Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Workers of the World Unite Against Starbucks

By Liza Featherstone, The Nation. Posted May 21, 2007.


When you pay $4 for a cup of coffee-flavored foamy milk at Starbucks, part of what you're buying is an illusion of environmental responsibility. How they treat their workers is a different story.
Advertisement

Last week Starbucks faced legal and political trouble from its own workers. On the third anniversary of the founding of the IWW Starbucks Union, baristas in Chicago marched into a shop and told the manager they were signing up. (Starbucks workers have chosen to organize without government-mediated elections, through an interesting model called "solidarity unionism.")

Meanwhile, baristas in Grand Rapids, Michigan announced that they were filing a legal complaint against the company for violating their organizing rights through unlawful surveillance and other questionable tactics. All over the world -- Austria, England, Spain and Australia, as well as the United States -- Starbucks workers demonstrated in front of stores to protest the company's union-busting practices.

When you pay $4 for a cup of coffee-flavored foamy milk at Starbucks, part of what you're buying is an illusion of corporate social responsibility. The store exudes a warm glow of righteousness, from the recycled paper napkins to the empathetic messages about sustainable trade and ecological practices (Our farmers are happy! Buy a better lightbulb! Have some more foamy milk!).

The workers behind the counter are hoping the public will look beyond all the greenwashing and support their campaign, which has succeeded in raising wages and improving conditions for some workers.

The baristas are asking for better wages (some make as little as $8.75 an hour even in costly Manhattan), guaranteed hours with the option to work full-time and more affordable health insurance. (Despite widely-believed corporate spin to the contrary, Starbucks insures a smaller percentage of its workforce than Wal-Mart.)

In New York, the National Labor Relations Board (that bastion of radical left-wingers) has accusedStarbucks of violating workers' freedom of association in about thirty different ways, including illegally firing, threatening and disciplining workers for supporting the union. Managers forbade workers from talking about the union -- even when off-duty -- or wearing union buttons. The trial is in June. I'll be attending, and covering it, so stay tuned.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: labor, starbucks

Liza Featherstone is a New York City-based journalist. She is the author, most recently, of "Selling Women Short: The Landmark Battle for Workers' Rights At Wal-Mart" (Basic).


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
At $4 a coffee...
Posted by: Logic's Edge on May 21, 2007 2:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...I don't need any encouragement to stay away.

Have to wonder though, who is keeping Starbucks in business and why???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: At $4 a coffee... Posted by: frankenfoot
» RE: At $4 a coffee... Posted by: DaBear
» Not people who love coffee Posted by: thistleblower
Worse than Wal Mart?
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 21, 2007 3:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Never trust a place that sells tall, taller, and super-tall drink sizes that are all small.

A well-known secret is that WAWA's coffee is better, cheaper, and more generous, with the same extra sugar and fancy flavors. All the eco-yuppies will have to stand up while they're playing with their lap-tops and pretending to read Plato, but it's a small price to pay for doing the right thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ONLY at Starbucks?
Posted by: TheTruthSeeker on May 21, 2007 3:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about ALL workers unite!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When you pay $5.50 for an alternative magazine you expect...
Posted by: Bobsays on May 21, 2007 4:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That they pay their contributers well yet most don't. Look, Starbucks is no angel, but I have come across far too many so-called progressive organisations that pay badly and treat their staff like crap. I would suggest progressives clean up their own house and habits before going after Starbucks (which as employers goes, isn't bad).

If I have to hear another lecture from the likes of Naomi Klein while knowing she collects coin from Rupert Murdoch, I will puke.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Its hard to imagine a giant barista union.....
Posted by: kungfoofighterx on May 21, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A national barista union? That should be interesting. What about an ice cream scooper's or hot dog vender's? Oh yeah wait a second those businesses are still mostly local. I guess starbuks, boarders, and panera are the new factories mistreating employee's in the name of personal or share holder profit. Imagine that. There are so damn many of them I imagine if a shop did unionize they would just close it down and move it two blocks down the street instead of south america or asia like a factory would do if a union formed. Unions can be a good thing or terrible thing depending on who is in charge and what they expect in a competitive market just like any place you can work. Its hard to imagine a national barista uion. Consumers in general should try to buy from the local coffee shops. Its important to steer clear of giant corps like starbucks that dont support local interests to the same degree and diversity as local businesses will. Buy fair trade shade grown coffee from local shops and support corps like SB, union or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Co-ops not Corps.
Posted by: DaBear on May 21, 2007 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Businesses like coffee shops are better off being co-ops instead of corporations. Less damage can happen and there would be more competition.

My first reaction to this piece was, "what? Starbucks, that coffee company that routinely burns it's beans and slathers it over with sugar, that coffee company that runs indies out of every town they enter (like MalWart does), isn't the world's greatest employer? I'm stunned." $8.75 an hour wouldn't cut it in any city let alone Manhattan. Sure, rise up, fight the Man and all that. But dammit don't quit fighting Fourbucks until you're getting a living wage for frack's sake. In my "little" town that's $22/hr with benefits $28/hr without. I imagine Manhattsburg is closer to $30/hr with benefits.

I liked the author's sframe of coffee flavored foamy milk.. so true... they always scrimp on their shots of esspresso to begin with. Fight on, workers.

I used to drive to the other side of my town to the only remaining indie... but then gas went up over $3.50 ($3.49 was my breaking point--I can't afford to use my car anymore) and they cracked down on bicycles using the roads that can make the trip in less than an hour. I make my own damned coffee now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Reason to Boycott - Starbucks Supports Israel’s Militaristic Zionist Warmongering Agenda:
Posted by: freethink7 on May 21, 2007 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“Howard Shultz, the chairman of Starbucks is an active Zionist.

In 1998 he was honoured by the Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah with "The Israel 50th Anniversary Friend of Zion Tribute Award" for his services to the zionist state in "playing a key role in promoting close alliance between the United States and Israel". The Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah funds israeli arms fairs chaired by the butcher of Jenin - General Shaul Mofaz, and the zionist propaganda website honestreporting.com.

His work as a propagandist for Israel has been praised by the Israeli Foreign Ministry as being key to Israel's long-term PR success.”

Continue with article at http://www.inminds.co.uk/boycott-starbucks.html

Also Google: Starbucks Supports Israel Wars, approx 1 million hits (it’s all over the Internet)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» zionist? don't make laugh Posted by: thistleblower
» Actually - No Laughing Matter Posted by: freethink7
» RE: Actually - No Laughing Matter Posted by: frankenfoot
Fair Trade = Fair Wage
Posted by: 1stGenAmerican on May 21, 2007 9:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Add to this that Starbucks has been playing hardball with the Ethiopian people over the rights to their own coffee.. at least we have the power of our purses.. I buy all my coffee at Cafe Campesino Starbucks won't see another dime from me again...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you don't like it
Posted by: Kodiak44 on May 21, 2007 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the workers of Starbucks are unhappy, then maybe they should find another job. If all the workers quit then maybe Startbucks would get the point, but they must be doing some thing that is acceptable to their employees or they would not have any.

I don't drink coffee, so I don't go to Starbucks, so it would not bother me if all of their highly skilled employees quit and Starbucks closed. If you can not make a living wage at Starbucks, then why do people work there?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: If you don't like it Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: If you don't like it Posted by: Kodiak44
$4,00??!! A gallon of gas or a 12oz of coffee? Tough choice there...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on May 21, 2007 11:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...well, not really.

Ok, this article has inspired me to become a prAgreesive, too, and I shall do my part by boycotting Startbucks. Err, well, I'll do my part by looking out for my own economic self-interests. Namely, I'll continuing being my own "barista", and I'll just take feeling good by being "involved in the cause" as a side benefit.

I mean...good grief--my giant tub of generic grounds cost $5, and I can drink 12 cups per work day for most of month with that.

Thanks for raising my awareness on this important issue. Consider me fully *cough, cough* awarenessed on crappy coffee deals now, served up by willing workers who are trying to look out for their economic self-interest at the expense of their employer, who is also looking out for his or her economic well-being.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real value of Starbucks
Posted by: hRIOR on May 21, 2007 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I Hate Starbucks. Always have. Always will. For all of the reasons we know: labor relations, environmental, aesthetic, sociological, political, economic.

But, I must offer thanks to the company for an unacknowledged service. No, not for energizing the minds and bodies of its' customers, that's a given. No, my thanks are for tirelessly keeping the bowels of Americans and people across the globe flowing freely, due to coffees laxative effect.

They should use that fact in a promotional campaign.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I actually worked at Starbucks
Posted by: youngdem on May 21, 2007 12:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And they treat their employees surprisingly well. For any business, let alone food service. They give health benefits after 2 months at 20 hours a week, and don't have discriminatory hiring practices, except maybe that they try to hire students or people with more education. They give everyone their break at reasonable intervals, unlike most food service establishments that often don't give people any breaks, even if they're legally mandated to do so, and they pay well - for food service. Ask how much people at McDonalds in Manhattan are making. Starbucks gets a lot of flack they don't deserve just because they are a big, obvious target. Yeah. They're probably opposed to unions. So are most businesses. If you want to go pick on a big corporation, find one that actually abuses their workers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I actually worked at Starbucks Posted by: frankenfoot
They spend more on healthcare than coffee.
Posted by: 60secs on May 21, 2007 1:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Starbucks treats employees a lot better than most companies. They spend more on healthcare than coffee beans. Even part time employees get good healthcare. Try picking on the bad guys for once.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thailand And Korea Coffee 2x $ , workers 1/3 or less pay
Posted by: shinnam on May 21, 2007 5:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Starbucks charges nearly twice the US price for a cup of coffee in Korea and Thailand, (yes I have considered the exhange rate), but workers in South Korea make about $3.10 an hour and in Thailand it is a whopping $0.85 an hour.
Don't go to Starbucks in any country. They are even bigger liers than Mc Donald's at least the clown doesn't pretend to be progressive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

STARBUCKS: Ambassador of USA lifestyle
Posted by: richholland on May 21, 2007 8:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in Chiangmai (THailand) a cup of gingercoffee only costs
USA 3, = at STARBUCKS and the lovely young lady who serves you has no health insurance but she makes $ 4, a working DAY, because she hardly can live with this money in a city she has the luck that from time to time a nice elderly foreigner invites her for the night.
AS I understand it also has to do with american feminisme, with Freedom. ( to sell your body or be hungry)
And of course many little coffeeshops owned by thai people on the long run will be out of business because their coffee only costs 15 $cents. And especially american backpackers are afraid to eat outsight their MacDonald, PizzaHUt .
Thirty years ago America had its hippies now it Neocons.
But there is a small light 10 years ago everybody would learn english, studying american bussiness practice.
Slightly China gets more influence. children go to chines schools

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Starbucks coffe tastes...
Posted by: TheNamelessCity on May 22, 2007 12:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ULTRA-BITTER and ODDLY METALLIC. It is nearly unpalatable without a big shot of their fatty sweetening goo. Reason enough to STAY AWAY and REFUSE TO BUY THEIR PRODUCTS, especially if they union-bust on top of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Conor
Posted by: wuneyeddog on May 23, 2007 7:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Starbucks employee, I don't necessarily think that it's the greatest company in the world to work for, but what is? All I can say is, I make a lot of money to make coffee and everyone that I work with who wants insurance has it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Conor Posted by: allthingslucid
Its Horrible anyway
Posted by: andrewporter on May 29, 2007 2:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
View from UK - Starbucks is everywhere and I have to admit I am in the coffee business - marketing is everything - substance nothing - in other words marketing can get people to drink rubbish, on the other hand i can sell you some lovely green coffee beans?
Seriously important to stick to and support local business -it gives life more variety. In the UK there is too much homogenisation - ie all high streets look the same with Chain stores! And only bacause people shop there, Starbucks survives because people get rooted in habits and are not adventersome enough!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]