Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Despite the Mortgage Crisis, Hedge Funders Are Still Raking It in

By Sarah Anderson, AlterNet. Posted August 29, 2007.


The little guys may be hurting, but fear not for the titans of capital.
Advertisement

You've probably been staying up nights worrying about how hedge fund managers are going to weather the credit crunch stemming from the subprime mortgage storm. These men are expected to really suffer since they borrow so heavily to finance their gambling in global financial markets. Many were also stuck with piles of mortgage-backed securities when these paper assets plunged in value. A few funds have already stumbled, and Moody's credit raters have warned of a 50-50 chance that one of the big ones will crash soon.

For these troubling times, some reassuring thoughts:

He'll always have the pictures

Kenneth Griffin, head of Citadel Investment Group, chose Versailles as the site of his nuptials a few years ago and last year made a sum that would have made even Marie Antoinette's eyes pop: $1.2 billion. Now that heads are rolling from the mortgage meltdown, the image of the finance world's royals has lost a bit of its luster. And yet, unlike the ill-fated queen and and her Louis XVI, Griffin is expected to survive and maybe even come out ahead. He has already swooped in to take over the assets of one collapsed rival and is busily buying up the stocks of other battered companies. Go, Griffin!

louis ken

Louis XVI  Kenneth Griffin, Citadel Investment Group 

He'll always have Marilyn

Steven Cohen's SAC Capital fund dropped 6 percent during the first three weeks of August, reportedly one of its worst months ever. On top of that, Cohen now has to worry about a move afoot in Congress to cut off mortgage-interest tax deductions for mansions. Under the flimsy guise of "combatting climate change," Rep. John Dingell, D-MI, is going after owners of homes larger than 3,000 square feet. The size of Cohen's Georgian mansion in Greenwich, Conn.: 31,600 square feet (not including the ice skating rink, tennis court and beauty parlor). At least Cohen was able to enjoy his $1.2 billion windfall from last year while he could. On one spending spree, he picked up an Andy Warhol image of Marilyn Monroe, "Turquoise Marilyn," for an estimated $80 million.

marilyn

The Pentagon is hiring

James Simons's reign as the top-earning hedge fund manager may be short-lived. After making $1.5 billion in 2006, the Renaissance Technologies chief is expected to take a cut in personal earnings this year, as his biggest fund's value has remained flat, compared to a 21 percent return in 2006. However, if things really go sour for Simons, he could probably always go back to his former employer, the Pentagon, where he once applied his numbers know-how to code breaking.

Nest eggs

The average take for the 20 highest-paid private equity and hedge fund managers last year was $657.5 million. Without earning another penny, they would still have $10.9 million per year for the next 60 years, probably enough to maintain the yachts and private jets they might have purchased before the bubble burst. They can also take heart in the knowledge that in that one single year, 2006, they made 18 times the earnings of the top 20 highest-paid executives of publicly held companies and 22,255 times the pay of an average American worker. Suckers!

Tax breaks

Even if their earnings decline, hedge fund managers will likely still be able to take advantage of a convenient loophole that allows them to be taxed at a lower rate than common folk. That's because a substantial portion of their income is in the form of a cut of their funds' profits, which is treated as capital gains and taxed at 15 percent, rather than the 35 percent rate that applies to ordinary income. Some cranky class warriors in Congress are trying to plug this loophole. But luckily for the hedge fund managers, there is strong opposition, including from some Democrats. Whew!

No guff from shareholders

Chief executives of troubled publicly held corporations have to dread facing shareholders at their corporate annual meeting. Rude questions, angry placards, anything can happen. Sometimes they don't even vote the right way. Hedge fund managers, on the other hand, don't have to answer to stock-holding hordes or even report on their business activities to the federal Securities and Exchange Commission.

So, dry your tears for the hedge fund managers. While hundreds of thousands of families are losing their homes and tens of thousands of workers are losing their jobs as a result of the mortgage crisis, at least the guys who helped inflate the bubble are going to get along just fine.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: ceo pay, hedge funds, executive excess

Sarah Anderson directs the Global Economy Project at the Institute for Policy Studies and is a co-author of Executive Excess 2007, released Aug. 29 by IPS and United for a Fair Economy.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The rest of the story, please?
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 29, 2007 2:05 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know that the instances cited in this article show anything illegal. So far as I know, anyone can hang out a shingle as a broker. How many who try to set up hedge funds fail? What about the likelihood of the government asking the taxpayer to bail out failing hedge funds?

So, how big is the portfolio these individuals manage? And what kind of percentage of the profit do they get? Without that information, does annual individual earnings mean anything at all? Or is the point that we, readers, are supposed to be impressed or overwhelmed with the big numbers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The rest of the story, please? Posted by: Joshua Holland
Tears in Cheek
Posted by: Urstrly on Aug 29, 2007 4:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course we shouldn't cry for hedge fund operators who make both enormous fees and a percentage of the accounts of their super wealthy investors. The profits are supposed rewards for the high risks they take; at least there's some qualification of investors so that ordinary folk don't invest there. But, as it turns out, you may own some of them if you have money in a pension fund. So the risks they take may be your own. Did you sign on for that? Are you making 20 percent on your investments?

I'm furious that government officials, some of them prominent Democrats, endorse tax breaks to these phenomenally wealthy people while our middle class bears the burden of supporting their lifestyle. Think of all the newly homeless people screwed by unscrupulous mortgage lenders whose debts the hedge funds bought. Maybe they can move into some of these recently vacated estates and play a little tennis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In those ethereal spheres.
Posted by: talkville on Aug 29, 2007 5:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The funds hedge against nothing; they exclude-- that's their hedge. They are mutual funds and they are managed by the parasites who figured out how to globalize gullibility. They are globalization writ large.

Cry for them? Hmmmm.

The criterion for membership in these funds is capital infusions, a minimum not a maximum. The centralization made available to them -- world-wide -- by technology is their on-going key. "Free Markets" are their Markets. Plain and simple. There are States, there are Vaticans, there are Royalties, there are Families. Capital investments of those magnitudes is difficult to com-prehend, but not so difficult to experience -- it is our social relations as they now exist. There is no State, not even our own (although it contains the controlling interest) which can any more regulate investments of such magnitude. Which means that our history is now privately, not publicly, determined.

Cry for them? Hmmmmm.

The dissolution of all our social infrastructures (check out news of arson fires all over Greece, for instance of current events) will be met by a global "Marshall Plan", currently capital does not give one whit about it. The difference will be that this neo "Marshall Plan" will not be decided, controlled, regulated or in any way influenced by the State or any popular concerns. They will determine the terms and the conditions of re-construction. Globally.

Any one who is of the leftist or popular or democratic persuasions ought to think carefully about these issues. There is a reason our infrastructures and our governments are being gutted from the inside. As are our social relations themselves.

The Right has launched an offensive in earnest; it is not a Right we've been accustomed to see. It is the Right of Absolutism, of Totalitarianism and Despotism. The Theologians have joined into the effort, and it makes a difference.

Cry for the Hedge funders? Hmmmmm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sell sell sell, score score score Posted by: eddie torres
NOBODY'S CRYING FOR THEM
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 29, 2007 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fallout from hedgefunds and loan sharking is what most of us care about. Hedgefund managers will be just fine. The guy next door who loses his house won't be. This country became so obcessed with enormous wealth that we lost sight of ordinary people with jobs trying to earn a lving. That's most of us. It's time to focus on Average America. It's time for labor unions and some job protection and benefits. Education has to be made affordable. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Congress, Banks and Fed Collude to Cause Mortgage Crisis
Posted by: cognitorex on Aug 29, 2007 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lessons of the Great Depression give way to greed.

The history behind the mortgage fiasco and bank liquidity is a complex long intertwined affair.

After the Great Depression new financial regulations were put in place. For one, banks were barred from equity deals or brokerage operations. Then, fairly recently, Congress and the Fed gave in to the natural greed of the banks and let them return to brokerage/equity dealings. It is in no way surprising that subsequent to dismantling safeguards the present catastrophe should occur. It is axiomatic to allowing banks to invest in speculative fashion outside of regulated asset lending scenarios.

As many have said there is a tie-in here to the S&L debacle.

Congress and the Fed deregulated the S&Ls to give in to the natural greed of the big banks. Prior to deregulation the S&Ls were allowed to pay one half percent more for savings than other banks. That attracted long term secure savings/ assets to the S&Ls which they lent out long term in mortgages. It was a stable arrangement and as a side affect the money stayed local. Coveting these assets the big banks, Congress and the Fed made a devil's pact allowing S&Ls with no experience in non mortgage financing to go deregulated into risky areas. They crashed but the big banks got their hands on the trillions in mortgage assets which became speculative assets, leading to excess and our present liquidity crunch.

My point is that Congress and the Fed have bent to the greed of the big financial institutions and systematically dismantled well thought out needed protections, apparent from The Great Depression.

Now, John and Jane Doe will have to pay higher interest rates for their car loans, etc until the banks eroded capital (much of which was stripped off as fees to individuals) is replaced.

This is simply more organized theft (!**!) like excessive CEO salaries which are in truth a form of embezzlement.

Craig Johnson

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Neither Person In Conversation Knows What Hedge Fund Is
Posted by: fanny666 on Aug 29, 2007 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Soprano' Tax Plan for financial and ethical equity.
Posted by: cognitorex on Aug 29, 2007 9:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back the Soprano' Tax Plan to restore financial and ethical equity in the Capital Markets.

Like the mob, reputable and not so reputable financial enterprises 'whet their beaks' on all commercial flows of capital.

(Wall Street firms are expected to pay out a record $23.9 billion in bonuses this year. 12/20/06 USA Today)

"Meanwhile the financial types have stripped a tenth of a point here and a half a point there from these capital flows, enriching themselves until the speculative 'excessive risk' schemes meet their inevitable and repetitive denouement." (from: Cognitorex , "John Doe Pays" )

One manifestly equitable countervailing economic policy would be to place a one one hundreth of one percent Value Added Tax on all capital flows.

The financial mafia ('Them') enrich themselves by taking a bite out of America's capital flows at every instance while 'Us', the creator's of this wealth, need Moms and Dads working multiple jobs to eat and provide the capital for this system.

In a bad year, when capital and equity shrink due to the excesses of the financial mob's schemes, the little guy has to pony up to replace the capital. In this manner, John and Jane Doe repeatedly have to pay an effective greed tax and pay more for their car loans, their mortgages and their credit cards until the cosa nostra bankers replace their depleted capital.

As our capital washes around the globe for economic enterprises, both good and bad, and for hedging and for asset speculation, there is no reason that the John and Jane Doe population that most suffers the cost of the downturns couldn't charge a way tiny `rent' for this resource.

Direct these tax flows to Social Security and Medicaid and these programs would thus be amply funded and capitalism would manifestly not miss a heart beat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Technical hedge funds got taken to the cleaners
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Aug 29, 2007 10:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The John Henry funds (John Henry owns the Boston Red Socks) were used by commodities manipulators as a piggy bank. They simply moved the price of commodities up or down to a technical "decision point", got the hedge funds to act, and then forced the price of the commodities in the other direction to crush the funds. Ted Butler documents this for silver at www.investmentratities.com. Butler refered to the funds as "brain dead" for their gullibility.

The result was that the funds lost money in a commodites bull market, while the manipulators pocketed the money. the actions of the manipulators were in violation of commodities law, but with the Bush Administration's anti-regulation stance, it was ignored by the regulators.

Problem with all of this is that our financial markets are increasingly being rigged-- ultimately they're an accident waiting to happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Taxes
Posted by: vertical on Aug 29, 2007 11:38 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There should be some amount that if your income goes higher than that you go into a 99% tax bracket where say you were to make more than ten million you get a penny on the dollar, and that money should be redistibuted to those that need it like Katrina victoms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wall Street-on-Sea, aka Upper Hedgistan
Posted by: eddie torres on Aug 29, 2007 2:09 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Guardian yesterday waded into the tragic unraveling of a modern American community devastated by the financial undertow spreading from Wall Street. Greenwich, Connecticut - home of 380 hedge funds managing $100 billion - has a nervous feel and an unstable future.

Fine art galleries, cigar stores, designer fashion boutiques, and $400-haircut barber shops are all feeling the pinch and complain that their clientele are slightly "tetchy" and "uptight" of late.

Private submarine crews who frequent the area's hotspots like "Barcelona Wine Bar" and "Baang Cafe & Bar" express concern that next summer's cruising destinations will reflect a dramatic shift towards "economizing" on expenses. Instead of visiting exotic undersea locales like Tahiti and the Seychelles, think "sunken barges of Hoboken."

Oh, the humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think you missed a bit in the James Simons paragraph...
Posted by: Singo111 on Aug 30, 2007 1:35 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the fact that Jim gives over $100m a year to a charity researching Autism, making him one of the biggest charitable donors in the world.

All of the people mentioned above have built their businesses through hard work and intelligence. None have committed crimes and all abide by any regulations by which they are asked to abide.

The idiots who take out $500,000 mortgages when they have no income are the ones who deserve to suffer - not the hard working people who keep the global economy afloat.

If you're that jealous, get back to university, learn something and then go and work 100 hour weeks for 30 years, and then you might be in the same position as some of these hedge fund managers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I've got a lot to say on this matter...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 1, 2007 1:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But someone else said it far more eloquently than I can:

Money it's a gas
Grab that cash with both hands and make a stash
New car, caviar, four star daydream,
Think I'll buy me a football team
Money get back
I'm all right Jack keep your hands off my stack.
Money it's a hit
Don't give me that do goody good bullshit
I'm in the hi-fidelity first class traveling set
And I think I need a Lear jet
Money it's a crime
Share it fairly but don't take a slice of my pie
Money so they say
Is the root of all evil today
But if you ask for a rise it's no surprise that they're
giving none away...

German Chancellor Merkel had a lot to say on this matter as well:

"Staking out the German government's oft-repeated position, Merkel said the risks arising from highly leveraged financial institutions, like hedge funds, would under certain circumstances "have to be paid for by the people."

Citizens in a democracy expected politicians to confront these risks, the chancellor said, adding that it was strange that there were strict rules for companies listed on stock exchanges but not for the multitude of new financial institutions and products.

On rating agencies, Merkel said the methods they used in evaluating banks and government bonds should be made more open.

In the past, high ratings had been issued, "which later proved not to be valid," Merkel said.

Merkel has committed herself to using the final months of the German presidency of the Group of Eight (G8) to revive a theme she and Finance Minister Peer Steinbrueck wanted on the agenda of the G8 summit in Heiligendamm in June.

The Germans tried - and failed in the face of adamant US and British opposition - to push through more stringent scrutiny of hedge funds."


I have a real bad feeling about this, to tell you the truth... Maybe I spend too much time thinking about Stalinist Russia and Nazi Germany, and it's distorting my perception. Maybe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Government To Bail Out Hedge Fund Operators
Posted by: sofla100 on Sep 1, 2007 6:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many of your "hedge funds" are composed of securities that consist of bundled mortgages called REIT's, or Real Estate Investment Trusts. These securities are then sold to investors and to banks as what is often called "commercial paper." Now, a big crisis has emerged because our hedge fund "geniuses" always only calculated on real estate to go up in value. They also never counted on owners of the real estate (in the REIT's and commercial paper) to default on their mortgages. Alas, real estate collapsed and many are walking away and defaulting. But, now who do you think is coming to the rescue? Our illustirous President, Mr. Free Markets himself. He is now trying to get the US government, via Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (US subsidized mortgage issuers mostly under FHA), to assume many of the mortgages in these REIT's and commercial papers. Hence, taking our dear hedge fund operators off the hook. Our "super Republican" government, to the rescue for the bad investments of the hedge fund operators. Of course, under the guise of helping "the little guy," but we all know who is really being helped. It's the hedge fund operators who will be saved billions. The little guy defaults on a $200 or $300K mortgage, and, he has bad credit for awhile but recovers. The hedge fund operator has to assume hundreds, if not thousands, of these defaults. So, guess who is coming to the rescue?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]