Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

May Day Alert: De-Unionization Hurts Women, Especially Latinas

By Linda Chavez-Thompson and Gabriela Lemus, Chicago Sun-Times. Posted May 1, 2007.


The 30-year assault on unions has hurt all working Americans, but some groups have felt more pain than others.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Although women have made many gains since the 1960s, they must still catch up with men when it comes to equal pay and the benefits that generally accompany it, like educational attainment and access to health insurance, paid leave and other benefits. This is particularly true for women of color, who have the highest levels of disparities in income in comparison to men. In 2006, women overall made 77 percent of men's annual earnings.

The wage gap is stark irrespective of one's ethnic group, but for Latinas it is singularly startling. Latinas earn only 52.4 percent when compared with men. In industries that are job-typed, such as teaching and nursing, where many Latina workers are concentrated, unions have fostered change in closing the pay gap and given Latinas access to health insurance and other benefits. We must assess the remaining barriers to economic equality and push hard for policies that are even-handed and diminish gender and racial inequities. If ever there was an argument for joining a union, then this would be it. And if ever there was an argument for having the capacity to bargain collectively without retribution, this would definitely be it.

Women are struggling. As a result, their families are also facing challenges. Women are the foundation for family decisions and unfortunately, more and more, they carry the primary responsibility and are the sole decision makers in their children's welfare. Latinas also often uphold their family and cultural traditions to take care of their elders. Women's role as caretakers in our society is one factor in pay inequity. Absent strong government-provided safety nets, like quality affordable day care, women will continue to be forced to choose between their families and their jobs.

Not everything is at the federal level. States have an important role to play in the shifts of women from poverty to economic prosperity. States can implement innovative programs that assist women by providing educational and training programs to maximize women's earning potential, or alternatively, they could set their own minimum wage laws and strengthen pay equity at the state level. Yet, local, state and national policies continue to lag behind the changing realities of women's lives as they struggle to balance the need to work with their obligations to care for their families.

At the federal level, there is legislation in Congress that could potentially address part of the solution toward pay equity, and that is the Employee Free Choice Act. EFCA would restore workers' freedom to form unions and collectively bargain, while strengthening penalties for companies that coerce or intimidate employees. It is critical that women be allowed to form unions and be part of a process where they can express an opinion by the simple but deliberate signing of an authorization card. Union women earn 31 percent more in their median weekly earnings than those without a union, which translates into $758 per month in comparison to $579 without a union.

The freedom to join a union is a fundamental right protected by our country's constitutional freedom of association, its labor laws and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Yet, this right continues to be eroded, and as a result, more and more women have become the victims of harassment, discrimination and even termination for attempting to improve their lives by forming unions.

Clearly, women have the right to improve their economic well-being and the welfare of their families. By so doing, they also help to strengthen the communities they live in by being able to contribute more to their local and state economies. On this Equal Pay Day, government and employers have a unique opportunity to come together with workers to both create a better environment in the workplace and improve economic equality.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: labor, women, latinas

Linda Chavez-Thompson is executive vice president of the AFL-CIO. Gabriela Lemus is executive director of the Labor Council for Latin American Advancement.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hot and cold for unions.
Posted by: HughScott on May 1, 2007 2:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I’m a former Teamster and inactive (retired) member of another labor organization, the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA). Two things I will never do -- betray my country and cross a picket line.

At the same time, because I’m independent-minded and dislike other people making decisions for me, I never really enjoyed being a union member.

In a perfect world, labor organizations would not be necessary. Also in Fantasy Land, corporations would treat their employees fairly, pay decent wages and give benefits that workers deserve -- such as vacations, health insurance and retirement plans. Thus unions will always be needed. More power to them.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption (irrefutable impeachment evidence).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yep Posted by: Philip Newton
Where's Waldo?
Posted by: NoPCZone on May 1, 2007 6:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm 45 and have NEVER seen a union organizer at any workplace in my entire adult life. The only Unionized members I have worked with were Federal GS civilians back in my days of Military service. WTF?

I agree with the concept of Unions, but hear little but noise and see very little action outside of the SEIU. The SEIU, btw, withdrew from AFL-CIO and cleaned up the corruption and ineffectiveness endemic to American Labor Unions.

I'd like someone from the AFL-CIO to explain why they hung their 'brothers & sisters' out to dry during the Hormel lock-out back in the day. The Union Lawyers and officials got paid, the workers got screwed, the picket lines were crossed by other AFL-CIO members, the state and Feds did nothing, scabs were brought in and the people were told to bend over and grab their ankles. It is sh*t like this that keeps millions from being willing to commit to a Union.

Many of the people running Labor Unions these days have never worked a blue collar job in their life and have never been through an organizing drive with their very livelihood on the line, unlike earlier times. They pass checks from worker's dues to the very same politicians who have passed 'Right-to-Work' Laws, appointed ant-Union judges, etc.

I'm sorry, but until the top and the bottom of the Unions get their act together and their head out of their arse, it's no dice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Here's Waldo! (From an SEIU member) Posted by: Philip Newton
Can the Illegals by unionised? They are the biggest threat to the
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on May 1, 2007 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
poorer workers in the USA, especially Hispanics and Blacks but others also. They help grow the income disparity and take jobs from the poorer amoungst us (entry-level jobs, agriculture jobs, basic service industry jobs, etc.) Interestingly the illegals might also damage the middle-class as they take the traditional "first jobs" and "summer jobs" away from high school and college students. This could help explain (not the only reason) why young adults seem to expect a 'highpaying' 'high prestige' job soon upon graduating since they missed out on real work experience. If the illegals can be unionised then they can demand better wages which would force them to compete fairly with citizens. Otherwise they will continue to take away jobs and drive down labour costs. Since both the Democratic and Republican parties like the illegals (cheaper nannys, busboys, and lawnboys for their gated estates) unionisation might be the only way to save working class and middle-class America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» We all need unions Posted by: Philip Newton
SEIU is on the front lines
Posted by: Philip Newton on May 1, 2007 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1997 I gathereed with thousands of unionists in Watsonville to support the UFW. The Teamsters were there. In the 60s and 70s these same Teamsters had been used to bust up UFW rallies. Now they stood together.

At the WTO “Battle in Seattle” in 1999, I marched with 27,000 labor union members, environmentalists and social justice workers fighting for a world free of corporate rule. Did we win? Of course not. It was and is a never-ending battle, but one which we must not stop waging.

I’m an SEIU member, and while I’m glad we broke away from AFL/CIO and started Change to Win, we are still part of a movement with common goals. I have some frustrations with organized labor, but I also know from experience that my union is the only firewall between me and what amounts to industrial slavery.

As a steward for over 20 years, I have seen the power of unions to make lives better. It’s hard and frustrating work, but it is necessary work. Not glamorous. Just needs doing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Union member
Posted by: messedup on May 1, 2007 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very few women in our union are active union members. They are to busy shopping, vacationing, or doing the family thing to give much support to a union. Our office environments are filled with women, who will only work 9-5 while the men get the dirtier jobs, undesirable jobs, and off-shift work. About 75% of our stewards are men. However, I believe it may be easier for a woman to get another woman to sign a union card.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Women unionize?
Posted by: bradford on May 1, 2007 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get real. Women don't even stick together among themselves, forget about a union. It's a lost cause trying to organize these selfish spoiled children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Women unionize? Posted by: Philip Newton
» RE: Women unionize? Posted by: astudent
» RE: Women unionize? Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: Women unionize? Posted by: icj
» RE: Women unionize? Posted by: bornxeyed
» Well said! Posted by: bradford
» RE: Well said! Posted by: astudent
» RE: Well said! Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Well said! Posted by: astudent
» RE: Well said! Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Well said! Posted by: bradford
» RE: Well said! Posted by: morticia
A "Heady" subject
Posted by: Philip Newton on May 1, 2007 4:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hedy Lamarr, the lovely actress, was also a famous inventor.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedy_Lamarr

Here is an excerpt of but one of her feats:

"Hedy Lamarr: Invention of Spread Spectrum Technology
Although better known for her Silver Screen exploits, Austrian actress Hedy Lamarr (born Hedwig Eva Maria Kiesler) also became a pioneer in the field of wireless communications following her emigration to the United States. The international beauty icon, along with co-inventor George Anthiel, developed a “Secret Communications System” to help combat the Nazis in World War II. By manipulating radio frequencies at irregular intervals between transmission and reception, the invention formed an unbreakable code to prevent classified messages from being intercepted by enemy personnel."

Einstein's wife was no slouch, either. He just had a better agent...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Women Inventors
Posted by: Philip Newton on May 1, 2007 4:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lest anyone doubt, here is a list (hardly comprehensive) of famous women inventors. Hedy Lamarr's invention helped make possible the medium on which we are now communicating. Here are some more:

http://www.women-inventors.com/

http://www.women-inventors.com/Hedy-Lammar.asp

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

May Day Alert: De-Unionization Hurts Women, Especially Latinas
Posted by: ratty on May 12, 2007 10:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
May Day Alert: De-Unionization Hurts Women, Especially Latinasmature women - free mature mature hardcore porn videos lesbian sex GEFFEDEVS766GERTT9009ED cruel strapon - free gallery foot fetish al comentario femdom movies transex - mature women shemale fucking shemale movie these movies mature swinger - dating service privacy policy adult personals swinger party forced sex stories - humiliation stories rape stories forced rape rape forced female facesitting - femdom movies female wrestling sitting and facesitting facesitting facesitting facesitting huge natural breast - breast cosmetic surgery the breasts breast enhancement cruel strapon - free gallery foot fetish al comentario femdom movies

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement