraud perpetrated against moderate-income homebuyers in the subprime market. At this point, there is probably no way to avoid a recession. If those making economic policy show no better judgment going forward than they have in the recent past, it is likely to be a long and painful recession.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: lending crisis, sub-prime, interest rates, fed, recession, housing bubble

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. TomPaine contributor.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
MBS has long been a growing part of the US financial system. This grew the housing bubble as well.
Posted by: yellow on Sep 12, 2007 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to the Lehman Brothers Global Aggregate Index, Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS) has grown as a proportion of the Lehman aggregate Index to be the largest financial asset class of 35% in 2002 up from 29% ten years prior. In 2002, MBS financial assets totalled about $2.7 trillion eclipsing US Treasury Bonds at only 21% of the Index down from 45% ten years prior and valued in 2002 at about $1.7 trillion. Low interest rates helped make MBS assets the fastest growing in Global financial markets. They are highly profitable and have had better yields than either US treauries or Corporate bonds.

This new form of liquidity has increased the housing bubble by encouraging loans which further bloat the MBS portfolios which are backed by US government gaurantees. The current financial crisis shows that the increasing instability of middle class incomes can not continue to prop up the US capitalist system through further debt creation and debt driven "growth." The financialization of US capitalism has grown hand in hand with declining average annual GDP growth rates and risks collapse and economic ruin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article is pretty good...with a few IDIOTIC comments
Posted by: chizmania on Sep 13, 2007 8:07 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The comment "It was incredibly negligent for the Federal Reserve Board and the Bush administration to allow the housing bubble to grow unchecked" is so silly I can't believe it ever made it to print. Yes, Bush and the fed are liable for EVERYTHING. The idea that lenders are at fault is also stupid. Have you ever purchased a home?? There are TONS of places where the payments (including possible fluctuation) are made quite clear. If a company lied then prosecute them. The people who are at fault are the individuals (yes, sometimes individuals are at fault...not "the government" or "society") who tried to buy a home they couldn't afford. There is nothing that has more disclosure than mortgages - the docs are 100 pages of disclosure, with summary pages that explain payments. Do you feel bad for the thousands of people who bought homes they couldn't afford with 0% down and made tons of money? Will they give it back? Of course not - but suddenly they pay for their own mistakes with foreclosure and we need someone else to blame. Puh-leez

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh please!!! Posted by: wdednam2002
Batten the hatches
Posted by: Democritus on Sep 13, 2007 2:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It appears that we're in for a stormy ride. Will there be a recession? Maybe. Will there be pain. You bet. The supply-side economists who have been jumping up and down about the success of the Reagan and Bush tax cuts are in for a cold bath. The supposed successes of lowering tax rates to boost our economy have been hidden by the enormous debt that we have incurred. This is Republicanism at its best--or worst. Just lower tax rates and keep on spending--let the Chinese and Japanese buy our paper to keep the party going. The really sad part about it is that the fatcats will retire to their chalets in Switzerland and the rest of us will be picking up the bill.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

haven't you heard?
Posted by: lionsdenmother on Sep 13, 2007 3:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
not long after the media started to cover the burst, the fed said they would keep interest rates low to help the finance companies try to stay afloat. Oh but no help for homeowners then to state they wish the lenders would work out something with homeowners who are in trouble

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

housing been busted.....
Posted by: eosrk on Sep 14, 2007 7:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...not long after Ben Bernanke took over from Greenspan, whom since been yelling, "the sky is falling, the sky is falling."

And you know what, it really is!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]