Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Spirit-Crushing 'McJobs' Are Putting an End to Upward Mobility

By Margy Waller and Shawn Fremstad, Philadelphia Daily News. Posted April 12, 2007.


If we want to save the middle class, it's time to focus on what's happening in the low-wage labor market.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The media and the pundits spend a lot of time focusing on the massive increase in compensation for top jobs.

But if we really care about strengthening the national economy, it's time to focus on the other side of the story -- what's happening in the low-wage labor market. In a report we've written (with Heather Boushey and Rachel Gragg), "Understanding the Low-Wage Labor Market in the United States," we find that more than 40 million jobs -- about 1 in 3 -- pay low wages.

What is low-wage work? Surprisingly, there's no official definition. One commonly used formula defines a low-wage job using the federal poverty threshold: $20,444, or $9.83 an hour, in 2006. But plenty of people agree the federal poverty line is outdated and has limited appeal for describing low-wage work in today's economy.

To avoid these problems, we've adopted a new definition of low-wage work that uses what we call a social-inclusion approach and, importantly, takes inequality into account. Under this definition, a low-wage job is one that pays substantially less than the job held by a typical male worker -- that's any job paying less than $11.11. How many are like that? Forty-four million.

That's worse than most people realize. Especially since most low-wage jobs don't offer benefits like paid sick days, health insurance or retirement accounts, tend to have inflexible or unpredictable scheduling requirements, and provide little opportunity for career advancement.

And these jobs have been getting worse relative to others. Over the last quarter-century, the typical low-wage worker has seen an increase of a mere 6 cents an hour -- to just $8.53 an hour. Meanwhile, higher wage workers got a raise of 22 percent.

While low-wage workers haven't seen much of a raise since 1979, the economy and productivity have grown substantially. For several decades before 1980, productivity growth and wages rose together -- in other words, workers shared in the gains. But over recent decades, workers continued to be increasingly productive, yet they haven't seen any payoff in wages.

Obviously, it's possible to combine economic growth with higher standards of living for more citizens. Most other countries with advanced economies have a much larger proportion of middle- and upper-wage jobs than the United States.

Inequality here is further compounded by limited economic mobility. Despite the strongly held belief in the myth of Horatio Alger, most low-wage workers do not usually move up.

We have many more entry-level jobs than we have entry-level workers -- that is, workers who are new to the labor market -- and too few jobs that provide a middle-class standard of living. It turns out that in the U.S. labor market today, it's not possible for everyone to be middle class, no matter how hard they work.

These jobs can't be "offshored" -- it's tough to clean hotel rooms or serve coffee from across the ocean.

Policymakers aren't unaware of all this. They talk a lot about low-wage jobs, but increasing the minimum wage is just the first small step up because it won't do much to turn low-wage jobs into better ones.

With so many jobs like that which aren't going away, strengthening our economy has to mean answering the question: How do we make low-wage jobs into better jobs?

We've developed our initiative -- the Mobility Agenda -- to address just this question. And we're coming up with some interesting new ideas and strategies.

At least three proposals in Congress can make a difference.

The Healthy Families Act would require paid sick days for workers.

The Employee Free Choice Act would restore workers' ability to have some negotiating power regarding work conditions.

And following the lead of states and localities, we're finally talking seriously about guaranteeing health care for all -- disconnecting something so essential from the workplace would improve all jobs.

We approach this work with a theory:

It's bad for our economy and democracy for the income gap to be so big. The only way to restore the middle class is to improve the labor market with a mix of new ideas and strategies for improving low-wage work.

Our economy and our nation will be stronger for us all when we do.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: low-wage jobs

Shawn Fremstad and Margy Waller co-founded Inclusion, a virtual think tank and home of the Mobility Agenda. For more information about low-wage work and the Mobility Agenda, see www.inclusionist.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
If I had to pick one thing...
Posted by: CriminallySane on Apr 12, 2007 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I had to pick one thing to do to create better paying jobs, I think it might be to look at the decaying infrastructure all around us, especially in the realms of public transportation and transport infrastructure. High value-additive jobs, that create genuine physical improvements for everyone, with the ripple effect of giving those rebuilders and modifiers more disposable income. That income, unlike the additional lucre flowing into the coffers of the wealthy, would be spent on goods and services. Those goods and services purchased would create more demand, and so on.

Low wages are there because they are the one direct legacy of the perennially discredited (and yet perennially espoused) supply-side economics. To those apostles of "voodoo" I have nothing to say - reality can not penetrate their outer shell of magical thinking. And everyone else knows that a demand economy actually helps itself.

And as public transportation began to improve, I'd then get to work on the policy level, creating incentives to use it over private vehicles whenever and wherever possible. And I'd likely include things like fees modeled on London's "congestion charges" - maybe starting with a surcharge on all monthly parking contracts in downtown areas, with the proceeds dedicated to further improvements in the public trans sector.

Not perfect, not all-encompassing, to be sure, still, let's review: Better paid workers, better public transit, better movement in and out of cities, better air quality because of the improvements in transit and fewer cars idling, better energy use in people-moving terms.

What the hey, it's a start.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: If I had to pick one thing... Posted by: CriminallySane
» RE:FDR would agree. Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: FDR would agree. Posted by: yellow
» RE: FDR would agree. Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: FDR would agree. Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: FDR would agree. Posted by: sea4th
» RE: FDR would agree. Posted by: Lincoln fan
» I agree! Invest in Labor Posted by: DataDoc
Putting the cart before the horse
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Apr 12, 2007 9:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"But if we really care about strengthening the national economy, it's time to focus on the other side of the story -- what's happening in the low-wage labor market."

I think the low-wage labor market is an indicator of the strength and other properties of the national economy, not a driving force behind it.

With globalization exporting so many of our manufacturing (and many other) jobs, while we import cheap labor to do the jobs which can't be exported (construction, agriculture, hotel cleaning), it's only an expected result that we can't get to a living wage. Corporate welfare (including ag subsidies) has certainly exacerbated and helped drive all this. I think if the 'macro' house were put in proper order that a living wage for the lower end of the labor market could easily follow, but obviously those with the power to affect things at that level are gonna rig things for their own benefit since they don't necessarily have the interests of everyone else in mind. It's easier to distract and placate the masses with endless amounts of celebrity gossip and pointless controversies.

It would be a start if people stopped perpetrating the status quo by buying into lesser evilism and if they resolved not to vote for those who don't have the interests of the larger citizenry in mind, but this includes not falling for empty rhetoric which isn't backed up by tangible action.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New Deal
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Apr 12, 2007 9:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The USA should begin a New- New Deal type program to rebuild the aging instructure and convert the oil-economy to a solar-wind economy. Fat chance, I know. Nobody needs the services of McJob providers. If you want to end the worker exploitation by companies like fast food restaurants and Walmart...don't shop there. We all vote with our dollars. As long as you're buying that McBurger, 9.00 per hour jobs aren't going away...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» oops, typos...still waking up Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: New Deal Posted by: astudent
HOW TO CONTINUE THE SLIDE...
Posted by: gellero on Apr 12, 2007 9:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just keep importing cheap labor (20 MILLION so far ) from Mexico, keep feeling 'sorry' for the 'immigrants' , let them stay, and watch the wages of native American continue to slide in real dollars.........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» MEXICANS AREN'T THE PROBLEM Posted by: HistArch
» RE: MEXICANS AREN'T THE PROBLEM Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» As I Said Posted by: gellero
» RE: As I Said Posted by: tya
» RE: HOW TO CONTINUE THE SLIDE... Posted by: xconservative
» I like them Posted by: gellero
» RE: I like them Posted by: xconservative
» RE: I like them Posted by: anonymous black writer
Eat the Rich
Posted by: WitchyNy on Apr 12, 2007 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Profit based systems are the problem.
Capitalism is the problem.

Everyone stay home. Everyone grow an organic garden.
"People should be living in homes they built themselves and eating food they grew themselves".
-The Grapes of Wrath

A 'job' should be based on its necessary importance.
Everyone should have a skill VS a job. A home garden and homemade bread is a skill. The entire industrial system is the problem.

Example-We do not need a lot of doctors and hospitals.
One every fifty miles or less -should be plenty.

What we NEED- are Nurse-Midwives. People who stay home and eat organic veggies and exercise and have low stress and clean air and water are amazingly healthy.

We NEED solar scientists. If we can go the the moon-we can develop solar and alternative energy. But as Ralph Nader said...."there will only be a huge breakthrough in solar power when the corporations can figure out how to make a PROFIT on it". The sunshine is free. Thus sunshine is subversive to capitalism!

People are so crammed together in cities they have forgotton the Earth and what really matters and are so dependent on 'jobs' they have forgotton how to LIVE.

We need to change the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: at the Rich Posted by: yellow
» RE: at the Rich Posted by: willymack
» I AGREE Posted by: gellero
» RE: at the Rich Posted by: animalleaderisgreat
» Free...... Posted by: gellero
» RE: at the Rich Posted by: jaby
» Dear jaby Posted by: WitchyNy
» Dear Witchy Posted by: jaby
Indentured Slaves and Cheap Labor
Posted by: dayahka on Apr 12, 2007 4:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American democracy with its propaganda of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for all is a myth. The US was founded by people who owned slaves, required land ownership for citizenship, denied citizenship to poor whites and blacks alike...Everything since then has been just a scam to cover the tracks of the capitalist elite...

So-called illegal immigration is totally supported by the capitalist elite. The reason is simple: it is far cheaper to allow illegal immigration so as to expand the pool of cheap labor than it is to continue to fund home-grown labor. The so-called "middle-class" was an economic convenience at one time when labor want in high demand, but today "middle-class" labor is too expensive and too demanding. You might as well forget it...There isn't going to be any income equality in the US again...Thye middle class is finished...All we have left is a vast pool of indentured slaves with 30-year mortgages (read indentured contracts) and a decreasing standard of living. 66 percent of Americans are obese; 66 percent of Americans are obsolete.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Value of Service
Posted by: peachmcd on Apr 12, 2007 8:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we, as a 'Christian' nation, valued the humble, necessary services given to us by waitresses, crop workers, teachers, shop clerks, hotel maids, etc... properly, we might show evidence of having our heads somewhere other than up our collective heinies.

If we made the minimum wage a living wage, I'm guessing there wouldn't be quite so many jobs that "Americans" "won't" do (SH*T I get so steamed when some talk show host uses the word 'Americans' like that - as shorthand for "white people").

I am a cashier with three graduate degrees in Religious Studies. I chose this work because it enables me to do social justice work/writing in my off-time and because it is a school for the Christian virtues of patience, helpfulness, cheerfulness, and humility.

If you don't happen to value those virtues enough to pay someone decent wages who has to embody them for a living, here's a more self-centred reason for Ugly Americans to pay service workers decently: should it be an increasingly rare joy to run into a grocery worker, waitress, hotel worker (etc)... who understands English, comprehends what the heck you need, and gets it for you cheerfully and expeditiously?

Living Wage & Card Check Unionization. Now.
Because Service Workers are Necessary.

Peach McD in Durham NC

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Value of Service Posted by: phatkhat
» maybe you should Posted by: Tea
And more to come
Posted by: greekTowner on Apr 12, 2007 10:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
link

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you for this article.
Posted by: Ghoulman on Apr 13, 2007 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... just thanx. :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ACORN
Posted by: TUStudent on Apr 15, 2007 3:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ACORN is working on issues such as attaining a livable minimum wage and paid sick days, their campaigns can be found at www.acorn.org.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nope - You missed the solution totally.
Posted by: JeffersonReborn on May 11, 2007 1:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you truly desire to deal with the problem, we as a nation have to tackle Globalization. This means dealing with the Federal Reserve, World Bank and IMF. It also means dealing with the super powerful international rich who have no home nation but bypass the public and are the politicians themselves.

There is no simple solution. We have two groups attempting to do the same thing at the same time. One group is the socialists and the other is the wealthy aristocracy who see globalization as a tool to break down laws in their favor. Two different groups but at this time they both have the same agenda. And that is why the democrats and republicans look no different, their current agenda’s have merged.

Health care nonsense, welfare programs and any other band-aid won't fix the wound we are bleeding from. People need to be able to stand on their own two feet without the need of debt, welfare or the pressure from massive inflation caused by the debt system which the banks use to tax all of the people in the world. This system cannot last forever and because of this treadmill many will be throw off a cliff through no fault of their own.

The rich are so outside reality now, you will hear comments such as "Let them eat Cake". Or akin to Susan Sheybani you might hear, "Why don't they just take Prozak to solve their poverty?” These elites are so outside everyday living that they are a threat to the future of what remains of the US constitution. This borderless economy will likely also cause massive poverty while the elites wine and dine in luxury, the same as in history before us. You will hear more and more that people are just being lazy, it's the fault of the average citizen, and it’s just business. But it isn't and it is personal and it is time to make it personal.

Until a majority of us wake up and are willing to make them bleed as they have made average innocent humans bleed, nothing will change. If someone attacks you, economically or physically, it is only rational to protect yourself. Unless of course you live in the United States, then the elites shout something is wrong with the citizens as they give themselves a bonus paycheck and cut your paycheck and magically costs rise anyway because people use debt instead of income.

The time to act is soon for us to be able to take out the corrupt trash. If we wait to long we will likely be forced to take out the trash, wrong or right in a more inhuman fashion. Time to read up on the constitution of the US, learn about Thomas Jefferson and who undermined this country from the very beginning. It is also time to understand everything about the banking systems, especially the Federal Reserve central bank that is legalized monopoly for profit. Time to read up on the socialists and World Bank and IMF. These are all key to the problems and reasons why we stand where we are. These instituations represent the foreign policy that most of the world hates. If we wait to long, violence will likely be the only tool left available.

The obvious solutions are to remove the wealthy and the socialists out of office and put real decent average Americans in office. Smartly plan for globalization it's negatives and positives while finding ways to enforce international laws with respect to our own country. Free trade in America is good because it follows our laws we can enforce, BUT fair smart trade with nations is needed because we have no authority outside our borders and they can seriously undermine and damage our nation through economic actions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement