Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

While Europeans Vacation, Americans Toil

By Marie Cocco, Truthdig. Posted July 12, 2007.


Shorter vacations, longer work weeks and skimpy sick leave for Americans add up -- not to greater upward mobility, but to a burned-out workforce earning less than preceding generations.
07122007story
07122007story
Advertisement

If you're reading this while on vacation, great for you. If you're reading this at work, having recently finished a vacation or a five-day weekend cobbled together around last week's celebration of Independence Day, I hope the time off was as spectacular as the fireworks.

If you won't get another day off work until December's holiday season, you're not alone. Americans and vacations just don't mix.

This may surprise those who have just spent hours stranded at airports or idling in a hot line for a ride at an amusement park. But a quarter of American workers get no paid vacation or paid holidays. And on average, those private-sector workers who do get paid time off are granted only nine vacation days and six paid holidays each year, according to government statistics analyzed by the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

The liberal-leaning think tank analyzed paid vacation and holiday leave policies among the U.S. and nations with comparably developed economies--the European Union, Canada, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. The predictable portrait is one of the United States as a nation of workaholics--a syndrome related less to the archetype of a striving executive than it is linked to government policy.

In the rest of the industrialized world, a month or more of paid vacation is typical, and often required. Many Americans know that. And there are can-you-top-this supplements to this surfeit of paid time off. Such as: In Austria, workers who labor at "heavy night work" get two or three extra days off. Also in Austria--as well as in Sweden and New Zealand--workers are actually paid at a higher rate when they're on vacation than when they're at work.

In France, workers get extra paid time off if they take some of their vacation days outside of the summer season. In Norway, those 60 and older get extra time off. And of course, your vacation could be ruined if you get sick while you're away. So Sweden guarantees that if a worker becomes sick while on leave, the days of the illness don't count against vacation time.

Stingy leave policies in the United States go hand and hand with weekly work hours that exceed those in many industrialized countries. And they parallel skimpy sick leave and family leave policies that give millions of Americans no effective safety net when illness or emergencies strike. Nearly half of private-sector workers--57 million people--have no paid sick days, according to Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., a chief sponsor of a measure to require at least some sick days for employees who work more than 30 hours per week. The problem is particularly acute for low-wage workers, more than three-fourths of whom get no paid leave when they are ill.

In theory, all this hard work is supposed to spark a more robust economy that is, in turn, an engine of greater upward mobility than what is found in the supposedly coddled precincts of, say, the European Union. But lately, it hasn't. An ongoing, bipartisan study of intergenerational economic mobility conducted jointly by conservative and liberal-leaning researchers for the Pew Charitable Trusts has found the myth of superior American mobility to be--a myth.

Researchers for the Economic Mobility Project studied the relationship of adult children's incomes to those of their parents and found that the United States now lags behind France, Germany, Sweden, Canada, Finland, Norway and Denmark in this measure of upward mobility. "There is little available evidence that the United States has more relative mobility than other advanced nations," the group reported in May. "If anything, the data seem to suggest the opposite."

Comparing the incomes of American men who were in their 30s in 2004 with males who were in their 30s in 1974, the researchers found that today's men actually earn about 12 percent less, after inflation, than their fathers' generation did. "There has been no progress at all for the youngest generation," the group reported. The American family stays afloat because its total income has been swelled by women's paychecks.

The sober statistics should lead toward saner economic policies. Europe, Canada and the rest of the industrialized world are doing just fine with guaranteed health insurance, pensions, maternity leave and sick time--not to mention a month at the beach. Here at home, nothing threatens the American dream so much as political disinclination to cast off old thinking and demand change for new and harsher economic times.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: labor, vacation time

Marie Cocco is a prize-winning syndicated columnist on political and cultural topics for The Washington Post Writers Group. She is a frequent commentator on national TV and radio shows.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Americans are getting shafted
Posted by: georgiaorwell on Jul 12, 2007 1:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you, Marie, for writing this article. It's becoming a well known fact that the US government and private industry are, well, BIG TIGHTWADS! They spend billions of dollars in numerous countries but do not take care of their own people. If you work for the US Gov in Europe, your housing may be taken care of, but your pay is in US dollars - not indexed, like multi-national companies, to scale with the euro (or country in which you work). Multi-nationals will pay for expat housing and index their pay to pound sterling or euros, including benefits. Also, I know of many expats who willingly go to work in France or the NL, etc., just to have the holiday/vacation/paid leave, which is generous and totally surpasses the US's stingy 9 days. Also, the healthcare is so much better and cheaper, which is either non-existent for US workers or hugely expensive. Truth is - it ends up being a higher quality of life in Europe, but the US doesn't pay either its workers, home or abroad, a decent wage. Consider, also, the way they pay and treat US troops abroad and it's a crime!

The US government and corporations are destroying what used to be a proud nation of hard-working people - they simply do not appear to care about ever making improvements in people's lives. Imagine the millions of Americans who are trying to pay for their families while striving to pay off college loans - in many European countries, these loans are forgiven after a few years - automatically. Our Congress simply never passes anything in the people's interest and America has become a land for simply the rich and richer - everyone else can pretty much go to hell when you look at the way the American people are treated by the fatcat politicians and corporate fascists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well said! Posted by: redceres
» RE: Well said! Posted by: Trazom
» RE: CHRISTIAN AMERICA! Posted by: Cathyc
More vacation time improves the economy
Posted by: Annarisse on Jul 12, 2007 3:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1) When full-time workers take time off for any reason, part-time workers usually pick up most, or sometimes all, of the missed work. This gives people who are struggling a chance to get some full-time hours and experience in a situation that involves a definite time limit - and therefore reduced risk for employer and employee.
2) In France, the school system is set up to accommodate vacations at different points in the year, so families with young children can often take a week's holiday on the ski slopes and another week's holiday at the beach. Imagine the boost this gives to the tourist industry! Imagine the seasonal jobs that open up, especially for students!
3) Happy workers are better workers. So are healthy ones.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

americans get their reward after death
Posted by: richholland on Jul 12, 2007 4:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes brave patriots work untill you drop dead and you will go to heaven...
What will happen as many young americans come to Europe, there is plenty of work to do.?????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hey, why not.... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Hey, why not.... Posted by: willymack
Outsourcing and Contracting
Posted by: kelt65 on Jul 12, 2007 4:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I work in IT, which seems to be under assault by the military industrial complex these days. It seems 50% of the IT jobs out there are with some company that makes bombs.

At any rate, these are the companies that get big contracts to do IT work, both for the government and large corporations. Whenever the contract switches hands, typically workers lose all their time put in towards more vacation. Most companies, for example, will increment you an extra week of vacation after five years. Not so for a contractor. Of course, they have policies which amount to the same thing, but if the contract switches hands, you're "reset." Even though I've essentially worked for the same people for the last five years, I've actually seen my vacation time get smaller, the contract keeps getting skimpier, it seems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Basically, yes Posted by: ateo
Every summer a similar article is posted...
Posted by: olderworker on Jul 12, 2007 4:33 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..while it's true that Americans get less paid vacation time than workers in other countries, there is nothing to stop us from taking unpaid leave.
I know that not everyone can do this, but last year, when I changed jobs, I took a week off in-between the last day of the old job and start date of the new job, and took the bus up to Quebec City (I live in Boston, so this is fairly cheap & easy to do). I also took two unpaid weeks a couple of months after starting the new job, because had already made arrangements to go to France. And, NO, I'm not paid very much. I do budget travel with a capital "B", looking for the cheapest flights months ahead of the trip and renting a house from a friend who owns a house in France.
Again, it may not be possible for the average debt-laden American (I do have school loans but no credit card or car loan debt, and no mortgage) but I recommend taking as much vacation time as you can!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh Gee
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line on Jul 12, 2007 4:37 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe if people did careers they liked more they would not whine about not having time off. Time off is all fine and well and certainly appreciated, but if you work only forty hours a week, that really is not all that many hours. Thats vacation in and of itself. I cannot fathom the idea of working only 40 hours a week, and somehow I get everything(or almost everything) done that I need to...Plus get to take some quality time for myself. Time management is a good thing... Certainly I am not suggesting that people should not get vacations...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh Gee Posted by: Jabby
» RE: Oh Gee Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Oh Gee Posted by:
» RE: Oh Gee Posted by: John Wilbur
» RE: Oh Gee Posted by: RaW
» To all y'all Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» Look again.. Posted by: superdan
» RE: Look again.. Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» Inverse logic. Posted by: justaguy
» Fascist? Posted by: justaguy
» Yes, fascist. Posted by: mjabele
» After all this time... Posted by: mjabele
» Narcissistic hypocrite. Posted by: justaguy
» RE: Oh Gee Posted by: cstrut
» RE: Oh Gee cstrut Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» rotting Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: rotting Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: rotting Posted by: YogiBear
» Anybody? Posted by: moflard
» RE: Anybody? Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Oh Gee Posted by: jmp3954
Power in the Hands of Corporations
Posted by: igoeja on Jul 12, 2007 4:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the past several years I've been telling myself the following:

What's good for corporations is bad for people.

A bit oversimplified, but true.

There is no illusion as to what benefits from laws regarding sick leave, health care, etc. It is the corporations that hire people. The idea that what is good for the economy is good for people is rarely true, and although the goals can seem related, they are only positively related by the rate of productivity growth, rather than productivity itself.

Also, the wealth of middle class America comes at the expense of the wealthy - a historical analysis From Wealth and Democracy by Kevin Philips, although the 90's would seem to belie this truth - so the recent cuts in capital gains and corporate taxes, combined with lax IRS oversight and CEO greed, have created a new gilded-age economic divide. Part of the way the US can become better for the middle and lower classes is by empowering unions and taxing the wealthy, along with creating a universal health care system, reducing the military, and creating laws that reduce the control of corporations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here is Australia's comparrison
Posted by: Nedtheredhead on Jul 12, 2007 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.workingtoday.com.au/leave1.html

ANNUAL LEAVE
Most employees are entitled to four weeks paid annual leave after each 12 months work. Most employees are additionally entitled to 17.5% annual leave loading.
A casual employee's hourly rate includes an amount in lieu of paid annual leave.
LONG SERVICE LEAVE
Different provisions apply in each state and territory. Generally, long service leave accrues each year and after an employee reaches the qualifying period, he or she entitled to take paid leave.
SICK LEAVE
Most employees who are sick or injured and cannot work are entitled to be paid for a limited period. The employer must be informed as soon as possible (within 24 hours) if you are sick. In most cases, after using two days sick leave in any year the employee will be required to show proof of illness - a medical certificate (in some cases a Statutory Declaration may be accepted).
CARER'S LEAVE
An employee is entitled to use up to five days personal leave each year as carer’s leave to provide care and support for members of the employee's immediate family or household who are sick and require care and support.
BEREAVEMENT LEAVE
In most cases two days paid leave is available upon the death in Australia of an employee's immediate family member. This includes parent, child, grandparent, sibling, spouse and ex-spouse. In addition up to ten days unpaid leave may be granted. Paid leave is not available for more distant family members.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here is Australia's comparrison Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» RE: Here is Australia's comparrison Posted by: animalleaderisgreat
» He is a neoconservative... Posted by: justaguy
» RE: He is a neoconservative... Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» Oh really? Posted by: justaguy
» What is your point? (nm) Posted by: justaguy
» RE: Here is Australia's comparrison Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» RE: Third World Country..... Posted by: The Butcher
» RE: Third World Country..... Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» Is this an advertisement? Posted by: justaguy
» Blame Hawke as much as anyone. Posted by: justaguy
» RE: Blame Hawke as much as anyone. Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» Oh, you're an idiot. Posted by: justaguy
» Oh , and... Posted by: justaguy
» RE: Oh , and... Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» The Courier - Mail.... Posted by: justaguy
» RE: The Courier - Mail.... Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» Nonsense. Posted by: justaguy
» RE: Nonsense. Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» Oh FFS. Posted by: justaguy
» RE: Oh FFS. Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» Yes. Posted by: justaguy
» RE: Yes. Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» No, they didn't. Posted by: justaguy
» RE: No, they didn't. Posted by: Nedtheredhead
Still time for a kiss in the AM
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Jul 12, 2007 5:21 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regardless of what country you live in, certan laws of economics prevail - one must work for a living - and it seems the French are realizing this even though American liberals want their SUV's and time off as well!

CNN.Com - PARIS, France (Reuters) -- Their new president wants to get the French to work harder to compete in global markets, but some traditions are likely to endure -- including long holidays, a kiss for colleagues in the morning, and a decent lunch. ............

Newly elected president Nicolas Sarkozy may not agree. With unemployment hovering above 8 percent and the economy barely growing 2 percent, at issue is whether France can keep up its lifestyle and be competitive.

"France is really going downhill," said Jeremy Salomon, a Frenchman working as a project manager at optical manufacturer GrandOptical in the southwest suburbs of Paris.

"If there is no change, France will be at the end of the queue in terms of productivity."

Conservative Sarkozy has promised to tackle this problem, with reforms aimed at restoring the values of hard work and rewarding people who "get up early". He wants to make the 35-hour work week a minimum, not maximum, requirement, allowing people to work more.

"Sarkozy wants to make it possible for people who work overtime to be paid for it," Salomon said. "I think he wants to try to change the French mentality in terms of work ethic."

While Americans focus on productivity, Salomon said the French waste time with meetings. He joked that another big time-drain was the tradition of greeting everyone in the morning by kissing them twice on cheek: "That's like 20 minutes gone by."

Salomon is not paid overtime, even though he usually works from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m., with an hour for lunch. Instead, he gets extra vacation -- which adds up to so many days off it is hard to find time to work.

"We get 48 days off, not including national holidays," he said. "So much vacation time makes it hectic to work."

Whining and dining

Despite free time and benefits that workers in other countries may envy, many in France are still discontented. One recent study found French workers the world's biggest whiners.

Yet according to Thomas Philippon, a New York University Stern School of Business professor, this is not because the French hate work: they value hard work highly.

He said a lack of internal promotion at companies and a lack of cooperation are some reasons why French workers are unhappy.

"Overall in France, internal promotion has a bad connotation. If someone gets promoted, we think he's a suck-up."

Another gripe is that raw recruits hired direct from elite institutions are put in charge of more experienced workers.

Isabelle Perrin, a spokeswoman for the CFDT, one of France's largest unions, said the French worker is unjustly maligned: what France needs is more people being put to productive use to help pay the pensions of an ageing population...............

Brina Goldfarb, an American who has been working in Paris for three and a half years, believes France's leader is spouting "free-market jargon" and ignoring reality.

Goldfarb, who works at a small architectural firm, said she is contracted to work a 39-hour week, but does about 50 hours. "I can't see my boss paying us for all the extra overtime." Like many in France, however, her overtime work is compensated by extra time off, not cash. Back home, she would be richer but the French lifestyle and a French fiance won her over: "I did think I would have had a more humane life than if I was working in New York."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Still time for a kiss in the AM Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Equilibrium Posted by: CatDad
» RE: quilibrium Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: quilibrium Posted by: babs
» RE: quilibrium Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: quilibrium Posted by: Rolomax
» Productivity, schmoductivity. Posted by: justaguy
In the army…
Posted by: White middleclass male on Jul 12, 2007 7:03 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
…we get 30 days of paid leave per year (Usually 2 week in the summer and 2 weeks around Christmas). Viva la Status Quo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: In the army… Posted by: moflard
» It's 30 days period Posted by: ateo
» RE: In the army… Posted by: famouspipeliner
Not only productivity
Posted by: daro on Jul 12, 2007 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans can't take or don't take long holidays so only some 5% hold a passport. Indeed, apparently only 15% of Congress members hold a passport.
Is it any surprise therefore that Americans generally exhibit such a woeful ignorance of and even indifference to the rest of the world?
For some years I ran a Tourist Company in France and led groups of Americans on walking trips. One of the pleasures was to be able to present clients with new experiences and visit places that they would not otherwise have seen. It was a permanent surprise to discover how many of these intelligent and highly-paid people were so out of touch with things beyond their frontiers. And it was utterly depressing to encounter every now and again the executive who had to phone his office daily or receive reams of faxed data - the guy who couldn't let go!
You should get out more!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not only productivity Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» You're history is f***ed up. Posted by: justaguy
» RE: You're history is f***ed up. Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» You keep compromising then.. Posted by: justaguy
» And would you rather... Posted by: justaguy
» RE: And would you rather... Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» Are you in the CEC? Posted by: justaguy
» RE: Are you in the CEC? Posted by: Nedtheredhead
Obesity, anti-depressants...
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Jul 12, 2007 7:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's no wonder we are the most obese and depressed/manic citizens on the planet...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Canada and the EU sure are looking better every day...
Posted by: arclight on Jul 12, 2007 8:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and if I could get permanent residency and a work permit in a place like Germany, I surely would. Like, today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

UNIONS ARE STILL THE ONLY ANSWER
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 12, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Long Hours, fear of losing the job, low pay, limited time off all contribute to many social ills. Homelife is almost extinct. Everybody is 'busy'. Children are shuffled around non-stop. Unnecessary shopping wastes so much time. When people can relax about how the bills are paid all that changes. It's all a form of distraction. Like it or not, it's about organizing. Labor unions are not a handout, but they afford people some protection and job security. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Unions today- Posted by: WitchyNy
» RE: Unions today-The four hour day.... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Unions today-The four hour day.... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Unions today- Posted by: EJ
I remember a news story from years ago
Posted by: sausage on Jul 12, 2007 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't remember which network's evening news program nor even the date, though suffice it to say it was sometime in the mid to late Seventies or early Eighties, when I saw a story about a union trying to organize a factory in some Southern state.

I don't even recall the union or industry but I clearly remember a statement from a wizened, woman worker, who opposed union organization:"We don't wanna union, we wanna work!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Probably North Carolina Posted by: YogiBear
I remember a news story from years ago
Posted by: sausage on Jul 12, 2007 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't remember which network's evening news program nor even the date, though suffice it to say it was sometime in the mid to late Seventies or early Eighties, when I saw a story about a union trying to organize a factory in some Southern state.

I don't even recall the union or industry but I clearly remember a statement from a wizened, woman worker, who opposed union organization:"We don't wanna union, we wanna work!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Elementary, yes, elementary. Read on.
Posted by: american on Jul 12, 2007 9:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This razzle, dazzle, watch-out-for-my-left-while-I-hit-you-with my-right gig is old hat: The Romans, the Soviets, the Nazi's all practiced it and Machiavelli, among others, codified it.

To gain easily - that is, without giving something of equal value in return - is to steal. To steal, one must lie. Both are bad. To be bad is to go against God, Nature.

Morality aside, the "received" economic, political, and policy "doctrines" that are blown from one corner of the media the other and back, like cottony tree seeds in a twister have us in a tailspin. Not one of these seeds sprouts a useful tree– Are they intended to? Wingtips kicking your downed body from the other side, New York and Washington institutes and foundations that have a million to one preference as media audience vs. you and me expulse all the more hot air from “above.”

From the same quadrant Bush and Cheney have us frantic putting out thousands of purposely-set fires of ineffable nonsense and prevaricated injustice. Part of the game plan is to keep us occupied so we can't maintain our democracy. We can't stretch our arms and minds with free time in order to create, mend, regroup and reflect. If we are on our heels, we cannot be on our toes. We embody less competition: fewer and fewer tycoons that'll ever walk out from the garage or basement; fewer people with less energy and spare time to challenge the injustices. The harder it is for us, the easier it is for them. And – Oh! – lately, has it been easy for them!

Democracy seeks inclusivity; capitalism seeks exclusivity. Democracy gains by what you know; capitalism gains by what you do not--this is why we are trained instead of educated. This is why we only have useless tripe from the “mainstream” media. These people, while appearing to come from different quarters – government, media, corporate and advocacy chairs – feigning contrast, are all essentially the same group of people: The Money People. We would all know this clearly if we were indeed educated. We would discern that all of the pillars of "conservatism" have fallen except the "principle" of buoying the wealthy. We would maybe reflect that floodgates of globalization that New York and Hollywood broke open sanctioned the global backwash that has flushed our culture and customs so that that have become in all ways distorted or extinguished.

We would see the disharmony not just between unfettered capitalism and democracy but between capitalism and the environment. See, industry can exact real costs on the environment, which impact people and all life. Industry does not want to account for these costs. They do not want to pay for them. (Life on earth be damned.) Things may not add up, and, God forbid, people will have to transfer to new, more local and self-reliant forms of getting what they need. That would mean no more revenue stream. Enter the by, -for, and -of industry government.

Look at the big picture. The kids funneling through the elite prep schools and universities while claiming eminent qualification have left this country’s government, industry, health system, culture, and environment in worse conditions to high degrees in nearly all ways.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Elementary, yes, elementary. Read on.
Posted by: american on Jul 12, 2007 9:47 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]