Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

May Day Alert: Only Global Unions Can Stop the Race to the Bottom

By Stephen Lerner, AlterNet. Posted May 1, 2007.


Ironically, globalization is creating the greatest opportunity to organize global unions among the poorest and least-skilled workers employed in an economy dominated by giant corporations.
Advertisement

Editor's note: Stephen Lerner is a veteran union organizer with the Service Employees' International Union (SEIU) who headed the Justice for Janitors campaign. This is adapted from an article that originally appeared in the winter 2007 issue of the New Labor Forum.

At no time in history has there been a greater urgency or opportunity to form real global unions whose goal is to organize tens of millions of workers to win economic and social justice by counterbalancing global corporations on the world stage even as the power of the state declines.

Global labor solidarity, as currently practiced, is failing and will continue to fail in the face of the growing power of global corporations and the declining power of the state. Instead, global unions need to be formed whose purpose is to unite workers to negotiate global agreements with global corporations. The property services sector, which includes janitors and security officers, has many of the critical characteristics and immediate conditions needed to organize a true global union, and provides an important, but not unique, model of how a global union is possible. Globalization is creating change at an even faster pace than during industrialization. We need to understand how it is reshaping workers' lives and power around the globe, so that instead of being swept away by globalization, we can harness it to transform ourselves and the world. To win real power, workers and their unions need to build a movement defined not by what we are against, but by what we are for: a movement inspired by hope for a better world and a plan to achieve it. Anything else puts unions at risk of becoming as irrelevant as those who opposed industrialization in the hope of defending artisans and small craftsman.

Understanding globalization: the world is tilting

The world is tilting away from workers and unions and the traditional ways they've fought for and won justice -- away from the power of national governments, national unions, national solutions and government institutions developed to facilitate and regulate globalization. It is tilting toward global trade, giant global corporations, global solutions, and toward Asia, especially China and India. We can no longer depend on influencing bureaucratic global institutions, like the ILO, or fighting the entities that ultimately are accountable to or controlled by global corporations, like the WTO. Workers and their unions need to use their still-formidable power to counter the power of global corporations before the world tilts so far that unions are washed away, impoverishing workers who currently have unions and trapping workers who don't in ever-deeper poverty. The power equation needs to be balanced before democratic rule and institutions are destroyed.

Tilting toward global corporations

Since the formation of early global companies, like the English East India Co. (1600) and the Dutch East India Co. (1602), multinationals have spread around the world. In 1600 there were 500 global corporations. In 1914, there were 3,000; in 1992, 30,400; and by 2000, the total number of global corporations had ballooned to 63,000. Today, they are bigger and more powerful than ever before and no longer allegiant to the country in which they were born or are now headquartered.

As multinationals have grown, wealth and capital have become increasingly concentrated. Of the 100 largest economies in the world, 52 are not nations -- they are global corporations (see here for data). The problem isn't that corporations operate in more than one country -- it is that multinational corporations are so powerful that they increasingly dominate what happens in whole countries, hemispheres and the entire globe.

Tilting away from the state

For 150 years, trade unionists and progressives have viewed influencing and trying to gain control of the state as central to any strategy of winning a more just society. National governments still have enormous influence, but their power is diminishing every day.

As corporations grow in power, the state will find it increasingly difficult to mediate their behavior to protect workers and their unions. The state must be pressured now to act as a vehicle that can assist unions in gaining the ability to deal directly with multinational corporations both in their own countries and across the globe. This is a crucial distinction. Instead of depending on national governments to control global corporations, as states become weaker and corporations stronger, we need to pursue a strategy that anticipates the continued decline of state power and works to rebuild workers' strength today so we can deal independently and directly with global corporations in the future. We need to do so quickly, while states still have some power to regulate corporate behavior.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: global economy, globalization, global unions, seiu, labor, justice for janitors, lerner



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A BAD IDEA!
Posted by: Temporary on May 1, 2007 12:11 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In general thats a pretty bad idea! People in Mexico, India or China have different standards of living. Besides, they should do NOTHING to help you out! If you are so AFRAID and HELPLESS in the face of your own congress and big business, then you indeed should suffer! These countries should not get caught in any "global unions" led from either Washington or London! The whole idea is totally RIDICULES! If you have a problem, then fix it at it's source!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A BAD IDEA! - AMEN! Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Me, too! Posted by: Philip Newton
"Global" unions?
Posted by: HughScott on May 1, 2007 1:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds to me like a new version of old-fashioned Communism. Bad idea.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption (irrefutable impeachment evidence).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Global" unions? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: "Global" unions? Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: "Global" unions? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: "Global" unions? Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: "Global" unions? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: "Global" unions? Posted by: yellow
» WHAT IS A CRACKER? Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: WHAT IS A CRACKER? Posted by: yellow
Good analysis!
Posted by: saywhat? on May 1, 2007 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with alot of the points presented in this article. As corprorations increasingly become heads of state supported by governments unwilling to protect the working people, unions have an important role. Their ablility to organise effectively really does depend on international caucuses because now, for example, corporations can import labor (just like old time slavery) into other countries and skirt around labor conditions. Also a single corporation can be present in every nation in the world, and unless individual governments protect working conditions, labor has no recourse and collective bargaining is impossible.

at some point ceo's will have to give up their perverse bonuses and bargain at the table!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SOS
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on May 1, 2007 6:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Same old shite...

Globalism is inevitable, so don't bother fighting it as much as it is destroying any autonomy or livability around the entire world just shifting more and more money upwards to the already rich and those in a position to have their palms greased to sell out the workers of their nation. Just contemplate what designer color of chains you want to have clamped onto you. Just think about what color you'll paint your cell walls.

Yes, organize your unweildy "global" unions and protest your corporate owners all you want. Prepare for corruption and eventually accepting FAR less than you should actually have.

You can either be a slave and appologist for the plantation owners... or you can fight for your freedom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» and nevermind... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» I'm a union member... Posted by: sausage
» RE: I'm a union member... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: I'm a union member... Posted by: Lincoln fan
» So what are YOU doing, Bob? Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: So what are YOU doing, Bob? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: I'm a union member... Posted by: sausage
» Fight; how? Fight; what for? Posted by: Lincoln fan
A great "D'uh" moment in the labor union movement
Posted by: sausage on May 1, 2007 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So many American labor unions have the word "international" in their official name one gets the impression that they are, indeed, part of a greater worldwide organization. That has never been the case. With the AFL-CIO "international" extends to Canada, if that.

Of course our "libertarian" friends bring up the canard of old fashioned communism. In fact certain features, universal health care, universal public schooling up through college, etc., were not all that bad. That is why Otto von Bismarck, the consummate conservative, appropriated those Marxian ideas, founding the modern European welfare state, in Hohenzollern Germany. But libertarians live under the delusion that the mere sound of their own individual farts somehow influence events round the world.

Besides, American exceptionalism is a dying dinosaur, as our corporationist friends are wont to tell us. Moreover, since Chinese and Indian workers will inevitably demand higher wages, our corporationist friends are already casting covetous eyes on Africa in their never-ending shell game of driving wages to the bottom to increase profit margins. And, as the world is a globe, by the time Asia and Africa are sucked dry, a poverty-stricken America will be ripe, once again, for the picking. The true internationalizing, if I can coin such a word, of the labor union movement is long overdue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Peace
Posted by: Lincoln fan on May 1, 2007 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At present, I don't think that international unions are a good idea and I don't think that global corporations are a good idea. I don't want to have my well-being dependent on giant international unions fighting against giant international corporations. Or even worse, global unions and global corporations cooperating to rob the people. Corporations have corrupted unions before and they can do it again.

I think it's obvious that if the people are to be in control, there must be no organization bigger nor more powerful than their government. It's also a fact that the people must be in control of their government. The problem that the U.S. people face today is that the corporations control our government.

I think it boils down to this. We, the people, must take control of our government and take control of the corporations or we are doomed to virtual slavery or bloody revolution. I think that there is still time to regain our freedom peacefully.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I am familiar... Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: I am familiar... Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Well the, problem solved... Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Well the, problem solved... Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Well the, problem solved... Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Well the, problem solved... Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Well the, problem solved... Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: No, I didn't... Posted by: EagleMB
otto
Posted by: otto on May 1, 2007 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like on the first article today on "something about to pop", I agree. Again, I apologize for religious connotations but I see all this as a way that God is working through good people who are building the Kingdom of God, one of justice and peace - whether they realize it or not. Something new is happening in the world - a sort of new "enlightenment"!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

not possible without global government
Posted by: gerdhansel on May 1, 2007 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Global unions are not possible without global government.

Global corporations succeed because they play nation-states against one another.

But is global government really a good idea? Talk about too much power in too few hands. When nation-states get too big for their britches (like Nazi Germany or George Bush's USA) other nation states eventually put them in their place.

But who will challenge a rogue global government? The Martians?

Be careful what you wish for.

Sometimes I wonder if humanity wouldn't be better off living in the world of Mad Max or The Stand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unions are for me
Posted by: solrev on May 1, 2007 10:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was little my dad was a union organizer, so I got to attend a lot of union meetings in my kitchen. One time they were going to strike for a dime increase. I was old enough to know a little arithmetic. I calculated the loss wages against a dime raise and it came out a bad deal for the union members. My dad told me that they were not striking for a dime increase in their wages. They were striking for the people who came after them. Later, I worked in the south where they had the right to work. I asked the people in the factory how many hours a day they had a right to work. They all said eight hours. Then I asked them if they knew that four men were hanged in Chicago striking for their right to work eight hours. They knew nothing of unions and the National Labor Relations Act. Reagan and every government since has been so anti labor that the NLRA has been gutted. In order for the US to spearhead globalization, the unions had to be gutted right here. Global unions do not have a chance and we have lost something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wrong Approach
Posted by: CatDad on May 1, 2007 11:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stopping/rescinding "Free Trade"/WTO deals like NAFTA and CAFTA is the way to go...the unfortunate thing is...corporations have tasted the blood of cheap/slave labor that these agreements have brought and they'll fight kicking and screaming to keep them. Until the issue of "free trade" is addressed it's pointless to attempt to organize trans-national labor unions...especially when it's hard enough to do it on a national basis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The answer to multinational corporate power is international labor unity
Posted by: Philip Newton on May 1, 2007 11:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SEIU is establishing global unions for one reason: Our only remedy for multinational corporate power is in organizing labor internationally.

I belong to SEIU. My local (in Oregon) has great autonomy, and is able to draw on the resources of the SEIU International in DC. It is the best of both worlds. (I have had 23 years of activism in this union, enough time to have some perspective.) Members hold our democratically-controlled local acountable -- bet on it.

THe US labor movement is importing ideas and inspiration from Third World labor activists at least as much as we are exporting them from the US. These heroes in Korea, Mexico, South America and the Middle East, to name a few, know what it is to fight and die for the right to form a union. They wouldn't be doing it if it were not a vital and necessary thing.

No one would.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WAGES IS NOT THE ONLY ISSUE!!! Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: WAGES IS NOT THE ONLY ISSUE!!! Posted by: poppop_schell
» Eagle: Posted by: Philip Newton
» Eagle... Posted by: Philip Newton
» RE: agle... Posted by: EagleMB
» Lockouts and replacement workers Posted by: Philip Newton
Fact #1: globalization is the OPPOSITE of 'free trade'
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 1, 2007 12:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A free trade agreement would be about one paragraph long:

"Businesses in country A can trade with businesses in country B. Our government reserves the right to restrict trade in order to protect our fledgling industries, and your government also has that right. We expect labor standards in your country to be similar to labor standards in our country, and we expect environmental standards in your country to be similar to those in our country; if these standards are not met than trade will not be allowed. We will tax your imports at a reasonable level, and your government can also tax our exports to your country."

Globalization is not trade, it's colonization and slavery masquerading as free trade. David Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage sets the stage for free trade, and can be summed up as Gains come because each country specializes in producing the good for which its comparative cost is lower.

For example: Mexico once had a healthy agricultural sector and could produce a lot of corn. The United States once had a healthy manufacturing sector and could produce a lot of steel. Thus, Mexico had a comparative advantage in corn production and the US had it in steel production; thus you'd expect steel to be sent to Mexico and corn to be sent to the US.

In todays world, the US government pays megacorps like Cargill and Archer Daniels Midland massive subsidies which allow them to send corn to Mexico at artificially low prices, destroying Mexican agriculture. Now that the market has been cornered, Cargill etc. jack up the prices in Mexico, resulting in widespread poverty and massive levels of immigration to the US, where underpaid immigrants work on Cargill's factory farms. Similarly, US steel production is moved to countries where labor costs are low due to repression of employees by dictatorial governments. This is all made possible by the elaborate 'bilateral trade agreements' which are books of legalese that define how any business activity will be handled. That's not free trade, that's colonialism and slavery.

The most telling argument against the Clintons, and the reason that noone should vote for Hillary, is that they were wholehearted supporters of these arrangements (i.e. 1996 NAFTA). The only prominent candidates who have brought the issue up are Edwards and Kucinich; once Clinton and Obama saw that it hit a popular nerve they jumped on board - which is just their attempt to get more votes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A New Monolith to Confront the Old Monolith?
Posted by: DaBear on May 1, 2007 12:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This seems like a lot of effort to simply replicate the monolithic stoopid that caused the problem in the first place. Corporate globalization can be stopped if people simply take them down: pull charters, engage in corporate sabotage that impacts shareholders and CEO's so painfully they cannot continue, opting out of corporate employment, and so on. Spend energy on cutting the toes, then the feet, then the legs out of global corporations then you can take off their heads. As Michael Franti says, "You never ever ever make a deal with the devil." That's all global unionizing is... just making deals with the devil. It's a gigantic, energy sucking band-aid on a festering mangled limb.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's not a deal... Posted by: Philip Newton
» RE: There are only 2 solutions... Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: There are only 2 solutions... Posted by: poppop_schell
» Bingo, Schell. Posted by: Philip Newton
» RE: How will that stop outsourcing... Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Sometimes it is... Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Sometimes it is... Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: HUMAN CAPITAL Posted by: Sum Won
» Eagle, read "Mania in America." Posted by: Philip Newton
Given up?
Posted by: snowhound on May 1, 2007 12:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have we given up the fight for independence of global domination? I'm not sure the people in this country have woken up yet to see what's been going on. I'd rather think that the American people, the biggest consumer group in the world, will rise up against this corporate domination. These corporations will try force our nation to live by their rules. An example being CODEX which will regualte our health freedom. I feel once we wake up and realize our freedom has been striped away by right wing fear mongering, the American people will rise up and revolt against the tyranny. We own Congress! Congress does not own the people and the Corporations do not own Congress. F the WTO and WHO, NATO. They can kiss our consuming A$$ goodbye. We will demand our health freedom. We will demand new fuel technology such as electric cars and solar energy. We will demand that our country not folllow the laws of a global economy who's main purpose is to create profit. We will demand our national debt be paid off so we can remove ourselves from the Federal Reserve and print and control our own money.
If we don't, we'll get exactly what we deserve.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well we won't and we will Posted by: Philip Newton
» RE: Given up? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Hey Bob, I have one question? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Hey Bob, I have one question? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Hey Bob, I have one question? Posted by: Lincoln fan
It ain't always about the money
Posted by: Philip Newton on May 1, 2007 4:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a reply I made to another poster.

SEIU has proved that organizing lower-paid workers on a global scale is working. It is true that the industrial base of the US is eroding, and taking with it many union jobs. It is a big lift, but unions must follow the work and the workers.

It is not just about economics. Having a voice at work (like, not being fired at will for starters) and other contract protections are a vital part of what unions achieve -- if they have a united rank and file.

This, more than anything else, is the major cause of failed unions: there is no union without people willing to do the work of unions -- organizing and remaining organized. In part, we can be excused for buying the anti-union bill of goods from the US Chamber of Commerce and NAM, to name but two, but we have no excuse for our laziness, and that, more than any propaganda effort, is what is killing unions today.

That is why international unionism is good for the industrialized world as well as the Third World.

The Third World unionists have taught us the meaning of the words, "fight" and "organize."

Bless them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It ain't always about the money Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: It ain't always about the money Posted by: Philip Newton
Why participate?
Posted by: Sum Won on May 2, 2007 3:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can't stop the race to the bottom. Why do we see no option other than to participate in it? Why are we so concerned with preserving the institutions created to manage an industrial mass society? Isn’t it time to move on? A globalized union may be well intentioned but it predisposes us to accept our role and purpose in life as wage slaves and consumers. The race to the bottom is stacked in favor of things most alternet posters view as ecologically, culturally and socially wrong, so why don't we concentrate our efforts on a new race?
What is left of the union movement can only survive by returning to its roots as a force for social justice. If it continues to seek greater power to allocate more for its members it only alienates it self from those who remain oppressed, or seek alternative forms of economic and social interaction. Unions need to use their remaining power to aid those who have chosen the human race over wage slave one. By engaging and supporting local initiatives that are focused on “the most salient issues of our day: climate change, poverty, deforestation, peace, water, hunger, conservation, human rights, and more” then they will gain the support, loyalty and admiration from a core constituency that it has lost touch with. In this manner a new role and purpose will unfold for them.

What are we doing to help that global democratic movement pop? Some highlights from the article but read it again and you will see the path.

“tens of millions of ordinary and not-so-ordinary people willing to confront despair, power, and incalculable odds in order to restore some semblance of grace, justice, and beauty to this world.” “part of a coalescence comprising hundreds of thousands of organizations with no center, codified beliefs, or charismatic leader. The movement grows and spreads in every city and country.” “The movement can't be divided because it is atomized -- small pieces loosely joined. It forms, gathers, and dissipates quickly. Many inside and out dismiss it as powerless, but it has been known to bring down governments, companies” “In place of isms are processes, concerns, and compassion. The movement demonstrates a pliable, resonant, and generous side of humanity.” “It will soon suffuse and permeate most institutions.” “It is not a liberal or conservative activity.

Our current Industrial model based "economy" is defined to exclude all work or production not intended for the market. These economic constraints are barriers that are no longer needed but exist to perpetuate the status quo and prevent us from moving forward. A post industrial economy can be modeled on aspects of a pre industrial one where they did not differentiate tasks into work and leisure. The term for what they did was living. It is in my opinion the only solution to the "jobless boom". In the same manner that those who ruled the feudal system were resistant to the birth of industrialization and the loss of power as their serfs became workers there are those in power today who fear the loss of privilege and status given the irrelevance of their roles without workers. The unfolding postindustrial economy provides the tools for “wage slaves” to become largely self sufficient and independent of employers but few have done so as the majority of us are like sheep that have forgotten how to be independent and prefer the comforts of captivity regardless of our eventual fate.

Think about “This unnamed movement's big contribution is the absence of one big idea; in its stead it offers thousands of practical and useful ideas” “It is trying to remake the world” “The movement has three basic roots: the environmental and social justice movements, and indigenous cultures' resistance to globalization-all of which are intertwining.” We can learn from as well as teach those indigenous cultures. The third wave, Alvin Toffler predicted could unfold.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why participate? Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Devolution Posted by: Sum Won
» RE: Devolution Posted by: Sum Won
» RE: Devolution Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Devolution Posted by: Sum Won
» RE: Devolution and UNITY 08? Posted by: poppop_schell
Sum Won:
Posted by: Philip Newton on May 2, 2007 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sum Won:

Unions are returning to the values of social justice. I can think of few forces in this world wit the focus – and the power to carry off such an agenda. In alliance with other groups, such as environmental movements, Jobs With Justice, evangelical progressives, etc., unions are a powerful force for just such change as you advocate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sum Won: Posted by: Sum Won
» Newfoundland Posted by: Sum Won
» RE: Newfoundland -- I hope so! Posted by: Philip Newton
» RE: Sum Won: Posted by: Philip Newton
Mania in America
Posted by: Philip Newton on May 3, 2007 7:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a great book, called "Mania in America." In essence, the writer asserts that capital, wedded to the internet and freed from national bonds, is in hyper-drive. It is no longer restrained, as envisioned by Adam Smith, by local conditions, or balanced by local politics.

In short, the writer asserts, the machine is grinding at a rate that is not sustainable, enriching a few and impoverishing the rest of us. Our great technology is tapped into our MORE primitive and base instincts, and not serving our higher selves: that part of our minds which have learned cooperation and prize empathy and sustainability.

The lizard brain is at the switches. The monkey is flying the rocket. It's a mess.

If a rebalancing does not occur from some source -- unions, NGOs, stronger national politics -- then the machine will grind itself -- and our world -- into the dust.

One way or the other, balance will be found.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DK in 08'
Posted by: Stop bush now on May 4, 2007 1:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
pass it on
www.Kucinich.US

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]