Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

How Popular Movements Can Confront Corporate Power and Win

By Michael Marx and Marjorie Kelly, YES! Magazine. Posted August 29, 2007.


The gap in power between corporations and democratic forces has widened enormously in recent decades. Here's what we do about it.
corpam
corpam

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Michael Marx Marjorie Kelly

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Corporate power lies behind nearly every major problem we face--from stagnant wages and unaffordable health care to overconsumption and global warming. In some cases, it is the cause of the problem; in other cases, corporate power is a barrier to system-wide solutions. This dominance of corporate power is so pervasive, it has come to seem inevitable. We take it so much for granted, we fail to see it. Yet it is preventing solutions to some of the most pressing problems of our time.

With global warming a massive threat to our planet and a majority of U.S. citizens wanting action, why is the U.S. government so slow to address it? In large part because corporations use lobbying and campaign finance to constrain meaningful headway.

Why are jobs moving overseas, depressing wages at home, and leaving growing numbers under- or unemployed? In large part because trade treaties drafted in corporate-dominated back rooms have changed the rules of the global economy, allowing globalization to massively accelerate on corporation-friendly terms, at the expense of workers, communities, and the environment.

Why are unions declining and benefits disappearing? In large part because corporate power vastly overshadows the power of labor and governments, and corporations play one region off against another, busting unions to hold down labor costs while boosting profits, fueling a massive run-up in the stock market.

Why were electricity, the savings and loan industry, and other critical industries deregulated, contributing to major debacles whose costs are borne by the public? In large part because free market theory, enabled by campaign contributions and lobbying, seduced elected officials into trusting the marketplace to regulate itself.

With all this happening, why do we not read more about the pervasiveness of corporate power? In large part because even the "Fourth Estate," our media establishment, is majority owned by a handful of mega-corporations.

Big corporations have become de facto governments, and the ethic that dominates corporations has come to dominate society. Maximizing profits, holding down wages, and externalizing costs onto the environment become the central dynamics for the entire economy and virtually the entire society.

What gets lost is the public good, the sense that life is about more than consumption, and the understanding that markets cannot manage all aspects of the social order.

What gets lost as well is the original purpose of corporations, which was to serve the public good.

A Movement for the Public Good

The solution is to bring corporations back under citizen control and in service to the public good. The main components of such a movement already exist--including organized labor, environmentalists, religious activists, shareholder activists, students, farmers, consumer advocates, health activists, and community-based organizations.

We've seen the power of ordinary people working together on the streets of Seattle in 1999, challenging the World Trade Organization. We've seen them achieve impressive results curbing sweatshop abuses, limiting tobacco advertising, challenging predatory lending practices at home and abroad, and protecting millions of acres of forests, to name just a few successes.

We've also seen the growth of community-friendly economic designs like worker-owned enterprises, co-ops, and land trusts that, by design, put human and environmental well-being first.

Focus on Corporate Power

Each of these movements advocates for healthy communities, for a moral economy, and for the common good. If they acted together, they would possess enormous collective power. But as yet there is no whole, only disconnected parts. Despite many achievements, the gap in power between corporations and democratic forces has widened enormously in recent decades.

Activists and citizens are beginning to turn this around. We can build on this work. But if we are to close the gap in power, our strategies must evolve. We need to dream bigger, to speak with one voice across issue sectors, and to act more strategically. We need to focus less on symptoms of corporate abuse and more on the underlying cause--excessive corporate power. We must recognize that ultimately our struggle is for power. It is not just to make corporations more responsible, but to make them our servants, in much the same way that elected officials are public servants.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: democracy, grassroots, corporate accountability, social movements, corporate power

Michael Marx is director of Corporate Ethics International (CEI) in Portland, Oregon. Marjorie Kelly is with the Tellus Institute in Boston and the author of The Divine Right of Capital. They are part of the Strategic Corporate Initiative, a group unifying efforts to curtail corporate power, and igniting change toward a more humane, sustainable democratic society and economy. Read more about the SCI and read their full report: "Strategic Corporate Initiative: Toward a Global Citizens' Movement to Bring Corporations Back Under Control."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
rfields
Posted by: rfields on Aug 30, 2007 11:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael and Marjorie, please check out www.democraticcritique.us as a possibility for a unifying analysis and vision. Thanks, r

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ideology vs reality
Posted by: sea4th on Aug 30, 2007 4:23 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By placing value on a system that thrives on producing disposable goods, we're guaranteeing a future catastrophe.
We creating waste faster than nature can absorb it, and it's
coming back to bite us in ways we have yet to understand.

I strongly recommend everyone to read "The Case Against
The Global Economy" edited by Jerry Mander and Edward Goldsmith. It's a little dated, but it goes back to the early days of the push for globalization, and points out some of
what we're now experiencing.

The insight of some of the contributators is amazing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ideology vs reality Posted by: PirateJesus
Putting our money where our mouth is
Posted by: ld7440 on Aug 30, 2007 6:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ideology is a beautiful thing. However, corporations respond to the almighty dollar more than to anything else. Create a list of corporations that we need to target for its totalitarian and "immoral" practices, and urge citizens everywhere to write to them in protest, and to boycott their goods. When stocks begin to fall, then and only then will they take notice.

Power to the people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Taking Pesonal Responsibility Posted by: Jeff Hoffman
» RE: Taking Pesonal Responsibility Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Taking Pesonal Responsibility Posted by: Jeff Hoffman
» RE: Taking Pesonal Responsibility Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Taking Pesonal Responsibility Posted by: Jeff Hoffman
Case Wagenvoord
Posted by: Wagenvoord on Aug 31, 2007 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is a real pleasure to read an article like yours that resonates so completely with me. I will definitely be checking out your website to see what else it has to offer.

If you are interested, you can check out an article I wrote for The Smirking Chimp that touches on the same subject at http://www.smirkingchimp.com/threat/8899.

Keep fighting the good fight!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

language
Posted by: uncleeddie on Aug 31, 2007 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think right off the bat we should insist on more accurate and informative descriptive terms in discussing corporate power. Two of the more prevalent terms that drive me insane are Globalization and white-collar crime. More accurately these should always be called Global Corporatization and Corporate crime. Anything that an entity does that is negative should be portrayed accurately and inoculate terms only hide the true damage of bad and immoral actions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: language, uncleeddie Posted by: 1gma
» RE: language Posted by: Lauren
I see where you want to go but I'm not sure I understand how you expect to get there
Posted by: Suzon on Sep 4, 2007 3:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The politicians are the key to bringing corporations to heel. But how do we get them to need our votes when they need corporate money for all that advertising?

(Corporations are irresponsible because they were set up to be. William the Conquerer created the Corporation of the City of London in 1067, allowing it to be a law unto itself and remains that to this day.)

I think we need a few indictments. Nancy Pelosi comes to mind because she's protecting a corrupt administration which is endangering every last thing of value!

People have to be tested to get citizenship. They ought to have to pass a test to take office. Better yet, they should have to pass a test to even run for office. And NO cheating!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hitting the Streets, General Strike 9/11 Posted by: Bladerunner2020
FREE Radio & TV
Posted by: shangrilalad on Sep 4, 2007 3:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FREE Radio & TV

Right from the beginning of our Republic, many individual owners of newspapers pumped out lies to support their own self-interest. Radio and the TV Media came along and nothing much changed until anti-democratic corporations owned by the Almighty Rich merged to monopolize and control everything American’s could hear and see.

The Fairness Doctrine was a United States FCC regulation requiring broadcast licensees to present controversial issues of public importance in a manner deemed by the FCC to be honest, equitable and balanced. It also sought to prevent consolidation and monopolization of the airwaves, but the doctrine was abandoned by the Reagan Administration to pave the way for Corporatism. Where we are now.

We fell for the lure of Free Radio and TV entertainment, but lost our freedom to mass mind control. This is the way it works: They don’t tell us the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth; they lie and tell us only what supports their own self-interest.

We have come full circle, but now only a half dozen corporations owned by the Almighty Rich control the lies and brainwashing. That’s called Capitalism.

If we ever get the notion to resist Capitalism, lies and brainwashing, we can begin by blocking out Big Media news. Someone will always lie to us, but “In a multitude of counsel, there is safety.” Proverbs.

Don‘t pass on lies from generation to generation, “Teach your children well,” what you have learned.

.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NEED
Posted by: gerbi on Sep 4, 2007 4:07 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
good afternoon

re " WE NEED"


i need to win the lotery as well...


most likely that i will not !

have a nice day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NEED Posted by: RaW
» RE: NEED Posted by: humanhybrid
Think of the alternative!
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 4, 2007 6:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imagine what it might be like in 20 years if our efforts are successful and people could once again govern themselves

This isn't the time to dream rosy dreams. I don't think that we have 20 years. It's time to face reality. Imagine what it will be like in 20 yearsif if we don't take control of the government and the corporations that it serves. It's time to take control of both political parties and force their candidates to serve the people; not corporations.

Organizing and coordinating protests are not only counter-productive they're unnecessary. This is the way we've always done things, and obviously, in the long run, it doesn't work.

I suggest that we need everyone to work seperately. Each to push his. own issue. That's where his heart is. The only common thread necessary is a common strategy to take control of our government.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not in my lifetime
Posted by: ducque on Sep 4, 2007 6:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing like this will happen at least in my lifetime.

Unbridled capitalism requires an underclass for survival. In the second half of the 20th century, it was the "third world" of China, India, etc. Today, with China and India refusing to play by the old rules so much that a permanent underclass must necessarily be created in the US. This means a return to the "good old days" of the railway barons, etc. -- the destruction of the middle class, and more rigid and wider stratification between the "have nots" and the "have so much you can't believe its".

We are well on the way to this conclusion.

If you think you can change things by writing to companies, trying boycotts, etc., I've got a bridge to sell you.

The only hope would be for a sea change in American attitudes, to the point at which the state becomes afraid of its citizens (e.g., France, England), as opposed to its citizens being afraid of the state. As long as a sizable fraction of the populace is "authoritarian" oriented (to give and to accept), there's not a prayer of change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not in my lifetime Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Not in my lifetime Posted by: ducque
» RE: Not in my lifetime Posted by: talkville
RE: It's not corporations, it's the people that run them.
Posted by: talkville on Sep 4, 2007 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And now they're panicking and doing everything possible to pull back the Internet from us! Besides other parts of OUR government, we need to watch the FCC and their rulings very carefully in the next few years. As for corporations, it's always the people that run them; despite the Supreme Court ruling making them 'persons" way back in the 1800's, only humans speak and act. I never heard IBM or McDonnel Douglas or Halliburton say anything!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hinkley's 28 Words Could Change the World
Posted by: JerseyGuy on Sep 4, 2007 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Robert C. Hinkley, developer of the Code for Corporate Citizenship, is a corporate attorney and currently a partner of the international law firm of Jones Day. He has practiced corporate law for over 20 years and has spoken and written on the topic of corporate social responsibility during his recent time away from practice.

Hinkley has proposed adding the following 28 words to the existing duty of directors, which is to make money for shareholders according to the doctrine of shareholder primacy, thereby creating a legal duty for corporations to take into account the social effects of their actions:

“The duty of directors henceforth shall be to make money for shareholders but not at the expense of the environment, human rights, public health and safety, dignity of employees, and the welfare of the communities in which the company operates.

For more information, see: http://blj.ucdavis.edu/article/533/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keep it simple so "reg'lar folks can unnerstan"
Posted by: sausage on Sep 4, 2007 7:51 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know, I read this essay and agree with it but do you really think the average union guy or gal at yesterday's Labor Day parade or picnic can comprehend it?

A few years back I was invited to attend an Iowa Citizens Action Network (ICAN) symposium. Why? Maybe it was some letters to the editor I wrote, I don't know.

Anyway, during lunch and afterwards, before we went back into our groups, I got into an impromptu discussion with some ICAN interns about the economy. As I recall my end of the discussion went something like this:
"Look, the proper, and primary, role of government is ordering the economy. Government should act as an honest broker in disputes between citizens and business.

Think of it this way. Think of the economy as a football game. On the one side are eleven 800 pound gorillas, playing for the corporations, on the other is the rest of us. Now, the government should function as the referees, leveling the playing field.

But what we have now, is that the referees are in the luxury suites with the owners of the team of 800 pound gorillas. So the gorilllas are whackin' the pee-jesus out of us.

And if the referees ever come down from the luxury suite it's when, through some miracle, the rest of us have driven down to the gorillas' ten yard-line, it's third an one and it's looking like we might score. The gorillas jump off-sides, sack our quarterback and the referees flag us for a 15 yard personal foul and loss of down!

The trick is to get the referees back on our side. In a nutshell that's what we have to do."


So, that's the trick. Getting enough referees who'll be honest brokers and not living it up in the luxury suites with the Gorillas' owners. And toward that end before we can change corporate behavior we have to change how elections are financed in this country. We need to end "business as usual" when it comes to political campaigns.

Right now the leading presidential candidates of both major political parties, Rudy Giuliani and Hillary Clinton, are up in the luxury suites.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Alternative deployment method...? Posted by: eddie torres
HOW IT USED TO BE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Sep 4, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent article. All of this can happen. Just after World War II we were a thriving country. Opportunities for all. There were regulations on all industries to avoid corruption and imbalance. It worked. Over the years, those regulations were discarded and since Regan it's been a free for all. That has not worked. American Corporations were HERE, had American employees and paid their taxes to the US. Nobody based in the Bahamas. It can happen again. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not in My Lifetime Either......An Honest ..Courageous Leader..
Posted by: picket on Sep 4, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The pendulum has swung so far to the Right that unless the populous wake and get active there will be no change.

For example:

We have NO Fourth Estate. The "newsreaders make millions and are employed by Corporations, and they TOLD you that Dennis Kucinich has no chance to win because he does not have Corporate $$$$$$$$$$. He DOES have Populist Ideals but.......blah blah blah....

Free Market Theory is part of religious theology. Quiz some of your neighbors that vote Republican, ask them about the GOP platform. What you will get are media soundbites.

GWB pretended to be a regular redneck cowboy and it worked well for him and his friends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a silent gesture that could remind the individuals who hide behind corporate status
Posted by: Suzon on Sep 4, 2007 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and our elected corporate enablers that we strongly object to how they are running things.

Get some colored nail varnish. Every time you empty your pockets or take a look into your purse, pull out a coin and put a lick of nail polish on it. Just one coin will do.

Spend it as normal. Next time put polish on two coins at a time. When you notice you've got someone else's decorated penny, dime or quarter, up the ante even more.

If a whole bunch of us started doing this (hey, people bought pet rocks, didn't they?), eventually no one would be able to avoid coins carrying the message we're mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore!

Who do we let know about this? The middle men, the politicians! Each of us participating can write letters explaining why we are doing what we're doing.

Drip. Drip. Drip. Get the message?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If life could imitate movies!!!
Posted by: vomeggido on Sep 4, 2007 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Star Trek- First Contact:

How much did this ship cost and how much do you get paid?

PICARD:

We no longer use currency- our quest to better ourselves is what motivates the species now.


Wouldn't this be awesome! Wouldn't this eliminate every single problem on the Planet? Sure it would.

If man can think it- write it- and act it- It is possible. So why do we just act like it?

Because its all a bad act. Its a fucking slap in the face. The entertainment industry is a clever ruse designed to keep us all occupied and stuffed with a manipulative feel-good hope ending to keep us coming back to the theater for a view of how good its gonna be.

Its a crock of bullshit.

Wake up AMERICA and smell the long con or else you'll lose the right to complain, scream or fight when your all covered with shit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Imagine... Posted by: eddie torres
The next 20 years?
Posted by: Davidco on Sep 4, 2007 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are talking about people's livelihoods here. The process whose goals (only) are sketched above is best likened to trying to take red meat away from lions.

'Well meaning' teachers, for example, have successfully stonewalled merit-based pay for most of the past century. No group is immune to perceived threats to a status quo with which they are, in the main, satisfied.

Sadly, the economic crises that will be the basis for collapse of the currency (peakoil, withdrawal of far eastern credit etc.) are just around the corner.

These will create massive popular unrest but it is unclear to me how that political energy can be mobilized to serve the commonweal. History teaches that the default trajectory in such circumstances is toward some kind of violent totalitarian 'solution'.

We need to study the last throes of the Ancien Regime, pre-Leninist Russia & China and Weimar to learn, at least, what not to do when social, political and economic institutions begin to collapse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How good its gonna be?
Posted by: vomeggido on Sep 4, 2007 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does it get anymore Republican than this heading?

The entertainment industry is yet another bank owned bunch of corporate conglomerates who have over-run the talent and replaced it with cheap high-gloss smoke and mirrors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How good its gonna be? Posted by: Lauren
Do you want to destroy the hold that corporations have over congress and the president?
Posted by: www.dmocrats.org on Sep 4, 2007 9:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hello

Do you want to destroy the hold that corporations have over congress and the president? Simple. Organize and Demand progressive legislation from some of these corporations and do not buy from them until they get the GOP to get congress to enact this legislation.

Send this letter to the Republican party now! Also put this on your web page so others can see it.

Copy and paste the letter below and email it directly to info@gop.com the Republican Party and get 2 friends to send this letter and have those 2 friends get 2 friends to send it and so on. Thank you. Drop me a message to info@dmocrats.org with the subject Done after you have sent the email.

Hello

Get your Republican party to end the war in Iraq, with Bush and Cheney resigning, and until you do we stop buying televisions, refrigerators, stoves, ovens, dishwashers, dvd players, stereo equipment, light bulbs from one of your party's major contributors and War contractors General Electric Corporation ( 203 373 2211 ) who cannot afford to lose a large sector of the publics business and money.

Get your Republican party to remove the FICA taxable income cap and tax all of a person's income for social security purposes and enact HR 676 Single payer universal health care into law and repeal Medicare Part D and place the prescription drug benefit in Medicare Part B covering 80 percent of all medication with no extra premiums, no extra deductibles, no means tests, no coverage gaps, and completely remove the means test to Medicare Part B and until you do, we will not buy consumer products and prescription drugs from one of the biggest pharmacy chains and GOP contributors in the country, Rite Aid, who cannot afford to lose a large sector of the publics business and money.

Get your Republican party to enact a $10 an hour minimum wage, and until you do, we will not go to the following restaurants and GOP contributors Wendy's, Outback Steakhouse, Olive Garden, Red Lobster, and Dominos Pizza who cannot afford to lose a large sector of the publics business and money.

Get your Republican party to enact into law Universal vote by mail with paper ballots counted by civil servants with civil servants registering voters and keeping track of registrations, and until you do, we will not buy any GOP contributor Dell computers or monitors or go to the following restaurants and GOP contributors Wendy's, Outback Steakhouse, Olive Garden, Red Lobster, and Dominos Pizza who cannot afford to lose a large sector of the publics business and money.

Get your Republican party to get congress to pass and enact a law legalizing abortions from conception to six months, and to nine months when the life of the mother appears threatened, and until you do we stop doing business with two of your biggest contributors Dominos Pizza and Curves for Women Health Clubs.

Signed,


Also:

Call GOP contributor and war contractor General Electric Corporation at 203 373 2211 and ask for the public relations department. Tell the person in public relations that you want the GE CEO to get Bush to end the war in Iraq and then Bush resign with Cheney and until that happens you will not buy any GE products and that you will tell your friends about this.

This message brought to you by the Liberal Democratic Party of the United States of America. http://www.dmocrats.org



Call Rite Aid at 1-800-325-3737 and tell the person to get the CEO to get the GOP to enact HR 676 Single payer health care and repeal Medicare Part D and place the drug benefit in Medicare Part B covering 80% of drugs with no extra premiums, no extra deductibles, no means tests, no coverage gaps, and remove the means test for Medicare Part B and until you do, we won't buy ANYTHING from Rite Aid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MEANWHILE
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Sep 4, 2007 10:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mike and Marge,

You present interesting long term strategies, but Bush & Cheney are busy arranging World War Three.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When will you people ever learn??!!
Posted by: MAD on Sep 4, 2007 10:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This had to be one of the more absurd articles Alternet has ever had the audacity to present. Those of you who actually think anything will change in this country without a violent overthrow of the current system of government are out of your F'ing minds.

In over 230 years absolutely fuck all has changed in this kleptrocratic, racist and warmongering country and you people keep yammering about popular movements, democrats and writing letters to your congressmen. The level of naivate here at Alternet is absolutely staggering!!

For the love of all that is sane and rational wake the fuck up! Until as recently as the 1960s, blacks and whites were forced to attend separate schools. How many of you have contemplated the absurdity and grotesqueness of that? We are still the only remaining industrialized country (apart from being the wealthiest) that does not provide health care for its citizens. We have invaded numerous countries in the last 40 years and have been soundly thumped in all but one (Gulf War I) and are currently preparing to get thumped in another theater - Iran.

ALL OF OUR POLITICIANS ARE CORPORATE WHORES! The sooner you arrive at that simple conclusion, the sooner we can get on with ridding this country of the maggets that feast on its rotting corpse. They are transfering wealth and then offshoring. They control the media, the food supply, the water and have stripped us of our precious civil liberties.

No one should count on Alterneters do get things done. Just look at your surroundings. Itunes, ringtones and Netflix? WTF? Is this the voice of progressive media? Has it occured to any of you that Alternet is the status quo? Read this quickly as it will be zapped faster than you can say hypocrite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gathaiga
Posted by: gathaiga on Sep 4, 2007 10:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are not enough people who are unafraid of getting out of their comfort zone to be an effective force.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good point... Posted by: Michiganman
How to Achieve Fair & Balanced ...
Posted by: shanaza on Sep 4, 2007 12:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pick one from the menu and run with it ...

1. Overthrow
2. Do not pay taxes
3. Incorporate "We The People" and play by corporate rules
4. Move to another country
5. Vote out the incumbents, even though your rep/senator is not like the others

#1,3,4 require effort; #1,2,4 require "guts"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

confronting corporate power
Posted by: vasumurti on Sep 4, 2007 12:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Grassroots movements and activists have long recognized the power of multinational corporations.

In 1989, for example, Presbyterian Minister and environmental activist Richard Cartwright Austin discussed proposals to amend the Constitution:

"It is time to affirm that all creatures within the boundaries of our nation deserve constitutional recognition, and that rights extend beyond the human community to embrace all of natural life.

"This is the most radical of the proposals because it would give species, natural systems, and natural features constitutional standing and rights of their own--independent of their contributions or lack of contribution, to human welfare.

''To secure their rights within our legal system they would, of course, require human agents willing to argue their case, just as agents now represent the perceived interests of infants, the comatose, and others who cannot speak on their own behalf.

''Corporations, which are legal constructions and not natural beings, have standing in court to protect their interests now. This amendment would grant similar privileges to spotted owls threatened by timbering in the Pacific northwest to marine life in Chesapeake Bay suffering urban and agricultural pollution, and to the beauties of the Yosemite Valley hidden behind too many buildings and vehicles.

"A constitutional amendment to recognize the rights of a vast new constituency--all God's creatures--will not succeed without broad popular support. Animals ask us for considerate treatment and the earth cries for loving care."

Austin's words reflect the rising tide of environmental concern in America and the emergence of an animal liberation theology.

Similarly, a pro-life liberal pamphlet distributed by Milwaukee SOUL (Save Our Unwanted Lives), points out that under current U.S. law, *corporations* are considered legal persons while humans in prenatal development are denied this moral status.

Corporations, of course, look out for their own self-interests; not the interests of oppressed classes of beings. Again, grassroots movements and activists have long recognized the power of multinational corporations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A General Strike Has Been Called For 9/11/07
Posted by: Bladerunner2020 on Sep 4, 2007 1:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't work, don't go to school, don't buy anything.
http://www.strike911.org
http://www.dailygrail.com/node/5232
Spread the word, we have a week!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clean Elections are one answer...
Posted by: ldasteelworker on Sep 4, 2007 3:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe there is a method to the madness of apathy that consumes the majority of People...

Academic research has documented how corporate influences are associated with many adverse adult and child psychological, physiological, behavioral, social and health outcomes.

In the US in 2005, spending on advertising reached $144.32 billion! The average adult sees 21,000 television commercials a year. Most advertisements are paid for by the largest corporations in the world and they are not paying all that money for something that they don't get results from...

Our founding fathers of this Untied States envisioned a Republic in which the People came first, followed by a system of federal, state, and local governments serving the best interests of the people, followed by private individual businesses, and then followed by corporations - which were strictly regulated under a state charter system. Today this has been turned on its head!

Contemplate the following quotations:

"As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed."

"The belief is common in America that the day is at hand when corporations... after having created a system of quiet but irresistible corruption - will ultimately succeed in directing government itself. Under the American form of society, there is no authority capable of effective resistance..."

The first quote was written by President Abraham Lincoln in 1864 and the second was written by Henry Adams in 1870! President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us in 1960 about the influence of the military-industrial complex; "The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted..."

The only hope I see in all of this is the youth in this world who have yet to "learn" about all the things that they can't change for the better....

We need "Clean Elections" which is a system of government financing of political campaigns where the role of corporate influence is greatly reduced or eliminated. This actually has a proven record in the States of Maine and Arizona:

"What we're seeing in Arizona is the decline of the big money candidate. In 1998, overwhelming majority of the races, in fact 80 percent of the races, were won by the big money candidate. The candidate with the big bucks won their race. In our primary in 2002 we found that that was the case in only three percent of the races." - Cecilia Martinez, The Clean Elections Institute.

If you don't like the current state of apathy, the "regulations" and how they're "enforced", or the taking of the public rights by corporations without a soul or any conscience to social responsibility or our environment, then I would encourage you to involve and educate young persons and take back our democracy from those it wasn't intended for by working for Clean Elections.

SEE ALSO:

PR Watch ( http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues ) PR Watch exposes the "invisible men" who control our political debates and public opinion, twisting reality and protecting the powerful from scrutiny...

'Gangs of America, The Rise of Corporate Power and the Disabling of Democracy' by Ted Nace ( http://www.gangsofamerica.com/ )

'NOW - The Clean Election Movement' ( http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/cleanelections.html )

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» AGREE 10,000% Idasteelworker Posted by: Michiganman
We Live in a Fascist Country. I Truly See No Way to Win.
Posted by: Mr. Terrific on Sep 4, 2007 4:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a black male who grew up in the South, I remember remarking to a radio host in aproximately 1991-92, that we are moving towards a "totalitarian" state. Naturally she felt I was totally out of my mind. I can only wonder what she feels now. The writing is on the wall and it is not grafiti. Our lives are being controlled and manipulated by the power elite directly and indirectly, through legislative enactments thanks to the corporate lobbyists, and judical enforcement thanks to the Supreme Court, and all the lesser courts of the land.

I have noticed that a lot of people are leaving America whom were born in this country. Back during World War I and II, many Black american men returned to Europe once they got out of the service. This letter is not from a World War I or World War II veteran, however, I took the time to read this essay and found it to be masterful in its elucidation as to why the author decided to leave this country. I thought I would share it with the readers.

Why I Left America The Rise Of Elitist Fascism And The Death Of American Democracy

Americans who have wealth tend to own homes in other countries. Yet, there is always an exploited class that keeps the engine running, so that the elite can prosper on the backs, and eventually the carcasses of the poor and the so-called "middle" class, {look for economic statistics as to who truly is classified as middle class as in lower middle, middle middle, and upper middle}.

Growing up in the South as a black male, for years you would hear the adage "hard work never killed anyone!" Whenever I hear someone say that, I tell them to take a trip to the cemetary. Hard work has killed a lot people around the world. The best tool of achievement that a poor, disenfrancished person can have, is a very good education and hopefully some acquired skill sets to propel him or herself out of poverty.

As to the corporations and the fascists who represent them in our government and political system, the first step is know thy enemy. The second step is to plan a method of enlightening the masses, and the third step is to hope for a miracle, because we will need one!

Terrific

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

coyote
Posted by: donkey on Sep 4, 2007 9:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How strange to indict Nancy Pelosi, when it's the administration that is corrupt.... Perhaps that's part of the problem -- we get sidetracked by personal vendettas and ignore the elephant in the room.

Has there every been an administration in our history so beholden to and so protective of corporate interests?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: coyote Posted by: Lauren
Corporate power
Posted by: cny39316 on Sep 5, 2007 3:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The founding fathers were very concerned about the rise of corporate power. They had first-hand knowledge of it from the abuses they suffered from the East India Company. Corporations were kept on a short leash. Their charters could be revoked if they were found not to be acting in the best interests of the state. They were not allowed to make political contributions and not allowed to own other corporations.

In the 19th century, railroads were the big monopolies. They won a major victory in 1886 with a decision in Santa Clara County vs. Southern Pacific Railroad. That decision has been used to apply the fourteenth amendment (which dealt with ending slavery) to give corporations the full civil rights of people. Corporations were considered artificial persons under Roman Law, which gave them the right to sue in court to enforce contracts, etc. Since the Fourteenth Amendment didn't specify "natural persons" as opposed to "artificial persons", the courts interpreted it as applying to corporations as well. Almost all of the lawsuits involving the Fourteenth Amendment have been filed on behalf of corporations. This ruling has been used to protect corporations from having their charters revoked, enable them to make political contributions (since it's their First Amendment right to free speach), enable them to own other corporations, etc.

This last point is especially important when it comes to environmentally destructive businesses like mining. A big corporation will form a subsidiary to do a mining operation. When they're done and it comes time to clean up their mess, they transfer all their assets of value back to the parent corporation (Who's to say what constitutes a fair deal?). Then the subsidiary files bankruptcy and the parent company has no responsibility.

There is a grass-roots movement afoot to change that. Read all about it in Thom Hartman's book Unequal Protection.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

if we buy
Posted by: bluetiger on Sep 5, 2007 5:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we buy shares of stock in any corporation we become owners of said corporation. this means that we have a say in any of their business discussions and/or decisions. so we could really make a difference.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: if we buy Posted by: Lauren
Big money contributors for social justice needed
Posted by: icha on Sep 5, 2007 10:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it all really boils down to education. People might mindlessly buy into the world of corporate propaganda that drowns us day and night because their minds have been left susceptible to it through faulty education. Schools spend months teaching children in elementary school about how Columbus "discovered" the new world. They should be teaching them about the phenomenon going on in their communities and pro-active activities that can build a strong character and understanding of the reality in front of them, not stories crossed with myths and propaganda.

The idea that fragmented forces should become unified to change corporate and government structure is totally valid. I think that corporations and the laws concerning lobbying and corporate campaign financing are so out of control though that it´s naiive to think that moral force of the people can change those structures. We desperately need enough people with power to take the causes of the people under their own wings to get into the back board rooms where things happen. Money talks. People are so distracted with getting through traffic, getting home and feeding their kids and getting ready for work the next day, they´d have to drop their daily activities to really unite, because our structures are all very isolating. Where are people supposed to come together, when we all work in little offices, sometimes not even seeing the sun go through it´s stages all day.

A drastic change is needed, it just seems the forum needs to be there first in order for the people to fill it. Big money contributors to the effort for reduction of corporate power are what´s needed. Outside of that becoming a reality, communication is the key. We all need to start talking to each other more. How to do that when we spend all day working is a different story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PIPEDREAM @ AMERIKA CORP
Posted by: Hal on Sep 6, 2007 2:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“Daring to dream that such a turn of events is possible--and charting the path to get there--is a critical challenge of our new century.”

This story is no more than a hollow pipedream minus a single substantive or lasting proposal. It’s all about vague slogans and skin-deep window dressing that fail “the critical challenge of our new century” and do zero to curb the core issues addressed.

The core issue?

Our economy is rigged by private bank monopoly Ponzi scheme via “Federal Reserve” Corporation (not federal and no reserves) foisted on the U.S. by robber barons in an Orwellian 1913 law that was supposed to protect Americans from the “Money Trust” (de facto Fascist monopolists). Of course what the “Federal Reserve Act” did was to give global corporate criminals near total control over the American economy and thus, all its political organs, Mockingbird media establishment with all the rest.

Here’s a very simple yet accurate way to ID the problem in Q and A:

Q – How much power would you have if you could “legally” counterfeit your own private money and charge interest for it?

A – Unlimited power of master over slave. And no exaggeration.


CLUE: a centrally planned and privately rigged economy is a license to steal from the good little sheep. And to murder them. Control the money and you control everything worth controlling. Everything.

Above all, the founders fought this power. And won. The last president that defeated the “Money Power” was Andrew Jackson. It’s no surprise FDR singled Jackson out for this achievement.




“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
PRESIDENT FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT (on oligarch rule in a letter to handler “Colonel” Edward M. House, confidence man for the cartel and founder of the Council on Foreign Relations. House also handled President Wilson in the foisting of a private and unconstitutional “Federal Reserve” Corporation sham with its IRS in 1913. November 21st, l933)

“No nation but the freemen of the United States could have come out victorious from such a contest; yet, if you had not conquered [the privately owned “U.S.” central bank], the Government would have passed from the hands of the many to the hands of the few, and this organized money power from its secret conclave would have dictated the choice of your highest officers and compelled you to make peace or war, as best suited their own wishes.”
PRESIDENT ANDREW JACKSON (the 7th President in his farewell address to the nation, March 4, 1837)

“This [Federal Reserve] Act establishes the most gigantic trust [private monopoly] on earth. When the president [Wilson] signs this bill, the Invisible Government of the money power will be legalized… The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill.”
CONGRESSMAN CHARLES A. LINDBERG SR. (speaking to Congress in opposition to the global banking cartel and its privately owned “Federal Reserve” Corporation monopoly. December 23rd, 1913)

“Britain is the slave of an international financial bloc.”
BRITISH PRIME MINISTER DAVID LLOYD GEORGE (on the money cartel June 20, 1934)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

At this stage
Posted by: talkville on Sep 6, 2007 3:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Big corporations have become de facto governments,..." Some of them manage and control more resources than many countries do. Even the US State has delivered significant controlling powers into the hands of some of these. With the IMF, WTO and such, even Westphalian doctrines are out-dated. Our US government is itself a corporation now in many respects and inextricably bound with producers and suppliers in what still is called brazenly 'the private sector'. We are IN and not OF the problematics of fascism - in Mussolini's description.

Indeed democratic forces all must ORGANIZE and the sooner the better. Coalition-building is an urgent need. The first corporation we need to take back, however, is our own government. All the other ones will do is change PR firms maybe and alter their commercials to fit "consumer preferences'. When corporations, since the late 1800's are given the same status as human persons in significant ways, we're already confronting a monumental problem of power. But corporations exist via state charters, and the Constitution, among other things, GUARANTEES each of our states a REPUBLICAN form of government. Work needs to be focused at state as well as federal levels. And, after all, democratic forces grow out of local conditions.

I heard somewhere that military defeat does not dispose of the creed. The idea of fascism had and has many admirers since those days of World Wars and before. There's many ways plants grow over time.

"Big corporations have become de facto governments,... ."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: At this stage Posted by: Lauren
I think we are done
Posted by: vomeggido on Sep 6, 2007 9:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As beautiful and fantastic as these ideas are- I believe the elite has already moved into the position of not having to answer or sway to these proposed changes----We just don't know it yet and are under the illusion that there is still hope.

More will be revealed in the next two years that confirm my suspicions that a revolution for change has long since past us by.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]