Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Trade: U.S. is "World's Biggest Loser"

By Todd Tucker, Eyes on Trade. Posted August 29, 2007.


"Victims" of the perverse system we created?

Editor's note: The following originally appeared on Public Citizen's blog, Eyes on Trade

Manufacturing News today (sorry, not linkable) says that the U.S. is the "world's biggest loser - by far" in terms of the WTO dispute resolution system.

The World Trade Organization has ruled against the United States in 40 of 47 cases... That number is "astounding," according to Robert Lighthizer, a partner in charge the international trade group at the law firm of Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom. The United States "has suffered disproportionately from the problems with the WTO dispute settlement system, having been named as a defendant in far more cases than any other WTO members."

(Note that Public Citizen's dispute database shows that the United States has lost 43 of 50 cases. Since Manufacturing News doesn't elaborate further on its statistics, we're not sure where the discrepancy arises.) Lighthizer goes on to say,

"As a result of this judicial activism, our trading partners have been able to achieve through litigation what they could never achieve through negotiation... The consequent loss of sovereignty for the United States in its ability to enact and enforce laws for the benefit of the American people has been staggering. The WTO has increasingly seen fit to sit in judgment of sovereign acts running the gamut from U.S. tax policy to environmental measures to public morals."

All this is true, but it's not just the United States that loses at the WTO. Pretty much all defendants lose WTO disputes. According to Public Citizen's WTO disputes database, while the United States has lost 86 percent of its cases as a defendant under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU), out of all DSU cases, the defendant loses 88.7 percent of the time. So the United States is roughly in line with the rest of the world in terms of having its domestic laws overridden by the WTO.

So claiming the United States loses at the WTO is accurate, but also misses the bigger picture a bit. As Dani Rodrik says as quoted in my earlier post, what's really needed is to rethink the whole system.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: wto, economy, trade



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
sanjuanorca
Posted by: dauntless on Aug 30, 2007 9:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This kind of information needs to be widely publicized so our citizens reshaped thir image of transnational corporate business as the ruthless exploitation it is. The article would have more impact if it revealed details of individual cases, corporations that benefitted, tax law superceded, public safety or morality that was transgressed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The US is also the biggest Plaintiff in DSUs. More DSU are brought by the US than anyone else.
Posted by: yellow on Aug 31, 2007 8:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The WTO was created for big US TNCs to protect their investments, markets, patents, and perogatives on profit repatriation and other business concerns. The EU and others at first had no use for the WTO primarily because they wanted to protect their agricultural sectors against foreign competition. Now America is upset about foreign competition and can't control the game and avoid inconvenient rules as they could under the old Bretton Woods international order from the 1940s. Let the US now be stuck with its own Frankenstein's Monster and maybe there will be pressure for change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The biggest abusers
Posted by: John Annis on Sep 1, 2007 10:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's one thing losing a case, it's another thing altogether to make the US stop the behaviour that led to the case in the first place.

Maybe after the Weimar Republic-style recession that's going to hit you soon you will learn to be a little (read a lot) less arrogant and more humble in your dealings with other countries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]